When a handset is brought into proximity to a reflector, e.g. a tabletop or hand, the near field of the antenna is disrupted. This disruption changes the impedance of the antenna and thus changes the output load impedance of the power amplifier (PA). Since the power amplifier efficiency, linearity and harmonic performance are functions of load impedance, when the antenna is mismatched, the transmitter loses efficiency and distorts the output signal. The power efficiency loss results in less talk time but can be mitigated with a larger battery. As the handset must meet strict government regulations regarding distortion, the power amplifier must handle the changing load impedance without exceeding the allowed distortion.
One prior art technique is to supply the power amplifier (PA) with significantly more primary power. This allows for more linear operation into mismatch, but results in an inefficient, large power amplifier. This reduces the talk time unless the battery is grown, and increases the cost of the PA. Another prior art technique uses two smaller PAs. The load to each PA is inverse to one another. Thus, when one sees an open, the other sees a short. This minimizes distortion but requires more semiconductor area. The efficiency suffers due to the loss in the combined network. Alternatively, an isolator may be placed between the power amplifier and the antenna. The isolator adds cost, is large, adds loss and so requires a larger PA, and restricts the bandwidth of the transmitter.
An apparatus and method for adapting a power amplifier to a varied load includes modifying the drive signal to the power amplifier, measuring the value of at least one electrical parameter, determining a difference between the measured value and a predetermined value, and periodically adjusting the drive signal according to the difference. The apparatus can also vary the bias network of the power by adjusting one of the following electrical parameters: average Drain to Source Voltage (VDSavg), average Drain to Source current (IDSavg), average Gate to Source voltage (VGSavg), for each stage as necessary. The nomenclature is as typically used for Field Effect Transistors, but this technique can be applied as well to Bipolar Junction Transistors.
The power amplifier bias controller of the present invention has the capability of changing its characteristic load line, allowing reconfiguring for different loads. As the near field changes, the amplifier can be re-biased, the drive level modified, to follow the impedance change while maintaining constant power to the antenna.
The difference between the measured forward power and the expected forward power is determined, either within the handset or by the base station (not shown). The power is adjusted by changing parameters such as IDSavg, IDSavg, VGSavg, and input power.
In some systems, the base station commands the handset to increment or decrement the output power. At each command, the output power is compared to the expected power, and an algorithm is engaged to determine whether the PA must be reconfigured to match the load.
Although the present invention has been disclosed using the nomenclature of field effect transistors, the concept is easily extended to amplifiers made using bipolar junction transistors.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5278994 | Black et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5432473 | Mattila et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5977831 | Davis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987333 | Sole | Nov 1999 | A |
6060950 | Groe | May 2000 | A |
6424216 | Mu et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6580318 | Taylor | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6600369 | Mitzlaff | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6615052 | Parmenter | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6734729 | Andrys et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744316 | Louis et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6798287 | Wu et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803818 | van Amerom | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6891438 | Arai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6972626 | Takahashi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6985033 | Shirali et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7062237 | Brandt | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076218 | Greverie et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7096034 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116173 | Tsutsui et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145396 | Dupuis | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7250818 | Ayun et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20020146993 | Persico et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070087706 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |