1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a new pacemaker which reestablishes or keeps the physiological electric synchrony of the heart and a method of application in the right ventricular septum, being possible to use, in order to facilitate the implantation and to avoid the connection and disconnection, a sheath to check a proper place and then screw the catheter in said place.
This method together with the pacemaker are responsible for the reestablishment and preservation of the physiological electric synchrony of the heart and is herein referred to as “EB (Electric Bypass)” due to the obtention of an alternative electric circuit and to the creation of the virtual electrode.
With the pacemaker of my invention and its method of application, a septal ventricular stimulation system with a high performance electrical and contractile synchrony is produced, thus significantly changing the implantation of a definitive pacemaker, making them more physiological. In the examples where my invention was applied, several patients with QRS narrowing were tested as well as those suffering disorders in the AV atrio-ventricular and intraventricular impulse conduction. The results show the QRS narrowing phenomena and the orientation of the depolarization with similar vectors compared to those of a depolarization by the His-Purkinje system.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A pacemaker is an electronic apparatus that produces electric impulses, intended to stimulate the cardiac muscle. The number of impulses produced per minute is called frequency. The mechanism is fed from electric power from batteries. These electric impulses are conducted to the heart by means of a cable (or electrode), so that the pacemaker itself (or pulse generator) is placed at a quite shallow surface underneath the skin, while the electrode is placed much more deeply inside the organism, up to the heart.
The first pacemakers, asynchronous, were only blind instruments that continuously produced 70 electric impulses per minute, carrying them up to the heart by means of an electrode. The electronic circuit consisted of a few diodes, transistors, resistors and a capacitor. One or more batteries provided the necessary power to feed the circuit and stimulate the heart. These pacemakers complied very well with their role when the patient's own rhythm was absolutely absent. However when the failure in the rhythm was just intermittent, the pacemaker slightly interfered with the normal rhythm, at the moments when it was reestablished.
Afterwards, the more intelligent pacemakers came out, Pacemakers on demand, that stopped functioning when the cardiac rhythm was reestablished. This supposed the introduction of new circuits, capable of detecting the electronic activity of the heart and new pacemakers were called “on demand” since they just started working when they were necessary.
Pacemakers on demand may be implanted in the atrium, in order to treat failures in the sinus node; or in the ventricle so as to treat the heart block.
An important advance in the development of programmable pacemakers was to make them more versatile. The first ones only worked under a frequency set in factory, with fixed pulse energy and were able to detect certain level of cardiac electric activity also fixed.
It may be interesting to be able to change the stimulation frequency at certain moments, adjusting it to the organic needs. In other cases, a decrease in the pulse energy may be advantageous to save power and extend the duration of the pacemaker, or on the contrary, increase it if the muscle became resistant. In some patients, it would be useful to get the pacemaker to have higher or lower capacity for detecting electric impulses, in order to eliminate the influence of abnormal rhythms, or external interferences. All of the above-mentioned options became possible with the introduction of the Programmable Pacemaker.
Currently, different kinds of these pacemakers are available, which allow the adjustment of their function to different states of healthy or sick organism without causing any discomfort to the patient.
Programmable pacemakers are insensitive to the needs of the organism and their functioning is to be changed from the outside, so that their adaptability is relative. There are other kinds of pacemakers which are more physiological, that is to say, more capable of meeting the organic needs at every moment, with its continues fluctuation. In cases where the formation of the cardiac stimulus in the atria is maintained, and the problem lies on the conduction block between the atria and the ventricles, a kind of pacemaker which senses atrial activity and then stimulates the ventricles can be introduced. These are the “atrial triggered” pacemakers, which constitute a practical reality, once the problems of implanting two catheters, one in the auricle and the other in the ventricle, are solved. In these pacemakers, as the variations in the atrial rhythm depend on organic needs variations, the pacemaker is led by the body needs
Currently, for cases where it is not possible to use atrial guidance, pacemakers have been developed that are capable of sensing other parameters in the body activity, changing automatically their frequency (self-programming frequency pacemakers). Some pacemakers catch vibrations of the body during movement; others detect breathing activity and accelerate frequency of the heart in combination with the frequency of breathing; others detect fine vibrations in the cardiac electric activity caused by exercise and others being at the stage of design or project respond to the exhaustion of oxygen in blood, to changes in body temperature, or even to many of these causes.
First pacemakers were big and short-lasting. They weighted one hundred grams, had a diameter of 7-8 cm, and 2-3 cm of thickness, wrapped with silicone rubber toughly applied. They were fed by mercury-zinc batteries that could last no more than 2-3 years. Electrodes broke frequently because of the phenomenon called “fatigue of materials”.
Nowadays, size has been reduced by a quarter or a fifth, weight has been reduced to less than a third, duration reaches 5-10 years according to the designs, and electrodes are made of a certain design and material that practically prevent their breaking and allow energy savings.
At present, we have smaller pacemakers, more powerful, long lasting, more versatile and more comfortable for the patient.
Traditional ventricular stimulation in the apex of the right ventricle (RV) is well known in the art, which through several years of use, it has shown an important reliance as regards permanence of the catheter in the correct place, control of the cardiac frequency and facility for its implantation.
On the other hand, stimulation in the apex of the RV can lead to non-homogenous left ventricular contraction, myofibril erradication, and disorders of myocardic perfussion. This generates an increase in the morbidity and mortality of these patients, therefore leading from several years ago to look for other places of unique and simultaneous stimulation in order to improve electric and hemodynamic parameters of permanent stimulation.
As it can be seen novelty in pacemakers was only slightly related to the place of application of electrodes. In the new pacemaker of my invention, it can be seen as an advantage, apart from those described in the previous art, when applied on patients with pacemaker indication with preserved interventricular contraction, it prevents from deleterious effects of the traditional pacemaker over the ventricular function.
Also there are some advantages for patients with disorders in intraventricular impulse conduction and allows the re-establishment of the normal intraventricular activation sequency.
Other advantage is that in patients who suffered from heart failure with blockage in its left branch, allows me to apply well-known advantages of re-synchronization through using only one catheter, so as to obtain the electric alternative circuit procedure that we herewith call EB Electric Bypass.
As already known, traditional ventricular stimulation in the apex of right ventricle (RV) has shown along the years, great trust as regards its permanence, control of the cardiac frequency and ease for its introduction. However, day by day it has been proved that regardless the fact that it keeps atrio-ventricular synchrony through stimulation of both chambers, results are far away of causing a real phyisological synchrony. Right ventricular stimulation on apex of RV generates a pattern of electric activity, asynchronic in itself and therefore contraction and asynchronic left ventricular contraction.
On the other hand, stimulation in the apex of the RV can lead to non-homogenous left ventricular contraction, myofibril erradication, and disorders of myocardic perfussion. These disorders cause an increase in the morbidity and mortality of these patients, therefore leading from several years ago to look for other places of unique and simultaneous stimulation in order to improve electric and hemodynamic parameters of constant stimulation.
In the illustrative examples attached to the present invention its significant usefulness is shown, in presence of left ventricular dysfunction with dual-chamber (AV) pacing, resynchronizing its activity with only one catheter in RV septum, without the need of special electrophysiologist training, as seen in
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a pacemaker is disclosed which reestablishes or keeps the physiological electric conduction of the heart and a method of application. The pacemaker is a pulse generator, it has a ventricular output including at least two superimposed monopolar pulsewaves of reversed polarity between each other, with programmable configuration, with respect to a neutral which can be the pacemaker's metallic box or a third electrode in the case of a tripolar catheter. The catheter can have a deflectable sheath, with an electrode on its distal tip. The invention consists of a new pacemaker, and a method of application in the right ventricular septum, being able to use in order to facilitate the implantation and to avoid the connection and the disconnection, a sheath to check a proper place and then screw the catheter in said place. This method and the pacemaker are the responsible of reestablishing or preserving the physiological electrical conduction of the heart due to the creation of an alternative electric circuit and to the creation of a virtual electrode.
This new pacemaker is intended to render a stimulation of a high septal penetration as already mentioned called herein “EB (Electric Bypass)” as previously mentioned, and which consists of a real approach to the permanent physiological pacing.
Apart from the method for application to facilitate the implantation and to avoid the connection and disconnection of the catheter, a deflectable sheath can be used with an electrode on its edge which allows a stimulation to verify the proper place and then screw the catheter in said place. This sheath is removed after finding the proper place for stimulation and is eventually disposable.
Likewise, in the present invention apart from the new pacemaker and its method of application, a new right septal stimulation is described, which allows the generation of a wave front with simultaneous ventricular depolarization and QRS narrowing either in patients with normal QRS or in those with conduction disorders.
The normal conduction throughout the His-Purkinje system produces a fast synchronic sequential depolarization of the myocardial fibers causing a more efficient ventricular contraction. It is already known that the best place for pacing to prevent the ventricular dissynchrony keeping its normal activity while applying the catheter is the His bundle.
Several methods have been developed to reach the His Bundle by septal stimulation. However there were several troubles in its implementation, requiring special treatment for finding the catheter, with variable results.
Together with the pacing system including the new pacemaker and its method of application, by septal implementation the wavefront penetration to the Hisian mainstream is obtained. The result is a narrow QRS, similar to the one in the normal conduction and with an almost normal hemodynamic efficiency.
With reference to
The present pacemaker 1 is a pulse generator, single-chambered or dual-chambered, with conventional features: it has a ventricular output including at least two superimposed monopolar pulsewaves of reversed polarity between each other, with programmable configuration, in respect to a neutral which can be the pacemaker's metallic box or a third electrode in the case of a tripolar catheter. The distal electrode 12 of this catheter 10 is fixed in the right ventricular RV septum S for the ventricular stimulation, thus producing an electrical alternative circuit or Electrical Bypass (EB) of the bundle block, being a non-conventional cardiac stimulation application place, so we are in the presence of a new use by the creation of a virtual electrode for the physiological electric synchrony of the heart. Two charts showing two different options can be seen in
In each of
In the method of application and the way to facilitate the implantation and to avoid the connection and disconnection of the catheter, a deflectable sheath with an electrode in its edge can be used, which allows stimulation, in order to check the proper place and then screw the catheter in said place. This sheath is removed after finding the proper stimulation place and is eventually disposable.
This new pacemaker and its method of application consist of:
Apart from the new pacemaker and its method of application with the deflectable sheath with an electrode on its edge, the present invention describes a new technique for the right septal stimulation which allows the generation of a wave front with simultaneous ventricular depolarization and QRS narrowing either in patients with normal QRS or in those with conduction disorders.
This is obtained by the formation of a virtual electrode which generates a stimulation field significantly higher than the one in a traditional electrode for the physiological stimulation. Said higher current field allows to compromise more distant areas than the pacemaker place even overcoming conduction disorders, —electrical bypass (EB)—. The use of said virtual electrode assures an energy saving with regards to the necessary high output and makes the placing in the septum easier avoiding difficult electrophysiological mapping procedures.
For a better comprehension of the present invention, a septal ventricular stimulation system with high performance in the electric and probably contractile synchrony, is described. This system is intended to significantly modify the definitive pacemaker implantation, making it more physiological. Patients with QRS narrowing were tested, as well as patients with AV atrio-ventricular and interventricular conduction disturbances, showing in all of them the QRS narrowing phenomena and the orientation of the depolarization with vectors similar to those in the depolarization through the His-Purkinje system.
The embodiments of my invention are shown in the application of traditional pacemakers made in 50 consecutive patients who were stimulated in right septum with standard bipolar catheters. They were used for the record of the His bundle activity and with the pacing technique of my invention, pacemakers, method of application and a special high penetration technique of system EB.
In order to use a conventional voltage a pulse generator driven by a traditional over-stimulation pacemaker was used, with programming outputs from 1 to 36 volts and two types of waves, a sequential biphasic and another superimposed biphasic wave, with pulse widths programmable from 0.1 to 2 milliseconds. The second wave uses each electrode individually with reference to an indifferent one with opposed polarities. This allows the use of a traditional output and generating a virtual electrode of great magnitude of current which is the objective of EB stimulation (Electrical Bypass), and reducing the use of high energy with the results previously tested.
In order to know the behavior of the left ventricle in normal patients and with several branch conduction disturbances, a multipolar catheter through the coronary sinus was used. The distal dipole represents the side basal portions of the left ventricle, as it was recently shown by CARTO® search.
Forty-nine patients were successively analyzed at the EP Lab during the procedures to evaluate sinus function and A-V conduction.
These patients were divided in two groups:
Group A (31 patients) was tested with pacing on edge of RV and in septum with high output (20 volt).
Group B (18 patients) was tested with the pacing stimulation of my invention, with the EB alternative electric pathway in septum.
In both groups the duration of the QRS was measured, both the basal as well as during the different types of stimulation. In order to test the activation in basal and distal portions of the left ventricle, the gap between the beginning of the QRS and the depolarization in the coronary sinus of the most distant portion of the left ventricle was measured.
Table 1 describes the results in relation to features and magnitude of the width of the QWRS obtained in each case.
References: measures are expressed in milliseconds; narrow ANG=QRS lower than 100 msec; sSEP=width of QRS in septal stimulation; sAPEX=width of QRS with stimulation from apex of RV; R-LF=conduction time from R to a record of RV from the coronary cavity; EB-RV=conduction time from septal stimulation EB to a record of RV from the coronary cavity; sRV-LV=conduction time from stimulation on apex of RV to a record of the LV from coronary cavity; EST=features of stimulation; 20 mA=traditional stimulation with output of 20 mAmperes.
As described in the table above, there are no major differences between QRS EB and the spontaneous QRS. The average, QRS EB has 14 msec more than the spontaneous QRS. This delay is caused by a delta wave at the beginning of the QRS due to the septal penetration through a muscular pathway before the arrival of the stimulus to the specialized conduction system. Then the remaining depolarization is exactly the same as the normal QRS configuration. Differences regarding septal stimulation were not observed either when it was performed with higher energy (20 volts).
In the cases where RV apex was paced, a marked difference in spike-to-LV interval versus spike-to-LV(EB)interval was observed, LV activity being recorded as previously explained from the distal dipole of a multipolar catheter located in the coronary sinus. In average, the conduction time from the apex of RV to LV is increased by 54 msec in respect to the septal stimulation time EB to LV. This significant shortage of left-ventricle to right-ventricle time is also registered because of the presence of complete left branch block in the basal ECG, wherein the QRS significantly narrows (39 msec average) after EB stimulation. It is also accompanied by significant narrowing of the QRS in both cases (61 msec average), which supposes a more effective electric re-synchronization of the left ventricle.
In three cases, stimulation was conducted after the radiofrequency AV node ablation, in order to avoid the high frequency response in cases of paroxystic atrial fibrillation. In these patients septal stimulation showed ventricular capture, from the same place wherein ablation was realized, with narrow QRS despite of the proper complete AV block obtained.
Septal EB stimulation shows a significant narrowing of the QRS similar to the normal conduction, through the His Purkinje system. It is possible to interpret this fact as an entrance of the wavefront to the His bundle, due to the special features of the EB stimulation. In some cases, the QRS similarity so suggests. However, in some circumstances, particularly when the previous QRS has a delay by the presence of the branch block, a significant narrowing is observed, similar to the one observed in the simultaneous stimulation of both ventricles (re-synchronization).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20040104782 | Dec 2004 | AR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3614955 | Mirowski | Oct 1971 | A |
3804098 | Friedman | Apr 1974 | A |
3866615 | Hewson | Feb 1975 | A |
3911928 | Lagergren | Oct 1975 | A |
3942536 | Mirowski et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3949757 | Sabel | Apr 1976 | A |
3995623 | Blake et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4026303 | Babotai | May 1977 | A |
4030508 | Thalen | Jun 1977 | A |
4057067 | Lajos | Nov 1977 | A |
4106512 | Bisping | Aug 1978 | A |
4136703 | Wittkampf | Jan 1979 | A |
4154247 | O'Neill | May 1979 | A |
4217913 | Dutcher | Aug 1980 | A |
4258725 | O'Neill | Mar 1981 | A |
4278093 | Lafortune et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4282885 | Bisping | Aug 1981 | A |
4289134 | Bernstein | Sep 1981 | A |
4289144 | Gilman | Sep 1981 | A |
4311153 | Smits | Jan 1982 | A |
4332259 | McCorkle, Jr. | Jun 1982 | A |
4365639 | Goldreyer | Dec 1982 | A |
4393883 | Smyth et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4402329 | Williams | Sep 1983 | A |
4437474 | Peers-Trevarton | Mar 1984 | A |
4458677 | McCorkle, Jr. | Jul 1984 | A |
4458695 | Peers-Trevarton | Jul 1984 | A |
4463765 | Gold | Aug 1984 | A |
4469104 | Peers-Trevarton | Sep 1984 | A |
4497326 | Curry | Feb 1985 | A |
4540236 | Peers-Trevarton | Sep 1985 | A |
4543956 | Herscovici | Oct 1985 | A |
4549548 | Wittkampf et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4559951 | Dahl et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4567901 | Harris | Feb 1986 | A |
4570642 | Kane et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4577643 | Beranek | Mar 1986 | A |
4589420 | Adams et al. | May 1986 | A |
4602645 | Barrington et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4603705 | Speicher et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4624265 | Grassi | Nov 1986 | A |
4624266 | Kane | Nov 1986 | A |
4627439 | Harris | Dec 1986 | A |
4630204 | Mortara | Dec 1986 | A |
4633880 | Osypka et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4641649 | Walinsky et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4643201 | Stokes | Feb 1987 | A |
4646755 | Kane | Mar 1987 | A |
4649937 | DeHaan et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649938 | McArthur | Mar 1987 | A |
4664113 | Frisbie et al. | May 1987 | A |
4667686 | Peers-Travarton | May 1987 | A |
H356 | Stokes et al. | Nov 1987 | H |
4721115 | Owens | Jan 1988 | A |
4751931 | Briller et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4784161 | Skalsky et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4785815 | Cohen | Nov 1988 | A |
4799486 | DuFault | Jan 1989 | A |
4799493 | DuFault | Jan 1989 | A |
4819647 | Byers et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4819661 | Heil, Jr. et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4819662 | Heil, Jr. et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4876109 | Mayer et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886074 | Bisping | Dec 1989 | A |
4892102 | Astrinsky | Jan 1990 | A |
4895152 | Callaghan et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4922607 | Doan et al. | May 1990 | A |
4922927 | Fine et al. | May 1990 | A |
4924881 | Brewer | May 1990 | A |
4953564 | Berthelsen | Sep 1990 | A |
4967766 | Bradshaw | Nov 1990 | A |
4972848 | DiDomenico et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4994078 | Jarvik | Feb 1991 | A |
5002067 | Berthelsen et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007864 | Stutz, Jr. | Apr 1991 | A |
5016646 | Gotthardt et al. | May 1991 | A |
5050001 | Kupersmith et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056516 | Spehr | Oct 1991 | A |
5063932 | Dahl et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5076285 | Hess et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083564 | Scherlag | Jan 1992 | A |
5092879 | Jarvik | Mar 1992 | A |
5129404 | Spehr et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5144960 | Mehra et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152299 | Soukup | Oct 1992 | A |
5174289 | Cohen | Dec 1992 | A |
5179962 | Dutcher et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181511 | Nickolls et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5223226 | Wittmer et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5242430 | Arenas et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5255693 | Dutcher et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5259394 | Bens | Nov 1993 | A |
5259395 | Li | Nov 1993 | A |
5267560 | Cohen | Dec 1993 | A |
5275620 | Darby et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282845 | Bush et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5299569 | Wernicke et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5300108 | Rebell et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5304219 | Chernoff et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306292 | Lindegren | Apr 1994 | A |
5313953 | Yomtov et al. | May 1994 | A |
5320642 | Scherlag | Jun 1994 | A |
5324327 | Cohen | Jun 1994 | A |
5336252 | Cohen | Aug 1994 | A |
5342414 | Mehra | Aug 1994 | A |
5344439 | Otten | Sep 1994 | A |
5358516 | Myers et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366496 | Dahl et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370665 | Hudrlik | Dec 1994 | A |
5374286 | Morris | Dec 1994 | A |
5381790 | Kanesaka | Jan 1995 | A |
5393929 | Yagihashi | Feb 1995 | A |
5405373 | Petersson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5411544 | Mar et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425755 | Doan | Jun 1995 | A |
5433735 | Zanakis et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5439391 | McEtchin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5447533 | Vachon et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5447534 | Jammet | Sep 1995 | A |
5456706 | Pless et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5456708 | Doan et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5466253 | Doan | Nov 1995 | A |
5476497 | Mower et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476499 | Hirschberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5476501 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476502 | Rubin | Dec 1995 | A |
5492119 | Abrams | Feb 1996 | A |
5500008 | Fain | Mar 1996 | A |
5514172 | Mueller | May 1996 | A |
5515848 | Corbett, III et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522874 | Gates | Jun 1996 | A |
5524338 | Martyniuk et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527344 | Arzbaecher et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5531780 | Vachon | Jul 1996 | A |
5545201 | Helland et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554178 | Dahl et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571163 | Helland | Nov 1996 | A |
5578068 | Laske et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5593405 | Osypka | Jan 1997 | A |
5593433 | Spehr et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5609158 | Chan | Mar 1997 | A |
5628778 | Kruse et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628779 | Bornzin et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634829 | Kerul | Jun 1997 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5674272 | Bush et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674274 | Morgan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683447 | Bush et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702427 | Ecker et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709753 | Olson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716390 | Li | Feb 1998 | A |
5718720 | Prutchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720099 | Parker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728140 | Salo et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733323 | Buck et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5755766 | Chastain et al. | May 1998 | A |
5769881 | Schroeppel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772693 | Brownlee | Jun 1998 | A |
5782898 | Dahl et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800464 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5800465 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807306 | Shapland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810887 | Accorti, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814077 | Sholder et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814079 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5832062 | Drake | Nov 1998 | A |
5851227 | Spehr | Dec 1998 | A |
5861013 | Peck et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5871506 | Mower | Feb 1999 | A |
5871529 | Bartig et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871531 | Struble | Feb 1999 | A |
5876399 | Chia et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5876431 | Spehr et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5916214 | Cosio et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5925045 | Reimels et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935159 | Cross, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941868 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964795 | McVenes et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5972416 | Reimels et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995871 | Knisley | Nov 1999 | A |
6006139 | Kruse et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007476 | Wascher et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6024739 | Ponzi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6059726 | Lee et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070104 | Hine et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086582 | Altman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096069 | Bischoff | Aug 2000 | A |
6123084 | Jandak et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141588 | Cox et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141594 | Flynn et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161029 | Spreigl et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165164 | Hill et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6212434 | Scheiner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219581 | Schaldach et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230061 | Hartung | May 2001 | B1 |
6236887 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254573 | Haim et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256541 | Heil et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267778 | Cohen | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6309370 | Haim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6341235 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345204 | Scheiner et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351679 | Ainslie | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358247 | Altman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363286 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6416510 | Altman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6463334 | Flynn et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468263 | Fischell et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471697 | Lesh | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484057 | Ideker et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6505082 | Scheiner et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6535766 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540725 | Ponzi | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542775 | Ding et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6544270 | Zhang | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547787 | Altman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556874 | Audoglio | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560489 | Hauck | May 2003 | B2 |
6575931 | Ponzi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585716 | Altman | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6606517 | Park et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609027 | Kroll et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623473 | Ponzi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623474 | Ponzi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643546 | Mathis et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650940 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6702744 | Mandrusov et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702777 | Haim et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6718206 | Casavant | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6766190 | Ferek-Petric et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768923 | Ding et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6801807 | Abrahamson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6804555 | Warkentin | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6810286 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6855124 | Gonzalez et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6901289 | Dahl et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6905476 | Ponzi | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907285 | Denker et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909920 | Lokhoff et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915169 | Flynn et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6931286 | Sigg et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6937897 | Min et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7027876 | Casavant et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039168 | Potts | May 2006 | B1 |
7039462 | Pastore et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062544 | Ollis | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7096051 | Alder | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7113825 | Pastore et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7130682 | Stahmann et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7187970 | Shemer et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7245973 | Liu et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257443 | Pastore et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280872 | Mosesov et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7317950 | Lee | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319900 | Kim et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7359837 | Drew | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392095 | Flynn et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395042 | Alder | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7400931 | Mandrusov et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7460914 | Mandrusov et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7509170 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512440 | Ortega et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529584 | Laske et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7792580 | Borowitz et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7817784 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8005544 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8010192 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8014861 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8050756 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8078287 | Liu et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010031986 | Hauck | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010044619 | Altman | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010492 | Donovan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016615 | Dev et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022863 | Hauck | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026228 | Schauerte | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020049478 | Ding et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058981 | Zhu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020099413 | Mower | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020120318 | Kroll et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020169484 | Mathis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183720 | Hill et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193836 | Schmidt | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198583 | Rock et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009145 | Struijker-Boudier et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032938 | Altman | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069625 | Ley et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078625 | Casavant | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093104 | Bonner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105492 | Ding et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105496 | Yu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030109914 | Westlund et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030113303 | Schwartz | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030125615 | Schwartz | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129750 | Schwartz | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163184 | Scheiner et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171723 | Ponzi | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195470 | Ponzi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040006265 | Alhussiny | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064176 | Min et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040104782 | Ruffieux | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106958 | Mathis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122484 | Hatlestad et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153127 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186546 | Mandrusov et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213770 | Seward et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040214182 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215240 | Lovett et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215249 | Corbucci | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215251 | Sharma et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040247093 | Potts et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260374 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050049516 | Ideker | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075677 | Ganion et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125041 | Min et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136385 | Mann | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137671 | Liu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152516 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050159725 | Tockman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203580 | Prentice et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050267557 | Flynn et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050277993 | Mower | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060030810 | Mandrusov et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064027 | Borowitz et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060095860 | Wada et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060104596 | Askins et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116596 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136001 | Ortega et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060224197 | Havel et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224224 | Muhlenberg et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070027488 | Kaiser et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070060961 | Echt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093872 | Chirife et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093874 | Chirife et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129764 | Burnes | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070232949 | Saksena | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070233216 | Liu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070239219 | Salo et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080262587 | Flynn et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080319496 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319499 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319500 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319501 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005830 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005832 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090005846 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054942 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090093859 | Ortega et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090093861 | Ortega et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090099619 | Lessmeier et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105778 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090259272 | Reddy et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100042176 | Snell | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100318147 | Forslund et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110264158 | Dong et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110307026 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319772 | Ingle | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319956 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120041500 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120041503 | Zhu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120053651 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101539 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005319498 | Jul 2011 | AU |
2827595 | Apr 1979 | DE |
3712082 | Oct 1988 | DE |
0042551 | Dec 1981 | EP |
0057877 | Aug 1982 | EP |
0282047 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0321764 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0452278 | Oct 1991 | EP |
0573275 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0591053 | Apr 1994 | EP |
0612538 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0620024 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0672431 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0709111 | May 1996 | EP |
1234597 | Aug 2002 | EP |
2164560 | Feb 2010 | EP |
2164562 | Mar 2010 | EP |
2465489 | Mar 1981 | FR |
2575925 | Jul 1986 | FR |
2757773 | Jul 1998 | FR |
2240721 | Aug 1991 | GB |
10052507 | Feb 1998 | JP |
WO-9220401 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-9422525 | Oct 1994 | WO |
WO-9615665 | May 1996 | WO |
WO-9740883 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-0074773 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-03035170 | May 2003 | WO |
WO-2005011475 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO-2006068880 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2008063498 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2009006321 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009006325 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009006331 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009006339 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO-2009078751 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO2009006327 | Aug 2009 | WO |
WO-2010042910 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010071849 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO-2011139691 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO-2012005985 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060142812 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |