This application is a National Stage completion of PCT/EP2018/053964 filed Feb. 19, 2018, which claims priority from German patent application serial no. 10 2017 204 729.1 filed Mar. 21, 2017.
The invention relates to overload recognition.
Modern motor vehicles, especially passenger cars, are increasingly equipped with assistance systems which on the one hand make life easier for the driver, but on the other hand allow less and less feedback about the chassis to the driver. As a result the driver may not be made aware of a defect, such as a bent track-rod or a deformed transverse control arm. From corresponding tests, however, it is known that the residual service life after a plastic deformation of chassis components is sometimes considerably reduced. Thus it could happed that due to the compensating effect of the assistance system prior damage to the track-rod, for example as a result of driving over an obstacle, is not noticed by the driver and later for that reason leads to fracture and to an accident.
Thus, DE 10 2010 043 778 A1 describes a steering element with a mechanical overload protection system which, when it acts, results in a clearly perceptible play of the steering, but which, as already said, would be compensated by an assistance system and would therefore not be noticeable by the driver.
DE 10 2013 018 526 A1 relates to a system for detecting a change of an axle adjustment of a motor vehicle. For this, the system comprises a force-measuring unit or an angle-measuring unit, which sends a signal to an evaluation device. The evaluation device compares the signal at the time with a reference signal, and if the reference signal is exceeded this is interpreted as an overloading of the vehicle axle.
The evaluation of a force signal is often prone to a larger element of vagueness since a force above the calculated load limits does not necessarily also result in damage. Consequently a repair is carried out, which in itself would not be necessary.
Angle measurement is likewise not a clear measurement parameter, since in the event of an overload the theoretical case may arise that although two control arms in the axle have been bent, the angle between the two control arms remains within the tolerance range since the respective deformations, as it were, compensate one another. Then both control arms would have to be replaced, but the system would not detect that situation.
The purpose of the present invention is to provide an overload recognition system which overcomes the problems known from the prior art.
This objective is achieved by designing the sensor system as a deformation detection sensor for an individual chassis component.
In contrast to the prior art, the deformation of the chassis component is detected as the reference variable. Thus, compared with the prior art a value is used which would allow a defect to be recognized directly, which defect also leads to a change of the chassis geometry or even to damage. Furthermore, the load is determined on a single component. No compensation effect can take place within the chassis.
In a further advantageous embodiment of the invention, the sensor system comprises a plurality of individual sensors. On the one hand this makes for a certain redundancy and measurement errors can be recognized.
With regard to determining the deformation direction, the individual sensors are arranged in different planes relative to one another.
To produce a sensor system which is particularly simple to handle, the individual sensors form a cage. The cage only has a low design strength and does not therefore reduce the quality of the measurement signal.
For this it is further provided that the cage is held on one side in the longitudinal direction of the chassis component. Axial stresses could also falsify the measurement signal.
To fix the sensor system, the cage has an annular attachment section. The sensors themselves are not loaded in connection with the attachment function.
According to an advantageous sub-claim, the attachment section is fixed by way of a fastener of the chassis component. The cage can for example consist of a plastic material which is tightened by a screw cap.
For this, the attachment section is made radially elastic, for example in that it has slot-shaped cutouts.
In a further design the chassis component is made in two parts which form between them a parting line where the attachment section is arranged. Consequently no additional fastener are needed for the sensor system.
It can also be provided that the attachment section and the fastener are permanently connected to one another. This considerably simplifies handling during the assembly process.
In order to be able to detect even the slightest deformations, the sensor is arranged at least in the vicinity of the region of the chassis component with the lowest structural strength.
The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to the following description of the figures.
A chassis 1 shown as an example in
The chassis 1 is designed to be steerable and comprises a steering device 19 illustrated only schematically, with a chassis component 21 connected thereto. In this example embodiment the chassis component 21 is a track-rod 21 with a bearing 23; 25 at each end. Between the track-rod 21 and the wheel carrier 9 is arranged a steering lever 27 by means of which axial movement of the track-rod 21 is converted into a pivoting movement of the wheel carrier 9 and the wheel 11. Basically however, the invention could also be used with a chassis that cannot be steered.
When an overload of the chassis 1 occurs, the track-rod 21 tends to be a more sensitive component, because if it is deformed, this has a direct influence on the steering behavior but also on the ability of the vehicle to travel in a straight line.
The sensor system comprises a number of individual sensors 37, which extend in the longitudinal direction of the track-rod 21. In the circumferential direction the individual sensors are arranged distributed on different planes relative to one another. The individual sensors 37 can relate to various measurement methods. Basically, a length change of an individual sensor results in a changed electrical signal, which is sent to an evaluation device (not shown). If the track-rod 21 is bent, then similarly a deformation takes place, as in the case of torsion, although due to the bearings 23; 25 at its ends, torsion of the track-rod 21 is very unlikely.
As can also be seen from
The cage is held on one side in the longitudinal direction of the chassis component, i.e. the end toward the bearing 23 is fixed and the other end, in the direction of the steering lever 27, is free. This fixing of the holding point is established for the variant concerned, but can be designed differently for another axle configuration. The one-sided fixing avoids any axial stresses within the sensor system 35.
The cage 39 has an annular attachment section 45 which comprises a flange area 47 or a conical area. In turn, the attachment section 45 is held by fastener 49, in this case a threaded nut of the chassis component which engages with the threaded shaft 29 and thus fixes the cage 39. Consequently the attachment section 45 is positioned at a parting plane 51 of the two-part chassis component, namely between the track-rods 21 or the threaded shaft 29 and the bearing 23 (
The attachment section is preferably made radially elastic, for example in that the attachment section 45 has a number of cutouts 53 or slits distributed in the circumferential direction.
It can also be provided that the attachment section 45 and the fastener 49 are permanently connected to one another, in that the attachment section 45 is injection-molded onto the fastener 49.
Preferably, the sensor system 35 is arranged at least close to the area of the chassis component or track-rod 21 that has the lowest design strength. The result of that is that even small deformations, which would not yet be measurable in other components or component sections, can now also be detected.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2017 204 729.1 | Mar 2017 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/053964 | 2/19/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/171992 | 9/27/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5431050 | Yamada | Jul 1995 | A |
5585572 | Kindler | Dec 1996 | A |
5753828 | Madni et al. | May 1998 | A |
5933002 | Jacobsen | Aug 1999 | A |
20030062215 | Yasuda | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20100134782 | Roberts | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20130298726 | Diekhoff et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20150006054 | Hofmann | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150166101 | Ross | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2005 027 251 | Dec 2006 | DE |
10 2009 032 991 | Dec 2010 | DE |
10 2010 031 064 | Jan 2012 | DE |
10 2010 043 778 | May 2012 | DE |
10 2012 107 391 | Feb 2014 | DE |
10 2013 018 526 | May 2015 | DE |
2 218 629 | Aug 2010 | EP |
Entry |
---|
German Office Action Corresponding to 10 2017 204 729.1 dated Nov. 17, 2017. |
International Search Report Corresponding to PCT/EP2018/053964 dated Apr. 10, 2018. |
Written Opinion Corresponding to PCT/EP2018/053964 dated Apr. 10, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200011663 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |