The embodiments disclosed herein relate to printing devices, and more specifically to document retrieval from and the document output trays of such devices.
One of the trends in office work group printing devices is size reduction. While print speeds, image quality and media handling features, such as input/output tray capacity, are becoming greater, sales prices are being forced down. Lower prices encourage product placement on desks or small office table tops, which further influences printing device working envelopes to be as small as reasonably possible. Extending media output trays take up valuable space and there is a broad goal of incorporating the output tray largely internal to the product enclosure. This solves one customer problem but creates another, as the now crowded, limited access tray appears more like a tunnel than an easy to see and access print retrieval tray. Access from a concurrently exposed end may not be possible if the product is configured with an optional finisher. The media path is often inset to the extent that the exposed edge of the output media may end up to several inches from the exterior surface of the side of the unit offering access.
It would be desirable if the user had easier access to the media output of printing devices having recessed document output trays.
The embodiments disclosed herein describe a media stack access enhancement nudger that shifts the media closer to the exposed grasping area in a limited access output tray. The nudger may slide a media stack in a linear direction to be grasped for removal or may pivot the stack outward to make one or the other end of the stack more accessible.
Embodiments of the present invention include a printing device having a recessed output tray. The output tray includes a nudging mechanism including a nudger that engages a stack of paper such that when the nudger moves, the stack will move with it and an actuating mechanism to move the nudger, thereby moving the stack of papers.
Embodiments also include a printing method that includes printing a document, and moving or rotating the document in an outward direction from the somewhat inward location from which they exit a printing device so that the document may be retrieved more easily.
Various exemplary embodiments will be described in detail, with reference to the following figures.
The term “printing device” as used herein refers to devices that produce hardcopy documents. Printing devices include, for example, copiers, printers and multi-function devices. Paper, as used herein, refers to any markable media such as, for example, paper, plastic, and textile materials.
The embodiments described herein are suited for use in many different printing devices as well as in any other system outputting a sequence of sheets.
One method of making output documents more accessible includes using a nudging mechanism. The nudging mechanism could include a nudger that moves an output document stack in an outward vector, including a substantially linear manner, in the direction from which the user would retrieve the document stack. Alternatively, the nudger may rotate or pivot the document stack so that one end is easier to grasp by the user. The nudger may be centered on the media edge for the size having the highest use volume (A, A4 for letter size printing devices) sufficiently to slide as a stack in the direction of the nudger movement or may be positioned off center so that the nudge would result in rotating or pivoting a stack of typically sized media. Combinations of the sliding and rotating motion may also be useful. The nudging mechanism could also include a riser or fence that is able to move a media stack by being equal or greater in height than the possible stack or by being sufficiently high relative to a media stack that media engaged by the riser or fence is collectively stiff enough to cause media above to move in concert. The nudging mechanism may also enable manually offsetting print jobs or more easily shifting smaller size media, such as cards or envelopes, by using a nudger with intermediate stationary adjustments.
The nudger does not need to move the media edge all the way to or past the edge of the inset. The benefit of the nudger is to make media easier to retrieve by bringing it close enough to the outer enclosure that visibility and grasping are noticeably improved. Opening height, depth of media position, and contours or shape of the enclosure forming the tray opening influence the travel required to achieve this objective.
Alternatively, pivoting, pushing, pulling or sliding a lever or knob accessible from the printing device outer surface, and preferably close to the output tray, could actuate a manual stack nudger directly or through a link or flexible cable. The manually actuated nudger would ideally have a spring return action for the lever that would leave the media stack in the shifted position so actuation and media retrieval would involve only two operations.
As can be seen in
In the embodiment shown in
An additional alternative to orthogonal travel is a nudger that travels at an angle so it shifts the media stack in two axes. An automated nudger has the potential added benefits of being used as a stack off-setter. When used to separate print jobs by offsetting, it may be desirable for the media stack to follow the nudger both outward and inward so that multiple jobs can be offset. Technically, this two-directional movement could be done manually as well, although it may not be as valuable in routine printing applications as the user would necessarily be there to remove the particular stack being offset in person.
To help facilitate movement of a stack, a nudger may include an underside support that aids in controlling the media during a shift.
Nudgers that ensure movement of the media when pushing it may be augmented with complementary features that also allow the greater portion of a stack that is not retrieved to be retracted to the normal position without significant unintended displacement or orientation of the media. The underside support portion may assist in implementations capable of job offsets as the media would more readily tend to remain in an orderly stack.
A nudging mechanism is especially helpful if the printing device in question outputs a variety of paper sizes. A printing device may produce a gamut of sizes from oversized envelopes to postcard-sized outputs. If it has a recessed output tray, retrieving the smaller postcard-sized media may be difficult. The nudging mechanism may be used especially or solely for particularly small paper sizes and not used for the larger sized sheets of paper. A nudger may be designed to allow adjustment for alternative or particular media sizes. The adjustment may be facilitated by components that permit the adjustment of the nudger without otherwise affecting nudger displacement or travel. The media output nudging configuration may incorporate movement of any or a combination of vectors or pivots and may include one or more nudging risers and/or bottom supports of any configuration, including position adjustments for various size media. The nudger may be designed to have multiple ranges of travel so that it moves a shorter distance or rotation for typical A or A4 paper and a longer distance or rotation for smaller size media. The terms pivot and rotate, as used herein, are intended to encompass any non-linear path, such as arc, radial, or curved motion.
It will be appreciated that several of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims. Unless specifically recited in a claim, steps or components of claims should not be implied or imported from the specification or any other claims as to any particular order, number, position, size, shape, angle, color, or material.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4322068 | Cayn et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4481751 | Ujhelyi | Nov 1984 | A |
4518300 | Kent | May 1985 | A |
5662320 | Fujiwara et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5722650 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5758981 | Lesniak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774778 | Adachi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5836579 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839048 | Kato | Nov 1998 | A |
5897110 | Fujiwara | Apr 1999 | A |
6076825 | Kato et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085913 | Aiko et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6209865 | Regimbal et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6394442 | Antinora et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6889974 | Tamura et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7093992 | Zeller et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7237774 | Fukatsu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7431289 | Sekiyama et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7537209 | Kato et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7637502 | Ata et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20050035522 | Gonzalez et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20060071423 | Ata et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070273088 | Ong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
62046863 | Feb 1987 | JP |
03111372 | May 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090160123 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |