The general principle of the disclosure is based, for example, on the reduction and the increase of the slew rate of the output signal of an interfacing device.
Simplification of the description, the rest of the document will simply describe the specific case of a NMOS type output buffer. Those skilled in the art will extend without difficulty this lesson to any types of output buffers, especially de PMOS and “push-pull” type output buffers.
In relation to
In this example, the output interfacing device 500 comprises:
For reasons of clarity, the detailed architecture and the operation of the first inverter INV1 are not described again below.
By way of reminder, this first inverter INV1 is formed by a first transistor TP1 and a second transistor TN1. mounted with common gate and drain.
The output interfacing device 500 comprises an input 1 to which is applied an input SIN and an output 2 signal delivering an output signal SOUT to an external load C1 (which is for example a capacitance of 50 pF).
As shown in
As may be seen below, the feed back 54 creates a feed back loop, which accelerates the switching dynamic of the device.
In one example, the feed back is carried out via a control capacitance CSL. Advantageously, initialisation means 56 are provided to discharge the control capacity CSL. The initialisation means 56 comprise a fourth PMOS type transistor mounted with common source and drain with a fifth NMOS type transistor. The fourth PMOS transistor is commanded by the input signal SIN (which is applied to the gate of the transistor), and the fifth transistor NMOS is commanded by the command signal SCOM delivered by the first inverter INV1. Consequently, at each switching of the input signal from VCC to VSS, the fourth PMOS and fifth NMOS transistors are made conductive, which has the effect of short circuiting the control capacitance CSL and thus of discharging it.
In this example, the output interfacing device 500 further comprises command means 55 permitting the feed back to be authorised or not.
As shown by
Hereunder in reference to
When the input signal SIN is greater than or equal to VSS and less than or equal to 1.5V, the capacitance of the gate (not shown) of the output transistor TN2 is loaded via the command signal SCOM. The increase in voltage of the command signal SCOM is controlled (which is to say delayed) by the control resistor RSL. The consequence of this is to delay the command of the output transistor TN2, and therefore to slow down the switching speed of the device. It is important to note that, in this case, the second inverter INV2 delivers an inverted command signal SCOM* substantially equal to VSS. The third transistor TN3 is therefore made non conductive (switch open), which has the effect of deactivating the feed back loop. It may also be noted that the control resistor RSL improves the immunity of the device to interference and/or electromagnetic interference.
In return, when the input signal SIN is greater than 1.5V and less than or equal to VCC, the second inverter INV2 delivers an inverted command signal SCOM* substantially equal to VCC, the third transistor TN3 is therefore made conductive (switch closed) and the feed back loop activated. The gate capacitance (not shown) of the output transistor TN2 is then loaded via the output signal SOUT (which is supplied by the control capacitance CSL). The consequence of this is to accelerate the command of the output transistor TN2, and therefore to increase the switching speed of the device.
The addition of the control resistor RSL with the feed back loop (control capacitance CSL) permits the effect of the external load capacitance C1 on the slew rate) of the output signal SOUT to be inverted.
Now in relation to
More precisely,
As shown in
An example of the disclosure provides a technique, which permits simple and efficient control of the slew rate of the output signal of an output interfacing device.
An example of the disclosure provides a system, which permits the slew rate of the output signal to be accelerated, when the capacitance of the load at the output of the device increases.
It should be noted that the formulation of this advantage is, in itself, novel and inventive as those skilled in the field of output interfacing devices have not yet envisaged obtaining a slew rate of the output signal that is increasingly higher for a capacitive load that is increasingly higher.
An example of the disclosure provides a system, which generates reduced interference with respect to the classic output interfacing devices.
An example of the disclosure provides a system, which is simple and inexpensive to make.
Although the present disclosure has been described with reference to one or more examples, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure and/or the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/09246 | Oct 2006 | FR | national |