The present invention relates generally to cardiac therapeutic devices, and specifically to cardiac pacemakers.
In certain heart diseases, either congenital or acquired, natural pacing is replaced or assisted by artificial pacing induced by a pacemaker, which is generally implanted in the patient's chest. Pacemakers known in the art provide artificial excitatory pulses to the heart tissue to control the heart rhythm. Early pacemakers were asynchronous pulse generators that operated at a fixed invariant rate. Later, demand type pacemakers were developed, in which stimulation pulses are produced only when a naturally-occurring heartbeat is not detected within some maximum type period.
Cardiac pacemakers are required to deliver a stimulus pulse of sufficient magnitude and duration to cause an action potential to propagate from the point of excitation, leading to heart muscle contraction. Thus, the primary function of a pacemaker is to regulate heart rhythm rather than the contractility of the muscle. Furthermore, it is known in the art that the use of a pacemaker generally results in decreased contractility of the cardiac muscle and, consequently, a decreased cardiac output (CO) for a given heart rate.
The hemodynamic effect of different types of pacemakers has long been researched. For example, Wessale et al., in an article entitled “Stroke Volume and Three Phase Cardiac Output Rate Relationship with Ventricular Pacing,” Pacing Clin Electophysiol 13 (May, 1990), pp. 673-680, describe a three-phase relationship between pacing rate and cardiac output. At a low pacing rate CO increases with increasing rate. There is an intermediate range of rates in which CO stays steady, and above which a further rate increase will cause a decrease in CO. This, of course, causes a major problem for the patient, since a demand for a higher pacing rate typically stems from a demand for an increase in tissue oxygen supply. Research and clinical experience show that with various types of pacemakers, some cardiac output augmentation may take place initially, but is not maintained on a long-term basis and may even deteriorate compared to the situation before beginning pacing. (See, for example, Wirtzfeld et al., “Physiological Pacing: Present Status and Future Developments,” Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 10 (January, 1987), pp. 41-47.
Talit et al., in “The Effect of External Cardiac Pacing on Stroke Volume,” Pacing Clin Electophysiol 13 (May, 1990), pp. 598-602, evaluated the hemodynamic effects of external cardiac pacing on ten subjects and found a decrease of 23% in stroke volume and 14% decrease in cardiac output when compared to the values of these parameters that were obtained prior to pacing.
It is a principle of pacing that the optimal pacing mode is that which gives optimal hemodynamics, thus making the patient the most comfortable. This principle has guided researchers to attempt to regulate the mechanical performance of the heart by synchronization of the contraction of the heart chambers using sequential A/V or multisite pacing. Attempts have also been made to provide pacemakers with improved physiological sensing capabilities, for use in giving feedback to the pacemaker.
After pacing switch 30 is opened, discharge switch 32 is closed, typically for about 20 ms, causing an anodic (positive voltage) discharge phase 42 to appear across electrodes 36. The specific duration and amplitude of this phase of the pacing waveform are not significant from the point of view of pacing, since it is intended only to remove residual charge and does not provide any stimulation to the heart.
A number of authors have suggested varying the shape and/or duration of the pacing pulse in order to obtain improved pacing effects or to reduce the pulse amplitude or charge flux needed to provide a desired level of stimulation. Among other techniques, biphasic pulses (including both cathodic and anodic portions) or bursts of pulses have been used for defibrillation and antitachycardic pacing.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,531,764 to Adams et al. describes an implantable defibrillator having programmable shock waveforms of different shapes and magnitudes in different combinations and sequences.
Fain et al., in their work “Improved Internal Defibrillation Efficacy with a Biphasic Waveform,” in the American Heart Journal 117 (February, 1989), pp. 358-64, show that a biphasic truncated exponential shock waveform significantly reduces the initial voltage and energy requirements for effective defibrillation.
Fromer et al., in an article entitled “Ultrarapid Subthreshold Stimulation for Termination of Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia,” in Journal of the American College of Cardiology 20 (October, 1992), pp. 879-83, describe the application of a train of stimuli to intracardiac electrodes in order to terminate tachycardic episodes without the need for cardioversion. The train ranged from 4 to 16 pulses, each 2 ms long. The pulse train was thus meant, under certain circumstances, to take the place of or precede more drastic defibrillative measures, and not to pace the heart.
Similarly, Hedberg, et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,622,687, describe an implantable defibrillator which applies a train of low-energy defibrillation pulses in order to defibrillate the heart with a lower total energy flux than would ordinarily be required using conventional defibrillation pulses. The train includes between 2 and 10 pulses, preferably about 10 ms apart. The width of the pulses is not specified. The pulses may be either monophasic or biphasic. In any case, the clinical and technical considerations in generating signals of the type employed by a defibrillator are entirely different from those involved in pacing the heart.
Kinsley, et al., in an article entitled “Prolongation and Shortening of Action Potentials by Electrical Shocks in Frog Ventricular Muscle,” in the American Journal of Physiology 6 (Heart Circ. Physiol. 35, 1994), pp. H2348-H2358, describe measurements of contraction length and intracellular action potential following application of shocks to heart tissue. By varying the strength of the shocks, the contraction strength of the tissue could be increased, and the action potentials lengthened or shortened. The authors propose that such techniques could be used in defibrillation, but make no suggestion with regard to pacing the heart.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,312,354, to Walters, describes a pacemaker with a circuit for pulse width modulation of the stimulus pulses applied to the heart. The purpose of the modulation is not to directly affect the pacing itself, but rather to afford a means for indicating to an external telemetry unit a control state of the pacemaker.
Thakor, et al., in an article entitled “Effect of Varying Pacing Waveform Shapes on Propagation and Hemodynamics in the Rabbit Heart,” in The American Journal of Cardiology 79 (Mar. 20, 1997), pp. 36-43, describe experiments using biphasic pacing pulses to increase the speed of electrical conduction in heart muscle fibers. Both monophasic and biphasic pulses of 2 to 8 ms total duration were applied to isolated muscle fibers using unipolar electrodes. The biphasic pulses consisted of a single cathodic pulse immediately followed by a single anodic pulse, or vice versa. The article reports that propagation of the resulting electrical potentials along the fibers was significantly faster for the biphasic stimulation. It was observed that pacing with an anodic/cathodic biphasic pulse resulted in faster electrical conduction, and led to an earlier development of pressure in the muscle fiber and a shorter duration of the pressure waveform than did monophasic pulses. The authors suggest that the biphasic pulse could be associated with the ability to augment muscular contraction.
PCT patent application PCT/IL97/00012, published as WO 97/25098, to Ben-Haim et al., which is incorporated herein by reference, describes methods for modifying the force of contraction of at least a portion of a heart chamber by applying a non-excitatory electric field to the heart at a delay after electrical activation of the portion. The non-excitatory field is such as does not induce activation potentials in cardiac muscle cells, but rather modifies the cells' response to the activation. The non-excitatory field may be applied in combination with a pacemaker or defibrillator, which applies an excitatory signal (i.e., pacing or defibrillation pulses) to the heart muscle.
It is an object of some aspects of the present invention to provide methods and devices for pacing the heart with enhanced contractility of the heart muscle.
It is another object of some aspects of the present invention to provide methods and devices for pacing the heart with modification of pulsatile blood flow dynamics.
It is yet another object of some aspects of the present invention to provide methods and devices for pacing the heart with modulation of action potentials in the myocardium.
It is a further object of some aspects of the present invention to provide methods and devices for pacing the heart with increased cardiac output and/or modification of other cardiac performance parameters such as peak-systolic and end-diastolic pressure, afterload and blood perfusion profile.
In some aspects of the present invention, the enhancement of contractility or increased cardiac output may be alternately activated and de-activated while pacing pulses are applied to the heart.
In preferred embodiments of the present invention, an improved cardiac pacemaker applies an extended pacing signal to the heart, the signal comprising a pacing pulse or a periodic waveform, preferably a train of pulses, having an overall duration substantially longer than a pulse duration required for pacing the heart. Preferably, the overall duration is at least three times the chronaxie time. Further preferably, the overall duration is greater than 8 ms, more preferably, greater than 10 ms, and most preferably, greater than 20 ms. The pulse shape and duration are controlled, however, as described hereinbelow, so as to reduce the risk of arrhythmia that could arise from the long duration of the extended waveform.
Preferably, the electrical current applied in each pulse is substantially greater than twice the threshold required for pacing, and more preferably, greater than three times the threshold, although still substantially less than a level that would be required for cardioversion or defibrillation.
In those preferred embodiments of the present invention wherein the extended pacing signal comprises a periodic waveform, the waveform preferably has a period of at least 2 ms (i.e. repetition frequency of 500 s−1), more preferably at least 10 ms, and most preferably at least 20 ms. The extended pacing waveform preferably comprises a pulse train, which is preferably superimposed on a DC offset. Each of the pulses in the train preferably has a duration of at least 1 ms. In some preferred embodiments, the period of the waveform varies over the duration of the signal, preferably increasing towards the end of the signal. Such an increase is believed to be effective in reducing the likelihood of inducing arrhythmias due to the extended overall duration of the signal.
The inventors have found that application of extended pacing signals in accordance with the principles of the present invention engenders a modulation of the action potential, leading to improvement of one or more cardiac performance parameters, particularly in connection with pulsatile blood flow from the heart. Such improvements may include enhanced contraction force of the heart muscle, increased cardiac output (i.e., increased stroke volume), decreased end-diastolic pressure, increased peak-systolic pressure, improved rate of pressure increase (dp/dt), increased afterload, improved cardiac efficacy and flow dynamics profile and improved cardiac index by comparison with pacing waveforms known in the art.
The present invention thus addresses the issue of the hemodynamic effect of the pacemaker in a novel manner. The stimulating signals it applies to the heart not only control the heart rate but also control the heart's contractility and therefore improve the hemodynamics based on a mechanism that has not been used in the art of pacing before and stands in contrast to the negative hemodynamic effects of pacemakers known in the art. Due to the major improvement in hemodynamic function consequent to the use of the present invention, it may benefit not only patients requiring pacemakers for rate control, but also patients who suffer from deteriorating functioning of the heart not necessarily related to the heart rhythm, such as patients who suffer from congestive heart failure (CHF). The extended pacing signals are preferably applied by a pacemaker, but may also be applied by a defibrillator device having a pacemaker backup.
It is believed that the enhancement of contractility in response to the extended pacing signals is due to a mechanism occurring at the individual myocyte level, probably a modification of the action potential due to an increased availability of calcium in heart cell membranes resulting from the pulses. In any case, the operation of the present invention is supported by experimental observation, on both individual muscle fibers and on complete, isolated hearts, as well as in vivo in large animal models, and is not dependent on any particular hypothesis.
It is further noted that the enhancement of cardiac function obtained by application of extended pacing signals in accordance with the principles of the present invention cannot be attributed to any mechanism disclosed in the prior art, such as those described in the above-mentioned article by Thakor et al. Thakor reported a slight improvement in dp/dt in an isolated heart muscle fiber, based on a mechanism of increased propagation speed, while applying pacing pulses and waveforms of substantially shorter duration and lower energy than in the present invention. By applying novel extended pacing signals, however, the present inventors, h, have demonstrated enhancement and control of the heart's pulsatile flow, as well as modulation of action potentials in the heart muscle, which were not observed by Thakor (or reported in the context of pacing by any other prior investigators) and would not have been possible under the experimental conditions described by Thakor.
Applying long-duration signals to the heart muscle may increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmia if some part of the signals extends beyond the absolute refractory period. Under these conditions, any rapid change in voltage applied to the heart can cause an additional, undesired excitation, which can be dangerous or even fatal to the patient, since it may lead to induction of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Therefore, in some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the extended pacing signal has a slowly decaying trailing edge or waveform envelope, rather than terminating sharply as is known in the art. In some of these preferred embodiments, the trailing edge or envelope decays generally linearly or exponentially. In other preferred embodiments of the present invention, wherein the signal comprises a periodic waveform, the period increases over the duration of the signal, thus, when the signal comprises a pulse train, a later pulse or pulses in the train are longer than an earlier pulse or pulses.
Additionally or alternatively, when extended pacing signals are applied at multiple sites in the heart, as described further hereinbelow, the signals are preferably mutually timed responsive to the respective refractory periods at the sites so as reduce or eliminate the possibility of undesired (and possibly fatal) additional excitations. In other words, at each of the sites, the signal is terminated before the end of the respective refractory period. Properly synchronized multi-site application of the signals both increases the safety of the pacemaker and aids in synchronizing the contraction of two or more of the heart chambers.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the pacemaker receives signals indicative of physiological parameters related to cardiac function, such as heart rate, cardiac output. LVP, ECG, or dp/dt of the left or right ventricle, and controls the application of the extended pacing signals responsive to the received cardiac function signals. In one such preferred embodiment, the pacemaker applies the extended pacing signals when the parameters are outside a predetermined range of desired values, for example, when the cardiac output is low. Alternatively or additionally, the pacemaker receives electrophysiological signals indicative of the propagation of action potentials in the heart. The signals are analyzed to detect the possible presence of abnormal activation in the heart. When the possibility of abnormal activation is detected, the pacemaker preferably modifies the extended pacing signals, for example, by reducing their duration and/or amplitude and/or the number of pulses in the train.
In one of these preferred embodiments, the electrophysiological signals comprise Monophasic Action Potentials (MAP), as are known in the art, which are preferably used to determine the duration of the refractory period and/or to detect abnormal local electrical activity at or adjacent to a pacing site in the heart. Principles and techniques of MAP measurement are described, for example, by M. R. Franz in “Method and Theory of Monophasic Action Potential Recording,” Prog Cardiovasc Dis 33(6) (May-June, 1991), pp. 347-368, and in “Bridging the Gap between Basic and Clinical Electrophysiology: What Can Be Learned from Monophasic Action Potential Recordings?” in Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 5(8) (August, 1994), pp. 699-710, which are incorporated herein by reference. The pacemaker preferably controls the extended pacing signal so that the pacing signal duration does not exceed that of the refractory period.
In another preferred embodiment, the electrophysiological signals are captured using close bipolar sensing, wherein local electrical activity of the heart tissue is measured using two small electrodes a short distance apart. A differential signal measured between the two electrodes reflects propagation of the action potentials in a small area, having dimensions on the order of the distance between the electrodes. The differential signal is thus used to determine the time of onset and the duration of the local action potential at the location of the electrode and to accurately observe changes in the action potential due to application of the extended pacing signals. As described above, the pacemaker preferably controls the extended pacing signal so that the pacing signal duration does not exceed that of the refractory period and/or to discontinue the extended pacing signals if abnormal local electrical activity is observed to result from the pacing.
Further alternatively or additionally, cardiac electrophysiological activity is mapped prior to application of the pacing electrodes. The map thus generated is used in determining where the pacing electrode or electrodes should be positioned and/or in programming and controlling the extended pacing waveform.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the extended pacing signal comprises a train of biphasic pulses. The inventors have observed that application of a train of two or more biphasic pulses, each pulse preferably having a duration of at least 5 ms, and more preferably at least 8-10 ms, substantially enhances the effect of increased contractility and cardiac output.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the extended pacing signals are applied using one or more intracardiac electrodes, applied to the endocardium, and operating in either a unipolar or, more preferably, a bipolar configuration. The electrodes are preferably made of highly conductive material with a large effective surface area. When multiple electrodes are used, different ones of the electrodes may have different surface areas or different shapes, for example, elongated or patch shapes.
In some of these preferred embodiments, pacing signals are applied using multiple electrodes at different, respective sites in the heart, in one or more of the heart's chambers. In such embodiments, the signals are preferably applied to the different sites in sequence, timed and programmed so as to maximize a desired enhancement of cardiac function. In one such preferred embodiment, one of the multiple electrodes, which is preferably positioned in one of the atria of the heart, applies conventional pacing pulses, while another of the electrodes, preferably in one of the ventricles, applies the extended pacing signals. Other combinations and configurations are also possible and are within the scope of the present invention; and the application of the extended pacing signals can be incorporated into substantially any mode of pacing known in the art, including (but not limited to) VOO, VVI, OVO, VVT, VVIR, VDT, AOO. AAIR, ADI, VDD, DDD and DDTv pacing. Preferably, the electrodes are positioned and the pacing signals are programmed and controlled responsive to a map of cardiac electrical activity, as described hereinabove.
In other preferred embodiments of the present invention, the extended pacing pulses are applied using epicardial, transmyocardial or transvenous electrodes or a combination of such electrodes.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the extended pacing signals are applied only when hemodynamic enhancement is desired, as described hereinabove, so as to conserve energy and extend the lifetime of a battery that powers the pacemakers. Preferably, when the extended pacing signal is not applied, the pacemaker applies conventional pacing pulses, as are known in the art, to pace the heart, or applies no pulses at all. Further preferably, both the extended pacing waveforms and the conventional pacing pulses are applied and modified responsive to signals indicative of cardiac function, as described above.
PCT patent application PCT/IL97/00236, which is assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and is incorporated herein by reference, also describes a pacemaker that gives cardiac output enhancement. This pacemaker applies both excitatory (pacing) and non-excitatory electrical stimulation pulses to the heart. By applying non-excitatory pulses of suitable strength, appropriately timed with respect to the heart's electrical activation, the contraction of selected segments of the heart muscle can be increased or decreased, thus increasing or decreasing the stroke volume of the heart.
Concepts of cardiac muscle stimulation are also described in the above-mentioned PCT patent application PCT/IL97/00012. This application describes the use of non-excitatory electric fields, applied via electrodes to selected areas of the heart muscle, to modify the muscular function and, inter alia, to strengthen a portion of the muscle and engender redistribution of cardiac muscle mass. Similarly, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, extended pacing signals are applied to one or more selected areas of the heart in such a manner as to engender muscle mass redistribution. Such redistribution can have the effect not only of locally strengthening the heart muscle, but also improving the muscular performance and efficiency of the entire heart.
Although preferred embodiments are described herein with reference to pacing of the heart, it will be appreciated that the principles of the present invention may similarly be applied to pacing of other muscles, particularly smooth muscles, such as the larynx, esophagus, uterus, intestines or bladder, or of other excitable tissue, such as hormonal glands.
There is therefore provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for heart pacing with hemodynamic improvement, including:
one or more electrodes, which convey electrical signals to respective cardiac muscle segments; and
signal generation circuitry, which applies an extended pacing signal, having an overall duration greater than three times a chronaxie time, to the one or more electrodes so as to pace the heart.
There is also provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for heart pacing with enhancement of cardiac contraction, including:
applying one or more electrodes to a subject's heart; and
conveying an extended pacing signal, having an overall duration of at three times a chronaxie time, to the one or more electrodes so as to pace the heart.
Preferably, the overall duration is at least 10 ms, and more preferably at least 20 ms, but less than approximately 100 ms.
Preferably, the cardiac muscle segments to which the one or more electrodes are applied are characterized by a refractory period, and the overall duration of the signal is such that the signal terminates during the refractory period.
In a preferred embodiment, the signal has a leading edge and a trailing edge, and wherein the trailing edge is characterized by an absolute rate of voltage change substantially smaller than that of the leading edge. Preferably, the absolute rate of the voltage change is less than a minimum rate of change necessary to generate an action potential in the cardiac muscle segments.
Preferably, the signal has an amplitude at least three times as great as a threshold for pacing the heart, but not sufficient for cardioversion and, further preferably, a duration at least three times a threshold duration for pacing the heart at the amplitude of the signal.
