This invention relates to tamper evident closure for a tube, container or package.
Tamper evident closures of various types are well known. One type of tamper evident closure comprises a tamper evident ring. Tamper evident closures with tamper evident rings are used for bottles and other containers with closures that generally have a diameter of about 5 to 6 centimeters or less, such as bottles or tubes for tablets, especially effervescent tablets. European Patent No. P 0 202 506, for example, discloses a container with a closure comprising a tamper evident ring.
Tamper evident closures known in the art may also comprise a tamper evident tab that may be on one side of the closure and be connected to the lid and the body of a tube, container or package by a tear-off and tamper evident web. The tab must be removed before opening the closure. Tamper evident tabs are often used for plastic, large diameter (more than 5 to 6 cm) cup-like packages with a lid.
Tamper evident tabs may be used with tubes as in French Patent No. 2,707,958 and Japanese Application No. 2004/175,436. Tamper evident tabs are readily apparent to the consumer, and a consumer may easily perceive whether the tamper evident closure has been broken or manipulated. This determination is harder with the tamper evident ring. In addition, it is easier to peel off a tamper evident tab than to break apart a tamper evident ring.
Although tabs have certain advantages, they also have certain drawbacks. If a tamper evident tab has been removed it is not always clear that the tube, container or package has actually been opened. Consumers might therefore unnecessarily reject or discard a tube, container or package, simply because the tab had been removed, even though the tube, container or package had not, in fact, been opened.
Tamper evident rings do not snap off the packaging as readily as tabs. But, it is easier for consumers to miss the fact that the ring has become detached from the packaging. Thus, a tamper evident ring might not protect the consumer if the tube, container or package had been opened. Another disadvantage of tamper evident rings is that the tamper evident ring can fall down the tube, container or package when the tear-off and tamper evident webs connecting the ring to rest of the packaging are broken.
Neither tabs nor rings, acting alone, have proven to be fully adequate to warn consumers of tampering without the false positive of missing or damaged tabs or the potential false negative of an overlooked detached ring.
The principal object of the invention therefore is to provide a closure which alerts the consumer that the tube, container or package had been manipulated while allowing the consumer to avoid discarding tubes, containers or packages unnecessarily.
Another object of the invention is to provide a system for showing evidence of tampering in a package with a primary and secondary warning to reduce to possibility of false positive and false negative indications.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the description that follows, and in part will be obvious from this description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
To achieve the foregoing objects and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the invention provides a closure for a tube, container or package having a ring connected to the tube, container or package; a lid connected to the ring both by means of a tab that is connected to the lid and the ring through tear off and tamper evident webs and tear-off/tamper evident webs between the ring and the lid.
An advantage of the invention is that the interconnected systems provide complementary systems for showing package tampering. The false positive of a tab that can become dislodged accidentally is offset by the ring, and the false negative of the ring is offset by the more visible tab.
Another advantage of the invention is that the package design directs the attention of the person opening the package to the tamper evident system at the time the package is opened for use. Thus, the attention of the consumer is directed to the tamper evident status of the packaging at the time the product contained in the package is to be used rather than at some other time when the consumer might not focus attention on the tamper evident status of the product.
Reference will now be made in detail to the presently preferred embodiments of the invention.
The invention comprises a package, such as a tube (for holding a roll of tablets or the like), a container, optionally having a narrowed neck, or any enclosure for a product designed to be opened at an access point. The invention further comprises a closure at the access point having tamper evident features. “Tamper evident” as used herein means that a person may reasonably determine whether the closure has been opened at least once by ordinary sensory perception, usually visual perception. The tamper evident features are also “tear off,” which means that, in opening the closure for the first time the features break or are deformed due to the application of force to the closure that is applied during the process of opening. The break or deformation of the features should be sufficient so that it will be revealed upon ordinary visual inspection.
The invention further comprises a lid for the closure that may be opened to gain access to the interior of the package through the closure and a ring that defines the outer boundary of the access point. The ring and the lid are not limited to any particular shape or design, but they are preferably complementary shapes, so that the lid engages the ring upon closing to reseal the closure.
The tamper evident features of the invention are intended to operate in the vicinity of the access point, without limiting the size or shape of the package or the product within the package. The tamper evident features include a tab that must be removed from the closure or deformed away from the closure during the first opening process and a plurality of small webs disposed around the ring that temporarily bind the lid and optionally the tab to the ring and optionally the tab to the lid before first opening. Upon opening these webs may be broken or deformed in an irreversible manner so that one inspecting the package may determine whether the closure has already been opened.
For ease of reference, but without limiting the scope or spirit of the invention,
As shown in
Before the package is opened for the first time tamper evident ring 3 and tab 4 are connected to lid 2 by means of tear off and tamper evident webs 7a and 7b and by hinge 8. To open the tube for the first time, it is first necessary for the consumer to remove tab 4, which breaks the tear off and tamper evident webs between tab 4 and both ring 3 and lid 2. An open area, window 9 then becomes accessible where tab 4 has been removed. The consumer can put his or her thumb into window 9 to push up lid 2, which opens by pivoting on hinge 8. At this point, tear off and tamper evident webs 7b between ring 3 and lid 2 are also broken. The hinge 8 is left as a connection between lid 2 and ring 3 and helps prevent the ring from dropping down the tube. In an alternative embodiment the ring can be designed such that an inside part of the ring extends over the lip of the access point, such as the lip of the tube shown in
Preferably the tear off and tamper evident webs are located around lid 2, ring 3 and tab 4 at predetermined distances from each other, more preferably at equidistant points from one another. In an alternative embodiment, to adjust the force required for opening lid 2 for the first time, the tear off and tamper evident webs joining the ring and lid 2 are arranged such that more of the webs are nearer to tab 4 or farther away from tab 4. In another alternative embodiment, more or fewer webs may be used, resulting in less or more empty space between each web.
In one embodiment of the invention, tab 4 may be located opposite hinge 8 on the periphery of the closure. Preferably, the tab should not extend beyond the external diameter of the ring, to assure better efficiency on packing lines and to reduce accidental removal of the tab during processing and distribution of the package. The tab may have any size and shape, but, for typical packaging of tablets or other similar items, the tab preferably has a width from about 8 mm to about 40 mm, more preferably from about 15 mm to about 25 mm, and most preferably about 20 mm. The tab may also preferably have a height of about 2 mm to about 20 mm, more preferably from about 7 mm to about 13 mm and most preferably about 10 mm. These dimensions are preferred for an application in which a human finger or thumb is to be used to open the lid. A pictogram, design or a wording, such as arrow 5, may be applied to the tab, preferably to indicate to the user how to remove the tab so that the lid may be opened.
The closure can be any shape, but circular or ellipsoid shapes are preferred for tablets and the like. Preferably the closure has a height from about 10 mm to about 40 mm, more preferably from about 15 mm to about 30 mm and most preferably about 22.5 mm. Preferably the closure has a total diameter of from about 10 mm to about 50 mm, more preferably from about 20 mm to about 40 mm, and most preferably about 34.5 mm. The lid may optionally contain a desiccant in a specific cavity, or it can contain an attached canister having a desiccant or other active material.
While the closure may use any design to open and close the lid, the closure is preferably comprises a snap-on type lid. In one embodiment of the invention gripping grooves 6 or other gripping aids may be placed on the lid or other points on the package to assist in opening or closing the package.
The invention also comprises a method for opening a closure for the first time, comprising the steps of detaching tab 4 from ring 3 and lid 2 by breaking the webs joining the tab 4 to the ring 3 and the lid 2 such that window 9 and the underside of a portion of lid 2 becomes accessible and then applying a force onto the underside of lid 2, i.e., by putting a thumb into window 9, and thereby breaking the tear off webs 7b joining the lid and the ring to open the closure. In the embodiment shown in
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the closure allows for the lid to be snapped back into place to recluse the package. In this embodiment, the next time the package is opened, the consumer may use his or her thumb to open the lid in the same manner as in the first opening, without the step of removing the tab.
The purpose of the above description is to illustrate some embodiments of the present invention without implying a limitation. It will apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations may be made in the apparatus or procedure of the invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
906875 | Hammer | Dec 1908 | A |
1875431 | Fabrice | Sep 1932 | A |
3255928 | Foster | Jun 1966 | A |
3642161 | Stroud | Feb 1972 | A |
3707240 | Wilson | Dec 1972 | A |
3850326 | Ryles | Nov 1974 | A |
3860148 | Sherin | Jan 1975 | A |
3957169 | Coursaut | May 1976 | A |
4024976 | Acton | May 1977 | A |
D248373 | Allen | Jul 1978 | S |
D256672 | Beck | Sep 1980 | S |
4320843 | Dubach | Mar 1982 | A |
4354610 | Kessler et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4385708 | Curry | May 1983 | A |
4394918 | Grussen | Jul 1983 | A |
4444326 | Musel | Apr 1984 | A |
4457437 | Heath, Jr. | Jul 1984 | A |
4487324 | Ostrowsky | Dec 1984 | A |
4522308 | Sullivan | Jun 1985 | A |
4527702 | Heath, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4531650 | Friendship | Jul 1985 | A |
4533058 | Uhlig | Aug 1985 | A |
4696408 | Dubach | Sep 1987 | A |
4706828 | Zinnbauer | Nov 1987 | A |
4752013 | Miller et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4752014 | House et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4771923 | Zinnbauer | Sep 1988 | A |
4782964 | Poore et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4787525 | Joyce | Nov 1988 | A |
4798301 | Bullock et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4828128 | Tackles | May 1989 | A |
D305735 | Zinnbauer | Jan 1990 | S |
4899897 | Buttiker et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919286 | Agbay, Sr. | Apr 1990 | A |
4934556 | Kleissendorf | Jun 1990 | A |
4967920 | Dahl | Nov 1990 | A |
4984701 | Margaria | Jan 1991 | A |
4986430 | Dutt | Jan 1991 | A |
4998988 | Zinnbauer | Mar 1991 | A |
5040691 | Hayes et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5042680 | Argudo et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5129531 | Beck et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5139163 | Diaz | Aug 1992 | A |
5141138 | Odet et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5201440 | Gross | Apr 1993 | A |
5207783 | Burton | May 1993 | A |
5219087 | Christensson | Jun 1993 | A |
5307948 | Blackburn et al. | May 1994 | A |
5373954 | Julian | Dec 1994 | A |
D360134 | Snyder | Jul 1995 | S |
5476181 | Seidler | Dec 1995 | A |
D370845 | Sherman et al. | Jun 1996 | S |
5538154 | Von Holdt | Jul 1996 | A |
5605240 | Guglielmini | Feb 1997 | A |
5875907 | Lay | Mar 1999 | A |
5875913 | Letica | Mar 1999 | A |
5875942 | Ohmi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
D411744 | Brach et al. | Jun 1999 | S |
5938054 | Loader | Aug 1999 | A |
5960979 | Van Den Brink et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979681 | PatrickJean-Luc Andre et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996833 | Lencioni et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
D436867 | Spreitzer et al. | Jan 2001 | S |
6257435 | Chedister et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283318 | Lee | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6341707 | Witt et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6405885 | Elliott | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409034 | Schorner | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6520370 | Nyman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6631820 | Harrold et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644487 | Peterson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6848603 | Gaiser et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6926165 | Conti | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6976607 | Benoit-Gonin et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7044317 | Smith et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
D527633 | Stull et al. | Sep 2006 | S |
7118003 | Sellari et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7156247 | Laburu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
D563783 | Fily et al. | Mar 2008 | S |
7374053 | Herald et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7469795 | Druitt et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7604139 | Long, Jr. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7731048 | Teixeira Alvares et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735665 | Robinson | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8083089 | Vovan | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010050264 | Schorner | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020079282 | Harrold et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088813 | Nyman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104852 | Staniszewski et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030034323 | Smith et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040069806 | Benoit-Gonin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040188374 | Ochoa Laburu | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040256347 | Druitt et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050017007 | Sellari et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023285 | Keung | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050092751 | Alvares et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050230342 | Folchini et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252916 | Varadarajan | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279727 | Graswald et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060011573 | Herald et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060043052 | Lin | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060186077 | Robinson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186078 | Ziegenhorn | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186079 | Ziegenhorn | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249474 | Sawyer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2737710 | Nov 2005 | CN |
2707958 | Jul 1993 | FR |
2733964 | Nov 1996 | FR |
2000033965 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2004 175436 | Jun 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090071927 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |