Packaging for fragile articles within container

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE37253
  • Patent Number
    RE37,253
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 12, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 3, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A unitary structure for packaging a shock sensitive article within a container is provided. The structure has a side flange adapted to contact a side end portion of the article and a number of sidewall structures disposed about the periphery of the flange which extend over the side end portion of the article to contactingly support the article. Each of the sidewalls cushions the article against shocks by having an outboard wall which operably and supportingly contacts the container and a bridge section integral with the inboard wall and the outboard wall to cushioningly space the outboard wall from the inboard wall. The structure also includes a crush depression integral to the flange, inward of the sidewall and generally extending away from the article to supportingly contact a lateral sidewall of the container thereby forming a cushion distance. The crush button is configured to absorb shock loading of the article directed generally toward the sidewall.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention relates to packaging for fragile structures such as printed circuit boards, disk drives or the like. More particularly, the invention relates to a flexible, thermally formed type of plastic packaging, of unitary construction, which is adapted to hold such fragile articles and to dissipate forces exerted upon shipping cartons containing such articles in such a manner that the articles are not damaged if the carton is dropped or mishandled.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Currently, the shipment of fragile articles, regardless of size and weight, requires special packaging to avoid damage to the articles. For this purpose, materials such as crumpled paper, nuggets of expanded foam, and/or preformed expanded polystyrene foam is used to package fragile articles, including but not limited to electronic articles such as computer CPUs, computer disk drives, VCR's and the like. The preformed polystyrene foam material is often provided in the form of “corners” or other support pieces which envelope at least portions of the packaged fragile article.




Aside from being bulky, upon an initial impact, the polystyrene foam loses virtually all of its shock absorbing qualities. Thus, fragile articles packaged with rigid pieces of expanded polystyrene foam as the protective media are susceptible to damage from repeated shocks to the box or container. A related disadvantage of such foam packaging is that a relatively thick piece of foam must be employed to protect a packaged article from impact, even though only a portion of the foam will be compressed upon impact. Also, shippers are required to select shipping containers, such as corrugated boxes, which are substantially larger than the article being packaged, merely to accommodate sufficient thicknesses of polystyrene foam which can absorb only one impact.




Another disadvantage of conventional polystyrene foam is that its bulkiness requires packagers to allot significant warehouse storage space to the foam packaging elements prior to use. Larger containers require additional warehouse space, both before and after assembly, and also take up more space per article shipped in rail cars or trailers.




Yet another disadvantage of conventional packaging for fragile articles is that because of its bulkiness, it is not generally economically feasible to ship the expanded polystyrene foam to a recycling location. Furthermore, even when the expanded polystyrene foam is recycled into product, the cost of recycling is relatively large and, generally, no more than about 25 percent recycled content can be utilized, with the remainder being virgin material. Indeed, considering the great quantity of expanded polystyrene foam which is currently in use to provide fragility packaging and the general lack of adequate recycling of this material, the adverse environmental impact is of staggering proportions. The present invention is directed to overcoming one or more of the above-identified problems.




Commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,226,543 discloses a package for fragile articles which addresses the above-listed problems, and provides a solution in the form of a unitary package having a platform portion held a specified distance above the substrate by a peripheral wall formation which also borders the platform portion. Shock limiting formations are formed in the sidewall structure for restricting the movement of the platform portion toward the lower edge of the peripheral wall upon shock loading of the platform.




It has been found that for some applications, the amount of thermoformable material required for manufacturing the package is excessive, and results in an uneconomical solution to the above-identified packaging problem.




Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved unitary shock-resistant package for fragile articles which deforms to absorb shock loading. A related object is to provide such a package which recovers from such deformation after each shock loading to absorb additional shock loadings.




An additional object of the present invention is to provide an improved shock resistant package which reduces the space required for storing large numbers of these packages prior to their use.




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide an improved package which employs recyclable material while achieving the above-listed objects.




A still further object of the present invention is to provide a unitary shock-resistant package which economically employs thermoformable material while achieving the above-listed objects.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, unitary structure for packaging a shock sensitive article within a container is provided. The structure has a side flange adapted to contact a side end portion of the article. Integrally connected to a peripheral portion of the flange is a peripheral sidewall structure with the sidewall structure having an inboard wall extending over the side end portion of the article to contactingly support the article. The sidewall cushions the article against shocks by having an outboard wall which operably and supportingly contacts the container and a bridge section integral with the inboard wall and the outboard wall to cushioningly space the outboard wall from the inboard wall. The bridge section resiliently restricts the movement of the inboard wall toward the outboard wall to dissipate the shock loading. The structure also includes at least one crush depression integral to the flange and generally extending away from the article to supportingly contact a sidewall of the container thereby forming a cushion distance. The crush depression is configured to absorb shock loading of the article toward the sidewall of the container.




Preferably, two of the structures are disposed within the container to contactingly support opposite side portions of the article and suspend the article from the longitudinal sidewalls of the container. Also each of the structures has a plurality of sidewall structures integrally connected to the peripheral edges of the flange and spaced from each other so that each of the sidewalls may independently absorb shock loading of the article. The number and arrangement of the sidewalls is typically predicated by the configuration of the article. Each of the sidewalls may be uniquely configured to adjust the resiliency of the sidewall to improve the shock loading characteristics of the sidewall.




An alternate embodiment of an unitary structure for packaging shock sensitive article is also provided. In the alternate embodiment, at least one foldable flap is attached to a distal end portion of one of the peripheral sidewall structures. The flap includes a planar portion and a shock absorbing protrusion extending outward from the planar portion. When the flap is placed in the folded position, the flap extends along the underside of the sidewall structure with the shock absorbing protrusion and the crush depressions contactingly engaging the sidewall of the structure to facilitate the shock cushioning characteristics of the structure.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

illustrates, in a top perspective view, an article located in an enclosure in a form of packaging constructed in accordance with the embodiment of the invention, and also having a package of the invention positioned along an opposite side of the article;





FIG. 2

illustrates, in a perspective view of the present packaging structure taken similar to the view of

FIG. 1

with a portion shown cut away;





FIG. 3

is a sectional view taken generally along the line


3





3


of FIG.


2


and in the direction indicated generally; and





FIG. 4

is a perspective view similar to the view of

FIG. 1

, of an alternate embodiment of a form of packaging constructed in accordance with the invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The preferred embodiment of the present invention provides an a unitary packing structure


10


is as shown in FIG.


1


. As illustrated, the unitary packing structure


10


is adapted to support and hold a lateral end portion


12


a of a shock sensitive article


12


such as a laptop computer or the like. The packaging structure


10


and a second packaging structure


14


for holding an opposite lateral end portion of


12


b the article


12


, will normally be positioned within a container


16


such as a box or corrugated carton. The container


16


is formed with lateral sidewalls


18


and


20


. Extending between the sidewalls


18


and


20


are a top wall


22


, bottom wall


24


and longitudinal sidewalls


26


and


28


. The packaging structures


10


,


14


are preferably positioned to contact the lateral sidewalls


18


,


20


, and the walls


18


-


28


are shown in a relatively tight fitting arrangement about the packaging structures


10


,


14


and article


12


. Furthermore, it is contemplated that with articles


12


having end portions


12


a,


12


b of similar configuration and dimensions, the packaging structure


14


will be similarly constructed to packaging structure


10


but oriented in the opposite direction, as shown in FIG.


1


.




The structure


10


is in the general form of a vertically oriented tray having a vertically extending central flange


30


which is adapted to contact and support the article


12


against lateral movement. The flange


30


has a peripheral edge portion


34


which is attached to at least one sidewall structure


36


forming part of the packing structure


10


. The sidewall structure


36


forms at least a portion of an enclosure


35


which, when viewed from the direction in which the article


16


extends, is generally configured in the shape of the end portion


12


a of the article. Such shapes may take the form of a polygon or of a an arcuate structure such as a circle or ellipse.




When the end portion


12


a of the article


12


is a rectangular configuration, an upper sidewall


40


may be formed similar to a lower sidewall


38


but in a reverse orientation to the lower sidewall and integral with the peripheral edge


34


at the other side of the flange


30


from the lower sidewall. Also forming portions of the enclosure


35


is a forward sidewall


44


along and integral with the forward side of the peripheral edge


34


of the flange


30


and a rear sidewall


46


positioned on the other side of the flange from the forward sidewall. The enclosure


35


formed by the sidewalls extends about the end portion


12


a of the article


12


to hold the article in a suspended relationship relative to the container


12





16


.




The forward and rearward sidewalls


44


,


46


are configured differently from the lower and upper sidewalls


36





38


,


40


. As is described below, the difference in configuration is important in the dissipation of the shocks applied to the package. Also the packaging structure conforms to the shape of the end portion


12


a of the article


12


to reduce the size of the packaging structure. However, components and features which are shared by the sidewalls


38


,


40


,


44


,


46


have been designated with identical references reference numerals.




Referring also to

FIG. 2

, the sidewall structures


38


-


46


have an inner wall


48


with a distal end portion


50


which is integral with the peripheral edge portion


34


of the flange


30


. The inner wall


48


extends inward inwardly from the flange


30


and about the end portion


12


a of the article


12


. The sidewall structures


38


-


46


, have outer walls


54


which are spaced from the inner walls


48


to form a hollow cushion spacing


55


. A proximal end


56


of the outer wall


54


is joined to a proximal end


58


of the inner wall


48


by a transverse bridge section


60


. Referring back to

FIG. 1

, a distal end portion


61


of the outer wall


54


supportingly contacts the top wall


22


, bottom wall


24


and front and back sidewalls


26


,


28


of the container


12


. As best shown in

FIG. 3

, preferably the distal end portion


61


is vertically aligned with the flange


30


. The inner wall


48


and outer wall


54


are formed with a slight draft as the walls extend inward, so that a number of packaging structures


10


may be nestingly stacked during storage.




To allow shocks to be dissipated through the structure


10


, the structure is formed of a flexible, resilient, preferably polymeric material. The shocks are primarily dissipated by the flexibility and resiliency of the bridge section


60


which forms a biasing and dampening arrangement


62


to maintain the cushion separation of the outer wall


54


from the inner wall


48


during shock loading. Should shock loading of the article


12


cause a force to be applied by the article on the inner wall


48


thereby deforming the inner wall and moving the inner wall toward the outer wall


54


, the flexing and resiliency of the bridge section


60


causes the bridge section to apply an opposing biasing force on the inner wall to dissipate the shock loading force.




In addition, after flexing, the resiliency of the material causes the inner wall


48


and outer wall


54


to return or recover to their original shape and position. An advantage of this flexibility and resiliency is that the present packaging structure


10


may absorb repeated shock impacts without deteriorating. Preferably the bridge section


60


is formed with an arcuate, generally semicircular cross sectional cross-


sectional


configuration so that the flexing of the bridge is spread over the length of the bridge. The bridge section


60


may also be formed with planar portions.




Any of a number of polymeric materials can be utilized to form the unitary packing structure


10


. Generally such materials will be characterized by the physical properties of durability, elasticity, or “memory”, high and low stability, and thermoformability. Particularly useful for forming the unitary packing structure


10


is high density polyethylene (HDPE), although other polymeric materials may be equally suitable, depending upon the application. High density polyethylene generally has a stiffness of about 150,000 PSI. This provides sufficient flexibility for the purposes of the present invention and sufficient resiliency so that the packaging structure


10


returns or recovers to its original loaded or less stress state following absorption of a shock. If desired, the HDPE used in making the packaging structure


10


may be recycled, post-consumer material.




It will be noted that the end portion


12


a of the shock sensitive article


12


is in a relatively tight fit against the inner walls


48


of the lower sidewall


38


, upper sidewall


40


, forward sidewall


44


and rearward sidewall


46


. Indeed, for better shock protection, it is preferred that the inner walls


48


be adapted and integral with the peripheral edge portion


34


of the flange


30


to pressingly engage and hold the article


12


when the article is positioned within the sidewalls.




It will also be noted that with the lower sidewall


38


, upper sidewall


40


, forward sidewall


44


and rearward sidewall


46


forming the enclosure


35


which surrounds the end portion


12


a, shocks which are applied to the article


12


in a direction generally parallel to the flange


30


, such as by dropping the container


16


, will be primarily absorbed and dissipated by the flexure and resiliency of the bridge section


60


and inner and outer walls


48


,


54


of one or more of the sidewalls.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the lateral edge


64


of the inner wall


48


, lateral edge


66


of the bridge section


60


and lateral edge


68


of the outer wall


54


are integral with and connected to end faces


70


.




Referring back to

FIG. 2

, it has also been found that the greater the longitudinal length of a wall such as the outer wall


54


or inner wall


48


, the greater the flexibility and less resiliency of a portion of the wall the farther that portion is away from the lateral edges


64


,


68


of the wall. For example, the midpoint of the inner wall


48


or outer wall


54


between the lateral edges


66


,


68


typically is the most flexible and has the least resiliency. In certain instances the portion may have too much flexibility to absorb shocks. Thus, in the preferred embodiment, intermediate resilient strength corners


80


are formed in the lower sidewall and upper sidewall


40


by forming a notch


82


in a middle portion


84


of the sidewalls. The strength corners


80


are defined by the connection between intermediate faces


86


, which are integrally connected to and extend between the inner wall


48


, outer wall


54


and bridge section


60


, and the bridge section


60


of the notch


82


.




The packaging structure


10


is preferable preferably thermoformed from a sheet of polymeric material which is transformed into the packing structure. The sheet would generally be from 10 to about 90 gauge (MILS) in thickness. In addition to thermoforming, it is contemplating that the packaging structure


10


may also be produced by injection molding. Regardless of the method of manufacturing, the particular thickness of the polymeric material making up the sidewalls


38


,


40


,


44


, and


46


is a function of the specific properties of the polymeric material itself and the weight and shape of the shock sensitive article.




As is well known, in the typical thermoforming process the thickness of the various components of the article is dependent on the initial thickness of the sheet of polymeric material and also the surface area of the component which is formed from that sheet. For example, in the packaging structure


10


, the farther inward a sidewall, such as the upper sidewall


40


, extends from the flange


30


the more surface area of the sidewall. The more surface area, the thinner the sidewall becomes. As the walls become thinner, the flexibility increases and the resiliency tends to decrease. Therefore, in the preferred embodiment, the lower sidewall


38


, upper sidewall


40


, forward sidewall


44


and rearward sidewall


46


are uniquely configured to vary the thickness of the material along the length of the sidewall thereby enhancing the shock absorbing characteristics of the packaging structure


10


. For example, as noted above, a middle portion


84


of the upper and lower sidewalls


38


,


40


tends to have greater flexibility and less resiliency than end portions


88


of those sidewalls. By forming the notch


82


, the middle portion


84


extends inward from the flange


30


for less distance than the end portions


88


. Thus, the inner wall


48


and outer wall


54


of the middle portion


84


is typically thicker than the inner wall


48


and outer wall


54


of the outer portions


88


which decreases the elasticity and increases the resiliency and shock absorbing characteristics of the middle portion


84


.




When packaging a shock sensitive article


12


having a plank like rectangular configuration, the forward sidewall


44


and rear sidewall


46


have a much shorter longitudinal length than the upper sidewall


40


and lower sidewall


36





38


. The short longitudinal length places the two end faces in close proximity to each other potentially causing the inner wall


48


to be too rigid thereby lessening the shock absorbing characteristics of those sidewalls. To increase the flexibility of the inner wall


48


, a middle portion


94


of the forward and rear sidewalls


44


,


46


is extended inward a greater distance than the outer portions


96


and forms a middle shoulder


98


. The increase in height of the middle portion


94


decreases the wall thickness of the middle portion thereby decreasing the resiliency and increasing the flexibility of the inner wall


48


, outer wall


54


and bridge section


60


to enhance the shock absorbing characteristics.




The sides of the shoulder


98


are formed by intermediate faces


100


which are integrally connected to and extend between the inner wall


48


, outer wall


54


and bridge section


60


. Corners


101


are formed at the connection of the faces


100


and bridge section


60


of the sidewalls


44


,


46


. The corners


101


strengthens the forward and rear sidewalls


44


,


46


.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the packaging structure


10


can be formed so that the lower sidewall


36





38


, upper sidewall


40


, forward sidewall


44


and rearward sidewall


46


may independently absorb shocks applied to the shock sensitive article


12


by being separated from each other by lands


102


. The intersection of the lands


102


and end faces


70


also form resilient strength corners


103


to resiliently maintain the separation of the inner wall


48


from the outer wall


54


during shock loading of the article.




The lands may be aligned with the flange


30


preferably by being co-planar with the flange. It is also contemplated that the sidewalls, for example the lower sidewall


36





38


, may be composed of one or more segments of sidewalls, separated by lands


102


.




Referring to

FIGS. 2 and 3

, the packaging structure


10


is also formed with at least one crush depression or crush button


110


for absorbing shocks which are applied to the article


12


in a direction generally normal to the plane of the flange


30


or along the longitudinal length of the article


12


. The crush button


110


is formed with lower end face


112


which is configured to contactingly engage the left lateral sidewall


18


(

FIG. 1

) and right lateral sidewall


20


. The distance between the flange


30


and the sidewall


18


established by the button


110


defines a cushion distance “d”.




The end face


112


is integrally connected to the flange


30


by a sidewall


114


. For stability, the crush button


110


is located within the sidewalls


36





38


,


40


,


44


,


46


. The crush button


110


primarily dissipates shocks applied to the shock absorbing article


12


by flexing and deformation of the sidewall


114


. The elasticity of the material forming the sidewall


114


allows the packaging structure


10


to accommodate repeated shocks.




The packaging structure


10


is preferably formed with three crush button buttons


110


, each having a generally rectangular cross sectional configuration such that four rounded corners


120


extend from the flange


30


to the end face


112


for each button. The corners


120


form strength pillars


121


for increases strength. In addition, channels


122


may extend between adjacent buttons


110


. At the juncture


124


of the channels


122


and crush buttons, additional strength corners


126


are formed to increase the strength of the buttons


110


.




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, if an end portion


12


a of an article is positioned within a unitary packing structure


10


, and the opposing end portion


12


b is placed within another such structure


14


, and the combination of the packaging structure and shock sensitive article is placed in the container


14





16


, a typical shipping arrangement will result. To facilitate the insertion of the packaging structure into the container


14





16


, corner notches or radii


128


may be formed on all four corners.




If this arrangement is shocked, as by dropping it, there will be a resulting force downwardly upon the lower sidewall


36





38


. In response to the force, the inner wall


48


will be forcefully flexed and forced toward the outer wall


54


, which contacts one of the longitudinal walls


22


-


28


, causing a flexing of the bridge portion


60


. The force applied to the sidewall


36





38


is then dampened and dissipated through the flexure and resiliency or the inner wall


48


and the exertion of the opposing force applied by the bridge section


60


. After the force has been dissipated, the elasticity of the sidewall


36





38


and resiliency of the bridge section


60


causes the sidewall to return to its original configuration.




Should the shock loading force by applied generally toward a lateral sidewall


18


,


20


, for example by dropping the container on an end, the sidewalls


114


of the crush buttons


110


may bow to absorb and dissipate the shock. After the shock has been dissipated the sidewalls


114


recover due to the resiliency.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, an alternate embodiment of the unitary packing structure is generally indicated at


200


. The packing structure


200


is similar to the packing structure


10


(FIG.


1


), but also includes at least one and preferably a plurality of foldable, shock absorbing flaps


202


. The flap includes a planar leaf


204


integrally attached to at least one shock absorbing protrusion


205


such as crush button


206


.




The flap


202


is preferably integrally and hingably attached to the distal end portion


61


so that it may fold from a first or straightened position, wherein the leaf


204


is generally co-planar with the flange


30


, to a second or folded position


202


a. In the folded position


202


a, the leaf extends below the flange


30


and the crush buttons


206


are positioned below one of the sidewall structures


36


. Also, in the folded position


202


a, crush buttons


206


and the crush buttons


110


contactingly engage the lateral sidewall


20


of the container


16


to establish the cushion distance d between the flange


30


and sidewall


20


.




The crush buttons


206


may be similarly configured to the crush buttons


110


and include an end face


208


and sidewalls


210


. For stability, the flap


202


is preferably formed with a plurality of crush buttons


206


which are eveningly distributed along the surface of the leaf


204


. In addition, the leaf


204


is dimensioned and the crush buttons


206


are positioned so that when the flap


202


is folded, the crush buttons


206


are disposed between the crush buttons


110


and distal end


61


.




Referring also to

FIG. 2

, the flap


202


may be attached to the distal end portion


61


adjacent any of the sidewalls


36


,


40


,


44


,


46


. Also, the packing structure


200


may be formed with one flap


202


or a plurality of flaps depending on desired shock absorbing characteristics. For example, the packaging structure


200


may include two flaps attached to distal portion


61


of opposite sidewalls


36


. The flaps


202


provide additional cushioning against shock loading forces which are applied to container


16


at a location in close proximity to an edge


214


between two sidewalls such as sidewall


20


and longitudinal sidewall


28


. The shock absorbing protrusion


205


may also be formed in other configurations such as a shape which mimics the configuration of the sidewall structures


36


.




A specific embodiment of the novel packaging for fragile articles within a container according to the present invention has been described for the purposes of illustrating the manner in which the invention may be made and used. It should be understood that implementation of other variations, and modifications of the invention in its various aspects will be apparent to those skilled the art, and that the invention is not limited by the specific embodiment described. It is therefore contemplated to cover by the present invention any and all modifications, variations, or equivalents that fall within the true spirit and scope of the basic underlying principles disclosed and claimed herein.



Claims
  • 1. A unitary structure for packaging a shock sensitive article within a container comprising:a side flange having a peripheral portion; a first peripheral sidewall structure of flexible material, said sidewall structure including an inboard wall integral with said peripheral portion and extending over an end a portion of the article, an outboard wall having a distal end and a proximate end, and a bridge section integral with said inboard wall and said proximate end of said outboard wall and spacing said outboard wall from said inboard wall to form a cushion space, said bridge section forming biasing means to resiliently restrict the movement of said inboard wall toward said outboard wall upon the shock loading of said article; and means for absorbing shock loading of the article generally in a first direction away from the article, said shock absorbing means including a at least one crush depression integral with said flange, and generally extending from said flange in the first direction to supportingly contact a side wall of the container and form a cushion distance.
  • 2. The structure of claim 1 wherein said depression extends in the first direction relative to said flange for a greater distance than said distal end of said outward wall.
  • 3. The structure of claim 1 further including a second peripheral sidewall structure extending over the end portion of the article, integral with said peripheral portion and separated from said first wall structure along said peripheral edge portion of said flange.
  • 4. The structure of claim 3 wherein said structure includes lands integral with said peripheral portion, said lands generally aligned with and extending outward from said flange to separate said first peripheral wall from said second peripheral wall.
  • 5. The structure of claim 3 wherein said second sidewall structure is integral with said edge portion on an opposite side of said flange from said first sidewall structure.
  • 6. The structure of claim 5 wherein said at least one depression is formed between said first sidewall and said second sidewall.
  • 7. The structure of claim 1 wherein said first peripheral wall includes lateral end faces integral with said inboard wall, said outboard wall and said bridge section.
  • 8. The structure of claim 1 wherein the cushion space is hollow.
  • 9. The structure of claim 1 wherein said first sidewall forms a notch along the length of said sidewall.
  • 10. The structure of claim 9 wherein said notch is formed midway between end faces of said sidewall.
  • 11. The structure of claim 1 wherein said first sidewall forms an elevated shoulder along the length of said peripheral wall.
  • 12. The structure of claim 1 including at least one flap including a second crush depression, said flap being integrally attached to a distal end portion of said sidewall structure.
  • 13. A unitary structure for packaging a shock sensitive article within a container comprising:a side flange having a peripheral portion; a plurality of peripheral sidewall structure of flexible material, said sidewall structures including an inboard wall integral with said peripheral portion with said sidewall structures arranged about the peripheral portion to form an enclosure about an end portion of the article, said sidewall structures including an outboard wall having a distal end and a proximate end, and a bridge section integral with said inboard wall and said proximate end of said outboard wall and spacing said outboard wall from said inboard wall to form a hollow cushion space, said bridge section forming biasing means to resiliently restrict the movement of said inboard wall toward said outboard wall upon the shock loading of said article; lands extending outward from said flange to separate said sidewall structures form from each other; and a crush depression integral with said flange, inward of said first wall and generally extending in a first direction from said flange away from the article to supportingly contact a sidewall of the container and form a cushion distance, said button crush depression including means for absorbing shock loading of the article generally in the first direction.
  • 14. A packaging structure for packaging an article within a container comprising:a flange for receiving a portion of the article, said flange defining a flange plane extending along the length thereof; an outer flange for positioning said packaging structure within the container, wherein said outer flange is substantially coplanar with said flange plane and extends along an outer periphery of said packaging structure; at least one sidewall portion attached to said flange and positioned between said flange and said outer flange, said at least one sidewall portion being configured and arranged to provide shock protection to at least a portion of the article when the article is positioned on a first side of said flange plane; and at least one hollow crush button for providing shock protection to at least a portion of the article, said at least one crush button extending at least partially from a second side of said flange plane, wherein said second side is opposite to said first side; said at least one sidewall portion forming an enclosure, with said flange and said crush button being positioned within said enclosure and said outer flange being positioned outside of said enclosure.
  • 15. The packaging structure of claim 14 wherein said at least one crush button includes an end face, wherein when said packaging structure is secured by lateral sidewalls of the container, said end face is positioned closer to an endwall of the container than other portions of said packaging structure.
  • 16. The packaging structure of claim 14 further including a plurality of crush buttons, with at least one channel extending between two of said crush buttons.
  • 17. The packaging structure of claim 14 wherein said at least one crush button is of a generally polygonal shaped cross-section, and includes strength pillars formed at each corner thereof.
  • 18. The packaging structure of claim 14 wherein said flange, said at least one sidewall portion and said at least one crush button are integrally formed from a single layer of material.
  • 19. The packaging structure of claim 14 wherein said at least one sidewall portion has a particular resiliency, and said at least one sidewall portion also includes a notch formed therein for adjusting said particular resiliency of said at least one sidewall portion.
  • 20. A packaging structure for packaging an article within a container comprising:a flange for receiving a portion of the article, said flange defining a flange plane extending along the length thereof; at least one sidewall portion attached to said flange, said at least one sidewall portion being configured and arranged to extend in a first direction along a side of the article and to provide shock protection to at least a portion of the article when the article is positioned on a first side of said flange plane; and wherein said at least one sidewall portion includes a middle portion extending in said first direction between two shoulder portions, said middle portion being bounded in said first direction by two faces extending generally transverse to said first direction such that said middle portion has a height with respect to said flange plane that is greater than said two shoulder portions and said middle portion has a different resiliency than said two shoulder portions, wherein said different resiliency of said middle portion is created because said middle portion has a wall thickness that is different from a wall thickness of said shoulder portions.
US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3047142 Heffley Jul 1962
3334798 Pezely, Jr. et al. Aug 1967
3356209 Pezely, Jr. Dec 1967
4202449 Bendt May 1980
4407898 Kato et al. Oct 1983
4483444 Gardner Nov 1984
4705170 Creaden Nov 1987
4759446 Dobashi et al. Jul 1988
4936453 Knitter Jun 1990
5226543 Foos et al. Jul 1993
5348157 Pozzo Sep 1994
5360108 Alagia Nov 1994
5385232 Foos et al. Jan 1995
5532044 Jen Jul 1996
5628402 Dickie et al. May 1997
5755331 Watson May 1998
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/516761 Aug 1995 US
Child 09/076688 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/516761 Aug 1995 US
Child 09/076688 US