Outcomes in Callers to the VA's 24/7 Veterans Crisis Line

Information

  • Research Project
  • 8443620
  • ApplicationId
    8443620
  • Core Project Number
    R34MH096854
  • Full Project Number
    1R34MH096854-01A1
  • Serial Number
    096854
  • FOA Number
    PAR-09-173
  • Sub Project Id
  • Project Start Date
    9/19/2012 - 12 years ago
  • Project End Date
    1/31/2015 - 10 years ago
  • Program Officer Name
    PRINGLE, BEVERLY
  • Budget Start Date
    9/19/2012 - 12 years ago
  • Budget End Date
    1/31/2014 - 11 years ago
  • Fiscal Year
    2012
  • Support Year
    01
  • Suffix
    A1
  • Award Notice Date
    9/19/2012 - 12 years ago

Outcomes in Callers to the VA's 24/7 Veterans Crisis Line

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): If we are ever to know with any certainty that crisis lines are effective in reducing deaths from suicide, or in managing distress levels in individuals before they are suicidal, three essential questions must be addressed: 1. Of the entire population of potential callers to a crisis line, what are the characteristics of individuals who cll a crisis line? 2. What are the key behavioral characteristics of responders that moderate individual characteristics of callers, resulting in acceptance of a referral given from a responder to the caller? 3. Is there an impact on important outcomes: death from suicide, suicide attempts and reattempts, hospitalization for suicidal behaviors, engagement in an ongoing safety planning process, and overall reductions in psycho-social distress? PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: We view a study of the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) 24/7 Crisis Line (formerly called the VA Suicide Hotline) as significant since suicide prevention crisis lines continue to be an intervention of great interest, while still defying reaching a high standard of proven effectiveness. Due to the very nature of community crisis lines, by virtue of their anonymity, it is difficult to answer three questions that must be addressed if we are ever to know with any certainty that crisis lines are effective in reducing deaths from suicide, or in managing distress levels in individuals before they are suicidal. These questions underscore the significance of this application because of our distinct ability to address issues that cannot be done in any other crisis line setting: 1. Of the entire population of potential callers to a crisisline, what are the characteristics of individuals who call a crisis line? 2. What are the key behavioral characteristics of responders that moderate individual characteristics of callers, resulting in acceptance of a referral given from a responder to the caller? 3. Is there an impact on important outcomes: death from suicide, suicide attempts and reattempts, hospitalization for suicidal behaviors, engagement in an ongoing safety planning process, and overall reductions in psycho-social distress? We recognize that considerable advances have been made in addressing Questions 1 and 2; indeed, Dr. Madelyn Gould who is a Co-Investigator on this study has been a leader, with others, in the field of examining the utility of suicide crisis lines But a critical difference between the national network of suicide crisis lines across the United States (National Suicide Prevention Lifeline, or NSPL) and VA's Crisis Line is that the VA's Crisis Line has the enhanced ability to study characteristics of callers and responders, the capacity to provide nation-wide services through immediate referral and follow-up care, and the critical capacity to identify outcomes in callers to the Crisis Line. Through the use of some new, innovative methods, including causal modeling, we have developed a study that we strongly believe has the potential to have a high impact on delivery of care through suicide crisis lines. I summary: This may not be the perfect study of the effectiveness of a suicide crisis line, but it overcomes many of the limitations inherent to studies of community crisis lines.

IC Name
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH
  • Activity
    R34
  • Administering IC
    MH
  • Application Type
    1
  • Direct Cost Amount
    309317
  • Indirect Cost Amount
    76532
  • Total Cost
    385849
  • Sub Project Total Cost
  • ARRA Funded
    False
  • CFDA Code
    242
  • Ed Inst. Type
  • Funding ICs
    NIMH:385849\
  • Funding Mechanism
    Non-SBIR/STTR RPGs
  • Study Section
    SERV
  • Study Section Name
    Mental Health Services Research Committee
  • Organization Name
    CENTRAL NEW YORK RESEARCH CORPORATION
  • Organization Department
  • Organization DUNS
    606310928
  • Organization City
    SYRACUSE
  • Organization State
    NY
  • Organization Country
    UNITED STATES
  • Organization Zip Code
    132102716
  • Organization District
    UNITED STATES