This invention relates to safety razors of the kind having a blade unit carried by a handle, the blade unit including an elongate blade with a rectilinear sharpened edge, or a plurality of such blades with parallel edges. The blade unit may be fixedly mounted on the handle with the intention that the entire razor be discarded when the blade edge or edges have become dulled. Alternatively, the blade unit can be detachably connected to the handle to enable replacement of a used blade unit with a fresh blade unit. Replaceable blade units are commonly referred to as cartridges.
There has been a general tendency over recent years for razor blade units to have been reduced in size, especially regarding the area of the surfaces which contact the skin around the blades during shaving, and the majority of blade units currently available in the marketplace are long and narrow with substantially rectangular configurations as viewed in a direction substantially perpendicular to the skin contacting surfaces. On the whole razor blade units of such shape and size have been found to provide an enhanced shaving performance in comparison with earlier blade units of larger dimensions.
The present invention is aimed specifically at a blade unit for body shaving, primarily in the axillary area. There are already on the market razors intended for use by ladies who do commonly shave their axillae, and like other razors there has been a strong trend towards making the blade units of these female razors with a narrow rectangular configuration as mentioned above. It has become the accepted thinking within the art that such blade units of narrow dimensions are especially beneficial for shaving the axillae since they will more readily fit into the rather deep concave socket of the axilla.
The present invention makes a significant departure from this current thinking in the shaving field and goes directly against all recent developments in this technical area as regards blade unit dimensions. Surprisingly, and contrary to all expectations, shaving tests have shown that not only can a blade unit of relatively large dimensions at least equal the shaving effectiveness of the smaller prior art blade units when shaving the axillae, but large blade units can be shaped to conform to the axilla region of the body so that shaving performance is not diminished, and that in terms of overall comfort large blade units have a superior performance to the prior art blade units and are preferred by users. It appears the added stability given by a large contact area with the skin gives the user greater confidence when shaving the axilla which cannot be viewed very easily during the shaving process, and as a consequence an improved comfort is perceived by the user and this more than counteracts any loss of performance due to the large contact area.
For most adult females, the underarm cavity has a minimum radius of curvature of about 25 to 30 mm. Therefore, a razor blade unit according to the invention has a length not greater than 60 mm, preferably not greater than 50 mm, and a length in the range of 40 to 45 mm is preferred. The width of the blade unit is preferably such that the aspect ratio, namely the ratio of the overall length to the overall width measured perpendicular to the blade, is in the range of 1 to 4, and in most of the preferred embodiments of the invention the aspect ratio is from 1.5 to 2.8, and more precisely in the range of 2.0 to 2.5. In the preferred embodiments the width of the blade unit is in the range of 12 to 23 mm, in particular 15 to 20 mm. Guard and cap surfaces are defined in front of and behind the blade or blades for contact with the skin in front of and behind the blade or blades during shaving, and preferably each of the guard and cap surfaces has a width of not less than 4.0 mm, at least where the width of the blade unit is at a maximum. The guard and cap each has a skin contact area which is preferably not less than 140 mm2, and the combined skin contact areas of the cap and guard are preferably at least 400 mm2, and most preferably in the range of 450 to 500 mm2. As the blade unit of the present invention is rather wide, in order to facilitate contact with the skin in the axilla over at least most of the guard and cap areas, as viewed in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the blade edges, the skin contacting surface is made convex. It is important to understand that the word “convex” as used in the present specification does not necessarily mean that the skin contacting surface is smoothly curved and it implies only that the guard and cap surfaces extend upwardly in the direction from their edges remote from the blade or blades so that the blade edge or edges are at a level above the remote edges of the cap and guard surfaces. More particularly, a straight line joining the outer and inner limits of each of the guard and cap surfaces is inclined at an angle of at least 5°, and possibly up to 25°, to a plane which is tangential to the skin contacting surfaces immediately in front of and behind the blades. In the preferred embodiments the angle of inclination is in the range of 10 to 20 degrees, and more specifically substantially equal to 15°. By virtue of the convexity of the skin contacting surface, the blade unit is preferably shaped to make at least three point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle having a diameter of from 30 to 100 mm, and preferably of about 50 mm whereby it will be ensured that the blade unit convexity will at least approximately conform to that of the axilla.
An important aspect of the blade unit according to the invention is that it defines a large area over which contact can be made with the skin during shaving, and a circumscribing perimeter extending about the skin contacting surface confines an area, referred to hereinafter as the “footprint area”, of at least 450 mm2. The most preferred footprint area is in the range of 600-750 mm2, and more specifically between 650 and 720 mm2.
Since the invention proposes a blade unit with a long and wide shape, a substantially rectangular configuration with sharp angled corners, at least at the edge adjacent the guard surface, is inappropriate. For the purposes of the present specification a sharp angled corner may be considered to be an angle less than about 120° with a radius of curvature less than around 3 mm. Preferably the curvature at any corner is at least 5 mm. The unacceptability of a substantially rectangular configuration and the objective of providing a large skin contact area means that the blade unit needs to be profiled, as seen in plan generally perpendicular to the skin contacting area, to obtain a relatively large area within the confines of the overall length and width dimensions. The “circularity” of a two dimensional shape is a convenient way of relating the area enclosed by its perimeter to the length of the perimeter, and expressing it in terms of a percentage compared with a circle which always provides the maximum area for any given perimeter length. Thus, the circularity for any shape is defined by the equation:
where
Razor blade units according to the present invention have a circularity not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the skin contacting area and having corner radii of 30% of said width. Preferably the circularity is greater than that of a rectangle with the same overall length and width and rounded corners with radii equal to 10% of the length. For blade units with a low aspect ratio, i.e. less than about 3, the lower limit (a) will apply, although even in the case of these blade units it is preferable that the circularity also exceeds limit (b). Acceptable oval blade units with an aspect ratio above 3.25 may have a circularity of less than 65%. Preferred embodiments with aspect ratios below about 2.75 have a circularity greater than 70%, and more particularly in the order of 80%. Typical prior art blade units have a circularity of less than 65%. The comparatively large circularity of a blade unit according to the invention can be achieved with rounded corners at the ends of the blade unit with relatively large radii of curvature of at least 6 mm, or with oval, elliptical or polygonal shapes which need not necessarily be symmetrical.
Having regard to the foregoing, the present invention resides in a razor blade unit comprising at least one elongate blade having a rectilinear sharpened edge and mounted in a substantially inflexible carrier, a skin contacting surface surrounding the blade edge(s) and including guard and cap surfaces on opposite sides of the blade edge(s), the aspect ratio of the length to width of the skin contacting surface being in the range of from 1 to 4, as seen in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the blade edge(s)—the skin contacting surface being convex, the overall length of the blade unit at the skin contacting surface being not greater than 60 mm, the skin contacting surface having a circumscribing perimeter confining a footprint area of at least 450 mm2, and the circumscribing perimeter being so shaped that the footprint area confined by said perimeter has a circularity (as herein above defined) not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the footprint area of the skin contacting surface and having corner radii of 30% of said width, and the edge of the blade unit adjacent the guard surface being free of sharp angled corners.
A razor equipped with a blade unit as described above has been found in shave tests to achieve a significantly improved overall performance in shaving the axilla and has also been found to be very effective in shaving other body areas, such as the legs.
It should be understood that unless otherwise stated, all dimensions and areas quoted herein are measured in a projected plane and as seen in plan view so the effect of the convex curvature of the skin contacting surface of the blade unit has not been taken into account in determining the relevant dimensional data.
To further illustrate the invention some forms of razor blade unit shaped and dimensioned in accordance with the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Each of the blade units shown in
The particular blade unit of
The blade unit of
All the embodiments of
In all of the embodiments of the invention the skin contacting surfaces are not flat and the views of
In
It is important to note that, as previously mentioned, all the dimensions quoted in the description and claims of this specification regarding length, width and area are based on the profile of the blade unit skin contacting surface projected onto a plane which is parallel to the plane of the shaving surface i.e. the plane denoted P in FIG. 11. In addition, when calculating the circularity, any minor irregularities in the perimeter, e.g. due to small indentations, such as narrow notches or projections which can significantly change the perimeter without substantially changing the area, should be disregarded.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9523040 | Nov 1995 | GB | national |
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/774,044, filed Jan. 26, 2001, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/063,842, filed Apr. 21, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,185,823, which is a continuation of PCT/US96/18192, filed Nov. 8, 1996.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
330418 | Partridge et al. | Nov 1885 | A |
951036 | Waterman | Mar 1910 | A |
1035308 | Boulter | Aug 1912 | A |
1342028 | Nordskog | Jun 1920 | A |
1382301 | McCaffrey | Jun 1921 | A |
1642338 | Holtzman | Sep 1927 | A |
1690557 | Smith | Nov 1928 | A |
1744280 | Peterson | Jan 1930 | A |
1768307 | Bleloch et al. | Jun 1930 | A |
1798447 | Behrman | Mar 1931 | A |
2139680 | Heinrich | Dec 1938 | A |
2183554 | Evans | Dec 1939 | A |
2501987 | Brown | Mar 1950 | A |
2547376 | Crawford | Apr 1951 | A |
2712178 | Marzio | Jul 1955 | A |
3477127 | Regan | Nov 1969 | A |
3724070 | Dorian, Jr. | Apr 1973 | A |
3783510 | Dawidowicz | Jan 1974 | A |
3842502 | Hagan | Oct 1974 | A |
3895437 | DiBuono | Jul 1975 | A |
3934338 | Braginetz | Jan 1976 | A |
4074429 | Roberts | Feb 1978 | A |
4208791 | Van Cleve | Jun 1980 | A |
4270268 | Jacobson | Jun 1981 | A |
4285124 | Diakanov | Aug 1981 | A |
4314404 | Ruiz et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
D271531 | Byrne | Nov 1983 | S |
4461078 | Carreker | Jul 1984 | A |
4562644 | Hitchens | Jan 1986 | A |
4712300 | Hemmeter | Dec 1987 | A |
4807360 | Cerier et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4875288 | Trotta et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4901437 | Iten | Feb 1990 | A |
4964214 | Welsh et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4977670 | Iten | Dec 1990 | A |
4984365 | Leonard et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5031317 | Jacobson | Jul 1991 | A |
5038472 | Iderosa | Aug 1991 | A |
5063669 | Althaus | Nov 1991 | A |
5084968 | Trotta | Feb 1992 | A |
5161307 | Althaus | Nov 1992 | A |
5191712 | Crook et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199173 | Hegemann et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5208982 | Feruzza, Jr. | May 1993 | A |
5249361 | Apprille, Jr. et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5295305 | Hahn et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5313706 | Motta et al. | May 1994 | A |
5369885 | Ferraro | Dec 1994 | A |
5416973 | Brown et al. | May 1995 | A |
5463813 | Otsuka et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5497550 | Trotta et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522137 | Andrews | Jun 1996 | A |
D373218 | Shurtleff et al. | Aug 1996 | S |
5557851 | Oritz | Sep 1996 | A |
5579580 | Althaus et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5604983 | Simms et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5689883 | Ortiz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
D403811 | Brown et al. | Jan 1999 | S |
5903979 | Oldroyd | May 1999 | A |
D415315 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1999 | S |
6161287 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185823 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
509-715 | Mar 1952 | BE |
319632 | Mar 1920 | DE |
319 832 | Apr 1920 | DE |
3733486 | Apr 1989 | DE |
87 17 729.3 | Nov 1989 | DE |
0 020 816 | Jan 1981 | EP |
0 453 906 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 477 132 | Mar 1992 | EP |
482 302 | Mar 1917 | FR |
806 899 | Dec 1936 | FR |
954 296 | Dec 1949 | FR |
1503887 | Dec 1967 | FR |
21940 | Sep 1913 | GB |
409902 | May 1934 | GB |
1157640 | Jul 1969 | GB |
1 377 134 | Dec 1974 | GB |
1 565 415 | Apr 1980 | GB |
2 155 383 | Sep 1985 | GB |
2200587 | Aug 1988 | GB |
2 274 421 | Jul 1994 | GB |
4-361783 | Dec 1992 | JP |
WO 9101204 | Feb 1991 | WO |
WO 9602369 | Feb 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040226172 A1 | Nov 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09774044 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 10653862 | US | |
Parent | 09063842 | Apr 1998 | US |
Child | 09774044 | US | |
Parent | PCTUS96/18192 | Nov 1996 | US |
Child | 09063842 | US |