The present invention relates to a cultivation system for bacteria, fungi or actinomyces in a bioreactor that is placed on-site at the location of a contaminated environment described in claim 2. The organisms degrade the contaminants in the environment through digestion. Such process is known in the art as bioremediation. The organisms used in the art are safe and efficient in the degradation of various contaminants. The formulation used in the bioreactor depends on the target contaminants. Customized formulations can be prepared to target a wide range of contaminants at the same time. The organisms dispensed into the contaminated environment to degrade the selected contaminants can be chosen from those that would prosper in the conditions of the environment where they would be applied. Some of these conditions are pH, temperature, nutrient levels, salinity, presence of bacterial inhibitors, availability or lack of oxygen etc.
The apparatus and methods of the invention have features that allow the growth of organisms efficiently outdoors under various environmental conditions such as extreme heat, extreme cold or direct intense sunlight. Quite often the location where the organisms need to be applied is not near a building or enclosure that can provide protection from extreme temperature or sunlight.
High temperatures (104 F or above) and ultraviolet radiation from direct sunlight are detrimental for the growth of microorganisms. For these reasons, the bioreactors are often enclosed away from such environments to ensure efficient growth. Stored organisms in feed chambers are also affected by high heat and even constant low ultraviolet radiation from sunlight. Many vegetative species (organisms that do not produce spores) which are very useful such as pseudomonas, paracoccus, nitrobacter, nitrosomas, thiobacillus are very sensitive to high heat and ultraviolet radiation from sunlight. Loss of viability results in low counts of these species in the feed going to the fermentation chamber. Furthermore, excess heat and sunlight can also cause low proliferation of various species when they reproduce themselves in the fermentation broth. On the other hand, cold temperature slows proliferation of organisms in the fermentation chamber also resulting in low cell counts.
The invention overcomes ultraviolet radiation from the sun with a dark coating that keeps out ultraviolet radiation from sunlight. Excess heat is overcome with a coating that reflects heat. The coating is made up of a special polymer and micro-ceramic spheres described in claim 1 g). The optional canopy system or shed in claim 1 h) also aids to keep excessive solar heat radiation from overheating the fermentation bath and the organisms in the feed chamber of claim 1 f). Additionally, the portable air conditioner of claim 1 i) helps protect from high temperature. During excessive hot weather, the air conditioner provides cool air into the control box to protect electronics. The cool air exits via a tube into the double wall of the feed chamber that stores the organisms or into a cooling jacket wrapped around the chamber. This prevents high heat in the storage chamber and allows the feeding organisms to maintain an extended shelf life. The air exits the double wall into the inlet port of the air pump that aerates the fermentation chamber. This allows cool air into the fermentation chamber preventing it from overheating due to environmental heat. The size and power of the air conditioner depends on the size of the reactor system. Guidelines of the size and power needed can be provided by one of various air conditioning systems specialized in electronic systems such as Kooltronic from New Jersey. The air conditioner has a dust filter to prevent unwanted dust from entering the control box.
Cold weather is normally overcome with the use of a heater. However, if the weather is very cold and there is not enough heating capacity, the fermentation media does not achieve optimum temperature. This is especially true when the environment temperature is near freezing or below it. Cold air enters the chamber during aeration of the fermentation media and often may overcome the heating capacity of the heating element. The invention uses a heater with high heat capacity. Over engineering of this element as described in claim 1 e) allows the fermentation chamber to be placed in very cold environments. Because the heating element is set to a specific temperature, there is no danger of overheating the media. It is important for the bioreactor to generate high enough cell counts especially if the contaminated environment weather is cold. The reason for this is that cold weather reduces biological activity dramatically. In order to make up for the lower biological activity, higher numbers of organisms are needed for proper digestion of contaminants.
The bioreactor contains a flexible air diffuser (claim 1b) that can provide air or pure oxygen to the organism culture. This diffuser is composed of a flexible micropore hose that can be shaped as desired to allow complete mixing of the culture without the need of mixers or recirculating pumps. Pumps create shear stress that can damage cell membranes. The flexible hose diffuser with micropores provides aeration and gentle agitation of the cells during the process of fermentation to allow the organisms to interact with their nutrients.
An additional feature of the invention is a membrane-air filter that prevents bacteria, fungi, spores and higher lifeforms from entering the fermentation chamber through the air supply. The membrane has a low pore size of 0.2 microns to prevent pathogenic microorganisms from the air to enter the fermenter. This provides protection from growing pathogens in the fermentation chamber which can be very dangerous to operators of the fermenter or anyone working near it. The best location for this biological filter is after the air pump and before the air diffuser. Biological filters are normally expensive and can only be reused a few times before discarding them. They also need to be removed and taken to a location where they can be autoclaved every time before they can be reused. The membrane filter in the invention is very economical and effective. Several membranes can be autoclaved sterilized and kept at the reactor location in an autoclaved bag. After several cycles of the bioreactor, the membrane can be discarded and another membrane can be placed. Replacement of the membrane is easy, fast, economical and convenient. The membrane can be held in place by various means such as clamped connectors or a screwable PVC connector union as described in claim 1 d).
In the art of bioremediation, contaminated waters, soil or biosolids are remediated using organisms such as bacteria or fungi sold as dormant or stabilized cultures. These products are sold in powder, pellets, liquid or in gel form. In all cases, the cells have to be placed in a state of dormancy that is known by those in the arts. This dormancy process is necessary for the shelf life of products sold in containers. The various dormancy processes kill a large percentage of the organisms. As much as half or more of the culture cells can be lost in the dormancy process.
In addition, commercially sold products have many high costs associated with them such as manufacturing, labor, process control, dormancy methods, dilution, standardization methods to maintain consistent viable cells, packaging and freight of diluted products. Even though powder products can contain desiccated organisms in spore form or in vegetative form (whole cells), these products have the additional cost of controlled dehydration of cells under rigorous conditions to reduce cell death. Pelletized products have the additional cost of pelletizing.
Liquid commercial products can be sold as spores or in vegetative form (whole cells). Liquid spore products are normally sold at concentrations that range from 0.1 billion cells per milliliter to 1 billion cells per milliliter (cell forming units or cfu). In addition to the costs mentioned before, they have two significant disadvantages. The first disadvantage is that not all microorganisms used in bioremediation produce spores. A great number of organisms used in bioremediation only exist in vegetative form. This greatly limits the organism species that can be used and reduces the efficiency and scope of target substrates and environments. The second major disadvantage is that spores could take hours to come out of dormancy and germinate into active vegetative cells depending on the temperature, oxygen level, pH and types of nutrients in the environment where they are used. In many cases, by the time the organisms germinate, they can be washed away such as in the case of application in the sewer or in short detention time systems. Even when they germinate, it takes time before they begin to reproduce themselves. This causes the organisms to reproduce themselves less times during the detention time of the contaminated environment. In the case of an onsite bioreactor such as the one in this application, the organisms are applied to the environment in vegetative form ready to begin to digest the contaminants and to reproduce themselves.
There are commercial liquid products that contain vegetative cells. These types of products also suffer from the same costly issues mentioned. Some products that are fully dormant in vegetative form need to undergo very severe dormancy methods that kill a large amount of the cells in the batch. Also, some of the chemicals used in the dormancy process can produce powerful-undesirable pungent odors. Other liquid vegetative products are in a semi-dormant state. These products are sold diluted. They are normally 0.1 to 0.2 billion cells per milliliter (cfu). The reason for this is that these semi-dormant bacteria are stored with some nutrients to keep them alive. The concentration of organisms and nutrients cannot be too high because the container would get bloated with gases produced during metabolism. In addition, if a high concentration of cells is used, the nutrients would be depleted faster causing the cells to die and shorten the product shelf life. Finally, care must be taken with these semi-dormant products because if the container is open and it is not fully used, it has the risk of getting contaminated by pathogens from the environment which would grow at the expense of the nutrients in the product. This poses a danger for people handling a contaminated product.
Bioremediation products can also be sold in gel blocks or gel cylinders. These products dissolve gradually in the environment where they are used. The organisms in these products are in spore form because heat is needed to solidify the gel and if vegetative organisms are used, they would die with the heat. The gel also contains antimicrobial products to prevent the spores from activating and begin to grow prematurely inside the gel. Antimicrobial products would also kill vegetative cells in the gel if they were used. For these reasons, gel products suffer from the same disadvantages as other spore products which need time to germinate. Finally, gel blocks or cylinders have an additional costly manufacturing and handling processes associated with them.
An on-site bioreactor solves all of the shortcomings mentioned. They produce high concentrations of vegetative organisms. This concentration normally ranges from 2 to 4 billion cells per milliliter but concentrations as high as 10 billion per ml could be achieved. Spore formers and vegetative organisms can be grown in the bioreactor and are applied to the contaminated environment when they are in vegetative form during the stationary phase of growth. At this stage, the organisms are entering the starvation mode. When they are applied to the contaminated environment, they begin to digest contaminants right away. Because the organisms from the bioreactor are active, they do not need time to come out of the dormancy state such as it is the case of dry vegetative bacteria or bacteria in spore form. In the on-site bioreactor, there are no dormancy steps of manufacturing that kill a high percentage of organisms. Also, there are no expensive standardization and process controls because the bioreactor outputs organisms at consistent numbers. In addition, there are no labor, packaging and transporting costs of diluted products. Finally, the species of microorganism that go into the bioreactor can be customized to target specific contaminants and to thrive under the conditions of the environment where they are applied such as pH, temperature, oxygen level, salinity, nutrient levels, toxins etc. With bottled products, this is not normally done because bottled products are manufactured in large batches for a wide range of needs and types of environments. In most cases these products are not customized for the specific contaminants and conditions of the environment where they will be used.
There are other on-site bioreactor systems but they do not have features that allow them to be used outdoors in extreme temperatures or exposed to direct sunlight. This limits their use to mild weathers or indoors buildings to allow them to maintain effective cell counts. High temperature can damage electronics, organisms and nutrients in the storage chamber. It also affects the fermentation broth making it difficult to maintain the optimum temperature for the organisms to grow efficiently in the bioreactor. In addition, if a bioreactor is outdoors, ultraviolet light from sunlight may also hinder the optimum growth of organism. Additionally, some of these bioreactors lack a biological filter to prevent pathogens from entering the bioreactor via the air supply. Others relay on expensive filters that need to be taken to a lab for autoclaving and then placed back in the bioreactor before they are eventually discarded.
For example U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,182 granted in 1998 to Lucido, Keenan, Premuzic, Lin and Shelenkova describes an on-site bioreactor that has three chambers. The first chamber holds the feed microorganisms, a second chamber supplies water with inorganic nutrients and a third chamber provides organic nutrients. This patent does have a biological air filter to prevent pathogenic contamination from entering the fermentation chamber through the air supply. Pathogens growing in the fermentation chamber are potentially dangerous for anyone working with or near the bioreactor. Some pathogens can produce natural antimicrobials to allow them to dominate environments even when non-pathogens have been fed in large numbers at the start of the fermentation process. The patent, also, does not make mention of a suitable heating element with reasonable capacity to maintain temperature in the fermentation chamber in the event of cold weather. When environmental air is provided as a source of oxygen to the fermentation chamber, the temperature of the air may be very low in the case of the winter season in many areas. The large volume of air needed for oxygenation will make it difficult for the fermentation chamber to maintain optimum growth temperature for the organisms. In addition, the apparatus does not have a cooling element that allows the control of excessive environmental heat in hot months. Excessive heat from exposure to the environment temperature and from direct sunlight will raise the temperature of the fermentation chamber above optimum causing a reduction in cell proliferation or even death. Excessive heat will also kill organisms in the feed chamber. This will cause lower initial cell counts during fermentation which can cause lower cell counts at the end of the fermentation cycle. In addition, lower initial cell counts make it more likely that pathogens which infiltrate the chamber would dominate the fermentation broth. The bioreactor in the cited patent is not designed for outdoor use in extreme hot or cold weather. It is limited to enclosure in buildings or temperature controlled structures. The bioreactor has additional shortcomings. It uses a mixing system to stir the components in the fermenter. This can be a source of shear stress to the cells being grown causing cell rupture and reducing cell output. In contrast, the flexible hose diffuser claimed in the present patent application mixes the contents thoroughly without shear stress. Finally, the patent cited above does not make any mention of protection from ultraviolet radiation. Some of the organisms in the feed tank and in the fermenter can be damaged by even low-constant levels of ultraviolet radiation from sunlight.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,402,941 granted in June 2002 to Lucido and Shaffer consists of a fermentation chamber and a nutrient chamber that contains inorganic and organic nutrients. The patent does not describe a biological filter that would prevent pathogens from entering the fermentation chamber through the air going in for aeration. This is dangerous for people working with the bioreactor or near it. Pathogens can enter the fermentation chamber through the air supply and reproduce themselves in large numbers. Furthermore, there is no mention of sufficient heating capacity to prevent extreme-cold winter air from cooling the fermentation chamber. Moreover, there is no mention of any cooling system to protect feed organisms and organisms in the fermentation chamber from extreme environmental heat. Finally, no mention is made of protection from ultraviolet radiation from the sun. This system does not seem to be designed for all-weather and outdoor operation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,355 granted in September 2004 to Shaffer, Fernandes and Lucido describes a bioreactor system. This bioreactor does not provide protection from the environment in excessively cold or hot weather. There is no mention of enough heating capacity or a cooling system that would keep the fermentation chamber within the needed temperature for optimum fermentation. In addition, there is no mention of a coating or any other means to reflect heat and ultraviolet radiation from direct sunlight. Another shortcoming is that the air is brought into the fermentation chamber via an air pump exits into the chamber in a submersed “airtube”. Such tube does not appear to provide adequate air bubble distribution for optimum oxygen exchange and mixing of the contents in the fermentation chamber. This is in direct contrast with the flexible air hose diffuser described in the present patent application which can be bent into any shape to maximize oxygen transfer and provide gentle mixing free of shear stress through small bubbles for optimum oxygen exchange. Finally, the air filtration in this patent (U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,355) is not economical nor easy to change such as is the case of the autoclavable filter membrane described in the present patent application.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,982,032 granted in January 2006 to the same inventors, Shaffer, Fernandes and Lucido also has the same shortcomings described above in U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,355. In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,234 granted in April 2006 to the same inventors, Shaffer, Fernandes and Lucido once again has the same shortcomings.
In another instance of an on-site bioreactor, U.S. Pat. No. 6,335,191 granted to Kiplinger, Pruitt, Evaro, Pearce and Robert Clarence in January 2002 describes a bioreactor that uses a vortex system to mix organisms and to bring them in contact with air. This system has a recirculating pump to mix the organisms in a vortex and bring them to the surface for aeration. One of the shortcomings of this system is that the constant shear stress of a recirculating pump can damage the cell membrane of organisms reducing their numbers. Furthermore, there is no mention of a bacterial air filter for the air going into the fermentation chamber. The potential of pathogens coming into the fermentation chamber can be dangerous. There is also no mention of heating or cooling to offset the temperature outside the fermentation chamber and the temperature of the air going in. This is critical as optimum temperature for the organisms being grown is essential for optimum cell counts. Finally, there is no mention of protection from direct sunlight. This system does not seem to be suitable for outdoor operation in extreme weather. It is indeed intended to be used inside temperature-controlled buildings. U.S. Pat. No. 7,081,361 granted to Pearce, Kiplinger, Evaro, Pruitt and Colarruso in July, 2006 describe virtually the same vortex system as mentioned above and the patent has the same shortcomings described. The same inventors were granted U.S. Pat. No. 7,635,587 in December, 2009. This patent also has the same shortcomings. U.S. Pat. No. 8,093,040 granted to the same inventors in January 2012 also has the same disadvantages described because it uses the same vortex system with no bacterial-air filter, nor heating or cooling to withstand outdoor weather nor protection from sunlight. U.S. Pat. No. 8,551,762 granted to Fleming, Boesch-Deveze, Evaro, Pearce, Rushing and Trevino in October, 2013, also describes the same vortex system with the same shortcomings.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,712 granted in June 2003 to Rothweiler comprises of a bacteria solution breeding tank (fermentation chamber), a bacteria solution tank for feeding organisms and an aeration pump. The bioreactor uses a recirculating pump which can be a source of constant shear stress and affect the membrane of the cells being grown reducing their numbers. The system has no cooling of the stock feed solution nor for the breeding tank in case of excessive environmental heat. Moreover, there is no protection from ultraviolet radiation. The patent also mentions an air filtration of two microns in pore size. A filter with pore size of two microns is not sufficient to prevent bacteria or bacteria spores from entering the system. A 0.2 micron filter is normally used for biological filters. An economical, autoclavable and easy to replace membrane filter as the one in this patent application has 0.2 micron pores. This membrane is effective, economical and can be used for multiple batches before it is replaced.
Canadian patent CA2368407 was granted to Moffitt, Ehrlich and Arrington in Jul. 24, 2003. This bioreactor does not have a biological air filtration system to prevent pathogens from entering the fermentation chamber through the air supply. It also has no cooling for the inoculant nor for the fermentation chamber in case of high environmental heat. In addition, there is no mention of protection of inoculants from ultraviolet radiation from sunlight. The system also uses liquid inoculants which are especially sensitive to heat and ultraviolet radiation. Liquid inoculants are also vulnerable to pathogens because water and nutrients allow them to reproduce themselves if they enter the inoculant. Liquid inoculants are normally no more than 0.2 to 0.4 billion cells per milliliter offering low competition to pathogens. Additionally, because of the low organisms count, the system is also bulky and not appropriate for small places. Inoculants with the option of powders, pellets, flakes or tablets like the one in the present patent application can be as much as 2 to 100 billion cells per gram. This makes the bioreactor system much more compact allowing the entire system to be placed on a standard pallet which is ideal for outdoor use. The absence of water also makes it hard for pathogens to reproduce themselves in the inoculant. In short, the system in the patent mentioned above does not keep pathogens out, it is bulky and it is not suitable for outdoor application in extreme weather.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,879,593 granted in February 2011 to Whiteman describes a bioreactor that can be used onsite.
The system can be used with a pre-fermentation and a post fermentation chamber to increase the number of organisms to be dispensed. However, at any stage of fermentation there is the possibility and danger of allowing pathogens into the system. If the media from pre-fermentation is used to feed the fermentation chamber and this media is then used for the post fermenter, the chances of incorporating pathogens at any stage causing them to proliferate increases substantially. Pathogens can be dangerous for people working with the bioreactor or near it. Some pathogens produce antimicrobial components which allow them to curtail competition from non-pathogens and reproduce themselves in unwanted numbers. This can occur in any of the fermenting stages and carry on into the next stage increasing their numbers further. A single stage fermentation chamber is safer. The cited patent also uses a pump to recirculate and mix the contents of the fermentation chamber. This is a constant source of shear stress which can damage cell membranes and reduce optimal growth in the fermenter. A flexible hose diffuser such the one claimed in the present patent application aerates and mixes the contents thoroughly without shear stress. The patent cited above also uses an inoculant that feeds the fermenter. This inoculant needs to be refrigerated to maintain its shelf-life. This makes the inoculant vulnerable to power outages. If a power outage cuts off energy to the fermentation chamber for a day, only one day of fermentation broth can be affected. However, since the inoculant in this system needs to be refrigerated, a single day of exposure to heat can damage the inoculant. This would produce a feed with low cell counts that would affect all the batches fed with that inoculant. In addition, it would also increase the chance of pathogenic contamination because of low competition from the inoculant. The cited patent can also use organisms in powder or gel form enclosed in water soluble capsules. However, there is no provision to protect the capsules from excessive environmental heat or from ultraviolet radiation from sunlight. Finally, the air filter appears to be a standard biofilter. These types of filters can be used a few times before they must be removed and autoclaved. After a few cycles they need to be discarded. They are hard to maintain and they are very expensive costing several hundred dollars that would be passed on to the customer. The biological filter described in the present patent application uses a membrane. Many membrane filters can be cut to size at the same time. Then, they are autoclaved to take to the location of the bioreactor. When needed a filter membrane can be replaced in less than a minute. Each membrane cut to size for the filter is only a few pennies and can run several cycles of the bioreactor. The patent cited above is not for outdoor use and it is vulnerable to pathogen contamination.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,873 granted in November 2011 to Foster, Smith, Duos and Guidotti describes a bioreactor that achieves aeration by recirculation of the fluid medium from the top of the fermentation chamber through a pipe that runs the length of the inner wall. The conical bottom has an orifice allowing for recirculation of the fluid medium tangentially to the sidewalls causing a vortex and mixing at the top. The air is supplied through a vent port. The constant shear stress of a pump to mix the fermentation media can affect the cell membrane of the organisms being grown reducing cell output. The air inlet has no biological filter that would prevent pathogens from growing in the fermentation media causing a potential danger for workers using the bioreactor or working near it. There is no description of a heating or a cooling system that would allow the fermentation media to remain at optimum temperature for the growth of organisms if the outside weather is too cold or too hot. There is also no description of protection against ultraviolet radiation from direct sunlight. The system also seems to be limited to a batch bioreactor for industrial wastewater. The same type of bioreactor was patented by the same inventors mentioned above in U.S. Pat. No. 8,486,266 issued in July 2013. Both patents share the same title: “Bacterial cultivation system for growth of substrate specific micro-organisms for use in industrial wastewater remediation”. The bioreactor is virtually the same and has the same shortcomings mentioned above. U.S. Pat. No. 8,282,826 was also assigned to the same three inventors in October 2012 and describes the same bioreactor to grow substrate-specific micro-organisms for use in industrial wastewater remediation. This patent also suffers the same shortcomings as described above.
Although the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62526189 | Jun 2017 | US |