Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
This invention relates to improvements in an expanding arrowhead. More particularly, the present over center expanding arrowhead. Places the centroid of mass of expanding elements of the blades at a location that keeps the blades closed during acceleration and flight and when a tab makes contact with the target, the blades are drawn open.
Description of Related Art including information disclosed under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98.
In archery hunting it is desirable to pierce an animal with a broad head arrow that can quickly kill the animal and can leave a blood trail that can be tracked to locate the animal. Broadhead arrows create additional drag because of the broad tip of the arrowhead. Broadhead blades which are exposed during flight often result in undesirable steering of the front portion of the arrow, causing the arrow to deviate from a perfect flight path that coincides with a longitudinal axis of the arrow shaft, when loaded or drawn within an archery bow. Reducing the surface area of a broad head blade, the undesirable steering effects can be reduced. However, by reducing the surface area of a blade, the cutting area within a target or game is also reduced, resulting in a less effective entrance and exit wound.
Conventional blade-opening arrowheads have been designed so that a substantial portion of the blade is hidden within the body of the arrowhead, such as during flight of the arrow. Upon impact, such blades are designed to open and thereby expose a cutting surface or sharp edge of the blade. When the blades of such conventional arrowheads are closed and substantially hidden within the body, the exposed surface area is reduced and thus produces relatively less undesirable steering effects.
When an arrow is sent the shock of sending the arrow can inadvertently open an arrowhead. To maintain the blades in a closed position during flight, upon impact, such annular retaining rings are designed to sheer or roll back along the opening blades, in order to allow the blades to move to an open position. Quite often, such conventional annular retaining rings are prone to cracking, particularly when the elastomer material dries out. A number of patents and or publications have been made to address these issues. Exemplary examples of patents and or publication that try to address this/these problem(s) are identified and discussed below.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,066,021 issued Nov. 19, 1991 to Paul V. DeLicia discloses an arrow system where impact with the tip of the arrow initializes blade opening. The blades continue to open as the arrow enters into the animal. A glancing blow will not open the blades because they are not sufficiently exposed to make contact with the hide of the animal.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,083,798 issued Jan. 28, 1992 to Douglas J. Massey discloses an expanding broad head for an arrow. This patent uses an internal slug that moves forward upon impact to open the broad head. Forward inertial as the arrow is launched has no effect on the inertial slug.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,197,367 issued Jun. 12, 2012 to Larry R. Pulkrabek et al discloses an expandable broad head with rear deploying blades. The blades are retained in a slot and forces on the ends of the blades slide the blades into an open orientation. With this design, a glancing blow will not open the blades because they are not sufficiently exposed to make contact with the hide of the animal to slide one or both of the blades open.
Published U.S. Patent Application number 2003/0153417 that published on Aug. 14, 2003 to Bruce Barrie et al., discloses an expanding broad head. Upon impact or deceleration of the arrow the blades will translate backward to an exposed condition. While this patent discloses expanding blades, because the initial force required opening the blades can be high to prevent pre-mature opening as the arrow is initially launched.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,905,874 that issued on Dec. 9, 2014 and U.S. Pat. No. 9,372,056 that issued on Jun. 21, 2016, both to Brian Sullivan et al., are titled Broadhead Arrowhead with Two-Stage Expansion. These patents disclose an arrowhead that opens in two stages. This provides a broad head arrow that can be launched with a traditional or compound bow to allow a hunter to bring down large game in an efficient manner. When an arrow is launched the arrow receives a thrust of energy from the string that launches the arrow. The initial thrust partially opens the arrowhead in a first stage of opening to provide a low fight profile that reduces flight air resistance. A major problem with this design is that once the arrow enters the prey the cutting blades can't be retracted to remove the arrow, or for the animal to dislodge the arrow if it is not killed.
What is needed is an over center expanding arrowhead where the force of the launch does not open the arrowhead, but the arrowhead opens upon impact. The arrowhead should remain closed without the need of a sacrificial element. The proposed over center expanding arrowhead provides the solution by placing the centroid of rotation for the blades over the center of the direction of travel.
It is an object of the over center expanding arrowhead to place the center of rotation of the blades in a location that momentum and inertial travel forces the blades to remain in a closed orientation. The initial launch of an arrow produces high forces on moving components of an arrow. The forces will cause components to rotate based upon the location of the rotational center of mass about a pivoting axis. Proper location of the center of mass can force the blades of the arrowhead to open or close upon launch.
It is an object of the over center expanding arrowhead for the blades to be temporally retained in the closed orientation. This is accomplished with a spring, elastomeric or a magnet. The spring, elastomeric member or magnet keeps the blades in a tucked or close orientation while a user handles the arrow. The retention is sufficient to overcome the forces or gravity on the blades as the arrow is being handled, and also allows the blades to easily open with slight force on the ends of the blades to open with the arrow contacts a target.
It is an object of the over center expanding arrowhead for the blades to minimize air resistance while the arrow is in flight. Minimizing the cross-sectional area of the arrow that moves through the air reduces air resistance and drag that can slow the speed of the arrow and effects the distance the arrow can travel and the velocity of impact as the arrow reaches a target.
It is another object of the over center expanding arrowhead for the cutting blades to fold into the body of the arrowhead as the arrow is withdrawn through the wound path. If the arrowhead remains expanded it is difficult to remove from an animal and must be cut or pushed through the animal thereby damaging part of the usable meat. Another problem is that if the animal is not killed, the animal can't rub the arrow out. If the blades retract when the arrow is pulled through the wound path minimal damage occurs to the meat and a wounded animal may be able to remove the arrow and heal.
It is another object of the over center expanding arrowhead for the cutting blade to pass through the body of the arrow head. Because the center of rotational is over the center of the arrow the blade also exists over the rotational center of the arrow. When the blade opens the cutting blade is rotated through the center of the shaft axis, in a two-blade version, where the blade then exists of the opposite side of the shaft axis as the blade enters the target. In a three-blade version the cutting blade are arranged 120 degrees around the shaft and rotate along the side of the shaft.
It is still another object of the over center expanding arrowhead for the cutting blade to open upon impact with a target. The opening tips of the arrow pivot through the body of the shaft. Slight pressure on the tips will pull the blade open to expose the blade where it can enter the target.
Various objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the drawings herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of the embodiments of the system and method of the present invention, as represented in the drawings, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention but is merely representative of various embodiments of the invention. The illustrated embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the drawings, wherein like parts are designated by like numerals throughout.
Each blade 30 and 40 has a tip 31 and 41 respectively that extends from the body 27 of the over center expanding arrowhead 20 while the remainder of the blades remain nested within the body. The tip 21 of the over center expanding arrowhead 20 is pointed to provide initial penetration of the over center expanding arrowhead 20 into the target. The tips 31 and 41 are arranged to make contact with a target and pull the blades 30 and 40 out of the body 27. While this figure shows two blades it is contemplated that the arrowhead can have three of four blades that fold into or across the body of the arrowhead.
The blades are held within the body 27 the blades are retained with a spring-loaded ball bearing 58. A slight radius 35 is placed in leading edge of the tip 31 of the blade 30. This arrangement of the ball 58 in the cradle radius 35 allows a user to easily open and close the blade 30 from the arrowhead for inspection. While a spring-loaded bearing is shown and described it is further contemplated that the retention mechanism can be a magnet, elastomeric, friction fit or other mechanism.
The blade 40 will continue to rotate until the stop(s) 46 of the blade 40 make contact with the stop(s) 28 in the rear portion of the arrowhead body 27. With the blades open the over center expanding arrowhead 20 will continue into the target and cut a wound path.
Once the arrow is within the target, the arrow can be withdrawn by pulling 94 on the shaft 29. The pulling force 94 will cause the blades 30 and 40 to rotate 95 into the closed orientation where the arrow can be withdrawn through the wound path. If an animal is not mortally wounded the animal can rub the arrow out of the wound path.
Thus, specific embodiments of an over center expanding arrowhead have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/536,894 filed Jul. 25, 2018 the entire contents of which is hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2212345 | Krieger | Sep 1938 | A |
2540387 | Butler | Feb 1951 | A |
2568417 | Steinbacher | Sep 1951 | A |
2859970 | Doonan | Jun 1956 | A |
3759519 | Palma | Sep 1973 | A |
4099720 | Zeren | Jul 1978 | A |
4166619 | Bergmann | Sep 1979 | A |
4579348 | Jones | Jan 1986 | A |
4615529 | Vocal | Oct 1986 | A |
4642929 | Franklin | Feb 1987 | A |
4973060 | Herzing | Nov 1990 | A |
4998738 | Puckett | Mar 1991 | A |
5066021 | DeLucia | Nov 1991 | A |
5082292 | Puckett et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5083798 | Massey | Jan 1992 | A |
5100143 | Puckett | Mar 1992 | A |
5112063 | Puckett | May 1992 | A |
5178398 | Eddy | Jan 1993 | A |
D342303 | Johnson | Dec 1993 | S |
5286035 | Ward | Feb 1994 | A |
5458341 | Forrest | Oct 1995 | A |
5472213 | Dudley | Dec 1995 | A |
5564713 | Mizek | Oct 1996 | A |
5803845 | Anderson | Sep 1998 | A |
5820498 | Maleski | Oct 1998 | A |
5857930 | Troncoso | Jan 1999 | A |
5879252 | Johnson | Mar 1999 | A |
5941784 | Mizek | Aug 1999 | A |
6200237 | Barrie | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6258000 | Liechty | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270435 | Sodaro | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283880 | Barrie | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6398676 | Mizek | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428434 | Liechty | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6554727 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6595881 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6626776 | Barrie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6669586 | Barrie et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6830523 | Kuhn | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6910979 | Barrie et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6935976 | Grace, Jr. et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7377869 | Wohlfeil | May 2008 | B2 |
7771298 | Pulkrabek | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8007382 | Sanford | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8043177 | Flanagan | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8105187 | Sanford | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8182378 | Futtere | May 2012 | B1 |
8197367 | Pulkrabek | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8210970 | Sanford | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8210972 | Adams et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
9372056 | Sullivan | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9879955 | Rowley | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20010006916 | Liechty, II | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010036876 | Barrie et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020065155 | Liechty, II | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098926 | Liechty, II | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030004021 | Barrie et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030073525 | Liechty, II | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030153417 | Barrie et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20070161438 | Fulton | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080102996 | Erhard | May 2008 | A1 |
20090111621 | Mizek | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100273588 | Pulkrabek | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120220400 | Pulkrabek | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190033048 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62536894 | Jul 2017 | US |