The invention relates to novel deformable laminate materials and to containers made therewith, for example dispensing tubes for toothpaste, cosmetics, condiments, glues, and other materials having the consistency of a paste, gel or cream.
Dispensing tubes present significant technical challenges. They need to be substantially impermeable to and not react with their contents. Toothpaste, for example, may contain volatile or reactive components such as active ingredients, water, salts, metal ions, sweeteners, and volatile flavorings. The tubes should protect the contents from light, as components may degrade in the presence of light, particularly UV light. Preferably the tubes should be rugged, able to withstand the rigors of transport, temperature variation, and use by consumers. The tubes are preferably thin enough to be readily deformable, so the paste can be easily squeezed out of the tube, yet tough enough to withstand significant pressures in filling and in use. Finally, the materials and manufacturing costs should be as low as possible, as packaging may constitute a significant fraction of the cost of goods for many products using dispensing tubes.
There is a need for dispensing tubes that provide performance equal to or better than existing tubes, but which are also environmentally friendly and inexpensive.
The invention provides, inter alia, a novel flexible, substantially gas impermeable laminate material, comprising an inner polymer layer, a substantially gas impermeable barrier layer, and an outer polymer layer, wherein the outer polymer layer comprises starch, e.g., Laminate 1 and 2, described below, which can be used to make dispensing tubes which are lighter and less susceptible to cracking or leaking than aluminum, which can be made almost entirely from renewable materials, which replaces non-renewable materials such as plastics made from petrochemical sources.
A multi-layered toothpaste tube containing renewable material is unique in that the superior function of the various layers is preserved but with the added benefit that reduced reliance on petroleum-based materials results in improved sustainability, reduced cost of goods and reduced impact on the environment through the product's life cycle.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The invention provides in a first embodiment, a novel flexible, substantially gas impermeable laminate material, comprising an inner polymer layer, a substantially gas impermeable barrier layer, and an outer polymer layer, wherein the outer polymer layer comprises starch, e.g. a starch/polyethylene blend with starch percentage at least 40%, e.g., 50-70% or about 60%.
For example, in one embodiment, the invention provides a novel flexible, substantially gas impermeable laminate material, Laminate 1, comprising the following layers (from inner layer, which in use would be in direct contact with contents, to outside layer):
The invention thus provides various embodiments of Laminate 1, e.g.,
In another embodiment, the invention provides a novel flexible, substantially gas impermeable laminate material, Laminate 2, comprising the following layers (from inner layer, which in use would be in direct contact with contents, to outside layer):
The invention thus provides various embodiments of Laminate 2, e.g., 2.
The invention further provides a dispensing tube comprising a laminate as described above, e.g., comprising a flexible, substantially gas impermeable laminate material, comprising an inner polymer layer, a substantially gas impermeable barrier layer, and an outer polymer layer, wherein the outer polymer layer comprises starch, e.g. a starch/polyethylene blend with starch percentage at least 40%, e.g., 50-70% or about 60% (Laminates of the Invention); for example a laminate selected from the foregoing Laminate 1, et. seq. or Laminate 2, et. seq. In one embodiment (Container 1), the dispensing tube comprises a tube having top end, a bottom end and a flexible wall made of a Laminate of the Invention, wherein the wall at the bottom end is crimped to form a seal, and wherein the top end has a shoulder sealed to and approximately perpendicular to the wall, wherein the shoulder is made of a material which is more rigid than the wall, the shoulder comprising or providing support for a nozzle, and the nozzle having a cap, such that the container may be sealed. The invention thus provides various embodiments of Container 1, e.g.,
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a toothpaste product, comprising toothpaste in a container according to any of the embodiments described for Container 1.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a method of recycling plastic laminate toothpaste tubes, e.g., according to any of the embodiments described for Container 1, comprising selling toothpaste to consumers, accepting the tubes back from consumers after use, and recycling the tubes into resin-based products.
The following abbreviations are used from time to time in the specification:
Al: aluminum
EAA: Ethylene—acrylic acid copolymer
EVOH: ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer
HDPE: High density polyethylene
LDPE: Low density polyethylene
LLDPE: Linear low density polyethylene
PE: Polyethylene
PP: Polypropylene
PET: poly(ethylene terephthalate)
PLA: poly(lactic acid)
TPS: Thermoplastic starch
Preferred materials include the use of modified starch as a filler for PP or PE. Starch may be used in injection molded caps, as well as in starch filled films. Other renewable based materials such as seeds, bamboo, plant fiber, etc. can be fillers as well.
In one embodiment, laminates are made as follows: Bubble blown film is made by extruding a thin circular ring of plastic that is drawn up into an inflated bubble. The thickness is programmed with a combination of die gap and rotating tenting rollers. The bubble is collapsed at the top of the tenting assembly into a role that is rotated around the bubble for thickness control and distribution within the roll. Very wide sheets can be made this way. Cast films are made as a flat sheet extruded and drawn from a straight die nip onto a chilled roller. The thickness control is better with this making process than with the bubble blowing process.
In one embodiment, the outer PE layer in the tube laminate is a complex arrangement of blown film and molten extruded PE for special printing and sealing function. The inner cast PE film is laminated with coextrusion to a tie layer of EAA and on to an aluminum foil layer. The EAA tie layer is matched on the outer side of the aluminum foil as well. The layers come together at the factory in one pass through the lamination machine.
The laminate is transferred to the tube making machine to be formed into the tube sidewalls and welded to the shoulder making the nozzle. The overall thickness is 100 to 500 microns.
In some embodiments, one or more layers of the laminate contain high proportions of starch. Starch is the least expensive biopolymer on the market, and indeed is only about a quarter the price of polyethylene. Thus, by developing high performance laminates which also have high percentages of starch, Applicants are able to reduce reliance on petroleum-derived polymers, and also reduce costs
“Modified starch” for use in this invention includes starch which has been modified to enhance its compatibility in a blend with a polymer, for example by plasticizing starch to break down its crystalline structure and optionally chemically modifying the starch to reduce its hydrophilicity. Starch/plastic blends for use in the present invention preferably utilize pre-plasticized starch. If native starch granules are simply blended with synthetic polymers as fillers, plasticizers added, and there are no other modifications done on the starch, the highest percentage of starch that could be integrated into such compounds is 15-20% due to the high crystallinity of starch and its poor compatibility with synthetic polymers. Therefore the starch is plasticized to destroy its crystallinity to certain level, which makes the starch more easily thermoprocessed. The plasticized starch is then blended with some polymers with hydrophilic functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl, carboxyl groups) that can react with hydroxyl groups on starch, or with small molecular compatibilizers. The starch content of these compounds can reach 50-80%. For example, in a blend of plasticized starch with PE, the starch content is e.g. about 60 wt % in the compound. In one embodiment, only the outer or penultimate film layer is modified with starch/PE compound to minimize the potential interference of such modification to the packaged toothpaste. The outer layers do not contact directly with the toothpaste and are separated from it by the barrier layer.
In other embodiments, the invention uses thermoplastically processable starch, TPS, in one or more layers. TPS is a 100% starch material which can be blended with different synthetic polymers. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,777, in order to produce TPS, a plasticizer is mixed with native starch and the mixture is caused to melt by the application of heat and mechanical energy. After the mixture of starch and the plasticizer is molten, the melt is mixed until it is at least almost homogeneous. The mixing process is executed without the presence of water.
The foregoing description of preferred embodiments is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
As used throughout, ranges are used as shorthand for describing each and every value that is within the range. Any value within the range can be selected as the terminus of the range. In addition, all references cited herein are hereby incorporated by referenced in their entireties. In the event of a conflict in a definition in the present disclosure and that of a cited reference, the present disclosure controls.
Unless otherwise specified, all percentages and amounts expressed herein and elsewhere in the specification should be understood to refer to percentages by weight. The amounts given are based on the active weight of the material.
Toothpaste tubes are prepared using renewable and recyclable materials, then tested for performance. Laminates are prepared having the following configurations, from inside to outside:
Modification to the top end of the tube includes using reprocessed PET in the flavor barrier insert. Expected stress cracking behavior in the insert is improved with the design change including interior ribs to provide hoop strength and more resistance to stress cracking. Caps are made with recycled PP resin as opposed to virgin resin. Alternatively the caps are made of PLA resin and sputter coated with aluminum for better barrier is needed. The HDPE shoulder is made with reprocessed HDPE that passes a safety and aesthetic screening (aging study). In combination with reprocessed PET or another polyester any migration concerns from the reprocessed HDPE are removed.
Renewable PE made from sugarcane ethanol or other renewable sources is available from Braskem or Dow Chemical. Where aluminum foil is used as the barrier layer, recycled aluminum foil is used. Options to replace aluminum foil as barrier include PLA or metalized PLA, metalized paper, EVOH coated paper, EVOH coated PLA film, or metalized polyester, e.g., PET and PEN;
Finally, nylon from renewable sources, e.g. made using sebacic acid, is tested as a barrier material.
Starch filling, mixing the resins with modified starch to reduce the amount of plastic and enhance biodegradability, is also evaluated, by starch filling the internal LDPE layers and by making the cap resin 50% filled with starch.
Tubes are made using the following laminate structure (outside to inside):
Starch filling, mixing the resins with modified starch to reduce the amount of plastic and enhance biodegradability, is also evaluated, by starch filling the internal LDPE layers.
Tubes are made using the following laminate structure (outside to inside):
Starch filling, mixing the resins with modified starch to reduce the amount of plastic and enhance biodegradability, is also evaluated, by starch filling the internal LDPE layers.
Tubes are made using the following laminate structure (outside to inside):
A laminate is made using a blend of plasticized starch with PE. The starch content is 60 wt % in the compound. Only the outer film is modified with starch/PE compound to minimize the potential interference of such modification to the packaged toothpaste. The outer film does not contact directly with the toothpaste and is separated from it by the barrier layer. The outer film laminate, which includes the starch/PE layer, is produced separately and then is laminated on the barrier layer. It has been found that when the outer most layer of LLDPE is not included, the outer film layer of the starch/PE blend breaks when extruded with the other layers to form the laminate. However, it has also been found that the inclusion of an addition outer film layer of LLDPE may provide structural support for the outer film layer of the starch/PE blend to prevent breakage during extrusion of the laminate. The modified structure in this embodiment is shown as follows, outside to inside:
In this embodiment, the total outer film thickness is 185μ, with the outer film layer 1 and 3 of 27.5μ thick, respectively, and outer film layer 2 of 130μ. The starch/PE compound has a starch percent of 60%. The outer film is 3-layer co-extruded followed by film blowing.
This laminate is compare with a conventional laminate having a PE/barrier/PE structure with the tie layer in between PE and barrier. Both inner and outer PE layers have multiple-ply layers with different total thicknesses. The barrier layer is Al foil or other barrier materials. The tie layers are co-extruded PE/EAA layers to bond PE films onto the barrier layer.
The film properties of the outer films used in the novel laminate and the conventional laminate are compared in Table 1:
Toothpaste tubes are made using the laminate having the high-starch outer film. The tube properties are tested using the internal air burst, drop, inter-layer bond strength tests (Table 2) and found to be acceptable.
In this example, the outer film has a two-ply structure and the PE in the co-extruded tie layer is eliminated. This is done due to the good compatibility between PE/starch compound and the EAA as well as to reduce more petroleum based material in the structure to increase the biobased material content. The structure from outside to inside is as follows:
The present application is a U.S. national stage application under 35 U.S.C. §371of PCT Application No. PCT/CN2012/071846, filed Mar. 2, 2012, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. provisional application 61/451,945 filed Mar. 11, 2011, the entireties of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/451,945, filed Mar. 11, 2011. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2012/071846 | 3/2/2012 | WO | 00 | 9/6/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/122898 | 9/20/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4139665 | Herrero | Feb 1979 | A |
4784863 | Lustig et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5213858 | Tanner et al. | May 1993 | A |
5491011 | Pezzoli et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5702033 | Beaver | Dec 1997 | A |
6117506 | Graboski et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6242102 | Tomka | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6692801 | Berlin et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7740149 | Luburic | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7951436 | Knoerzer et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8697245 | Khemani et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20030008089 | Mueller et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20060032866 | Labbe et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070187429 | Farahmand | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080035999 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090048368 | Bash et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090206524 | Laidler et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20110135912 | Xu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20130315416 | Nakayama | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2532842 | Aug 2006 | CA |
1071878 | May 1993 | CN |
1 004 515 | May 2000 | EP |
S63120643 | Nov 1986 | JP |
H06-126897 | May 1994 | JP |
2010-253803 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2011-016244 | Jan 2011 | JP |
WO 02064366 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2006042364 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006060154 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2009157931 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2011009165 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application PCT/CN2012/071846 mailed Jun. 14, 2012. |
Terraloy, Thermoplastic Starch (TPS) Bioplastic Compounds, Starch Blend Technology, Teknor Apex fact sheet, date unknown, but prior to the date of the subject application. |
CN Search Report dated Sep. 6, 2014 for corresponding CN Application No. 201280012883.7. |
Official Action dated Oct. 17, 2014 in corresponding RU Application No. 2013145552. RU. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130333787 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61451945 | Mar 2011 | US |