The invention relates to packaging of transponder devices. It concerns, in aspects, both methods of packaging transponder devices and packaged transponder devices.
Transponder devices respond to an input signal by giving an output signal in response. The input signal, in many classes of transponder, serves to power the transponder. A widely used form of transponder device is the RFID tag—radio frequency power from a reader device is received by an antenna of the RFID tag. The RFID tag is powered and transmits data in the form of an identifier by modulation of the power received. The present applicants have proposed forms of transponder device, powered in a similar manner to RFID tags but designed to be read at short range and with memories for storing significant digital content.
In some circumstances, a user may not wish transponder devices to emit data. Suggested approaches for addressing this are destruction of the RFID tag by irradiating it with high power microwaves or jamming of an area by providing spurious simulated RFID signals to overwhelm a reader device and prevent it from using an anti-collision protocol to disentangle responses effectively. These approaches are stimulated by privacy concerns and are not suitable for efficient distribution of digital content on transponder devices.
In one aspect, the invention provides a packaged product comprising a physical product, an inductively powered transponder device having a memory containing digital content, and a packaging, the packaging being adapted to prevent sufficient signal from reaching an antenna of the inductively powered transponder device to enable the digital content to be read from the memory.
Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Embodiments of the invention are useful for packaging of transponder devices which are conventional RFID tags—such tags are described in many reference sources, for example “RFID Handbook”, Klaus Finkenzeller, 1999, John Wiley & Sons. However, particular value can be realised in packaging of transponder devices with significant memory—sufficient to store significant digital content rather than just identifier data—and an exemplary device of this kind (termed here “memory tags”) is described below. The type of memory tag discussed here is designed to be read by a suitable reader device at close range and to provide rapid data transmission—data can thus be read by “brushing” the reader device across the memory tag.
Referring now to
The memory 34 comprises a data store generally illustrated at 45 comprising a plurality of data units 46. A program 49 controls the behaviour of the memory tag.
The reader 31 comprises a resonant circuit part 51 which comprises an inductor L1 shown at 52, in this example an antenna and a capacitor C1 shown at 53 connected in parallel. A signal generator 54 is connected to the resonant circuit part 51 to provide a drive signal.
The reader 31 further comprises a demodulator, generally shown at 55. The demodulator 55 comprises a splitter 56 connected to the frequency generator to split off a part of the drive signal to provide a reference signal. A coupler 57 is provided to split off part of a reflected signal reflected back from the resonant circuit part 51, and pass the reflected signal to a multiplier shown at 58. The multiplier 58 multiplies the reflected signal received from the coupler 57 and the reference signal received from the splitter 56 and passes the output to a low pass filter 59. The low pass filter 59 passes a signal corresponding to the phase difference between the reference signal and the reflected signal to an output 60. An amplitude modulator is shown at 61 operable to control the amplitude of the drive signal supplied from the frequency generator 54 to the resonant circuit part 51.
A control unit 62 is operable to receive the output 60 from the low pass filter 59 and validate the received data. The control unit 62 is also operable to control the amplitude modulator 61.
A signal comprising a data unit is transmitted to the reader 31 by operating switch S1 shown at 39. This varies the resonant frequency of the resonant circuit part 32. This change in resonant frequency causes the phase of the signal reflected from the resonant circuit part 51 to vary with respect to the signal provided by the signal generator 54. This relative phase shift can be processed by the multiplexer 58 and low pass filter 59 to produce a digital output 63 as described in our earlier co-pending application published as GB2395628A.
When the tag 30 is moved sufficiently close to a reader 31 so that inductive coupling can be established between the resonant circuit parts 51, 32, power will be supplied to the memory 34 to run the program 49 and render the tag operational. A central part of tag operation is to transmit the data units 46 held in the data store 45. These are read from the data store 45 and transmitted as a part of a packet by operation of switch S1 under operation of the program 49.
It is particularly desirable that the tag 30 be provided as an integrated circuit, for example as a CMOS integrated circuit. A schematic of such an integrated circuit is show at 80 in
Use models for transponder tags—both of the type shown in
For completeness,
Various embodiments of the invention will now be described, embodiments among these being relevant to the inclusion of transponder devices within products as shown in
From the perspective of a method of packaging, these are illustrated by the flow diagram of
There are at least two reasons for preventing the transponder device from receiving enough signal to power it. One is to prevent content theft. If valuable digital content is contained within the transponder device—especially if this digital content is a central part of the product—then placing the full product on open shelves attracts a risk that dishonest users will upload the content from the transponder device without purchasing the product. Another reason is to prevent content modification. For transponder devices that can be written to as well as merely read from, there is a risk that on being powered, the spot will be written to and its content changed (which may be disadvantageous if data in the transponder device memory has, for example, a security function).
It is possible to prevent sufficient signal from reaching the transponder device to power it in alternative ways. A first way of doing this is to construct a Faraday cage around the transponder device. This may be achieved by surrounding the transponder device with a metal layer of sufficient depth that insufficient signal can penetrate to power the transponder device. While this is dependent on the power of the reader device, the power that can be provided by a reader is practically limited (by regulatory requirements from danger to the user or others, from picking up signal from other transponders not so protected) so an effective practical shield can be provided by a sufficient thickness of metal.
Thickness is best considered in terms of skin depth—this can be defined as the distance an electromagnetic wave must travel in a lossy medium to reduce by 1/{acute over (∈)} (approximately 36.8%). The skin depth is determined by the operating frequency and the resistivity of the metal as follows:
indicates data missing or illegible when filed
For operation at 2.45 GHz—a preferred value for memory tags—this provides skin depths for common metals of the following:
Aluminium—2 μm;
Tin—3.4 μm;
Copper—1.4 μm.
This compares to a typical thickness of a sheet of paper of about 100 μm. To shield a transponder device effectively, it is desirable to provide a metal thickness of at least five times the skin depth (preferably 10 times). It is apparent from the above that this can be achieved with either a metal foil, or with a free-standing metal structure.
A first embodiment is shown in
A second embodiment is shown in
A third embodiment is shown in
Sheet 601 clearly only shields memory tags 611 from the front. A comparable metal layer is needed on the reverse—this may be another sheet similar to sheet 601, or it may be a fixed part of the card 610 (as if sheet 601 is removed, then access to the memory tags from the front is possible and unhindered by shielding to the rear). This arrangement is not a true Faraday cage, however, as there is no metal on the edges of the card. While this could be addressed by design (for example, by sheet 601 wrapping around the edges and overlapping the back of the card), this is not necessary for producing a practical embodiment. If, as in most designs of memory tag, the antenna of the transponder device lies in the plane of the card 610, provision of power by a reader directly on to the edge will not cause significant power to be coupled into the antenna because the angle of incidence of the radiation is such that it will not illuminate the antenna. For a memory tag, the operational power requirements are significantly lower than for the simplest of RFID tags, so such side-illumination is particularly unlikely to cause difficulty in the case of memory tags, especially if the memory tag is located some distance from the edge of the card. A suitable design of memory tag, discussed in EP-A-1422658, is adapted to be read only at distances of less than 10 D, where D is an external dimension of the memory tag. The skilled person will appreciate that the design needs to be such so as not to act as a particularly effective waveguide—this can be determined readily by experiment.
A fourth embodiment is shown in
Packaged transponder device 710 is shown in more detail in
An end user enables activation of the transponder device 720 by scratching away at least a part of the metallic ink layer 718. This is shown in
It will be appreciated that in this arrangement, metallic ink 718 could be replaced by a small peelable metal sheet of the type shown in
As discussed above, it is possible to prevent sufficient signal from reaching the transponder device to power it in alternative ways. A second way of doing this is to absorb RF power from a reader before it reaches the transponder device. This may be achieved by arranging one or more absorbing devices in the packaging to prevent sufficient signal to power the transponder device being received by the transponder device. This approach may be combined with the previously discussed approach: power received from one direction may be absorbed, and in another direction shielded. This is described in more detail with reference to a fifth embodiment of the invention shown in
Over this insulating layer, both the antenna loop 821 and the load region 822 of the absorbing device are formed. The formation of these layers can be achieved by contact printing using appropriate pastes (insulating or conductive as appropriate). The scratch-off region 823 of the antenna loop is formed of a conductive paste that may be manually removed by and end user to break the antenna loop and thus prevent the absorbing device from absorbing power from the reader. The only requirements on this layer are that it is sufficiently bulky to provide good conductivity around the antenna loop so that the antenna is an effective antenna—skin depth is not a consideration. In the load region 822, three layers are stacked up—the top layer 831 and the bottom layer 833 are both conductive, and each is connected to a different arm of the antenna loop 821. Top layer 831 and bottom layer 833 form overlaid pads. Between these layers is a lossy dielectric layer 832. This layer is chosen so as to effectively draw power from the illumination by the reader and prevent sufficient power from passing to the transponder device 810. Other designs of load region 822 may be adopted—for example, each antenna loop limb may terminate in a set of fingers, the fingers of each limb interdigitating but being separated by a lossy dielectric region. This arrangement would allow for one less printing step (there would need to be only one rather than two printing steps for conductive material, as there would no longer be conductive material overlying other conductive material). As indicated above, if limited shielding only is required then the load region may be dispensed with altogether.
It is desirable for the whole of the antenna region to be protected against tampering (particularly invisible tampering). One possible option is to provide in-store conductivity testing so that the resistance across the antenna loop is found to be appropriate (in a similar manner to in-store or on-package battery testing).
If appropriate (for example in the case of a card) a similar shielding antenna loop could be provided on the rear side (possibly instead of a metal layer behind the transponder device 810).
The skilled person will appreciate that the range of approaches for packaging inductively powered devices so as to prevent sufficient power from reaching the devices to power them can be applied to a wide range of products and packaging form factors, and that different approaches (such as shielding and absorbing) can be used effectively in combination. While the discussion here mainly relates to packaging of items for presentation to potential customers in a store, this is not the only field of application. Similar packaging may be adopted for mailing items or otherwise sending them in transit in order to prevent unauthorised review of such items in transit. The bag constructed from a foil tube shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0424162.6 | Oct 2004 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP05/55568 | 10/26/2005 | WO | 00 | 11/5/2007 |