1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to manufacture of heads for data storage devices and more specifically to a write head for a hard disk drive.
2. Description of the Prior Art
As the areal density of storage media steadily increases and track widths become narrower and closer together, there is more and more chance of interference from adjacent tracks. This interference has become so common that the acronym “ATI” for Adjacent Track Interference has been coined. This interference naturally increases write and read errors and is therefore undesirable.
A typical read/write head 14 is shown in
Magnetic flux flows in lines which are not straight, and thus tend to spread out slightly as they traverse the gap 23 separating the poles P120 and P222. The amount of “spread” produced depends on the shape and configuration of the poles P120 and P222.
The N3 layer 44 is typically much wider than the N1 layer 42, and the N3 layer 44 is also typically slightly beveled to channel magnetic flux more easily. The bevel angle α 46 is shown in the figure and generally is in the range of 5-15 degrees.
The magnetic flux 48 is shown spreading out as it leaves the P2 pole 22 until it finally contacts the N3 layer 44 of the P1 pole 20. This spread establishes the ATI. It is evident that this ATI is much wider than the P2 pole 22, and thus undesirable.
The design of write heads in general is a balance between narrowing undesirably broad ATI and having poles broad enough to allow adequate magnetic flux flow so that there is good field strength to accomplish satisfactory write or overwrite of data. As track widths become narrower and narrower, this balance becomes ever more delicate.
Thus there is a need for a magnetic write head which has smaller magnetic flux spread, thus creating less ATI, while allowing good magnetic flux channeling for good write and overwrite of data.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is a magnetic disk drive head including a write head, which includes a P1 layer having a pedestal portion, a gap layer formed on the P1 layer, and a P2 layer formed on the gap layer. The P1 layer includes a shoulder formation having a neck portion and a beveled portion. Also disclosed is a disk drive having a write head with a P1 layer with this shoulder formation, and a method for fabricating a write pole for a magnetic recording head having a P1 layer with this shoulder formation.
It is an advantage of the present invention that it produces less ATI, and thus produces fewer read/write errors.
It is another advantage of the present invention that it produces greater manufacturing yields due to lower errors rates.
It is a further advantage of the present invention that it produces good magnetic flux channeling, and thus fewer write or overwrite errors in very narrow channel widths.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the following detailed description which makes reference to the several figures of the drawing.
The following drawings are not made to scale as an actual device, and are provided for illustration of the invention described herein.
A magnetic disk drive 2 is shown generally in
A read sensor 40 is sandwiched between a first shield, designated as S130 and a second shield S234, and these elements together make up the read head 28. An insulation layer 32 also separates S130 and S234 in the area behind the read sensor 40. The magnetic head 14 flies on an air cushion between the surface of the disk 4 and the air bearing surface (ABS) 24 of the slider 16.
As discussed above, magnetic flux is induced when current is passed through the coil 18. The flux then passes through the tip of the P222 pole, across the gap 23, through the recording medium (not shown) and returns through the P1 pole 20 to complete the magnetic circuit. The magnetic flux thus acts to write data to the magnetic medium.
Magnetic flux flows in lines which are not straight, and thus tend to spread out slightly as they traverse the gap 23 separating the poles P120 and P222. The amount of “spread” produced depends on the shape and configuration of the poles P120 and P222.
The novelty of the present invention may be best understood when compared to the prior art, as discussed above.
The N3 layer 44 is typically much wider than the N1 layer 42, and the N3 layer 44 is also typically slightly beveled to channel magnetic flux more easily. The bevel angle α 46 is shown in the figure and generally is in the range of 5-15 degrees.
The N1 layer 42 is also typically shaped to have a straight portion 43 and a beveled portion 45. The thickness of the N1 Straight portion 43 is generally 2-4 times the thickness of the gap layer 23.
The magnetic flux 48 is shown spreading out as it leaves the P2 pole 22 until it finally contacts the N1 layer 42 or N3 layer 44 of the P1 pole 20. This spread establishes the ATI. It is evident that this ATI is much wider than the P2 pole 22, and thus.
In contrast, the present write head 60 having a P1 pole with shoulder formation 62 of the present invention is shown completed in
As shown in
The novel write head with shoulder formation 60 of the present invention also requires a novel method of fabrication to produce, which is shown in
As
As an optional variation on this,
In
The neck portion 93 has a thickness 97, which is preferably 0.5-2.5 times the thickness 89 of the gap layer 23. The entire shoulder formation 64 which includes the neck portion 93, and the beveled portion 95, has a shoulder thickness 91 which is preferably in the range of 2-5 times the thickness 89 of the gap layer 23. This may be compared to the thickness of the straight portion 43 of the N1 layer 42 of the prior art (see
An optional seed layer 98 is shown, and also, as a second optional variation, a P2 second layer 99 as it is also possible that the P2 pole be a bi-layer structure. It is also possible that the P2 be more than two layers, although this is not shown in the figure.
While the present invention has been shown and described with regard to certain preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications in form and detail will no doubt be developed by those skilled in the art upon reviewing this disclosure. It is therefore intended that the following claims cover all such alterations and modifications that nevertheless include the true spirit and scope of the inventive features of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5898548 | Dill et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6487056 | Gibbons et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6539610 | Lo et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556377 | Chen et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6680832 | Fontana, Jr. et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6975486 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6987643 | Seagle | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7029376 | Guthrie et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7061717 | Takano | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7062839 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085099 | Sasaki et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7391591 | Hsiao et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7392578 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20010028531 | Morita et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020015266 | Han et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020159200 | Ju et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030035248 | Daby et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053251 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030112555 | Sato et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030214763 | Childress et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214765 | Ghaly et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040047085 | Liao et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040105192 | Chien et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040150912 | Kawato et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040184190 | Han et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040233577 | Takano | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050099727 | Dovek et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050190493 | Takano et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264934 | Oike et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270695 | Hsiao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080158731 | Hsiao et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060171069 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |