The present disclosure relates to industrial process control or monitoring systems. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to paddle style orifice plates and process variable transmitters of the type which use paddle style orifice plates to measure a process variable of an industrial process.
In industrial settings, control systems are used to monitor and control inventories of industrial and chemical processes, and the like. Typically, the control system that performs these functions uses field devices distributed at key locations in the industrial process and coupled to control circuitry in the control room by a process control loop. The term “field device” refers to any device that performs a function in a distributed control or process monitoring system, including all devices used in the measurement, control and monitoring of industrial processes.
Some field devices include a transducer which couples to the process fluid. A transducer is understood to mean either a device that generates an output signal based on a physical input or that generates a physical output based on an input signal. Typically, a transducer transforms an input into an output having a different form. Types of transducers include various analytical equipment, pressure sensors, thermistors, actuators, solenoids, indicator lights, and others.
Field devices, such as process variable sensors used in industrial processes can be installed in the field on pipelines, tanks and other industrial process equipment. Such devices sense process variables such as process fluid flow, process fluid temperature, process fluid pressure, process fluid conductivity, process fluid pH and other process variables. Other types of industrial process field devices include valves, actuators, field controllers, data displays and communication equipment such as industrial field network bridges.
One type of process variable sensor is a flow meter that can measure a rate of fluid flow, for example. Measuring flow in a pipe is a standard metric many industries need. The use of paddle style orifice plates to measure differential pressure flow is one of the most popular methods in use today. One drawback for using a paddle style orifice plate is that it is only one of several components necessary to make a measurement in a pipeline. Normally, an orifice plate is installed to create a restriction in the flow. Pressure measurements are taken just upstream and downstream of the plate using pressure ports. Typically, the pressure ports are located in special connection flanges welded into the pipeline. From these flanges the separate pressures are connected to a manifold that is attached to a differential pressure transmitter. The plate, flange tap flanges, valves, impulse tubes, instrument manifolds, and a transmitter are all separate components that must be procured and connected to make the measurement.
An alternative to the use of paddle style orifice plates is wafer style integrated flow meters which can be bolted into a pipe and connected to a data control system to get a flow measurement. However, even with the evolution of orifice plates into wafer style integrated flow meters, some users of industrial process control or monitoring systems are reticent about changing their standard practices to incorporate the newer technology associated with the wafer style integrated flow meters. In spite of combining numerous components into an integrated flow meter, some of these users do not like the additional width that comes with a wafer-type meter. The exposed bolts that span the wafer between the process flanges can be perceived as a safety risk if the fluid in the pipe is hazardous. However the narrower width of a paddle style orifice plate, typically in the range of 0.125-0.25″, does not carry the same exposed bolt perception.
Testing and other complications can limit wafer style integrated flow meters in size and materials. Expensive testing is frequently required to make a new line size and new calibration values. One reason for this can be due to the flow lab testing time required to create a formula correcting the plate's performance in different pipe schedules. Materials can be difficult to source for various tubing sizes and expensive to weld test. These and other reasons can make the use of paddle style orifice plate flow meters more desirable in certain circumstances or by some users, yet the above-discussed disadvantages of paddle style orifice plates remain.
The discussion above is merely provided for general background information and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
This Summary and the Abstract are provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. The Summary and the Abstract are not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor are they intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
A differential pressure fluid flow meter element for insertion between the connecting flanges of conduit sections of a fluid carrying conduit includes a flat orifice plate having a fluid contacting region for positioning in a flow of fluid through the conduit and a handle extending outward from an outer portion of the fluid contacting region. The flat orifice plate includes at least one pressure port formed in the fluid contacting region of the plate, and at least one impulse line channel formed in the flat orifice plate and extending from one of the at least one pressure port through the handle to a corresponding transmitter interface port. A plurality of apertures formed in the handle and disposed and arranged relative to the at least one transmitter interface port allow mounting of the process variable transmitter directly to the paddle style orifice plate handle, with the transmitter substantially perpendicular to a plane of the handle.
It must be noted that any of the disclosed features, components, apparatus, systems and method steps can be used in any combination with other disclosed features, components, apparatus, systems and method steps. The present disclosure includes such alternate combinations even though the disclosed features, components, apparatus, systems and method steps are not illustrated or discussed in combination in the example embodiments provided.
Disclosed embodiments provide a paddle style orifice plate design with embedded impulse lines which allow a process variable transmitter to be mounted on the handle of the orifice plate. This configuration allows omission of other components or fabrication/installation steps commonly required with paddle style orifice plates, such as tapped flanges, separate impulse lines, and an instrument manifold.
Process variable transmitter 102 is mounted to a handle portion 112 of a paddle style flat orifice plate 110 such that the process variable transmitter is substantially perpendicular to a plane of the handle and of the flat orifice plate 110. The plane is represented in
Referring now also to
As in
Loop communication circuitry 202 is coupleable to the process control loop 106 and is adapted to communicate upon the process control loop. Loop communication circuitry 202 can include circuitry for communicating over a wired communication link and/or a wireless communication link. Such communication can be in accordance with any appropriate process industry standard protocol such as the protocols discussed above, including both wired and wireless protocols.
As mentioned, in some exemplary embodiments, pressure sensor 224 includes first and second ports 210, 212 which are coupled to pressure ports 230 and 232 on the upstream and downstream facing surfaces 115 and 116 of orifice plate 110 through transmitter interface ports 214 and 215 on the handle 112 of the orifice plate, and through impulse line channels 211 and 213 formed in the orifice plate and extending through handle 112. Coupling of pressure sensor 224 through ports 214 and 215 includes coupling through isolation diaphragms and other pressure conveying apparatus and configurations. Sensor 224 can be any device that has an electrical characteristic that changes in response to changes in applied pressure. For example, sensor 224 can be a capacitive pressure sensor the capacitance of which changes in response to the differential pressure applied between ports 210 and 212.
Measurement circuitry 204 is coupled to sensor 224 and is configured to provide a sensor output related at least to differential pressure between ports 210 and 212. Measurement circuitry 204 can be any electronic circuitry that can provide a suitable signal related to differential pressure. For example, measurement circuitry can be an analog-to-digital converter, a capacitance-to-digital converter or any other appropriate circuitry.
Controller 206 is coupled to measurement circuitry 204 and loop communication circuitry 202. Controller 206 is adapted to provide a process variable output to loop communication circuitry 202, which output is related to the sensor output provided by measurement circuitry 204. Controller 206 can be a programmable gate array device, a microprocessor, or any other appropriate device or devices. Although loop communication circuitry 202, measurement circuitry 204 and controller 206 have been described with respect to individual modules, it is contemplated that they can be combined such as on an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). In an exemplary embodiment, memory 207 is included and is coupled to controller 206 for storage of computer readable instructions, parameter values, etc. used to configure controller 206 and/or measurement circuitry 204.
Referring now to
As can be seen in
In exemplary embodiments, methods of calculating flow taken using plate 110 can be based on ISO 5167-2. Instead of using the standard flange tap pressure taps frequently associated with paddle style orifice plates, in some exemplary embodiments pressure taps or ports 230, 232 can be corner tap pressure taps.
In some disclosed embodiments, improvement over wafer style integrated flow meters is achieved due to the absence of the wafer. For example, a standard wafer typically has a schedule 40 inside diameter and when it is installed into a different schedule pipe the discharge coefficient (Cd) needs to be adjusted by a factor known as the pipe schedule adjustment factor (PSAF). Since the disclosed embodiments utilize an orifice plate there is no wafer diameter effects to adjust for, leaving the customers and users with only plate bore and pipe inner diameter (ID) geometries to calculate flow. Since no PSAF is necessary and material is minimal, larger line sizes can be easily designed and fabricated. Using the disclosed embodiments, multiple components common to current integrated wafer flow meters, that require extensive manufacturing steps involving machining and welding, may be eliminated. In some disclosed embodiments, the number of components can be significantly reduced along with the number of manufacturing steps. Fewer processes for manufacturing can be refined and controlled. The consistency of production may also be increased. The use of less material as compared to a wafer style flow meter can provide benefits in reduced cost of certain components in exotic materials, allowing special alloys and materials to be used. Plate raw material can be easily sourced in exotic materials and the brazing process can be adapted for exotic materials.
For distribution, for example, the plate 110 can be stocked blank and then be machined to have any of the permutations of orifice bores required by customers before shipping, without compromising delivery dates. Additionally, the number of components customers will need to install to utilize disclosed paddle style orifice plates is significantly less than with wafer style flow meters. The necessity for special flanges, impulse lines, and manifolds is reduced or eliminated, making a flow meter using plate 110 substantially more plug and play. In conjunction with conditioning orifice technology, any place in a pipe with flanged connections and two diameters of upstream and downstream straight run become available measurement points.
Referring now to
In yet other embodiments, as shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Although a conditioning orifice plate is illustrated, the configuration set forth herein may be implemented with any appropriate orifice plate configuration including any number or configuration of apertures.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1480661 | Brown | Jan 1924 | A |
1559547 | Brown | Nov 1925 | A |
2614423 | Carbone | Oct 1952 | A |
2803962 | George | Aug 1957 | A |
2842962 | Horace | Jul 1958 | A |
2856962 | Christoph | Oct 1958 | A |
2927462 | Li | Jun 1960 | A |
3590637 | Brown | Jul 1971 | A |
3759098 | Logsdon et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3998097 | Akashi | Dec 1976 | A |
4249164 | Tivy | Feb 1981 | A |
4290314 | Geronime | Sep 1981 | A |
4370893 | Combes | Feb 1983 | A |
4399708 | Van Scoy | Aug 1983 | A |
4476730 | Brumm | Oct 1984 | A |
4750370 | Ossyra | Jun 1988 | A |
4938077 | Robinet | Jul 1990 | A |
5086655 | Fredericks | Feb 1992 | A |
5297426 | Kane | Mar 1994 | A |
5461932 | Hall | Oct 1995 | A |
5529093 | Gallagher | Jun 1996 | A |
6311568 | Kleven | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321166 | Evans et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345536 | Morrison | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6543297 | Kleven | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6622573 | Kleven | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6871881 | Hutton | Mar 2005 | B1 |
7255012 | Hedtke | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7284450 | Orleskie et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7591192 | Williams | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7654154 | Garnett | Feb 2010 | B2 |
9062994 | Ifft | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20030188586 | Orleskie | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20080307896 | Ifft et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090199656 | Kumar | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20140260670 | Strom et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150083262 | Van Buskirk | Mar 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 301 676 | Nov 1995 | GB |
6-213694 | Aug 1994 | JP |
0120267 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0120282 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification to Make Rectification for Chinese Patent Application No. 201520663467.4, dated Nov. 5, 2015, 2 pages. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/764,030, dated Dec. 16, 2014. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/764,030, dated Aug. 26, 2014. |
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/764,030, dated Jan. 30, 2009. |
Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 11/764,030, dated Jun. 20, 2008. |
Search Report and Written Opinion in International application No. PCT/US2016/021663 dated Jul. 14, 2016. |
Folsom R G et al: “Review of the Pitot Tube”, Transaction of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 17, No. 78, Oct. 17, 1956, pp. 1447-1460, XP002074738, ISSN: 0097-6822 figure 1 Introduction; p. 1447. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160290840 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |