The invention relates to a container or receptacle for securely receiving, sending, and protecting package/food deliveries, and in particular to a container or receptacle having an expandable bracket for removably securing the container to the door of a business or residence.
Online sales offer convenience to the consumer and efficiency for sellers, especially if the purchased product can be delivered rapidly and safely to the consumer's residence or business. This is not always the case, however, since the consumer may not always be present to receive the purchase when it is ready for delivery. Many deliveries are delayed because delivery services are hesitant to deliver to unoccupied buildings. Such delays inconvenience the purchaser and increase costs for the seller. One reason for the hesitance to deliver when no one is available to receive the package include potential for damage to the package due to weather, including spoilage of perishables due to heat. By far the most critical problem is the problem of theft. According to a recent poll, 31% of Americans report having experienced package theft. In 2016 alone, eleven million people had packages stolen from their doorstep. This is the main reason that an estimated one billion packages per year cannot be delivered on the first try because no one is available to receive the packages. One billion packages represents an enormous drag on e-commerce and the economy in general.
One obvious solution, namely allowing the customer to arrange for the package to be left with a neighbor, or having the package delivered to the customer's workplace, entails substantial inconvenience to both the party to whom the package is delivered and the intended recipient, as well as privacy and security concerns, and therefore has not come close to eliminating package theft, or prevented one billion delivery failures.
The problem of package delivery failure or theft has of course not gone unnoticed. To the contrary, online retailers are actively working to solve the problem, recently leading the leading online retailer to launch a program known as Amazon Key™, which involves granting access to vehicles and homes using satellite access, or retrofitting entrances with locking arrangements that permit delivery personnel to actually enter the building to which the package is to be delivered. However, the prospect of entry by a stranger into their vehicle or residence makes many customers uneasy, and the technology has so far not gained widespread acceptance and does not seem to present a widely applicable solution to the problem of package theft or delivery delays or failure when the occupant of the delivery address is absent.
Even though the need for secure package delivery has greatly increased with the popularity of online delivery orders, the problem of package theft actually predates the Internet and online shopping by many years, as have proposals to solve the problem. None has been successful. Packages have been vulnerable to theft and weather from the early days of mail order retailing, which began before the turn of the 20th century, as evidenced by the numerous U.S. patents that have attempted to address the problem. For example, it was proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 1,305,722, which was filed on Nov. 10, 1909, to prevent package theft by fixing a delivery box to a building so that, upon placement of a package therein, the box automatically locked and could only be accessed from inside the building. Since that early proposal, numerous attempts have been made to provide secure receptacles for package deliveries. Examples of patents and patent publications describing proposed solutions to the problem of package delivery protection include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,150,834; 5,979,750; 6,330,816; 6,375,070; 6,612,489; 6,412,688; 7,246,738; 7,815,112; 7,988,035; 8,358,199; and 9,700,168, U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2001/0045449; 2005/0193931; and 2014/0008246; International Patent Publication Nos. WO 2013/049063 and WO 2016/131043; and European Patent Publication No. EP 2,801,302.
A disadvantage of most of the previously proposed package theft prevention arrangements, including those disclosed in the above-cited patents and patent publications, is that they require permanent attachment of the delivery receptacle to fixed structures, making installation costly and difficult, and rendering the arrangements unsuitable for use by tenants and lessees of residences and businesses. In addition, since most packages do not fit in mailbox sized containers, the receptacles require a substantial amount of space for installation, and tend to detract from the appearance of the structure or building.
In order to avoid the disadvantages of a permanently attached receptacle, it has also been proposed to make the securing arrangements for the package receptacles temporary or non-permanent, enabling the receptacle to be set out for the purpose of receiving a package, and removed upon removal of the package by the intended recipient. For example, it was proposed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,155,755 and 9,596,952, as well as International Patent Publication No. WO 2015/177590 and Japanese Patent Publication No. 4-96712, to enable attachment and removal of a package-receiving receptacle by providing a U-shaped metal bracket designed to utilize the clearance provided under most doors by adapting the bracket to slide under the door when the door was opened, with removal of the bracket and receptacle prevented upon closing the door. Other under-door securing arrangements were disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,821,538 (directed to a shoe rack) and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2017/0188737 (package extension that fits under and engages inside of door only).
While solving some of the problems associated with permanent installations, these under-door receptacle-securing arrangements still have a variety of disadvantages. One disadvantage of the prior under-door bracket arrangements is that most exterior doors have weather-stripping or sweeps that interfere with installation of an under-door bracket. In addition, once the receptacle is installed under the door, it may interfere with opening and closing of the door, necessitating installation only at the time the last occupant of the building who intends to use the door is ready to leave, resulting in a great deal of inconvenience. Furthermore, the bracket itself can cause scratch or damage the door or mar its finish since it is not secured against sliding movement relative to the door as the door is closed and opened, and therefore can scrape against or mar the finish on the door. If the bracket is narrow, any attempt to pull the receptacle away from the door concentrates the pulling force on the area of contact between the bracket and door, increasing the possibility of damage to the door, particular if someone attempts to pull the receptacle away from the door. Still further, the presence of raised thresholds makes it difficult to position the bracket without some sort of flexible tether or pivot to enable the receptacle to rest on the ground despite the bracket resting on the raised threshold under the door.
As an alternative to under-door arrangements, it has also been proposed to secure receptacles to the top of a door. However, such hanging arrangements limit the size of the receptacle that can be used, and because of the difficulty of hanging a solid, heavy receptacle, have tended to involve relatively small receptacles, or bags and soft structures rather than solid boxes, and relatively thin and insecure hooks. Examples of over-door securing arrangements are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,694,668; 4,909,052; and 5,624,017; and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2016/0051073 and 2017/0127868.
Finally, another potential solution to the problems of package theft or weather or heat damage to unattended packages or contents of the packages is to simply notify the recipient of an impending package delivery, for example via the Internet as disclosed in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2017/0127868. This solution is necessarily limited as it requires the recipient to be in position to receive the package at the predicted time. Consequently, despite the numerous attempts to solve the problem of protecting delivered packages when the intended recipient is not available, the problem continues to worsen. In view of the importance of package delivery to both vendors and consumers, there is an urgent need for a more secure and yet convenient way to secure and protect delivered packages.
It is accordingly an objective of the invention to provide a package-protecting delivery receptacle that is easy to install and use.
It is a second objective of the invention to provide a package-protecting delivery receptacle that is easy to install and use, and that can be secured to a door without causing damage to the door.
It is a third objective of the invention to provide a delivery receptacle for packages that is easy to install and used, and that protects packages against theft and bad weather.
One or more of these objectives are achieved, in accordance with principles of a first preferred embodiment of the invention, by a package-protecting delivery receptacle that is attached to a front of the door by a sheet metal belt structure that slidably extends laterally on two sides of the receptacle and around two sides of the door, and in which a clamping mechanism that includes a rotatable clamping knob with a rubber or soft plastic contact surface secures the belt to a rear surface of two horizontally-opposed sides of the door.
Objectives of the invention are also achieved, in accordance with principles of a second preferred embodiment of the invention, by a package-protecting delivery receptacle that is attached to the front of the door by a sheet metal belt structure that slidably extends laterally from two sides of the receptacle and around then the two horizontally-opposed sides of the door, and in which a slidably adjustable clamping mechanism secures the belt to two sides of the door by engaging a rear surface of the door.
Because the invention is secured to the door by a belt-like sheet metal bracket rather than a rigid bracket, which can be passed through the clearance between the door and the door frame on two sides of the door, the invention provides a more secure attachment and yet easily installed attachment, with reduced risk of damage to the door or door frame. The width of the belt distributes forces across a wider area, protecting the door, while the clamping or clamping and sliding mechanisms prevent relative movement between the belt and door, preventing scraping that can damage or mar the door surface. Attachment at the sides of the door also avoids installation problems caused by door sweeps or thresholds.
In addition to the improved receptacle attachment mechanism, which enables simple installation by the customer without damage to or interference with operation to the door (or garage doors) to which the receptacle is attached, the package-protecting receptacle of the invention may include optional additional security and convenience features that allow the delivery carrier to access the receptacle using radio frequency identification (RFID), numeric codes, biometrics, or a variety of other access technologies, as well as notification of delivery to an app on the user's smartphone or personal computing device, a secure, tamper proof metal/industrial fabric case with an angled lid and secure lock, thermal compartments for food deliveries, and customization with respect to size and appearance. Respective to delivery carriers, the invention will enable prospective delivery via remote drones and robots as well as human carriers.
As shown in
As shown in
As will be described in more detail in connection with
A locking mechanism 55,55′ shown in
As shown in
Upon extension of the bracket sections 5 to a position in which a bend or crease 6 in the sections is parallel to the side of the door 2, a perpendicularly extending bent or L-shaped section 11 is extended around the side of the door or through the clearance between the door 2 and the door frame (as is necessary on the hinged side of the door). The bent section 11 may be pre-formed at the end of the bracket sections 5, or created by the user by bending the bracket sections at a vertical crease 12 or bending area. The latter option allows the bracket sections 5 to be fully retracted into the receptacle when the bracket has been returned to the unbent position.
In a first preferred clamping mechanism embodiment shown in
Securing of the clamping mechanisms 13 to the door 2 is accomplished by a clamping knob 17. Clamping knob 17 includes a rotary member 18 from which a threaded rod 18 extends, the threaded rod 18 passing through and engaging a threaded opening in the clamping mechanism arm 15 to a padded member 19 that pressed against the rear of door 2 upon turning, by the installer, of the rotary member 18. The padded member 19 may be made of a plastic material or provided with a soft pad so as to prevent damage to the door when the knob 17 is tightened to secure the corresponding bracket section 5 in position. Aside from the pad or padded member 19 and the rotary member 18, the clamping mechanism may be made of sheet metal.
An alternative to the clamping mechanisms 13 shown in
The preferred embodiments of the invention shown in
It will be appreciated that the different clamping mechanisms described above are illustrated by way of example, and that their construction may be varied without departing from the scope of the invention, as may details of the bracket sections and the receptacle itself, as noted above.
A preferred method of installing a package-protecting receptacle as illustrated herein involves extending the bracket sections 5 so that the bent sections 11 or 19 can be extended around sides of the door, attaching clamping mechanisms 13 or 21 to the bent sections 11 and 19, rotating the rotating members or pieces 18 or 26 to press the door-engaging padded members 19 or 27 against the door, optionally securing the brackets via knobs 10, and closing the lid of the receptacle, which is automatically or manually locked upon closure. The receptacle is moved after retrieval of a delivered package from the receptacle by reversing the installation steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1305722 | Kees | Jun 1919 | A |
1847969 | Marks | Mar 1932 | A |
4694668 | Ciletti et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4821538 | Gray | Apr 1989 | A |
4909052 | Hutwohl | Mar 1990 | A |
5098108 | McKinney | Mar 1992 | A |
5150834 | Bourke | Sep 1992 | A |
5624071 | Sosan | Apr 1997 | A |
5850967 | White | Dec 1998 | A |
5979750 | Kindell | Nov 1999 | A |
6155715 | Lake et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6204763 | Sone | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6330816 | O'Connor | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6375070 | Snoke | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6412688 | Tucker et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6612489 | McCormick et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6967575 | Dohrmann et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7246738 | Jonas | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7815112 | Volpe et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7988035 | Cox et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8358199 | Nesling | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8371965 | Quinn | Feb 2013 | B2 |
9596952 | Mencel | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9700168 | Evans | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9926108 | Wiley | Mar 2018 | B2 |
20010045449 | Shannon | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050193931 | Boudreau | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20140008246 | Pfeiffer | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20160051073 | Heinz et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160068306 | Heinz | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170127868 | Adewuyi | May 2017 | A1 |
20170188737 | Hippert | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2801302 | Nov 2014 | EP |
H4_96712 | Mar 1992 | JP |
WO2013049063 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO2015177590 | Nov 2015 | WO |
WO2016131043 | Aug 2016 | WO |