1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to electrical control circuits for a lawn and garden tractor or similar vehicle having a controllable power-take-off (PTO) system, and more particularly relates to an override system for establishing an override condition whereby the operator may operate the PTO while the vehicle is traveling in reverse.
2. Description of Related Art
Lawn tractors, mowing machines, and similar vehicles such as snow blowers, sweepers, and leaf blowers having PTO driven attachments are well known. Such machines generally include a magneto operated internal combustion (IC) engine for driving the machine and a controllable power-take-off (PTO) for transferring power to an attachment or implement, such as the cutting unit of a lawn and garden tractor.
Under certain conditions, it is desirable to operate the PTO while the vehicle is traveling in reverse. Various override systems have been proposed for this purpose, but many are inconvenient and difficult to operate. Providing an override system that is convenient, safe, reliable, and relatively simple to incorporate into existing engine control circuitry has been heretofore difficult to achieve.
Override control circuits adapted for use with a riding lawn mowing vehicle having a conventional magneto operated internal combustion (IC) engine. The control circuits are adapted to provide an override condition for selectively allowing the PTO (and associated cutting blades) of the vehicle to operate when the vehicle is traveling in reverse. The control circuits are responsive to input from a key actuated ignition switch, a manually activated override switch, a vehicle reverse switch, and a power-take-off (PTO) switch. In one aspect of the invention, if the vehicle is placed in reverse with the PTO switch engaged and without the override condition having been established, the engine of the vehicle will become disabled. In another aspect of the invention, the control circuit is adapted to disable an electric PTO clutch if the vehicle is placed in reverse with the PTO engaged and without the override condition having been established. In each of the exemplary embodiments, once the override condition is established, the override condition is maintained when the vehicle transitions between reverse and forward operation direction. This means the vehicle can be repeatedly shifted back and forth between forward and reverse without interrupting the override condition. The override condition is also maintained if the operator transitions the PTO between an engaged and disengaged condition subsequent to the override condition having been established.
These and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to one skilled in the art upon examination and analysis of the following detailed description in view of the drawings.
With reference to the drawings,
As described in more detail below, both circuits are adapted to provide an override condition for allowing PTO operation when the vehicle is operating in a reverse direction. The circuit of
As shown in
As mentioned above, the override control circuits of
With reference to table 1 in
Referring again to
With continued reference to
Once the operator has manually activated override switch 80, an electromagnetic force induced by electromagnetic coil 81 (assuming coil 81 is energized by terminal A1) is of sufficient magnitude to sustain the override switch 80 in the activated (i.e., closed) position. In the present embodiments, it is to be noted that although the electromagnetic force from the electromagnetic coil 81 is sufficient to sustain the override switch 80 in the activated position once the override switch has been manually (i.e., physically) activated by the operator, it is not of sufficient magnitude to activate or trigger the override switch by itself. Rather, the override switch is initially triggered by a physical input (i.e., twist and pull) from the operator. However, it is also understood that many other arrangements and/or combinations of switches, including, but not limited to, digital flip-flops, may be used to achieve the same results.
When the override switch 80 is closed, first relay 42 is activated via closed override switch 80. Once first relay 42 is activated, reverse switch 40 is isolated from PTO switch 20, allowing the operator to repeatedly open and close the reverse switch 40 without interrupting the continuous operation of the PTO. Since the override switch 80 is sustained in the closed position by the energized electromagnetic coil 81, there is no requirement for the operator to actuate the override condition each time the vehicle is put into reverse to facilitate mowing in reverse. In this way, once the override switch is engaged and the override condition is achieved, the vehicle can be repeatedly shifted back and forth through FORWARD and REVERSE positions without interrupting or re-setting the override condition. Accordingly, once the override switch 80 is activated and the override condition is achieved, the vehicle can be placed in reverse with the PTO ON without having to reactivate the override switch 80 each time the vehicle is placed in reverse. If during operation the operator should decide to disable the override condition, the operator may disengage the override switch 80 and return to the non-override mode of operation.
With continuing reference to
As discussed above, if the operator desires to operate the PTO while the vehicle is traveling in reverse, the operator must first activate the override switch 80 before reverse operation is selected. As shown in
Unlike the manual PTO circuit of
In the electric PTO circuit of
With continued reference to
In operation, if the operator desires to release the override condition, the operator may manually de-activate the override switch 80 by physically returning the override switch 80 to its original (i.e., open) position. This means that the operator must supply sufficient manual or physical force on the override switch (for example by pushing or pulling the twist-and-pull switch) to overcome the sustaining magnetic force induced on the switch from the electromagnetic coil 81. Once this is achieved, the override switch (which may, for example, be spring loaded) returns to its default (i.e. open) position, thereby interrupting the flow of current to first relay 42 and thus releasing the override condition.
As shown in
By allowing the operator to control the override condition with a single override switch 80, the system provides considerable operator convenience and improved operator safety, allowing the operator to disable the override system at any time during mowing operations. Moreover, a single override switch allows the operator to maintain at least one hand on the vehicle's steering control while also controlling the override system.
As shown in
In each of the control circuits of the present invention, there is no requirement for the operator to actuate the override condition each time the vehicle is put into reverse to facilitate mowing in reverse. Rather, once the override switch 80 is engaged and the override condition is achieved, the vehicle can be repeatedly shifted back and forth between forward and reverse direction without disabling the PTO or interrupting the override condition. In the exemplary control circuits of
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereunto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention therein. Although the present invention has been illustrated with discrete electrical components, it may also be implemented with integrated circuits, for example digital flip-flops, microcontrollers, and/or other software-based control systems. It is understood that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been disclosed, other modifications and alterations are within the knowledge of those skilled in the art and are to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/546,156 filed Feb. 20, 2004 and 60/549,519 filed Mar. 2, 2004.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/004782 | 2/16/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/24/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/081826 | 9/9/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3229452 | Hasenbank | Jan 1966 | A |
3999643 | Jones | Dec 1976 | A |
5203440 | Peterson, Jr. et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5314038 | Peterson, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5616964 | Peterson, Jr. | Apr 1997 | A |
5994857 | Peterson, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026634 | Peter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6109010 | Heal et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6237311 | Richards | May 2001 | B1 |
6316891 | Hough | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6405513 | Hancock et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437458 | Baggett | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6513310 | Hancock et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6568162 | Walters | May 2003 | B2 |
6591594 | Hancock et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6720679 | Harada et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6758292 | Shoemaker | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7128177 | Harvey et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131509 | Harvey et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20030056480 | Johnson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040026138 | Shoemaker | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040026150 | Nishi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040124026 | Walters et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040201286 | Harvey et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 389 556 | Feb 2004 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080135313 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60549519 | Mar 2004 | US | |
60546156 | Feb 2004 | US |