The present invention relates to a packaging machine and to a method for producing packages made of a film.
In packaging machines and in particular in the forming and sealing stations of the packaging machine, pressure must be provided for the heating of the film, the forming of the film and the sealing of the package. In conventional systems, the pressure is hereby controlled via manually settable filling times or manual pressure controllers, that is, a certain pressure is generated for a predetermined period of time via the opening of a valve. The pressure is thereby subject to fluctuations and a reproducibility is not given. This is disadvantageous in particular because different types of packaging and films in a packaging machine require different settings so that the reproducibility is important.
Furthermore, the valves comprising manual pressure controllers previously used for the gassing of packages require a backpressure, which often builds up too late for a rapid control process, in particular with small chambers and which thus causes the package to inflate.
The use of proportional controllers, which comprise a measuring and control engineering, is not common in packaging machines, because they increase the pressure too slowly. Conventional proportional controllers cannot completely open the valve in particular at the onset of the control, because there is a risk of increasing the pressure too much. They are thus too slow. Material stress limits can furthermore be exceeded.
It is the object of the invention to provide an improved packaging machine and an improved method for producing packages made of a film, which avoid the above-mentioned disadvantages.
An advantage of the packaging machine and of the method for producing packages made of a film, respectively, is the reproducibility of the parameters, which are set so as to be specific to the packaging. The control via the proportional controller can be used for different working stations of a packaging machine, such as forming station, sealing station, etc. In addition, the controller can, at the same time, be used as a valve, wherein one component can be saved as compared to the conventional systems, which require a valve and a pressure controller.
A further advantageous use of the invention occurs in response to the gassing process. It is possible with the method and the device according to the invention, respectively, to realize a slight increase of the volume flow into the package and thereafter a sharp increase so as to keep the package from inflating, caused by the initial lack of backpressure and the accompanying belated control.
A further advantage of the invention is the quality control, which is made possible by the reproducibility of the process. There are no possibilities for errors due to the capability of setting pressures manually. The required values can be stored as a function of the process and can be recalled therewith automatically. The control/regulating system ensures that the same pressure is present in the device during the entire process time.
Further features and advantages of the invention can be seen from the description of exemplary embodiments by means of the enclosed drawings.
a shows a diagram for comparing a conventional pressure setting with the pressure setting according to the invention via the proportional controller;
b shows a diagram for comparing a conventional proportional flow control with the proportional flow control according to the invention;
a shows a graph 40a, which shows the pressure build-up during the heating process without a proportional controller;
b shows a graph 40b, which shows the pressure build-up during the forming process without a proportional controller;
a shows a graph 41a, which shows the pressure build-up during the heating process with a proportional controller;
b shows a graph 41b, which shows the pressure build-up during the forming process with a proportional controller.
As can be seen from
The forming station 2 will be described below by means of
The forming station 2 serves the purpose of forming containers made of a film by means of compressed air and/or by means of a vacuum with or without a stamp. The film 7 is clamped for the purpose of forming and is initially heated at the heating plate 22. Subsequently, the film is molded during the forming process by means of a set pressure and/or by means of a vacuum with or without a stamp as rapidly as possible and thus with an even wall thickness and a slight cooling. The set pressure thereby substantially determines the result as a function of the film thickness, draw depth and container shape. Preferably, the control takes place in such a manner that, at the onset of the deformation, the valve is briefly opened completely so as to attain the fastest possible deformation and so as to then limit and readjust the pressure.
The production of a package will be described below by means of
The pressures in the forming device 2 are set by means of the electronic proportional controllers 24, 25 in the method according to the invention for producing packaging made of a film. The pressures can be set via a machine display and can be stored as a function of the process. The pressure currently available in the device will be accommodated by means of the control and regulating system integrated in the proportional controller and can thus be reproduced. The control can also be carried out by the machine control 28.
The forming station is brought to the set pressure, which is required for the deformation, in a relatively short period of time by means of the proportional controller 24, 25 and is held at this pressure until the film 7 cools down and deformation remains. Subsequently, the pressure is preferably released from the device into the atmosphere as fast as possible.
Subsequently, the container is filled (not illustrated) and is then closed in the sealing station 3 by means of the lid film 10 and is gassed beforehand, if applicable. Subsequently, the packages are separated in the cutting station 4.
With reference to
a illustrates a comparison of the proportional controller according to the invention and a conventional proportional controller in a pressure/time diagram. The proportional controller according to the invention has a more rapid response time than the conventional controller. As can be seen from
b shows the comparison of a conventional proportional controller, a combination of a valve and a manual pressure controller and a specific control for the gassing process by means of the proportional flow rate controller according to the invention in a volume flow/time diagram. According to the invention, a slight increase of the volume flow takes place hereby first prior to the sharp increase in the upper region of the diagram, so as to keep the package from inflating in particular with smaller chambers.
a (on the left-hand side of the image) shows the pressure build-up during the heating process without proportional controller by means of the graph 40a. The heating pressure initially rises above the set value and subsequently drops below the desired value due to leakage. A further disadvantage is that the desired pressure cannot be set but can only be attained with large deviation over the period t.
b (on the right-hand side of the image) shows the pressure build-up during the forming process without proportional controller by means of the graph 40b. The forming pressure initially rises just above the desired value (set value) and subsequently drops far below the desired value due to leakage. It is a disadvantage that the desired pressure cannot be set but that it can only be attained with large deviation over the period t.
a (on the left-hand side of the image) shows the pressure build-up during the heating process with proportional controller by means of the graph 41a. The heating pressure rises to the desired set value. Overshooting lies within the tolerance zone. It then remains on the set pressure until the end of the set period regardless of possible leakages. It is an advantage that the desired pressure can be set via the operation terminal.
b (on the right-hand side of the image) shows the pressure build-up during the forming process with proportional controller by means of graph 41b. The forming pressure rises to the set value. Overshooting lies within the tolerance zone. It then remains on the set pressure until the end of the set period regardless of possible leakages. It is an advantage that the desired pressure can be set via the operation terminal.
The proportional controller is preferably used in the forming station, in which the film is formed for the packaging. However, all of the working stations of a packaging machine can be equipped with the device according to the invention and can operate according to the method according to the invention, respectively.
Upper part and lower part are pressed together by the provision of pressure and are then sealed during the operation of the sealing station. The pressure can be systematically built up and maintained by means of an air cushion.
A further example of the device according to the invention is a working station, which comprises a gassing device. An initially slight and later sharp increase of the volume flow is desirable hereby. The pressure is measured and controlled in all of the working stations and is accordingly also readjusted during the operation so as to attain an optimal result.
In addition, quick-action ventilating valves for the maximum pressure compensation with the environment can be provided. So as not to damage sensitive products, furthermore a throttle valve can be provided, so as to reduce the suction speed in vacuum. These components are already known from the state of the art. A variable flap control in the form of a proportional flow rate controller is also possible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 031 527 | Jul 2007 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3694991 | Perdue et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3714754 | Holcombe et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3830365 | Krueger et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3972155 | Mahaffy et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4285639 | Woodring et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4567713 | Natterer | Feb 1986 | A |
4666394 | Wakamiya et al. | May 1987 | A |
4713047 | Klinkel | Dec 1987 | A |
5125216 | Redaelli | Jun 1992 | A |
5603203 | Robache | Feb 1997 | A |
6067778 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074203 | Leturmy et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6283145 | Fenn | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314991 | Gill | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6579082 | Castellari | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6748721 | Kodai | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7070161 | Piehl et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20010028124 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040065048 | Kondo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3404451 | Aug 1985 | DE |
10 2005 061 315 | Jun 2007 | DE |
0 192 605 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0 461 689 | Dec 1991 | EP |
569934 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1 445 530 | Aug 1976 | GB |
WO-2007071298 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090071100 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |