Paint spray booth treatment of waterborne coatings

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5248440
  • Patent Number
    5,248,440
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 30, 1992
    33 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 28, 1993
    32 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to a novel method for coagulating waterborne paints in paint spray booth recirculating water. The coagulant aid comprises a polynucleate hydroxy silicate-sulphate compound (hereinafter PASS) having the following average composition of the general formula:Al(OH).sub.B (SO.sub.4).sub.C (SiO.sub.X).sub.D (H.sub.2 O).sub.Ewherein B ranges from 0.75 to 2.0; C ranges from 0.30 to 1.12; D ranges from 0.005 to 0.1; X is greater than 2.0 but less or equal to 4.0 such that3=B+2C+2D(X-2)E is 1.5 to 4 when the product is in solid form; and E is larger than 4 when the product is in aqueous form, which may optionally be used together with alum or a mixture of alum and a polyamine. The coagulant aids of this invention may also be used advantageously with detackifying agents to simultaneously detackify and coagulate solvent based paint particles.
Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the treatment of recirculating water in the aqueous system of paint spray booths and more specifically to the use of certain novel coagulants which comprise polynucleate hydroxy silicate-sulfate compounds, which may optionally be advantageously used in combination with certain other organic detackification compositions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It is estimated that in the automotive and associated coatings industries, approximately 20% to 40% of the total volume of paint sprayed is overspray. The overspray is removed from the paint spray booth by air currents which are scrubbed by recirculating water. The oversprayed paint particles become entrained in the spray booth water which, if untreated, may cause plugging of piping and spray nozzles thus reducing the operating efficiency of the spray booth and increasing the voc emissions. Present paint spray booth detackification treatments are based upon clays (e.g. hectorite or bentonite) amphoteric metals (e.g. sodium zincate) and polymers (e.g. diallyldiamethyl ammonium chloride, melamine aldehydes, etc.) or a combination of these.
While the majority of paints currently used in the market are organic solvent based, in an attempt to lower voc emissions from the painting operation, the use of waterborne coatings is becoming increasingly more common. Waterborne paints are resin suspensions stabilized by a surfactant matrix which upon incorporation into the paint spray booth water disperse and/or emulsify resulting in an increase in both suspended and dissolved solids. These solids must be coagulated and removed from the spray booth water in order to maintain an effective painting operation. These solids do not, however, require detackification as required by organic solvent based paints.
There are, however, some paint spray booth operations wherein both organic solvent based paints and waterborne paints are sprayed into the same booth. Due to major differences in the formulations of waterborne paints and solvent based paints, separate paint detackification agents are necessary to treat the respective paint particles in the spray booth water. Consequently it would represent a major benefit if a single water treating agent could act not only as a coagulant but could also act as a detackifier or optionally if the coagulant could be used in combination with a detackifier without decreasing the performance of the detackifier.
Various aluminum containing compounds have been used as flocculating and coagulating agents in water treatment systems. For example, aluminum sulfate, also known in the trade as alum, has been used extensively as a coagulant in paint spray booth water. However, the use of alum has numerous disadvantages, in particular, it produces a high level of residual, soluble aluminum compounds which require additional treatment prior to discharge. In addition to alum, polyaluminum chloride has been considered for use as a coagulant aid in paint spray booth water. However, this material was found to be ineffective for coagulating water-borne paints. It was therefore surprising and unexpected that another polyaluminum salt was found to effectively coagulate waterborne paints in paint spray booth recirculating water.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved coagulant for use in the treatment of paint spray booth water containing waterborne paints.
It is another object of this invention to provide a process wherein a coagulant is added to the treating paint spray booth water to coagulate paint solids contained therein to facilitate their easy removal.
It is another object of this invention to provide a composition useful for treating paint spray booth water to coagulate waterborne paints and detackify organic solvent based paints contained therein.
In accordance with this invention, there has been provided a method of coagulating waterborne paint solids in paint spray booth water comprising adding to the water an effective amount of a polynucleate silicate-sulfate composition to coagulate the solids. The coagulant compositions of this invention may optionally be combined with various other coagulants, coagulant aids and detackifiers.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present invention is directed to a process of coagulating waterborne paints in paint spray booth recirculating water which comprises adding to the water, in an amount effective to coagulate the suspended or dissolved waterborne paint solids contained therein, a polynucleate hydroxy silicate-sulphate composition (hereinafter PASS) wherein the composition has the following general formula:
Al(OH).sub.B(SO.sub.4).sub.C (SiO.sub.X).sub.D(H.sub.2 O).sub.C
and wherein B ranges from 0.75 to 2.0; C ranges from 0.30 to 1.12; D ranges from 0.005 to 0.1; X is greater than 2.0 but less or equal to 4.0 such that
3=B+2C+2D(X-2)
E is 1.5 to 4 when the product is in solid form; and E is larger than 4 when the product is in aqueous form. The preparation of the polynucleate hydroxysilicate-sulfate coagulants of the present invention is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,981,675 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In general, the preparation of these compositions is a one-step process wherein aluminum sulfate, an alkali silicate and an alkali aluminate are reacted together in an aqueous solution under high shear mixing.
In accordance with the principles of this invention, the PASS may be added to the paint spray booth water in amounts effective to coagulate the suspended or dissolved waterborne paint solids. While the specific dosage amount can vary somewhat, in general, the compositions of this invention are added at a start-up dosage concentration of about 100-500 ppm active, and are preferably added at a concentration of from 250 to 2000 ppm. In general, the pH of the spray booth water should be greater than 7, and is preferably between 8-11.
It has also been discovered that the PASS may be advantageously used in combination with other coagulants and coagulant aids including but not limited to alum, cationic polyamines, sodium aluminate, sodium alginate, cationic aminomethylated tannins, cationic dimethylamine epihalohydrin, cationic polyaluminum chloride, and mixtures thereof. The weight ratios of PASS to coagulant aid is typically 1:99 to 99:1. These combinations are added to the system in the above dosage concentrations.
It has also been surprisingly discovered, that PASS may preferably be used in combination with other known detackifying agents to detackify solvent based paint particles in paint spray booth water. Thus in accordance with the principles of this invention, it is possible to utilize a waterborne paint treatment program in combination with an organic solvent based paint detackification treatment program, where appropriate, to simultaneously coagulate the waterborne paint particles and to detackify the solvent based paint particles, with no negative effects upon the extent of either detackification or coagulation.
Suitable detackifiers for use with the PASS coagulating compositions of this invention include, but are not limited to, melamine aldehydes such as, e.g. melamine formaldehyde, melamine dicyandiamide, or tannin-based polymers (as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,060 which is incorporated herein in its entirety), and the like, and mixtures thereof.
The above detackifiers can be added to the aqueous systems containing both waterborne paint and organic solvent based paint particles at a start-up dosage of about 350 ppm and at a maintenance dosage of from 0.15 to about 0.5 lbs product/lb paint overspray. The waterborne coagulating treatments can be added to the system at a start-up dosage of from 100 to 500 ppm active corresponding to a ratio of detackifier:coagulant of from (0.35 to 1.4):1 While it is preferred to add these treating agents separately, it is possible to pre-blend these compositions in accordance with the foregoing proportions. These proportions are not, per se, critical to the invention, and in general, they may vary greatly depending on the nature of the system being treated. Those of skill in the art can readily determine appropriate dosage amounts using conventional techniques.
Without further elaboration, it is believed that one of ordinary skill in the art, using the foregoing detailed description, can readily utilize the present invention to its fullest extent. The following examples are provided to illustrate the present invention in accordance with the principles of the present invention, but are not to be construed as limiting the invention in any way, except as provided in the appended claims.





Example 1
An initial screening was performed, as indicated in Tables 1-3 wherein several coagulants and coagulant aids were evaluated against two waterborne paint concentrations, 1% and 1.5% w/w respectively. Coagulant aids include polyaluminum chloride and alum; and coagulants include cationic polyamines, starches and tannin. The effectiveness of the coagulants and coagulant aids was qualitatively determined by the appearance of the floc. Thus, a pin floc was categorized as poor whereas a floc of 2-3 mm in diameter was categorized as excellent. Polyaluminum silicate sulfate was used as a control, and as shown in Tables 1 and 2 exhibited enhanced effectiveness at higher paint concentrations.
TABLE 1A__________________________________________________________________________Initial Screening of Coagulant and Coagulant Aids Upona Blue Waterborne Paint (1% w/w solution in D.I. water)Treatment 250 500 750 1000 1250 1800 1750__________________________________________________________________________PASS NC Poor Poor Good Good Good GoodAlum Good Good Good Good Good Good GoodCS1 NC Poor Poor Poor Poor Good GoodCS2 NC Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor PoorDMAC NC Poor Poor Good Good Good GoodCS/A NC Poor Poor POor Poor Poor GoodPAC NC Excl Good Good Good Good Good__________________________________________________________________________ NOTES: NC = No Change CS1 and CS2 denote quaternary ammonium cationic polysaccharides having charge densities of 3.0 and 1.5 meg/q, respectively, as disclosed in U. S. Pat. No. 4,088,600. DMAC denotes a water soluble quaternary ammonium polymer as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,288,770 having an average molecular weight of about 250,000. CS/A denotes a cationic polysaccharide combination having a charge densit of about 2 meg/q. PAC denotes polyaluminum chloride.
TABLE 1B__________________________________________________________________________Blue Waterborne Paint(1.5% w/w solution in D.I. water)Treatment 500 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000__________________________________________________________________________PASS Sm Floc Fair Excl Good Good Good FlocADE Good Excl Good Good Good Good FlocCS4 Sm Floc Poor Floc Poor Floc NC NC Poor NCNAA NC NC NC NC NC NC NCAMT NC NC NC Poor Floc Poor Floc Fair Floc FairM/F NC NC NC NC NC NC NCCH Poor Good Good Good Good Floc FlocDMAE1 Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Floc FlocDMAC2 Sm Poor Poor Poor Good Good Good__________________________________________________________________________ NOTES: Floc description/clarity description. NC = No Change. ADE denotes a mixture of alum and dimethylamine epichlorohydrin. CS4 is a cationic polysaccharide combination having a charge density of about 1.5 meq/g. NAA denotes sodium aluminate. AMT denotes a cationic tanninbased polymer prepared in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,080. CH = chlorohydrol. DMAE1 denotes dimethylamine epichlorohydrin having an average molecular weight of about 250,000. DMAC2 denotes dimethyldiallylammonium chloride having an average molecula weight of about 350,000.
TABLE 2A__________________________________________________________________________Initial Screening of Coagulant and Coagulant Aids Upona Yellow Waterborne Paint (1% w/w Soln. in D.I. water)Treatment 250 ppm 500 ppm 750 ppm 1000 ppm 1250 ppm 1500 ppm 2000 ppm__________________________________________________________________________PASS Poor Excl Good Good Good Good GoodAlum Excl Excl Good Good Good Good GoodCS1 Poor Good Good Good Good Good GoodCS3 Poor Poor Poor Good Good Good GoodCS6 Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Good GoodCS7 Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Good GoodDMAE2 Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Good GoodDMAC Good Good Good Good Good Good GoodCMS Poor Good Good Good Good Good GoodCMS/A Poor Poor Good Good Good Good GoodPAC Good Good Good Good Good Good GoodDMAE Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor PoorDMAE2/PAC Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor PoorDMAE/PAC Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor__________________________________________________________________________ CS1, CS3, and CS6 denote cationic polysaccharide having charge densities of greater than 3.0 meq/g, 2 to 3 meq/g and less than 1.0 meq/g, respectively. CS7 is a cationic polysaccharide combination having a charge density of less than 1.0 meq/g. DMAE2 denotes dimethylamine epichlorohydrin having an average molecular weight of about 60,000. CMS denotes a cationically modified polysaccharide. CMS/A denotes a cationically modified polysaccharide combination. PAC denotes polyaluminum chloride. DMAE denotes dimethylamineepichlorohydrin having an average molecular weight between 60,000-300,000. DMAE(2)/PAC are blends of DMAE(2) and PAC.
TABLE 2B__________________________________________________________________________Yellow Waterborne Paint (1.5% w/w Soln. in D.I. water)Treatment 500 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000__________________________________________________________________________PASS Good Excl Good Good Good Good GoodADE Good Good Good Good Good Good GoodCS4 Poor Fair Good Good Good Good GoodNAA NC NC NC NC NC NC NCAMT Fair Fair Good Good Good Good GoodM/F NC NC Poor Fair Poor Poor PoorCH Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor NC NCDMAE Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor NC NCDMAC2 Fair Good Good Good Good Good Good__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Black Waterborne Paint (Account:Modline)(1% w/w Soln. in D.I. water)Treatment 250 ppm 500 ppm 750 ppm 1000 ppm 1250 ppm 1500 ppm 1750 ppm 2000 ppm__________________________________________________________________________PASS NC NC NC Good Good Good Good GoodAlum Good Good Good Good Good Good Good GoodCS1 NC NC Good Good Good Good Good GoodCS4 NC NC NC Good Good Good Good GoodDMAC NC NC NC NC NC NC Good GoodCMS/A NC NC Poor Good Good Good Good GoodPAC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good__________________________________________________________________________
Example 2
This example illustrates the effectiveness of combinations of PASS and a mixture of alum, polyamine and hydrochloric acid in water.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Coagulant Combinations for Waterborne Paints(1% w/w Soln. in D.I. water)Treatment 250 ppm 500 ppm 750 ppm 1000 ppm 1250 ppm 1500 ppm 1750 ppm 2000 ppm__________________________________________________________________________Yellow WaterbornePASS/ADE Excl Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Excl Excl Excl Excl Excl Excl Excl Excl(30, 70)PASS/PAC Poor Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/PAC Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)CS6/PAC Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)Black Waterborne (Modline)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)PASS/PAC NC NC NC Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/PAC NC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)CS6/PAC NC NC NC Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)Blue WaterbornePASS/ADE NC Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Poor Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)PASS/PAC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/PAC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)CS6/PAC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Optimization of Polyaluminum Silicate Sulphate Combinations(1% w/w Soln. in D.I. Water)Treatment 250 ppm 500 ppm 750 ppm 1000 ppm 1250 ppm 1500 ppm 1750 ppm 2000 ppm__________________________________________________________________________Yellow WaterborneAlum/PASS Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Excl Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good(60, 40)PASS/ADE Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(50, 50)PASS/ADE Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(40, 60)PASS/ADE Excl Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)Blue WaterborneAlum/PASS Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(60, 40)PASS/ADE Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(50, 50)PASS/ADE Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(40, 60)PASS/ADE Poor Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)Black Waterborne (General Motors)Alum/PASS NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(60, 40)PASS/ADE Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(50, 50)PASS/ADE Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(40, 60)PASS/ADE Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)Black Waterborne (Modline)Alum/PASS NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE NC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE NC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good(60, 40)PASS/ADE NC NC Good Good Good Good Good Good(50, 50)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(40, 60)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)Navistar Brown Waterborne (Ohio Rubber)Alum/PASS NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(70, 30)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(60, 40)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(50, 50)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(40, 60)PASS/ADE NC Good Good Good Good Good Good Good(30, 70)__________________________________________________________________________
Example 3
The most effective coagulants and coagulant aid combinations of example 2 were rescreened and the supernatant clarity was determined by a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 490 nm. Table 6 illustrates the relative effectiveness of the combinations upon two waterborne paint samples.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Supernate Clarity Following Coagulant Screening TreatmentsConcentrations PASS Alum PASS/ADE ADE PAC CH CS1 CS3 CS4 DMAE__________________________________________________________________________(Yellow Waterborne) 250 ppm 0 84 92 2 47 0 0 0 0 0 500 ppm 89 86 44 4 0 0 72 0 0 01000 ppm 87 83 50 4 0 0 0 91 94 01500 ppm 73 80 53 8 0 0 0 0 6 02000 ppm 67 91 64 14 0 0 0 0 0 0Black Waterborne (Modline) 250 ppm 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 ppm 0 75 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 01000 ppm 0 78 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 01500 ppm 39 75 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 02000 ppm 77 73 75 0 0 0 39 0 31 0__________________________________________________________________________
Example 4
This example, as illustrated in Table 7, shows the general ineffectiveness of cationic flocculants as waterborne paint coagulants. As is apparent, these flocculants required in excess of 100 ppm to develop a floc, which would be considered unacceptable from a commercial standpoint.
TABLE 7______________________________________Cationic Flocculant Screening Upon Waterborne PaintsBlack Waterborne (General Motors)Concentration (ppm)25 50 100 150 200 250 300______________________________________PAA1 NC NC Good Good Good Good GoodPAA2 NC NC Good Good Good Good GoodPAA3 NC NC Good Good Good Good GoodPAA4 NC NC Good Good Good Good GoodPAA5 NC Good Good Good Good Good GoodSummary of ResultsAll the above flocculants performed poorly upon waterbornepaints from Modline (black) and Ohio Rubber (navistar brown).All anionic flocculants performed poorly upon the yellowwaterborne paints.______________________________________ Note: PAA1 denotes cationic polyacrylamide having high charge, low molecular weight. PAA2 denotes cationic polyacrylamide having low charge, high molecular weight. PAA3 denotes cationic polyacrylamide having low charge, high molecular weight. PAA4 denotes cationic polyacrylamide having high charge, medium molecular weight. PAA4 denotes cationic polyacrylamide having high charge, high molecular weight.
Example 5
The recirculating system of a paint spray booth was filled with 14 liters of a 10,000 ppm solution of melamine dicyandiamide formaldehyde and deionized water. The pH of the solution was adjusted .gtoreq.8.5 and an anionic (-0.5 meq/g) polyacrylamide was then added. A pin floc developed as a result of a reaction between the two polymers which quickly sheared providing a solid particle dispersion. The three waterborne treatments (alum, PASS and PASS/ADE) were added separately in three different paint spray booth (P.S.B.) tests (500 ppm). A red and black solvent high solids enamel paint was sprayed (20 ml) and the detackification assessed. None of the waterborne treatments had a negative effect upon the extent of detackification achieved using melamine dicyandiamide formaldehyde and a hydrolyzed polyacrylamide alone.
A yellow waterborne paint was then sprayed in the three separate tests and the paint was coagulated without any negative influence from the solvent paint detackification program.
Therefore, it is possible to utilize a waterborne treatment of either alum or PASS or PASS/ADE with the organic detackification program where appropriate.
Claims
  • 1. A method of coagulating waterborne paint particles in paint spray booth recirculating water comprising adding to the water, in an amount effective to coagulate the paint particles, a polynucleate hydroxy silicate-sulphate compound (hereinafter PASS) having the following average composition of the general formula:
  • Al(OH).sub.B (SO.sub.4).sub.C (SiO.sub.X).sub.D (H.sub.2 O).sub.E
  • wherein B ranges from 0.75 to 2.0; C ranges from 0.30 to 1.12; D ranges from 0.005 to 0.1; X is greater than 2.0 but less or equal to 4.0 such that
  • 3=B+2C+2D(X-2)
  • E is 1.5 to 4 when the product is in solid form; and E is larger than 4 when the product is in aqueous form and removing the coagulated paint particles to clarify said water inserted.
  • 2. A method of coagulating waterborne paints according to claim 1 wherein the effective amount is between 100 ppm and 2000 ppm.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the PASS is added to the system in combination with a coagulant aid selected from the group consisting of alum, cationic polyamine, polyaluminum chloride, sodium aluminate, sodium alginate, tannins, aminomethylated tannins, cationic dimethylamine epihalohydrins, and mixtures thereof.
  • 4. A method according to claim 3 wherein the weight ratio of PASS to coagulant aid is from 1:99 to 99:1.
  • 5. A method of coagulating waterborne paint particles and detackifying solvent based paint particles in paint spray booth recirculating water comprising adding to the water a polynucleate hydroxy silicate-sulphate compound (hereinafter PASS) having the following average composition of the general formula:
  • Al(OH).sub.B (SO.sub.4).sub.C (SiO.sub.X).sub.D (H.sub.2 O).sub.E
  • wherein B ranges from 0.75 to 2.0; C ranges from 0.30 to 1.12; D ranges from 0.005 to 0.1; X is greater than 2.0 but less or equal to 4.0 such that
  • 3=B+2C+2D(X-2)
  • E is 1.5 to 4 when the product is in solid form; and E is larger than 4 when the product is in aqueous form together with a detackifying agent in an amount effective to coagulate the waterborne paint and to detackify the solvent based paint particles, respectively and removing the coagulated and de-tackified paint particles to clarify said water.
US Referenced Citations (51)
Number Name Date Kind
2345543 Wohnsiedler et al. Mar 1944
2485079 Wohnsiedler et al. Nov 1949
2820777 Suen et al. Jan 1958
2884395 Wohnsiedler Apr 1959
3288770 Butler Nov 1966
3515575 Arnold Jun 1970
3718693 Samour et al. Feb 1973
3738945 Panzer et al. Feb 1972
3751451 Samour et al. Aug 1973
3780092 Samour et al. Dec 1973
3839419 Samour et al. Oct 1974
3861887 Forney Jan 1975
3879447 Samour et al. Apr 1975
3898274 Samour et al. Aug 1975
3925442 Samour Dec 1975
3928423 Samour et al. Dec 1975
3936492 Samour et al. Feb 1976
3953330 Tonkyn et al. Apr 1976
3990869 Forney Nov 1976
3990986 Gabel et al. Nov 1976
4002490 Michalski et al. Jan 1977
4055495 Gabel et al. Oct 1977
4125476 Dean Nov 1978
4130674 Roberts et al. Dec 1978
4185970 Dean Jan 1980
4440647 Puchalski Apr 1984
4481116 Cabestany et al. Nov 1984
4504395 Harpel et al. Mar 1985
4548967 Brown et al. Oct 1985
4554026 Cosper et al. Nov 1985
4558080 Quamme et al. Dec 1985
4563199 Lindenberger et al. Jan 1986
4564464 Harpel et al. Jan 1986
4600513 Mizutani et al. Jul 1986
4629572 Leitz et al. Dec 1986
4637824 Pominville Jan 1987
4656059 Mizuno et al. Apr 1987
4686047 Arots Aug 1987
4715962 Bhattacharyya et al. Dec 1987
4753738 Huang Jun 1988
4764561 Kiss et al. Aug 1988
4792364 Huang Dec 1988
4800217 Kiss et al. Jan 1989
4853132 Merrell et al. Aug 1989
4861491 Svensson Aug 1989
4888386 Huang et al. Dec 1989
4904393 Mitchell et al. Feb 1990
4913825 Mitchell Apr 1990
4981675 Haase et al. Jan 1991
5116514 Bhattacharyya et al. May 1992
5147557 Purnell Sep 1992
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2185739 Jul 1987 GBX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Automotive Coatings, Chemical Week, Jul. 4, 1984, pp. 30-34.