There is further provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for heart pacing with hemodynamic improvement, including:
one or more electrodes, which convey electrical signals to respective cardiac muscle segments; and
signal generation circuitry, which applies an extended pacing signal, including a train of a plurality of biphasic pulses, to the one or more electrodes so as to pace the heart.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for heart pacing with hemodynamic enhancement, including:
applying one or more electrodes to the heart; and
conveying an extended pacing signal, including a train of a plurality of biphasic pulses, to the one or more electrodes so as to pace the heart.
Preferably, each of the pulses in the train preferably has a pulse duration of at least 1 ms, and wherein the pulse train has a period of at least 5 ms, and more preferably of at least 20 ms. Preferably, the train of pulses includes a plurality of biphasic pulses. Further preferably, the train of pulses has a duty cycle between about 10% and 50%.
Preferably, the train of pulses includes square wave pulses or, alternatively, sinusoidal pulses.
There is moreover provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for heart pacing with hemodynamic enhancement, including:
one or more electrodes, which convey electrical signals to respective cardiac muscle segments; and
signal generation circuitry, which applies an extended pacing signal to the one or more electrodes so as to pace the heart, the signal having an amplitude at least three times as great as a threshold for pacing the heart, but not sufficient for cardioversion.
There is also provided, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for heart pacing with hemodynamic enhancement, including:
applying one or more electrodes to the heart; and
conveying an extended pacing signal to the one or more electrodes so as to pace the heart, the signal having an amplitude at least three times as great as a threshold for pacing the heart, but not sufficient for cardioversion.
Preferably, the signal has a duration at least three times a threshold duration for pacing the heart at the amplitude of the signal.
Preferably, application of the extended pacing signal modifies a characteristic of pulsatile flow of blood in the heart.
In a preferred embodiment, application of the extended pacing signal increases a stroke volume of the heart by at least 5%, and preferably by at least 10%, relative to the stroke volume when the heart is paced with pulses less than 2 ms in duration.
In another preferred embodiment, application of the extended pacing signal modifies a cardiac output of the heart by at least 5% relative to the cardiac output when the heart is paced with pulses less than 2 ms in duration at a pacing rate equal to that of the extended pacing signal.
In yet another preferred embodiment, application of the extended pacing signal increases a contractility of at least a portion of the heart by at least 10% relative to the contractility thereof when the heart is paced with pulses less than 2 ms in duration. Alternatively, application of the extended pacing signal decreases a contractility of at least a portion of the heart by at least 10% relative to the contractility thereof when the heart is paced with pulses less than 2 ms in duration.
In a preferred embodiment, application of the extended pacing signal modifies a muscular tension in the heart by at least 10% relative to the tension when the heart is paced with pulses less than 2 ms in duration.
Preferably, application of the extended pacing signal modifies the duration of an action potential in the respective cardiac muscle segments by at least 10% relative to the duration when the heart is paced with pulses less than 2 ms in duration.
Preferably, the signal generation circuitry includes a pulse generator and a DC offset generator, whose outputs are summed to provide the extended pacing signal.
In a preferred embodiment, the one or more electrodes include a plurality of electrodes, which are positioned in different chambers of the heart. Preferably, the signal includes a plurality of waveforms, which are applied respectively to the electrodes in the different chambers according to a predetermined time sequence. Further preferably, a pacing pulse having a duration less than 8 ms is applied to one or more of the electrodes positioned in a first one of the different chambers, and the extended pacing signal is applied to another one or more of the electrodes positioned in a second one of the different chambers.
In a preferred embodiment, the signal generation circuitry applies the extended pacing signal to the one or more electrodes in response to a demand for an enhancement of hemodynamic performance of the heart, wherein the enhancement of hemodynamic performance preferably includes an increase in cardiac output. Preferably, the apparatus includes a sensor which generates an output responsive to a physiological parameter indicative of the demand for the enhancement, wherein the signal generation circuitry applies the extended pacing signal responsive to the output from the sensor. Alternatively or additionally, in the absence of the demand for the enhancement, the signal generation circuitry applies pacing pulses to the electrodes of substantially lower energy than the extended pacing signal.
Preferably, the one or more electrodes include endocardial electrodes. Alternatively or additionally, the one or more electrodes include epicardial electrodes, transmyocardial electrodes or transvenous electrodes.
In a preferred embodiment, the apparatus includes a sensor, preferably an electrode, coupled to generate a signal responsive to activity of the heart, wherein the signal generation circuitry receives the signal from the sensor and modifies the extended pacing signal responsive thereto.
In a preferred embodiment, the electrode senses a Monophasic Action Potential signal.
In another preferred embodiment, the sensor includes a pair of closely-spaced bipolar electrodes, which sense a local endocardial action potential.
Preferably, the signal generation circuitry detects a possible arrhythmic stimulation of the heart and modifies the extended pacing signal so as to prevent the arrhythmic stimulation.
In a preferred embodiment, the one or more electrodes are applied such that conveying the extended pacing signal engenders a redistribution of cardiac muscle mass.
The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
Generator 50 comprises a waveform generator 56 and, preferably, a DC offset generator 54, which are synchronized by a trigger generator 52. The outputs of the waveform and DC offset generators are summed and input to an output stage 58, which preferably comprises a voltage output stage or, alternatively, a voltage-to-current converter. Trigger generator 52, waveform generator 56, DC offset generator 54 and output stage 58 comprise electrical elements that are known in the pacemaking art, but are suitably modified to provide relatively longer pulses and higher energy levels.
Signal 60 is shown in
a single extended pulse, either cathodic or anodic;
one or more biphasic pulses that begin with an anodic pulse, rather than with the cathodic pulse as shown in the figure;
a train of uniphasic pulses, either cathodic or anodic;
a train of pulses having non-square shape, such as sinusoidal pulses; or
a pulse train including more or fewer pulses than are shown in the figure.
Furthermore, pulses in the train may have a substantially uniform amplitude, or the pulse amplitudes may vary according to a predetermined envelope function.
An essential feature of signal 60 is its long overall duration T2, which must be substantially greater than the duration of pacing pulses commonly used in the art. Preferably, the period of the signal, T1, is itself also substantially longer than ordinary pacing pulses. As noted hereinabove, in order to generate action potentials in the heart, pacing pulses need have a duration of no more than 1-2 ms, whereas T1 is several times that long, and T2 is many times longer. Therefore, only a small, initial fraction of signal 60 is needed for actually pacing the heart, and the remainder of the energy in the signal is applied to increase the contractility. T2 is preferably kept less than about 100 ms in order to reduce or eliminate the likelihood that a later portion of signal 60 will give rise to an additional, arrhythmic stimulation of the heart tissue.
Initially, the muscle was paced with a conventional pacing signal, such as waveform 38 (
Pacing of the muscle was divided into several periods, labeled in
As can be seen in
Trace 74 in
By comparison, in the article by Thakor et al., mentioned above, action potentials were observed to propagate faster through the tissue, but no extension of their duration was reported. Furthermore, although Thakor observed slightly increased pressure and faster pressure onset in isolated muscle fibers, he did not measure or report an increase in cardiac output, as the present invention has been shown to engender. The range of signal durations (2-8 ms) and the total energy applied to the heart in Thakor's experiments were both roughly an order of magnitude less than corresponding values in preferred embof the present invention, as described hereinabove. The enhancement of cardiac output observed by the present inventors due to the use of extended pacing signals, and the pacing methods and pacemaker apparatus based thereon, are therefore believed to be substantively different from those reported by Thakor or by other investigators and to represent a more advantageous form of therapy.
An upper trace 80 in
A lower trace 90 in the figure shows measurements of tension made under the general conditions described above with reference to
In measurements of the dog's left ventricular pressure (LVP), it was observed that pacing with signal 96 caused the peak pressure to increase by 34-36% relative to the LVP under conventional pacing signal 92. Signal 94 caused a somewhat smaller pressure increase. The positive impact of the extended pacing signals on the heart's pulsatile flow is demonstrated by the increased amplitude of pressure waveforms 100 and 102, obtained when the extended pacing signals were used, relative to that of waveform 98 with conventional pacing. Furthermore, the mean aortic flow from the heart was observed to increase due to the extended pacing signals, up to about 12-13% more than the flow obtained under conventional pacing conditions.
Although electrodes 36 are shown only schematically in
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, when more than two electrodes are used, the signals applied respectively to the electrodes are mutually timed so as to optimize the heart's systolic contraction. For example, one or more electrodes may be placed in one of the atria of the heart, and another one or more in the corresponding ventricle, in which case the signal is preferably applied first to the atrial electrodes. Alternatively, a conventional, low-energy pacing pulse may be applied to the atrial electrodes and an extended pacing signal applied after a delay to those in the ventricle. Similarly, electrodes may be applied in both right and left ventricles, with stimulation preferably applied first in the right ventricle. In any case, the signals are applied to the electrodes in such order and timing as to optimize hemodynamic performance.
Pacemaker 170 comprises a microprocessor 176, which is coupled to timer circuits 172 and memory 174 (RAM and/or ROM) and controls the operation of generator 50. The microprocessor and ancillary timer and memory circuits are substantially similar to such circuits and devices as are known in the pacemaking art. They differ from the prior art largely in that they are programmed to administer extended pacing signals, as described hereinabove, either instead of or in addition to conventional pacing signals. A sense amplifier 178, as is similarly known in the art, receives and amplifies electrogram signals from electrodes 36. These signals are conveyed to microprocessor 176, which preferably regulates the operation of generator 50 responsive to the signals.
A key purpose of sense amplifier 178 is to inhibit the delivery of the extended pacing signal at the time of the heart chamber's repolarization, so as to prevent undesired, arrhythmic stimulation of the heart. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, one or more of electrodes 36 are used in Monophasic Action Potential (MAP) measurements of the heart's electrical activity, as are known in the art and described in the above-mentioned articles by Franz. To perform these measurements, a fixed potential is created, for example, by applying pressure at a location in the endocardium, and a unipolar action potential is measured by one or more of the electrodes relative to the fixed potential. Because the MAP measurements determine the action potential locally, the effect of “far-field” cardiac potentials is substantially reduced or eliminated. Such measurements can therefore be used to accurately monitorepolarization and sense local variations that may arise due to the extended pacing signal.
In another preferred embodiment, two of electrodes 36 are placed close together and used to capture electrophysiological signals using close bipolar sensing. A differential signal measured between the two electrodes reflects propagation of the action potentials in a small area, having dimensions on the order of the distance between the electrodes. The differential signal is thus used to determine the time of onset and the duration of the local action potential at the location of the electrode and to accurately observe changes in the action potential due to application of the extended pacing signals. As described above, microprocessor 176 preferably controls the extended pacing signal so that the pacing signal duration does not exceed that of the refractory period and discontinues the extended pacing signals if abnormal local electrical activity is observed to result from the pacing.
Thus, based on signals from amplifier 178, microprocessor 176 preferably detects a change in the local action potential indicative of a possible arrhythmic excitation of the heart due the signal, using the MAP measurement and/or other electrical parameters. When such a change is detected, the microprocessor limits the pacing signal duration accordingly, so as substantially not to exceed the length of the refractory period and avoid undesirable, arrhythmic stimulation. In addition, microprocessor 176 may be programmed so that pacemaker 170 functions as a rate-responsive pacemaker, introducing pacing pulses to electrodes 36 in response to detection of bradycardia, for example, or to other heart rate changes or arrhythmias, as is known in the art.
Preferably, a sensor 180 is coupled to heart 36 or elsewhere to the body of the patient, and provides an additional physiological input to microprocessor 176. Sensor 180 may comprise any suitable physiological sensor, or a plurality of sensors, known in the art. In particular, sensor 180 preferably comprises a stroke volume sensor or contractility sensor, such as a sensor based on intracardiac impedance measurement, as is known in the art, or alternatively or additionally, an oxygen sensor or pressure sensor. The sensor may then be used as part of a feedback loop, wherein microprocessor 176 controls the waveform generated by pulse train generator 50 in order to achieve and maintain a desired level of cardiac output.
Further preferably, microprocessor 176 is coupled by a wireless link, as is known in the art, to a telemetry system 182. This system is used in programming the microprocessor initially and in monitoring and adjusting its performance in later follow-up examinations of the patient.
As noted above, pacemaker 170 is preferably implanted in the patient's chest. It therefore preferably receives its power from a battery 184, which is suitably coupled to microprocessor 176, pulse train generator 50 and other power-consuming components. Because generator 50 applies substantially more energy to heart 22 than do pacemakers known in the art, the power drain on battery 184 is substantially higher. Therefore, battery 184 preferably comprises a rechargeable battery, for example, a lithium ion solid electrolyte type battery, as is known in the art. Periodically, battery 184 is recharged using a charger 186, which preferably charges the battery without forming a wired connection therewith, most preferably by inductive coupling of energy, as is generally known in the art.
It will be appreciated that the preferred embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and the full scope of the invention is limited only by the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
125424 | Jul 1998 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL99/00392 | 7/18/1999 | WO | 00 | 5/16/2001 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO00/04947 | 2/3/2000 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3572345 | Auphan | Mar 1971 | A |
3587567 | Schiff | Jun 1971 | A |
3651805 | Breiling | Mar 1972 | A |
3942536 | Mirowski et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3952750 | Mirowski et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4030509 | Hellman et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4106494 | McEachern | Aug 1978 | A |
4164216 | Person | Aug 1979 | A |
4184493 | Langer et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4202340 | Langer et al. | May 1980 | A |
4223678 | Langer et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4237895 | Johnson | Dec 1980 | A |
4273114 | Barkalow et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4312354 | Walters | Jan 1982 | A |
4316472 | Mirowski et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4384585 | Zipes | May 1983 | A |
4387717 | Brownlee et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4403614 | Engle et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4407288 | Langer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4440172 | Langer | Apr 1984 | A |
4506680 | Stokes | Mar 1985 | A |
4543738 | Mower | Oct 1985 | A |
4543956 | Herscovici | Oct 1985 | A |
4554922 | Prystowsky | Nov 1985 | A |
4559946 | Mower | Dec 1985 | A |
4559947 | Renger et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4566456 | Koning | Jan 1986 | A |
4572191 | Mirowski et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4628934 | Pohndorf et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4651716 | Forester | Mar 1987 | A |
4665609 | Henry et al. | May 1987 | A |
4674508 | DeCote | Jun 1987 | A |
4679572 | Baker, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4690155 | Hess | Sep 1987 | A |
4726279 | Kepler et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4726379 | Altman et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4765341 | Mower et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4821724 | Whigham et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4830006 | Haluska et al. | May 1989 | A |
4928688 | Mower | May 1990 | A |
4971058 | Pless et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4979507 | Heinz et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4998531 | Bocchi et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5003976 | Alt | Apr 1991 | A |
5018522 | Mehra | May 1991 | A |
5020544 | Dahl et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022396 | Watanabe | Jun 1991 | A |
5044375 | Bach, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5083564 | Scherlag | Jan 1992 | A |
5087243 | Avitall | Feb 1992 | A |
5097832 | Buchanan | Mar 1992 | A |
5111815 | Mower | May 1992 | A |
5129394 | Mehra | Jul 1992 | A |
5137021 | Wayne et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5154501 | Svenson et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156147 | Warren et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5156149 | Hudrlik | Oct 1992 | A |
5161527 | Nappholz | Nov 1992 | A |
5163428 | Pless | Nov 1992 | A |
5172699 | Svenson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5184620 | Cudahy et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5199428 | Obel et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5205284 | Freeman | Apr 1993 | A |
5213098 | Bennett et al. | May 1993 | A |
5236413 | Feiring | Aug 1993 | A |
5281219 | Kallok | Jan 1994 | A |
5282785 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284491 | Sutton et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5286254 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305745 | Zacouto | Apr 1994 | A |
5320642 | Scherlag | Jun 1994 | A |
5320643 | Roline et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327887 | Nowakowski | Jul 1994 | A |
5346506 | Mower et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353800 | Pohndorf | Oct 1994 | A |
5366486 | Zipes et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368040 | Carney | Nov 1994 | A |
5370665 | Hudrlik | Dec 1994 | A |
5386837 | Sterzer | Feb 1995 | A |
5387419 | Levy | Feb 1995 | A |
5391192 | Lu | Feb 1995 | A |
5391199 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1995 | A |
5398683 | Edwards | Mar 1995 | A |
5415629 | Henley | May 1995 | A |
5417717 | Salo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5419763 | Hildebrand | May 1995 | A |
5425363 | Wang | Jun 1995 | A |
5431688 | Freeman | Jul 1995 | A |
5443485 | Housworth | Aug 1995 | A |
5443489 | Ben-Haim | Aug 1995 | A |
5447520 | Spano | Sep 1995 | A |
5447525 | Powell et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5458568 | Racchini et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464020 | Lerner | Nov 1995 | A |
5468254 | Hahn | Nov 1995 | A |
5472453 | Alt | Dec 1995 | A |
5476484 | Hedberg | Dec 1995 | A |
5476485 | Weinberg et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476497 | Mower | Dec 1995 | A |
5482052 | Lerner | Jan 1996 | A |
5499971 | Shapland et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501662 | Hofman | Mar 1996 | A |
5514162 | Bornzin et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520642 | Bigagli et al. | May 1996 | A |
5531764 | Adams et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540722 | Clare | Jul 1996 | A |
5549646 | Katz et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5556421 | Prutchi | Sep 1996 | A |
5568809 | Ben-Haim | Oct 1996 | A |
5571143 | Hoegnelid et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5584803 | Stevens | Dec 1996 | A |
5584868 | Salo et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587200 | Lorenz | Dec 1996 | A |
5601609 | Duncan | Feb 1997 | A |
5601611 | Fayram et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5620468 | Mongeon et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626622 | Cooper | May 1997 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649966 | Noren et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651378 | Matheny | Jul 1997 | A |
5662687 | Hedberg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674251 | Combs et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5674259 | Gray | Oct 1997 | A |
5683429 | Mehra | Nov 1997 | A |
5683431 | Wang | Nov 1997 | A |
5687734 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697953 | Kroll et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5713935 | Prutchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720768 | Verboven-Nelissen | Feb 1998 | A |
5735876 | Kroll et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5738096 | Ben Haim | Apr 1998 | A |
5738105 | Kroll | Apr 1998 | A |
5749906 | Kieval et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755740 | Nappholz | May 1998 | A |
5782876 | Flammang | Jul 1998 | A |
5782881 | Lu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792198 | Nappholz | Aug 1998 | A |
5792208 | Gray | Aug 1998 | A |
5797967 | KenKnight | Aug 1998 | A |
5800464 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5807234 | Bui et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807306 | Shapland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814079 | Kieval | Sep 1998 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871506 | Mower | Feb 1999 | A |
5906607 | Taylor et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906633 | Mouchawar et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913876 | Taylor et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927284 | Borst et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5978703 | Kroll et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6032074 | Collins | Feb 2000 | A |
6032672 | Taylor | Mar 2000 | A |
6041252 | Walker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6071305 | Brown et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6086582 | Altman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6136019 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6141586 | Mower | Oct 2000 | A |
6151586 | Brown | Nov 2000 | A |
6178351 | Mower | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6295470 | Mower | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6311089 | Mann et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337995 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6341235 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6343232 | Mower | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6411847 | Mower | Jun 2002 | B1 |
RE38119 | Mower | May 2003 | E |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
148687 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0314078 | May 1989 | EP |
727 241 | Aug 1996 | EP |
62275471 | Nov 1987 | JP |
04117967 | Apr 1992 | JP |
4365493 | Dec 1992 | JP |
7126600 | May 1995 | JP |
WO 9200716 | Jan 1992 | WO |
WO 9508316 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9616696 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9810831 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9725101 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9725098 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9810828 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810830 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810831 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9810832 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9819719 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 0004947 | Feb 2000 | WO |