The present invention relates to an in-line painting installation, in particular for painting motor vehicle components.
For many years, motor vehicle bodywork components have been painted in-line. Each component passes in succession through a plurality of cabins for preparing, applying, drying, . . . purposes.
The main concerns of operators in the field of painting are associated firstly with reducing energy consumption in operation and secondly with ensuring line flexibility. An important factor in energy expenditure stems from creating and maintaining a vertical flow of air sweeping through a paint application station so as to limit as much as possible any contamination of elements of the line by particles of paint that are in suspension in the air and that have not become deposited on an article for painting. These particles are entrained downwards by a vertical flow of air sweeping through the entire volume of the painting station, the stream of air heading into a bottom cabinet where it is subjected to treatment, serving firstly to separate the paint out from the air, and secondly to adjust its humidity so that, in particular, it can advantageously be recycled. The energy expended in blowing the air constitutes an operating expense that it is advantageous to minimize.
Concerning flexibility, users seek the greatest possible diversity in articles for painting that can travel along the same line. In other words, the painting line is advantageous if it enables parts of some other type to be accepted merely by simple operations of changing the programming of the painting robot and of the part-supporting conveyors.
Present painting lines can be classified into two main categories:
Neither of those two categories presents an advantage that is decisive in terms of flexibility.
The invention satisfies the expectations of users better than existing installations both from the point of view of economy and from the point of view of flexibility, while presenting operating flexibility that enables cycle times to be reduced as much as possible.
Thus, the invention provides a painting installation comprising at least one painting cabin through which each part for painting passes, the cabin being situated between a top distributor manifold for blowing air and bottom means for collecting, recovering, and treating air carrying particles of paint, the cabin also being provided with at least one applicator for applying paint to the part, the applicator possessing a plurality of degrees of freedom, and with a conveyor for conveying the part, the conveyor possessing a number of degrees of freedom that is smaller than that of the applicator.
According to the invention, while the part is present in the cabin, the position of the part in the frame of reference of the cabin is controlled by the position of the applicator in said frame of reference by programmable means for servo-controlling the motor of the conveyor to the applicator.
One of the results of this servo-control connection between the conveyor and the applicator (which may be performed point by point: each point of the applicator corresponding to a position of the conveyor) is that it makes it possible to confine the relative movements of the part and of the applicator in a space of volume that is as small as possible. Consequently, extensions of the robot arm forming part of the applicator can be minimized to such an extent that is it is possible to limit the movements of the applicator to within a sector in three dimensions that presents an angle that is narrower than that previously required. Thus, the applicator can be housed in a corner of a cabin, thereby enabling the ground area occupied by the cabin to be reduced, and thus enabling the section of the volume swept by the flow of air to be reduced. As a result, other things being equal, energy savings are achieved.
The vertical walls that define such a cabin can then diverge going away from the entry into the cabin and converge going towards its exit, the applicator being housed in the vicinity of one of these oblique walls.
It should be observed that the greatest amount of confinement is obtained when the painting applicator is stationary and all of the degrees of freedom relating to the part for painting and relative to the applicator are carried by the conveyor of the part. However that is a theoretical condition that does not correspond to reality on a painting line. Such a conveyor would need to be constituted by a robot having at least at six axes. The expense of that solution would be completely unacceptable. Furthermore, it is not possible to envisage providing robots capable of handling an entire vehicle body, even though the invention is suitable for use therewith. Finally, such a conveyor robot would necessarily be exposed to contamination and the cost of maintaining it would also be very high.
In reality, the invention takes account of the fact that the conveyor in each cell is a simple self-contained conveyor, e.g. made up of a table on wheels. The degrees of freedom presented by the part in the cabin are those of the conveyor, enabling the conveyor to move forwards, to stop, and to reverse. In a more elaborate version, one or two rotations can be added enabling the part to turn about a vertical pivot perpendicular to the travel direction of the base conveyor. In any event, it is appropriate to ensure that the conveyor for conveying the part through the cabin is as simple as possible in order to facilitate maintenance. Servo-controlling the motor of the conveyor as a function of the position of the applicator also presents the advantage of enabling parts of different shapes to be processed in the same painting cabin. The path of the applicator is trained or programmed, and starting from this new path for a new part, it suffices to modify the parameters of the servo-control over the operation of the conveyor to said new path in order to obtain the desired result.
Furthermore, the invention makes it possible to save at least some of the time needed either while transferring a part from one station to another or while changing color from one part to another.
Preferably, each cabin has two independent conveyors controlled by the applicator, thus enabling cycle times to be optimized.
The paint installation of the invention lends itself advantageously to modularization. The sweeping air requirements are small enough to enable the installation for treating the air, and in particular including separating out the paint, to be contained in a basement of the cabin that can be fitted within the horizontal dimensions of the cabin, so that the cabin and its basement constitutes a self-contained unit fitted within a structure that is substantially rectangular and in which it is also possible to include ducts for transferring recycled air between the basement and the top distributor manifold.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention appear from the following description of embodiments given purely by way of indication.
Reference is made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The article for painting is carried by a support 6 that has entered the cabin via the entry 3 and that is secured to a conveyor 7 inside the cabin, enabling the support 6 to be moved inside the cabin in the travel direction A of the articles through the paint line. The applicator robot 5 is housed in an alcove 8, and its sweep angle is represented by angle D in
It has been observed that by organizing the relative movement between the applicator and the part in a manner that is different from that which is presently in existence, and in particular by using the degrees of freedom of the part-carrying conveyor better than they are used at present (advance, stop, or travel continuously), it is possible to reduce the size of this zone of contamination, thereby reducing the size of the cabins and thus the magnitude of the flow of sweeping air needed for proper operation thereof.
In a preferred embodiment, the conveyor 7 is actually made up of two motor-driven conveyors 7a and 7b with two motors 11 and 12, the support 6 being secured to the conveyor 7a while a support 13 following the support 6 is secured to the conveyor 7b. The motor 12 of the conveyor 7b is also servo-controlled in operation by the programmable unit U to the position of the applicator robot 5. By virtue of this disposition, it is possible to achieve better control over the relative position of two consecutive supports 6 and 13 so as to optimize working times by preparing the arrival of an article secured to the support 13 in concurrent time while the article 9 on the support 6 is being subjected to painting treatment. The servo-control of the motors 11 and 12 serve to obtain varying speeds in a direction B or in the opposite direction C for each of the conveyors 7a and 7b, and also stationary periods.
Finally,
This figure shows two successive cabins 21 and 31, each possessing two applicator robots such as 25a and 25b for the cabin 21 and 35a and 35b for the cabin 31 that are disposed in a mirror image configuration to each other about a longitudinal plane of symmetry parallel to the travel direction of the parts 9. With these duplicated robots, it is possible in one cabin to process twice as many parts in a given cycle time while optimizing the horizontal section of the cabin. If the articles 9 in the cabin 31 are secured to a support 6, itself coupled to the conveyor 37a of that cabin, then the articles 9 being processed in the cabin 21 are carried by a support 13 coupled to the conveyor 27b of that cabin 21 such that when these parts reach the cabin 31, the support 13 will be taken over by the conveyor 37b that is distinct from the conveyor 37a so as to make it possible to adjust for the best the relative positions of the parts entering the cabin 31 and the parts being processed therein. In
By means of this modular structure, it is entirely possible to transform an existing line, e.g. having two adjacent cabins 21 and 31 as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
05 09140 | Sep 2005 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2006/002000 | 8/29/2006 | WO | 00 | 3/7/2008 |