Patent Application
20240199805
The present application is based on and claims priority to Chinese application No. 202110359249.1 filed on Apr. 2, 2021, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The invention belongs to the field of photoelectric materials, and in particular relates to an oxetane polymer, preparation method therefor and application thereof, and energy-curable composition.
The preparations and applications for hydroxy-containing oxetane monomer compounds have been widely reported. For example, Macromolecules, 38, 1640(2005) discloses the preparation for 3-ethyl-3-(6-hydroxyhexyl)oxymethyloxetane; JP2000302774A reports a method for reacting a sulfonate of 3-hydrocarbyl-3-hydroxymethyloxetane with a diol in the presence of a base; and WO2007142236A1 reports that a hydroxy-containing 3-ethyloxetane compound is obtained by reacting a diol compound with an oxetane compound containing an easy-leaving group under an alkaline condition. In these methods, the oxetanated monomers are not the sole product, and further treatments are required before use, with a low atom utilization rate.
JP2019023256A discloses an oxetane-containing lactone polymer and its preparation method. A series of oxetane lactone polymers are obtained by reacting a hydroxy-containing oxetane with different lactone compounds. They have the advantages of low volatility and low curing shrinkage, but the syntheses of such oligomers are restricted by the raw materials, and the costs are high. Moreover, tin chloride is used as the catalyst in the preparation process, and the products involve halogen residues, which will have negative effects on subsequent applications.
The object of the invention is to provide an oxetane polymer, preparation method therefor, application thereof, and energy-curable composition. This oxetane-based polymer has a simple synthesis process without the use of halogen-containing raw materials, the problems of halogen residues, and the generation of other associated products, and thus having a high atom utilization rate. It has a low cost and a low viscosity, and is convenient to use.
In order to achieve the above object, according to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a low-viscosity oxetane-based polymer having a structure represented by Formula (I):
wherein R1 represents hydrogen or methyl, and the weight-average molecular weight of the polymer is between 250 and 1,100.
Further, the polymer represented by Formula (I) has a viscosity at 25° C. of 20-320 cps.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for preparing the polymer represented by Formula (I) as above, including: reacting 3-ethyl-3-hydroxymethyloxetane with oxirane substituted by R1 under an alkaline condition.
The reaction formula is shown below:
Without limitations, the alkaline condition may be achieved by adding one or a combination of two or more of sodium tert-butoxide, potassium tert-butoxide, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, etc. to the reaction system.
In the above preparation method, the raw materials used are all known compounds in the art. The reaction temperature is preferably 80-160° C. The reaction pressure is preferably 0.01-0.5 MPa.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, it also relates to the application of the polymer represented by Formula (I) as above in the field of energy curing. Accordingly, the invention provides an energy-curable composition comprising the polymer represented by Formula (I) as above.
Further, the process for energy curing is particularly preferably photocuring or thermocuring. Suitably, the application fields include, but are not limited to, coatings, inks, adhesives, and the like.
Hereinafter, the present invention will be further described in detail with reference to specific examples, but it should not be understood as a limitation to the protection scope of the present invention.
In the invention, unless otherwise specified, the viscosity at 25° C. is measured by a viscosity analyzer (Model: DV1, BROOKFIELD), and the weight-average molecular weight is measured by gel chromatography (Model: LC-20AD, Shimadzu, Japan).
Raw material 1a Raw material 1b Polymer 1c
To a 250 mL four-necked flask, 11.6 g of Raw material 1a and 0.1 g of potassium hydroxide were added, and heated to 120° C. under stirring. After adjusting the pressure of the reaction system to 0.2 MPa, 4.4 g of Raw material 1b was slowly introduced over about 30 min, and continued to stir for 2 h. Then the reaction was stopped to obtain a transparent liquid, that is, Polymer 1c. The measured viscosity was 23.95 cps (25° C.) and the measured weight-average molecular weight was 273.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 8.8 g, to obtain Polymer 2c with a measured viscosity of 29.95 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 321.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 13.2 g, to obtain Polymer 3c with a measured viscosity of 37.05 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 389.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 17.6 g, to obtain Polymer 4c with a measured viscosity of 41.45 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 424.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 22.0 g, to obtain Polymer 5c with a measured viscosity of 55.70 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 499.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 35.2 g, to obtain Polymer 6c with a measured viscosity of 105.5 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 716.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 44.0 g and the reaction temperature was 130° C., to obtain Polymer 7c with a measured viscosity of 304.5 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 907.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 13.2 g and the reaction pressure was 0.3 MPa, to obtain Polymer 8c with a measured viscosity of 37.2 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 387.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b was introduced in an amount of 17.6 g and the reaction temperature was 130° C., to obtain Polymer 9c with a measured viscosity of 40.32 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 418.
Raw material 1a′ Raw material 1b‘ Polymer 1c’ To a 250 mL four-necked flask, 11.6 g of Raw material 1a′ and 0.1 g of sodium hydroxide were added, and heated to 125° C. under stirring. After adjusting the pressure of the reaction system to 0.2 MPa, 5.8 g of Raw material 1b′ was slowly introduced over about 30 min, and continued to stir for 2 h. Then the reaction was stopped to obtain a transparent liquid, that is, Polymer 1c′. The measured viscosity was 25.22 eps (25° C.) and the measured weight-average molecular weight was 289.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 11.6 g, to obtain Polymer 2c′ with a measured viscosity of 32.65 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 334.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 17.4 g, to obtain Polymer 3c′ with a measured viscosity of 39.55 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 401.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 23.2 g, to obtain Polymer 4c′ with a measured viscosity of 44.05 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 439.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 29.0 g, to obtain Polymer 5c′ with a measured viscosity of 60.07 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 515.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 34.8 g, to obtain Polymer 6c′ with a measured viscosity of 124.5 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 732.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 46.4 g, to obtain Polymer 7c′ with a measured viscosity of 312.5 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 1,011.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 23.2 g and the reaction pressure was 0.3 MPa, to obtain Polymer 8c′ with a measured viscosity of 48.37 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 441.
In accordance with Example 10, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that Raw material 1b′ was introduced in an amount of 29.0 g and the reaction temperature was 100° C., to obtain Polymer 9c′ with a measured viscosity of 58.32 cps (25° C.) and a measured weight-average molecular weight of 509.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that the reaction temperature was 50° C. It was detected that Raw material 1a was not reacted completely, and the subsequent detections were not carried out.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that the reaction temperature was 180° C., to obtain a product with 30.45 cps (25° C.) and a weight-average molecular weight of 273, but the color of the product was yellow.
In accordance with Example 1, with other conditions unchanged, the difference lied in that the pressure of the reaction system was adjusted to 0.05 MPa. It was detected that Raw material 1a was not reacted completely, and the subsequent detections were not carried out.
By preparing photocurable compositions with the formulations shown in Table 1, the photocurable application performances of the polymers represented by Formula (I) of the invention were evaluated.
(at a weight ratio of 1:1);
(homemade by the process shown in Example 1 of JP2019023256A);
The photocurable composition was placed on a PET substrate and coated with a 25 # bar to obtain a coating with a thickness of about 25 m, and exposed in a crawler exposure machine (Model RW-UV20101, mercury lamp) to receive a radiation energy of 30 mJ/cm2 per time. The minimum number of times required for each formulation to cure completely was recorded.
The photocurable composition was coated on a PET film with a thickness of 25 m, and received a radiation energy of 200 mJ/cm2 for fully curing. In accordance with the pencil hardness test evaluation standard as specified in GB/T 6739-2006, a pencil was inserted into the test instrument, and fixed with a clip to keep horizontal. The tip of the pencil was placed on the surface of the paint film, and pushed in a direction away from itself at a speed of 1 mm/s by a distance of at least 7 mm. If there was no scratch, the test was repeated in an untested area, by changing the pencil to one having a higher hardness until a scratch at least 3 mm long was occurred. The hardness of the hardest pencil that did not scratch the coating indicated the hardness of the coating.
The photocurable composition was coated on a tinplate sheet with a thickness of 25 m, and received a radiation energy of 200 mJ/cm2 for fully curing. In accordance with paint film flexibility test standard as specified in GB/T 1731-93, the outside of the tinplate sheet coated with cured coating was wound on the rod shafts of 10, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 mm in turn along the length direction, and bent for 2-3 s, to observe using a magnifying glass. The diameter of the smallest rod shaft where the coating layer was damaged indicated the flexibility of the photocured coating.
The photocurable composition was coated on a PET film with a thickness of 25 m, and received a radiation energy of 200 mJ/cm2 for fully curing. In accordance with the paint film grid test evaluation standard as specified in GB/T 9286-1998, the coating film was cut into hundred of grids, wherein the tool nose should be sharp, and touch the substrate during cutting, at an angle of 45 degree to the coating film. The paint chips were removed using a soft brush, and a 3M scotch tape was stuck on the cut hundred of grids by applying a force such that the tape was stuck firmly to the surface and the grid areas of the coating film. Within 2 minutes, one end of the 3M tape was hold at an angle of 60 degree, and smoothly torn off within 1 second, to evaluate according to the following standards.
The performance test results are summarized in Table 2.
It can be seen from Table 2 that the oxetane-based polymer of the invention can be applied in the photocurable composition, and has comparable performances to the currently widely used hydroxy-containing oxetane monomer compounds.
Thermocuring:
By preparing thermocurable compositions with the formulations shown in Table 3, the thermocurable application performances of the polymers represented by Formula (I) of the invention were evaluated.
The above composition was formulated, coated on the tinplate with a bar, and placed in an oven at 80° C. for 2 hours, to observe its curing status. The thermocuring performances were evaluated according to the following standards, and the results are shown in Table 4:
It can be seen from Table 4 that the oxetane-based polymer of the invention can be applied in the thermocurable composition, and has relatively excellent curing performances.
Given the above, the oxetane-based polymer of the invention has a simple synthesis process having a high atom utilization rate and without halogen residues, has good application performances, and has an ideal prospect for commercial application.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 202110359249.1 | Apr 2021 | CN | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2022/082545 | 3/23/2022 | WO |
