Wellbores are drilled in geological formations (on land or offshore) to locate and recover hydrocarbons. A downhole drilling tool with a bit at an end thereof is advanced into the ground to form the wellbore. As the drilling tool is advanced, a drilling mud is pumped through the drilling tool and out the drill bit to cool the drilling tool and carry away cuttings. The fluid exits the drill bit and flows back up to the surface for recirculation through the tool. The drilling mud is also used to form a mudcake to line the wellbore.
During the drilling operation, it is desirable to perform various evaluations of the formations penetrated by the wellbore. In some cases, the drilling tool may be provided with devices to test and/or sample the surrounding formation. In some cases, the drilling tool may be removed and a wireline tool may be deployed into the wellbore to test and/or sample the formation. These samples or tests may be used, for example, to locate and evaluate valuable hydrocarbons.
Formation evaluation often involves drawing fluid from the formation into the downhole tool for testing and/or sampling. Various devices, such as probes, are extended from the downhole tool to establish fluid communication with the formation surrounding the wellbore and draw fluid into the downhole tool. A probe is an element that may be extended from the downhole tool and positioned against the sidewall of the wellbore. A packer at the end of the probe is used to create a seal with the wall of the formation. The mudcake lining the wellbore is often useful in assisting the packer in making the seal. Once the seal is made, fluid from the formation is drawn into the downhole tool through an inlet in the probe by lowering the pressure in the downhole tool.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A downhole tool for a wellbore within a geological formation may include a housing to be lowered into the wellbore, a probe carried by the housing, and a packer carried by the probe. The packer may include a rigid base, an elastomeric member carried by the rigid base and having a recess therein, and a support member within the recess and comprising a plurality of rigid segments interconnected to allow relative movement between adjacent rigid segments. The rigid base, the elastomeric member, and the support member may each have respective aligned openings therein defining a fluid sampling inlet.
A related packer to be carried by a probe on a downhole tool for use within a wellbore in a geological formation is also provided. The packer may include a rigid base to be carried by the probe, an elastomeric member carried by the rigid base and having a recess therein, and a support member within the recess and comprising a plurality of rigid segments interconnected to allow relative movement between adjacent rigid segments. The rigid base, the elastomeric member, and the support member may each have respective aligned openings therein defining a fluid sampling inlet.
A related method is for making a packer to be carried by a probe on a downhole tool for use within a wellbore in a geological formation. The method may include arranging a rigid base, an elastomeric member, and a support member so that the elastomeric member is carried by the rigid base and the support member is carried within a recess of the elastomeric member. The support member may include a plurality of rigid segments interconnected to allow relative movement between adjacent rigid segments. Furthermore, the rigid base, the elastomeric member, and the support member may each have respective aligned openings therein defining a fluid sampling inlet.
The present description is made with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which example embodiments are shown. However, many different embodiments may be used, and thus the description should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout, and prime and multiple prime numbers are used to indicate like elements in different embodiments.
Referring initially to
The downhole tool 20 is deployed into the wellbore 22 via a drill string 24 in the illustrated example. As the downhole tool 20 is advanced, drilling mud is pumped into the wellbore 22 through the drilling string 24 and out of the bit 23. The mud is circulated up the wellbore 22 and back to the surface for recycling. As the downhole tool 20 advances and mud is pumped into the wellbore 22, the mud may seep into sidewalls 25 of the wellbore 22 and penetrate the surrounding formation. As indicated by reference number 26, the mud lines the wellbore wall 25 and forms a mudcake along the wellbore wall. Mud which penetrates the wall 25 of the wellbore 22 forms an invaded zone 27 along the wellbore wall 25. As shown, the borehole 22 penetrates a formation 28 including a hydrocarbon fluid 30 therein. In the present example, a portion of the drilling mud 26 seeps into the formation 28 along the invaded zone 27 and contaminates the hydrocarbon fluid 30. The contaminated hydrocarbon fluid is indicated by reference number 31.
The downhole tool 20 is provided with a fluid communication device, such as a probe 32. The probe 32 extends from a housing 33 of the downhole tool 20 and carries a packer 34 (see
A fluid then flows into the downhole tool 20 via the probe 32 and packer 34, and may be collected in a sampling chamber carried within the housing 33 (although in some embodiments the collected sample material may be transported to the surface via a tube or pipe, for example). A vacuum pump (not shown) may optionally be used to create vacuum pressure to draw the sample material into the sampling chamber through the probe 32 and packer 34. Control of the above-described operations (e.g., probe/vacuum pump actuation, etc.) may be performed remotely from the surface via telemetry or other borehole communication techniques, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
An example configuration of the packer 34 is first described with reference to
An elastomeric member 37 is carried by the rigid base 35 and has a recess therein. By way of example, the elastomeric member 37 may be made from natural rubber, as well as other flexible compounds that are suited to borehole conditions. One such compound is compound 8009 from Maloney Technical Products of Ft. Worth, Tex., although other suitable materials may also be used. In the illustrated example, the elastomeric member 37 has an oval shape. A support member 38 is illustratively carried within the recess of the elastomeric member 37 and includes a plurality of rigid segments 39 which are interconnected to allow relative movement between adjacent rigid segments, as will be discussed further below. The rigid base 35, the elastomeric member 37, and the support member 38 each have respective aligned openings therein defining a fluid sampling inlet 40. By way of example, the fluid sampling inlet 40 may be sized to fit over a probe barrel (not shown) of the packer 32. In the illustrated example, the elastomeric member 37 includes cut-outs 41 respectively corresponding to the holes 36 in the rigid base, although in some embodiments a wider base may be used so that the holes may be spaced apart from the elastomeric member without using cut-outs in the elastomeric member.
The use of multiple rigid segments 39 to form the inlet 40 of the packer 34 may help increase the effective area of the inlet, and also to allow for different shapes for the inlet. This may be helpful as the borehole wall 25 may not be smooth, that is, it may have roughness or irregularities. However, using the support member 38 may help to bridge across these irregularities, leaving gaps, which the elastomeric flexible packer material of the member 37 may not otherwise be able to provide a sufficient seal with for sampling. By using the rigid segments 39, the support member 38 is divided into smaller linked segments which may more readily conform to irregularities of the borehole wall 25, while still providing desired support or rigidity.
More particularly, in the illustrated example the rigid segments 39 include interlocking features. In the example illustrated in
Generally speaking, the size of the rigid segments 39 may be determined based upon the expected size and orientation of the borehole irregularities. The rigid segments 39 may take various shapes or sizes, and may allow for relatively free movement of the segments with respect to one another. The elastomeric material may be bonded to the rigid segments 39, which may also help maintain the positioning of the segments in addition to the interlocking features. In an example configuration, the packer 34 may be about 3 inches wide and 8-10 inches long, while the support member 38 may have a width of about 1 inch and a length of about 7 inches for an average borehole diameter (e.g., about 1-2 feet in diameter). However, other dimensions may be used in different embodiments.
The rigid segments 42 when connected together define an elongate support member having a recessed medial portion 45 with raised sidewall portions 46 surrounding the recessed medial portion. Accordingly, when the support member 38 is pressed to conform to the wall 25 of the borehole 22, the raised sidewall portions 46 will cause the recessed medial portion 45 to be spaced apart or “stand off” from the borehole wall, so that sample fluid will flow within the recessed medial portion to the inlet 40.
Referring now additionally to
Turning now additionally to
Still another example packer 234 is shown in
Accordingly, it will be appreciated that various inlet shapes and configurations may be provided using the segmented approach set forth herein. Generally speaking, the segmented support members may be particularly beneficial for larger inlets, as it may otherwise be difficult to maintain good contact with an irregular borehole wall with elastomeric packers alone. The segmented configurations described above may also allow for use with a wider range of borehole sizes, since the rigid segments may allow the inlet to more readily conform to the borehole shape.
In one example embodiment, the packer 34 may be manufactured by positioning the rigid base 35 and the support member 38 in a mold, and rubber or other elastomeric material may be injected between those elements, and bonded to them, to form the support member 37. However, it should be noted that in some embodiments the support member 38 may be added after molding of the elastomeric member 37 is complete.
More particularly, the rigid segments 39 may be mechanically bonded together with an adhesive, or with small points of weld or brazing, or other suitable bonding approach. This allows the support member 38 to maintain its intended final shape through the molding process. The adhesive or small weld points may be made weak enough to allow the segments to break apart with use, for example. If the rigid segments 39 are machined out of a single piece of material, for example, very thin webs of material may be left between the segments. A secondary operation may also be performed after molding to break the rigid segments 39 apart, if desired.
While the above-noted packer designs were described with reference to probe packers, it should be noted that other configurations may also be used. For example, the support members described above may also be used with inflatable packer elements as well.
Many modifications and other embodiments will come to the mind of one skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is understood that various modifications and embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3452592 | Voetter | Jul 1969 | A |
6230557 | Ciglenec et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301959 | Hrametz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6658930 | Abbas | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6729399 | Follini et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
7114385 | Fisseler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7114562 | Fisseler et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7121338 | van Zuilekom et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128144 | Fox et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7395879 | Segura et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7584655 | van Zuilekom et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584786 | Nold, III et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7603897 | Gilbert et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7650937 | Fox et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7654321 | Zazovsky et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7841406 | Zazovsky et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8015867 | Kerr et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8210260 | Milkovisch et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8220536 | Tao et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8235106 | Fox et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20050161218 | van Zuilekom et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20070151727 | Tao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20100083748 | Kerr et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100132970 | Axland et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110107830 | Fields et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110162836 | Church | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120152533 | Hoefel et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120292024 | Fox et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130213645 | Proett et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140174721 | Brennan, III | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/072955 on Mar. 11, 2014; 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140174758 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |