The field of this invention is sequential equalization and then packer or bridge plug release with discrete mechanisms that are sequentially accessed with extension of the equalization and release tool and more particularly with a feature allowing forcible retraction of a lower slip cone from the lower slips should the slips fail to release with operation of the release mechanism.
Packers and bridge plugs serve as wellbore isolation devices. The main difference is that bridge plugs have no passage through a mandrel and are an absolute barrier, while packers have a mandrel passage and are usually associated with a valve to control flow between zones that are isolated from each other when the packer is set. In either case, these devices when set will have some differential pressure across them and the standard procedure for safe operation is to equalize the pressure across the packer or bridge plug first before release of the slip and seal assembly of the packer or bridge plug.
Very old designs involved a single movement of a mechanism to accomplish both tasks. This movement was in a single direction where the initial movement first equalized and continued movement in the same direction then released the slips and seal elements of the packer or plug. One potential problem with such a design is if the slips and seal of the packer or plug are released before the equalization has fully finished there could be a large enough force left on the packer to send it moving in a direction toward the surface which could send the tubular string attached to such packer moving out of the hole and create a dangerous condition. Accordingly subsequent designs sought to make the equalizing step discrete from the release step by using two discrete mechanisms and a grip tool that is initially blocked from grabbing the release mechanism as it initially grabs the equalizing mechanism by a plurality of dogs that act as travel stops. After the grip tool engages the equalizing mechanism and picks it up to equalize, a recess is presented opposite the dogs acting as a travel stop so that on a subsequent jarring down movement after equalization, the release mechanism is gripped because the dogs acting as a travel stop have gone into the recess so that a subsequent jarring up motion then releases the slips and sealing element of the packer. This system is described in detail in Bishop U.S. Pat. No. 8,322,413. Some problems inherent to this design are that wellbore debris could deposit near the dogs or their associated recess so that the packer release mechanism could not be gripped by the grip tool making release of the packer difficult if not impossible and dictating a milling operation for removal of the packer. Another issue with the Bishop '413 design was that once the lock ring below the slips was released to allow the packer to extend in a downhole direction for retraction of the upper and lower slips and sealing element there was still an issue as attempts were made to bring up the packer of the slips either not releasing their grip on the surrounding tubular or the slip cone not extending far enough away from the slips or getting pushed back under the slips as the packer was moved uphole causing the packer to get stuck.
To address these issues a grip tool was designed that eliminates the need for the dogs that act as a travel stop by having a grip tool that is initially only capable of reaching the equalizing mechanism. After equalization a further force applied in the same direction as for the equalizing results in a reconfiguration of the grip tool and locking the grip tool in the reconfigured position. In the locked reconfigured position, the grip tool is capable of engaging with the packer or plug release mechanism with an applied force. After such latching the applied force direction is reversed and the tool is released with an undermining of the ratchet lock used initially to hold the set position. In the event of a failure to release just relying on the stored potential energy of the set packer element an option is provided to re-engage the lower ratchet lock and transfer a downhole force to the lower slip cone to push the lower slip cone downhole from under the slips so as to provide another opportunity to get the slips and packer seal to release. An emergency release is provided to be able to remove the grip tool if the equalizing and release mechanisms fail to operate so that the grip tool and associated wireline can be removed from the borehole before fishing is attempted.
These and other features will be more readily apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the description of the preferred embodiment and the associated drawings while keeping in mind that the full scope of the inventions described herein are to be determined by the appended claims.
Retractable slips are illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,813,486 while retrievable bridge plugs and associated running tools are discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,366,010. Also relevant to telescoping tools are U.S. Pat. No. 6,349,770; completion method with telescoping perforation and fracturing tool U.S. Pat. No. 7,604,055; Downhole telescoping tool with radially expandable members WO 2011028812 and method and apparatus for accommodating telescoping action U.S. Pat. No. 3,354,950.
A tool equalizes a packer or bridge plug before it can release the slips and sealing element of the packer or bridge plug with a reconfigurable grip tool. In one configuration the grip tool is latched only into the equalizing mechanism for the packer or bridge plug. Having equalized the pressure and while still latched to the equalization mechanism the tool is reconfigured with a force and locked into a second configuration. From that position the grip tool can latch and move the release mechanism for total release and retrieval to the surface. Release force undermines a ratchet lock for the slips to allow extension as the sealing element extends axially and radially retracts. If the slips fail to release with undermining of the ratchet lock then a set down force can be applied to re-engage the lower slip cone to push it from the lower slips for a release.
Packer or plug release sleeve 52 has a similar exterior profile 54 as the previously described profile 46 except the locations for the multiple profiles 54 that appear on ends of a finger structure 56 shown in
The grip tool 100 is illustrated in
The profile 46 is initially gripped as outer collet support ring 120 and the grip collet ring 122 that is concentrically mounted to support ring 120 are deflected radially outwardly over the profiles 46 that exist at ends of extending fingers 58 as shown in
Having equalized pressure across the seal assembly 12 a further upward jar force is applied to tool 100 while still engaged to the profile 46 so that shear pins 124 fail as seen by comparing
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the extendable nature of the tool overcomes a risk of debris preventing the dogs in U.S. Pat. No. 8,322,413 from retracting. Such a failure of the dogs to retract into a recess will prevent plug or packer release as the tool in that patent would be precluded from reaching the release sleeve. By providing an extendable tool that is run in to release the packer or plug the exposure of components to wellbore debris is minimized thereby insuring operability when needed to equalize and release the packer. Instead of the dog design of the past, the telescoping feature of the tool 100 allows for a simple way to integrate the ability to change the reach of the tool to sequentially equalize and then release the plug or packer. The use of the ratchet profiles that lock together for tandem movement in a downhole direction provides a backup way to get the slips and sealing element to release in the event that jarring up on the release sleeve and reliance on the potential energy in the sealing element 12 does not allow the slips and sealing element to extend axially so that they retract radially to allow plug removal.
The above description is illustrative of the preferred embodiment and many modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the invention whose scope is to be determined from the literal and equivalent scope of the claims below:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
354980 | Hyde | Dec 1886 | A |
3354950 | Hyde | Nov 1967 | A |
4813486 | Wyatt et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5366010 | Zwart | Nov 1994 | A |
5791413 | Buzinsky | Aug 1998 | A |
6220348 | Serafin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6349770 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
7604055 | Richard et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
8322413 | Bishop et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20060131011 | Lynde et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20120043073 | Bishop et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130306327 | Williamson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005045181 | May 2005 | WO |
2011028812 | Mar 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160168938 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |