TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to output buffers and more particularly to single ended output buffers.
In an integrated circuit, output buffers are often used at output pins to transfer signals to the signal lines. The transmission of information across the signal lines can be subject to various problems such as impedance mismatch, signal reflection, or irregular output waveform. Typically, output buffers must meet specifications dictated by application, such as maintaining a smooth and robust output waveform.
Control logic 503 can output signals to control the operation of the output buffer. For example, an output 506 can be driven high by turning on p-channel output transistor 515 and turning off n-channel output transistor 517, or can be driven low by turning off p-channel output transistor 515 and turning on n-channel output transistor 517. An output 506 could also be placed in a high impedance state (i.e., tristate) by turning off both output transistors (515 and 517).
A disadvantage of conventional output buffer 500 can be the limited flexibility in meeting variations arising from different applications. While a drive strength of a conventional output buffer 500 can be increased by adding additional driver devices in parallel, doing so may only just meet a minimum output impedance necessary to reduce signal reflections on a transmission line driven by the buffer.
Another disadvantage of conventional output buffer 500 can be sensitivity to operating conditions. While an output buffer 500 can be tuned to meet worst case load conditions, if an actual output transmission line is less than such worst case, it can be difficult to meet driving requirements, such as rise time and fall time, particularly across uncontrollable variations in manufacturing process, differing operating voltages, and/or temperatures.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to a number of drawings. The embodiments show output driver circuits that can vary drive strength according to supply voltage conditions and/or provide programmable drive strength. As a result, an output buffer can meet performance requirements over a range of operating voltages. Further, programmability of drive strength can enable the output buffer to be configured to provide a desired signal profile despite variations in transmission line load.
Referring now to
A pull-up predriver circuit 104 can include a first switch element 112-0, a second switch element 112-1, and a first variable current source 114-0. A first switch element 112-0 can provide a low or high impedance path between a high power supply node VDD and a first driver control node 116-0 in response to signal PU_DIS. A second switch element 114-0 can provide a high or low impedance path between first driver control node 116-0 and first variable current source 114-0 in response to signal PREPU. First variable current source 114-0 can provide a current that is controllable according to current control section 110. More particularly, in response to a current control section 110, a variable current source 114-0 can source a current from first control node 116-0 (provided switch element 112-1 is in a low impedance state) that can vary inversely with respect to a power supply voltage and/or can be programmable.
A pull-down predriver circuit 106 can include a third switch element 112-2, a fourth switch element 112-3, and a second variable current source 114-1. A third switch element 112-2 can provide a low or high impedance path between a low power supply node VSS and a second driver control node 116-1 in response to signal PD_DIS. A fourth switch element 112-3 can provide a high or low impedance path between second driver control node 116-1 and second variable current source 114-0 in response to signal PREPD. Like first variable current source 114-0, second variable current source 114-1 can provide a current controlled by current control section 110 that preferably varies inversely with respect to a power supply voltage and/or can be programmable.
A driver section 108 can include a p-channel insulated gate field effect transistor (hereinafter PFET) P10 and an n-channel FET (NFET) N10. PFET P10 can have a source-drain path connected between a high power supply node VDD and an output node 118. A gate of PFET P10 can be connected to first driver control node 116-0. In such an arrangement, a rising edge of an output signal can be generated at output node 118 by disabling first switch element 112-0 and enabling second switch element 112-1. This can cause a potential at the gate of PFET P10 to fall according to the current drawn by first variable current source 114-0. This is in contrast to conventional arrangements that can drive a gate of an output PFET P10 by switching it to a low power supply VSS. PFET P10 can be disabled by disabling second switch element 112-1 and enabling first switch element 112-0, thereby connecting its gate to a high power supply node VDD. By providing a strong second switch element 112-1, large crowbar currents through output driver can be reduced or avoided as output PFET P10 can be turned off quickly.
NFET N10 can have a source-drain path connected between a low power supply node VSS and an output node 118. A gate of NFET N10 can be connected to second driver control node 116-1. In such an arrangement, a falling edge of an output signal can be generated at output node 118 by disabling third switch element 112-2 and enabling fourth switch element 112-3. This can cause a potential at the gate of NFET N10 to rise according to the current supplied by second variable current source 114-1. This is in contrast to conventional arrangements that can drive a gate of an output NFET by switching its gate to a high power supply VDD. NFET P10 can be disabled by disabling fourth switch element 112-3 and enabling third switch element 112-2, thereby connecting its gate to a low power supply node VSS. As the case of PFET P10, providing a strong fourth switch element 112-3 can reduce or eliminate large crowbar currents through driver section 108.
In this way, an output buffer can include output driver transistors that are enabled in response to current sources sinking or sourcing a current that can vary according to supply voltage and/or are programmable. Thus, drive strength of such devices can be varied without increasing or decreasing the number of driver devices, as is done in some conventional approaches.
Referring now to
Referring now to
A variable current source 214-0 can include a static section 226 and a programmable section 228. A static section 226 can include a current source that mirrors the current passing through current mirror source 224 and draws current from a current control node 230. Thus, a current drawn by static section 226 can also vary inversely with a power supply voltage. In a similar fashion, a programmable section 228 can include one or more current sources that mirror the current passing through current mirror source 224. Such current sources can be arranged in parallel with one another with respect to current control node 230. However, unlike static section 226, current sources within programmable section 228 can be switched into current control node 228 to vary that amount of current drawn at current control node 230. In the particular example shown, signals DRV0 and DRV1 can control the current sources of programmable section 228.
A switch element 212-1 can selectively connect a driver control node 216-0 to variable current source 214-0, to thereby drive a gate of PFET P20 low, to pull output node 218 toward VDD.
In this way, a pull-up device in an output driver can be controlled by a variable current source sinking a current with a magnitude that is both programmable and inversely related to a power supply level.
Referring now to
A current control section 210 can provide a current I_IN in the same fashion as described with reference to
A variable current source 214-1 can have the same general configuration as variable current source 214-0, except that current is sourced to a common current control node 230′.
A switch element 212-3 can selectively connect a driver control node 216-1 to variable current source 214-1, to thereby enable NFET N20, and drive output node 218 toward VSS.
In this way, a pull-down device in an output driver can be controlled by a variable current source sourcing a current with a magnitude that is both programmable and inversely related to a power supply level.
Referring now to
As shown in
In the arrangement of
In this way a current can be provided that can be inversely proportional to a power supply voltage.
While the embodiments of
Referring to
An input current section 402 can include a current mirror formed by NFETs N41 and N42 and load PFET P41. NFET N41 can have a drain that receives a voltage compensated input current I_IN. In one particular arrangement, a current I_IN can be generated by circuits like those shown as 210 in
Programmable switching section 404 can include one or more selectable legs to vary the amount of current drawn at node 418. In the particular example of
In such an arrangement, a current I1 drawn at node 418 can include that drawn by NFET N42, and any additional current draw switched in by switching section 404. Any of NFETs N42, N44 and N46 can be scaled with respect to NFET N41 to provide a desired programmability range.
A current driver section 406 can include mirror PFET P42, a drive current mirror N47/N48, and a drive PFET P43. PFET P42 can be connected in a current mirror fashion to load PFET P41, and thus can provide a current I2 to node 420 that mirrors I1. Drive current mirror N47/N48 can receive a current Id from node 420, and mirror such current to generate a current Idrive that flows from PFET P43 to NFET N48.
A drive strength modulator 408 can include NFETs N49 and N50 arranged in series with one another between node 420 and a low power supply node 408. In such an arrangement, when drive strength modulator is disabled (NFET N49 off), current Idrive can essentially mirror current I2. In contrast, when drive strength modulator is enabled (NFET N49 on), the scaling factor between the different legs of current driver section 406 can be changed, as NFET N50 is added in parallel with NFET N47. As a result current Idrive can be reduced.
Pull-down current source 410 can include a PFET P44 having a gate connected in a current mirror fashion to that of PFET 43. Thus, PFET P44 can source a current that mirrors current Idrive. Similarly, pull-up current source 412 can include an NFET N51 having a gate connected in a current mirror fashion to a gate of NFET N47, and thus sink a current that mirrors current Id (and hence Idrive).
An output driver section 416 can have the same structure as that shown as 108 in
Pull-up switch element 414-0 can be connected between a gate of driver PFET P40 and pull-up current source 412. Thus, when pull-up switch element 414-0 is enabled in response to signal PU, driver PFET P40 can drive output node 422 high based on a current Id. In a similar fashion, pull-down switch element 414-1 can be connected between a gate of driver NFET N40 and pull-down current source 410. Thus, when pull-down switch element 414-1 is enabled in response to signal PD, driver NFET N40 can drive output node 422 low based on current Idrive.
Again, due to the current mirroring of tuning circuit 400 currents Id/Idrive are inversely proportional to a power supply voltage.
Output driver circuits according to the embodiments can provide for rise and fall times that can meet a same specification under varying voltage supply conditions, as a drive strength is determined by sinking or sourcing a current that varies with power supply voltage levels.
In addition or alternatively, output driver circuits according to the embodiments can provide for a selectable rise and fall time, by enabling any of multiple current sources to increase and/or decrease a current that controls the drive strength of the output buffer. As but one example, for a worst case load condition, a first number of current sources can be enabled to provide a relatively fast switching speed. For load conditions less than a worst case, fewer current sources can be enabled, thus slowing down the rise/fall times appropriately. Such load-drive matching can reduce electromagnetic interference (EMI) in systems that drive signals between various locations.
Embodiments of the present invention can be employed as output drivers for various integrated circuits. As but one particular example, such an output driver may be particularly suitable for driving an output clock signal that can control the timing of other circuits in a larger system.
Embodiments of the present invention are well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited herein, and in a sequence other than that depicted and/or described herein. In one embodiment, such a process is carried out by processors and other electrical and electronic components, e.g., executing computer readable and computer executable instructions comprising code contained in a computer usable medium.
For purposes of clarity, many of the details of the improved solution and the methods of designing and manufacturing the same that are widely known and are not relevant to the present invention have been omitted from the following description.
It should be appreciated that reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Therefore, it is emphasized and should be appreciated that two or more references to “an embodiment” or “one embodiment” or “an alternative embodiment” in various portions of this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures or characteristics may be combined as suitable in one or more embodiments of the invention.
Similarly, it should be appreciated that in the foregoing description of exemplary embodiments of the invention, various features of the invention are sometimes grouped together in a single embodiment, figure, or description thereof for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure aiding in the understanding of one or more of the various inventive aspects.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Non-Provisional Application Ser. No. 11/904,901 filed Sep. 27, 2007 and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/847,554 filed on Sep. 27, 2006, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4636983 | Young et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4785427 | Young et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4845255 | Iwahara et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4877978 | Platt | Oct 1989 | A |
4890065 | Latetin | Dec 1989 | A |
4918664 | Platt | Apr 1990 | A |
5124597 | Stuebing et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5132936 | Keswick et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5153450 | Ruetz | Oct 1992 | A |
5157282 | Ong et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162672 | McMahan et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5315164 | Broughton | May 1994 | A |
5319252 | Pierce et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319258 | Ruetz et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5345112 | Nazarian et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5347183 | Phelan | Sep 1994 | A |
5361003 | Roberts | Nov 1994 | A |
5362997 | Bloker | Nov 1994 | A |
5381370 | Lacey et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383157 | Phelan | Jan 1995 | A |
5410191 | Miura | Apr 1995 | A |
5444406 | Horne | Aug 1995 | A |
5469558 | Lieberman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5489858 | Pierce et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5512854 | Park | Apr 1996 | A |
5561792 | Ganapathy | Oct 1996 | A |
5563605 | McEwan | Oct 1996 | A |
5583457 | Horiguchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5600271 | Erickson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5682114 | Ohta | Oct 1997 | A |
5708597 | Kelem | Jan 1998 | A |
5732027 | Arcoleo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5767736 | Lakshmikumar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5864506 | Arcoleo et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5933025 | Nance et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933039 | Hui et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5959479 | Woodward | Sep 1999 | A |
6055287 | McEwan | Apr 2000 | A |
6060922 | Chow et al. | May 2000 | A |
6107844 | Berg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6124741 | Arcus | Sep 2000 | A |
6167528 | Arcoleo | Dec 2000 | A |
6313682 | Muller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6414516 | Labram et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6504666 | Patti et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6580359 | Tam | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6680656 | Chen | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6734700 | Chiu et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6762634 | Hattori | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6853227 | Latetin | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7130225 | Terrovitis | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7138841 | Li et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7224195 | Pilling et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7230466 | Park | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233165 | Jordy | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236018 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7248083 | Chung | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7274254 | Hsieh | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279941 | Yonezawa et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7321246 | Nishimura | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7323898 | Sartschev | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330053 | Brucke et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332943 | Botti et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7391239 | Lenz | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7427893 | Liu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7446597 | Yu | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7449940 | Sunairi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7453928 | Ten et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7474131 | Hoffmann et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7477075 | Kesselring | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20020130684 | Labram et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050116737 | Pentakota et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060019619 | Al-Shyoukh et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060097764 | Yeh | May 2006 | A1 |
20070013411 | Asaduzzaman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070120582 | Chung et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070182461 | Harvey | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182462 | Lee | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070237265 | Chang | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070290728 | Tsai | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080018376 | Godes | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080042734 | Yu | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080054954 | Sun | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080129348 | Shau | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080226004 | Oh | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080290909 | Chung | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080290911 | Williams | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080303558 | Rho | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0315473 | May 1989 | EP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901: “Output Buffer Circuit,” Alan McLaughlin, filed Sep. 27, 2007; 27 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor, “Cypress Data Book Memories DataCom FCT Logic PC Products,” May 1995, pp. i-vii, 2-36 through 2-43, 2-227, 2-258 through 2-268, 6-1 through 6-15, and 6-74 though 6-84; 54 pages. |
Cypress Semiconductor, “Programmable Skew Clock Buffer (PSCB),” 1995, pp. 10-130 through 10-139; 13 pages. |
Efendovich et al., “Multifrequency Zero-Jitter Delay-Locked Loop,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 29, No. 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 67-70; 4 pages. |
Griffin et al., “Memory 1996: Complete Coverage of DRAM, SRAM, EPROM, and Flash Memory ICs,” Chapter 8, “SRAM Technology,” pp. 8-1 through 8-18, Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation, 1996; 20 pages. |
Griffin et al., Memory 1996: Complete Coverage of DRAM, SRAM, EPROM, and Flash Memory ICs, Chapter 7, “DRAM Technology,” pp. 7-1 through 7-20, Integrated Circuit Engineering Corporation, 1996; 22 pages. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Jul. 28, 1999; 1 page. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Jul. 31, 1998; 1 page. |
USPTO Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Jan. 12, 2010; 2 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/682,571 dated Mar. 26, 1992; 4 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/991,568 dated Feb. 1, 1994; 5 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Apr. 12, 1999; 13 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Apr. 22, 1998; 7 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Oct. 29, 2009; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/007,957 dated Nov. 30, 1987; 3 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/246,634 dated Jun. 19, 1989; 3 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/298,472 dated Oct. 17, 1989; 2 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/675,021 dated Jul. 2, 1991; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/682,571 dated Dec. 2, 1991; 4 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/945,705 dated Oct. 15, 1993; 9 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/956,794 dated Sep. 7, 1993; 3 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 07/991,568 dated Oct. 5, 1993; 5 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/103,449 dated Mar. 10, 1994; 4 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/111,164 dated Mar. 23, 1994; 3 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/228,927 dated Jul. 19, 1994; 4 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Sep. 14, 1999; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Oct. 1, 1997; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Oct. 19, 1998; 9 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 08/777,488 dated Apr. 14, 1997; 3 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 09/006,772 dated May 18, 1998; 7 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/014,578 dated Apr. 4, 2006; 6 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Jun. 5, 2009; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/007,957 dated Jul. 5, 1988; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/246,634 dated Aug. 14, 1989; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/298,472 dated Jan. 3, 1990; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/675,021 dated Nov. 5, 1991; 2 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/682,571 dated Jun. 15, 1992; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/945,705 dated Mar. 30, 1994; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/956,794 dated Mar. 17, 1994; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 07/991,568 dated May 20, 1994; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/103,449 dated Jul. 26, 1994; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/111,164 dated Jul. 12, 1994; 3 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/228,927 dated Apr. 21, 1995; 2 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/576,081 dated Jan. 31, 2000; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/777,488 dated May 27, 1997; 1 page. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/006,772 dated Sep. 28, 1998; 2 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/014,578 dated Jul. 20, 2006; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Feb. 12, 2010; 7 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated May 27, 2010; 6 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Sep. 2, 2010; 4 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Jan. 5, 2009; 5 pages. |
USPTO Requirement for Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 11/904,901 dated Apr. 15, 2009; 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60847554 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11904901 | Sep 2007 | US |
Child | 13013725 | US |