The present invention relates to a paint circulating system and method, of a type suitable for use with automated spray finishing processes.
Traditional paint spray systems, of the type employed in car manufacturing for example, usually consist of several separate paint lines, each providing a different coloured paint to a spray booth for distribution to a number of user points (e.g. spray applicators). In general, only one colour is sprayed or in use at any one time, so only one line is actively employed whilst the rest remain ready for use.
When a system is not in use because the paint is not being sprayed, it is usual to maintain the spraying pressure and paint velocity in the paint line, by pumping paint from a paint tank around a circuit and back to the tank. This is done for two reasons: firstly, because the liquid paint must be kept moving, otherwise pigmentation may start to settle out in the paint lines; secondly, because the lines must be primed to the required pressure before spraying commences. However, maintaining the lines at pressure is wasteful of energy.
To ensure that the paint is at the required pressure for spraying, a Back Pressure Regulator (BPR) is used in combination with the paint pump to regulate and maintain the required fluid pressure and flow at the spray booth. In conventional systems, the BPR is adjusted manually and uses a coil spring acting on a diaphragm to vary the width of a flow passage. This helps to maintain the paint pressure upstream of the BPR by controlling the fluid flow rate returning to the paint tank. Also, in many systems (such as those employing certain types of turbine or lobe pumps) the pump will be set to operate at a fixed pressure and flow rate and the BPR used to maintain the required system pressure. In this type of system, the BPR controls system pressure by adjusting flow rate to compensate for variations in the amount of fluid used at the spray booth. Thus, each line is usually operated in the condition required for spraying, whether the paint is being used or merely circulated. This is extremely inefficient and results a large waste of energy. For example, a system operating 24 hours a day may only be required to spray each individual colour, for, say, 1 hour a day. Each pump would be operated at the pressure and flow rate required to meet the system requirement for 24 hours a day even though the paint is not required to operate at the full system pressure and flow rate for 23 hours of the day.
In addition, a pump that is required to provide a higher flow rate and pressure for a longer period of time will suffer a higher rate of wear, requiring maintenance in a much shorter period of time than one that is used more sparingly.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a paint circulation system, which alleviates the aforementioned problems.
The paint circulating system according to the invention comprises a pump for pumping paint around the system, and a back-pressure regulator (BPR) to substantially eliminate pressure fluctuations of paint upstream of the BPR. Control means control the pump and the BPR to operate in one of a flow mode, wherein a required flow rate of paint around the system is maintained, and a pressure mode, wherein a pressure of paint between the pump and the BPR is maintained.
In embodiments of the invention, in the flow mode, the BPR is configured to be de-activated so as to allow paint to flow without varying the flow rate in response to pressure fluctuations. The BPR is preferably an automated type, whereby activation means such as compressed air or a hydraulic fluid is provided to activate and/or de-activate the BPR. The BPR may comprise a diaphragm that is acted upon by a spring or by fluid pressure on one side, and by the paint pressure on the other side. In the flow mode, the control means may be configured to control the pump so as to pump paint at a fixed flow rate. The fixed flow rate is preferably a low flow rate, at or just above a minimum flow rate required for the paint.
It is an advantage that the system is able to place the BPR and pump into the flow mode when pressurised paint is not required at the spray booth. In this flow mode there is no need to maintain a high paint pressure in the lines, and the pump can be operated at a steady, low flow rate to reduce energy consumption and wear.
In embodiments of the invention, when in the pressure mode, the BPR is configured to be activated so as to respond to variations in the paint pressure to maintain a substantially constant pressure upstream of the BPR. In the pressure mode, the pump is preferably configured to deliver paint at a predetermined pressure. The pump may be a variable speed, or variable capacity pump responsive to a control signal to maintain the predetermined pressure. A pressure sensor may be provided at the pump outlet, or other suitable position in the system, to provide a pressure signal as a basis for the control signal. The control means may be arranged to receive the pressure signal and to provide the control signal to the pump for maintaining the predetermined pressure.
It is an advantage that, when paint is required at the spray booth, the system can be placed into the pressure mode by activating (i.e. turning on) the BPR and operating the pump to deliver paint at a high pressure, thereby ensuring that the paint is delivered to the spray booth at the required flow rate and pressure.
In embodiments of the invention, the controller may be operable to switch the system between the flow mode and the pressure mode in response to a demand signal. The demand signal may be provided from a plant scheduling or ‘job queue’ data processing apparatus.
In one embodiment of the invention, the controller comprises a control card for mounting in a programmable controller or computer device. The control card is preferably provided with a plurality of input and output terminals for receiving signals from sensors in the system and for providing control signals to the BPR and the pump. The control card may be provided with a data link to a graphics system for set-up and monitoring purposes.
The control card may include a plurality of channels for controlling a plurality of paint circulating systems, each providing paint to a spray booth. Each of the plurality of paint circulating systems may provide a different colour of paint to the spray booth. It is an advantage that the system can operate in a manner that will allow the “job queue” data to control circulating system operating parameters. “Job queue” data is defined as the data collected by software that monitors the position of parts throughout an automotive OEM, Tier 1 or industrial plant once the parts have been loaded on a conveyor system. The job queue data may be used to provide demand signals to the colour valves to turn on and turn off the supply of paint to the applicators in the spray booth. In the same manner, with the system of the present invention, the job queue data can now be used to provide demand signals that automatically pressurize or de-pressurize the circulating system, depending on the needs at the applicator. This ability provides great savings with regard to paint wear (shear) energy usage and general pump component wear.
Particular embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein:—
Referring to
In this set-up, the BPR 15 is employed to control the upstream pressure in the system at the desired level, typically 5 to 10 bar when the paint is in use. The BPR 15 typically includes a diaphragm, one side of which is acted upon by a coiled spring.
The pressure of paint entering the BPR 15 urges the diaphragm against the spring force to open up a passage for paint. Any reduction in paint pressure results in the diaphragm moving under the spring force, tending to close the passage. This acts as a restriction to the flow of paint, which means that a greater pressure drop occurs across the BPR 15 so that the upstream pressure is maintained. The spring force acting on the diaphragm is pre-set so that the BPR 15 acts to maintain a set upstream pressure.
The known circulating system of
Referring to
The controller 26 is configured to control the smart pump 22 and the smart BPR 25 so that these will operate in either a flow mode or a pressure mode. The mode may be determined from job queue data.
When paint is needed at the applicators 16 (as per job queue data), the system 20 will be operated in the pressure mode. The controller 26 will issue a command signal that will cause the smart BPR to be activated so that it will operate to maintain the upstream pressure according to a predetermined set pressure. The user will also have pre-set the desired system pressure into a memory of the controller 26, for example via a laptop or PC input during initial start up. The controller 26 is programmed to control the pump speed so that the pressure will be maintained, by means of a suitable control loop. The pressure sensor 24 transmits the actual pressure in the paint line to the controller 26, which reacts by using the control loop to output a signal that controls the speed of the smart pump 22. For example if the paint pressure drops in the line below the set pressure due to usage at the applicators 16, the pump 22 will speed up in order to maintain pressure. Note: The smart BPR 25 will initially dynamically reduce the amount of fluid returning to the paint tank 11 in order to maintain the set pressure. The smart pump 22 only speeds up once the BPR 25 can no longer maintain the system pressure.
When material is not in demand (as per job queue data) the system 20 will be operated in flow mode. The user will have input the minimum flow rate required to meet the desired minimum paint velocity as recommended by material supplier and the controller will control the smart pump 22 to operate at the speed required to provide this minimum flow rate. In addition the controller 26 will issue a command to de-activate the smart BPR 25. The smart BPR 25 will no longer operate to maintain the upstream pressure, so that the only system back pressure will be due to the pipework frictional resistance. Energy usage will now be at a minimum.
Referring to
In addition, the smart card 30 is provided with a serial communications link 45. This is used as a data link to a computer 38 (e.g. a PC or a lap-top) that includes a graphics system for use in setting up the smart card, and for monitoring, data-logging and display of system parameters. The computer 38 may also receive data via one or more inputs 47 relating to other operating parameters of the system, for example differential pressures across the paint filter 13, or level indicators on the paint tank 11. The smart card 30 may also be provided with a further data link 46 to another, similar smart card, so that a plurality of smart cards may be cascaded in a single control system.
In use, set point values are inputted to the smart card 30 at initial start up via the communications link 45 from the laptop or PC 38. Job queue data from the software that monitors the position of parts being conveyed through the plant reports which paint system (i.e. which colour) needs to be in readiness for production, this data will be received by the smart card 30 to control the smart pump 22 and smart BPR 25 accordingly. The job queue data is transmitted to the smart card 30 by CCR LAN to the monitoring PC 38 or by digital input 41.
The memory on the smart card 30 includes a programmed control algorithm that defines the control loop for the operation of the smart pump 22 in response to the sensed pressure from the pressure sensor 24, when the system is operating in pressure mode.
Sequence of Operation:
Material is no longer needed (after color is no longer needed at the spraybooth)
It will be recognised that the in the pressure mode, the control of the paint pressure at the spray booth results from a combination of the operation of the smart pump 22 and the smart BPR 25. Table 1 shows an example of how the paint flow rates provided by the smart pump 22 and through the smart BPR 25 might change as different amounts of paint are taken out through the applicators 16. In this example there are five applicators, designated A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5. Four different rates of paint usage are shown.
In condition 1, the system has been switched into the pressure mode, but there is not yet any paint being taken out through the applicators. The smart pump provides a flow rate of 9 L/min to ensure the required paint pressure at the applicators, and all of this flow circulates around the system through the smart BPR.
In condition 2, two applicators are spraying at a rate of 2 L/min, while one is spraying at 1 L/min and the other two are not spraying. The total amount being taken out is 5 L/min. In this condition, instead of the flow through the BPR dropping to 4 L/min and the smart pump continuing to provide a flow of 9 L/min, the amount of paint circulating through the smart BPR has only dropped to 6 L/min, while the smart pump has increased its speed to provide a flow of 11 L/min.
Similarly in condition 3, all the applicators are taking out 2 L/min each (a total of 10 L/min), while the smart pump has increased its speed to deliver 13 L/min, and the amount circulating back through the BPR has dropped to 3 L/min. This means that the smart BPR is still controlling the upstream pressure, even though the amount of paint being taken out is more than was originally being provided. The pressure of paint at the spray booth will therefore continue to be maintained by the smart BPR when there in a subsequent increase in the amount being sprayed.
In condition 4, the applicators are spraying at their maximum capacity of 3 L/min each (a total of 15 L/min). In this case there is no need to provide any flow through the smart BPR as there can be no further increase in the amount of paint being taken out of the system. The smart BPR therefore closes the line back to the paint tank and all the flow is provided from the smart pump (15 L/min).
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2244686 | Garrison et al. | Jun 1941 | A |
| 3720373 | Levey | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3730773 | Graber | May 1973 | A |
| 3816025 | O'Neill | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3939855 | Wiggins | Feb 1976 | A |
| 3958724 | Ordway | May 1976 | A |
| 3981320 | Wiggins | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4005825 | Schowiak | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4009971 | Krohn et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4019653 | Scherer et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4062220 | Taube et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4085892 | Dalton | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4116259 | Koskimies et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4215721 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4231382 | Allibert | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4231392 | Allibert | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4232055 | Shaffer | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4265858 | Crum et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4281683 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4295489 | Arends et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4311724 | Scharfenberger | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4313475 | Wiggins | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4337282 | Springer | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4348425 | Scharfenberger | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4350720 | Scharfenberger | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4375865 | Springer | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4376523 | Goyen | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4380321 | Culbertson et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4390126 | Buchholz et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4397610 | Krohn | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4487367 | Perry et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4497341 | Wright | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4509684 | Schowiak | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4545401 | Karpis | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549572 | Wright | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4569480 | Levey | Feb 1986 | A |
| RE032151 | Scharfenberger | May 1986 | E |
| 4592305 | Scharfenberger | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4593360 | Cocks | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4627465 | Kolibas et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4653532 | Powers | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4657047 | Kolibas | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4660771 | Chabert et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4700896 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4706885 | Morin | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4714179 | Otterstetter et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4728034 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4750523 | Crouse | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4776368 | Drozd | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4785760 | Tholome | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4792092 | Elberson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4813603 | Takeuchi et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4828218 | Medlock | May 1989 | A |
| 4830055 | Kolibas | May 1989 | A |
| 4844706 | Katsuyama et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4846226 | Merritt | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4878622 | Jamison et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4881563 | Christian | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4884752 | Plummer | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4902352 | Christian | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4909180 | Oishi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4915599 | Katsuyama et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917296 | Konieczynski | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4928883 | Weinstein | May 1990 | A |
| 4936340 | Potter et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936507 | Weinstein | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936509 | Weinstein | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936510 | Weinstein | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4957060 | Cann | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4962724 | Prus et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4982903 | Jamison et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4993353 | Ogasawara et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5014645 | Cann et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5033942 | Petersen | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5058805 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5058812 | Cox et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5064680 | Cann et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5072881 | Taube, III | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5074237 | Ogasawara | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5094596 | Erwin et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5096120 | Luckarz | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5096126 | Giroux et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5100057 | Wacker et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5102045 | Diana | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5102046 | Diana | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5146950 | Rodgers et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5152466 | Matushita et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5154357 | Jamison et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5171613 | Bok et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5192595 | Akeel et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193750 | LaMontagne et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5195680 | Holt | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5196067 | Lacchia | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197676 | Konieczynski et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5199650 | Ishibashi et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5205488 | Heusser | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5220259 | Werner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5221047 | Akeel | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5223306 | Bartow | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5228842 | Guebeli et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5249748 | Lacchia et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5255856 | Ishibashi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5269567 | Kubota et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5271569 | Konieczynski et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5306350 | Hoy et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5309403 | Bartow | May 1994 | A |
| 5328093 | Feitel | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5336063 | Lehrke et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5397063 | Weinstein | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411210 | Gimple et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5413283 | Gimple et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5433587 | Bankert et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5460297 | Shannon et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5485941 | Guyomard et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5549755 | Milovich et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5632816 | Allen et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5632822 | Knipe, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5676756 | Murate et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5701922 | Knipe, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5725150 | Allen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725358 | Bert et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5746831 | Allen et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5787928 | Allen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5853027 | Winkel et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854190 | Knipe, Jr. et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5863352 | Gonda | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865380 | Kazama et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5944045 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6056008 | Adams et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6077354 | Kaneski et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6154355 | Alterburger et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6168824 | Barlow et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6305419 | Krieger et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6382220 | Kefauver | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6423143 | Allen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6533488 | Blenkush et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6612345 | Hosoda et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6619563 | van der Steur | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6627266 | Dion | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6712021 | Pollock | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6712906 | Estelle et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6722257 | Yoh et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6755913 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6821096 | Kosmyna et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6976072 | Mathieson | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7026365 | Lee et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 20030101931 | Estelle et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20031019131 | Estelle | Jun 2003 | |
| 20040001765 | Wood | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040030428 | Crampton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040056045 | Kosmyna et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154532 | Ramsay | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050152789 | Kapron | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20060177565 | Bhattacharya et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060193731 | Lendzion et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20070075163 | Smith et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122555 | Jones | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070207260 | Collmer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20080230128 | Smith et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1830966 | May 2008 | EP |
| 2 656 348 | Jun 1991 | FR |
| 1 155 328 | Jun 1969 | GB |
| 1 155 328 | Jun 1969 | GB |
| 05285436 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 2008012406 | Jan 2008 | JP |
| 520315 | Feb 2003 | TW |
| 570841 | Jan 2004 | TW |
| 2005061889 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| 2005075793 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| 2007031841 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO2007029094 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO2007031841 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO2007032827 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070075163 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |