The present invention relates to a packaging machine and particularly to a packaging machine having a transport mechanism.
An exemplary packaging machine can be seen in DE 2 123 133, incorporated herein by reference. Such a packaging machine has a frame having two frame parts arranged parallel to one another in the longitudinal direction. At one end of the two frame parts chain wheels are provided in each case, via which run two transport chains in the form of continuous chains. The individual chain links of the transport chains are equipped with clamps which hold a length of packaging material, such as a foil, at the edges. When the chain links come into engagement with the chain wheels, the clamps open, so the length of packaging material is inserted into the clamps. When the chain links are released from the chain wheels, the clamps close and the length of packaging material is held in a tensioned state between the transport chains. The chain wheels are in each case cantilevered on an axle. Between the chain wheels a foil guide drum for the length of packaging material is supported as freely rotatable about an axle. At the other end of the two frame parts further chain wheels are provided, which serve to open the clamps again by engaging in the transport chains, so the length of packaging material is released from the clamps. Various working stations are arranged along the frame. During transport of the length of packaging material through the working stations high precision of the forward feeds of both chains is required, in order to achieve as low forward feed tolerances as possible during successive operating cycles. Higher tolerances require more packaging material and cause increased costs. The transport chains have limited stability, however, and are elastically stretched like a spring under load. In particular with longer plants of more than approximately 10 meters in transport length, this stretching property has a marked effect on the precision of the transport distance as the load increases, owing to the length, and higher driving power results in even greater stretching. The relative stretching with greater length of the plant simultaneously gives rise to higher amounts of stretching, which cause practically over-proportionately higher tolerances. Additionally, the fluctuations can come out differently on the two transport chains and therefore cause distortions of the length of packaging, which, depending on the type of packaging material, can even lead to tearing of the length of material.
The present invention provides for a packaging machine with which the tolerances of the transport paths can be minimized.
In that the first engagement element is coupled to the second engagement element in such a way that both engagement elements are coordinated to one another with synchronous angles, it can also be ensured at the inlet on the entrance side that the transport paths of the two transport means are of equal length. Possible tolerances because of uneven stretching of the transport means owing to high tensile loads can thereby be compensated. Consequently, the packaging machine can be configured with a greater length than previously, without impermissibly large tolerances being obtained in the transport paths of the two transport means.
It is an advantage of the invention to provide a torsion-proof shaft, on which the two engagement elements are arranged as fixed against rotation, as this enables a simple and economical solution to the problem on which the invention is based. Additionally it is thereby possible to retrofit old plants without great constructional outlay, by subsequently mounting the two already existing engagement elements, supported rotatably on axles, as fixed against rotation on the shaft.
It is yet another advantage of the invention to provide a drive device which jointly drives the first and second engagement elements. In this way the transport device is driven at two points by two drive devices, making it possible for introduction of the load on to the transport means to take place at several points, so it is reduced per introduction point. Moreover, the advantage is achieved that it is thereby possible to use smaller drive devices.
It is still a further advantage of the invention to provide one drive device each in each case for the first and the second engagement element and drive them synchronously. It is thereby possible to use even smaller drive devices. The drive devices are advantageously controlled by a control device, so they are synchronized with one another. In this way angle-synchronous rotation of the drive shafts is implemented, i.e. so-called electronic shafts are therein implemented, wherein one shaft acts as “master” and the other as “slave”, in that it is triggered as a function of the master shaft.
The invention is explained in greater detail below using several illustrative embodiments, referring to the attached figures.
Referring to
In
Each transport chain 5, 6 consists of a multiplicity of chain links, only a few of which are schematically illustrated in
The chain wheels 8, 9 are supported as fixed against rotation on a common drive shaft 14. The drive shaft 14 is coupled to a drive device 15 in the form of an electric motor. The shaft is dimensioned in such a way that it is as torsion-proof as possible, i.e. the drive shaft is as far as possible not twisted when the transport chains 5, 6 are driven, in order to prevent transport chain 5, arranged further away from the drive device 14 and driven via chain wheel 8, running behind transport chain 6, which is arranged closer to the drive device 14 and driven via chain wheel 9. The drive device 14 rotates the chain wheels 8, 9 anti-clockwise in
However, as the transport chains have limited stability, when loaded they are elastically stretched like a spring, this occurring in particular with longer plants of more than 10 m in transport length. To prevent this, the engagement elements 10, 11 provided at the inlet 16 in the form of further chain wheels are connected as fixed against rotation to one another via a torsion-proof shaft 12, so the two engagement elements 10 and 11 are forced to run synchronously to one another.
In operation the rotation-proof connection between the engagement elements 10, 11 leads to the chain links of one transport chain being forced to run at a synchronous angle to the chain links of the second transport chain.
In
This alternative embodiment example differs from the structure seen in
In
This second alternative embodiment example differs from the structure seen in
In the same way the torsion-proof shaft 14 at the outlet 17 is arranged as offset downwards, wherein the transport chains 5, 6 are correspondingly turned via chain wheels 28, 29 and deflection rollers 26, 27. Additionally, the drive device 15 is, by contrast with the first embodiment example, not directly coupled to the shaft 14. Instead, mounted on the shaft 14 as fixed against rotation is a further toothed wheel 32, which is in engagement with a toothed belt 24. The toothed belt 24 is, moreover, in engagement with a drive pinion 25, which is coupled to drive device 15 via a drive shaft, not shown. The drive device is arranged in such a way that it is located directly below the shaft 14. In this way the drive device can be accommodated in a space-saving manner inside the frame 1 and does not project laterally outwards in the width direction.
The same arrangement is also possible for drive device 13 of shaft 12.
Moreover, according to a modification, not illustrated, it is possible to drive each of chain wheels 8 to 11 via its own drive device and to match each drive device as angle-synchronous via a control unit.
A further advantageous configuration of the invention provides the use of a toothed belt instead of the transport chain.
Thus, while the invention has been described with respect to certain presently preferred embodiments, those with skill in the art will recognize changes, modifications and other applications which will fall within the scope of the inventive concepts and claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 26 727.1 | Jun 2003 | DE | national |
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/478,162, filed Jun. 13, 2004.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60478162 | Jun 2003 | US |