The invention relates to a pair of cutting jaws.
In particular for separating bodies in rod form, so furthermore for example for separating threaded rods or the like, hand-held tools which have a pair of cutting jaws are preferably used. Such pairs of jaws are generally made up of a fixed jaw and a movable jaw, which can be displaced toward the fixed jaw.
In view of the known prior art, a technical problem for the invention is seen in the provision of a pair of cutting jaws of the type in question by means of which the transmission of high cutting forces can be achieved and which at the same time can be easily handled and allow individual adaptability to the circumstances, for example to the diameter of the workpiece to be cut.
A pair of cutting jaws are provided as individual jaws for hydraulic or electric pressing tools. Each jaw is formed in the manner of a lever, with a driving portion and a working portion, which extend in opposite directions from a pivot axis, the working portion also being reduced in its thickness by half or more in comparison with the driving portion. This configuration results in a pair of cutting jaws which, by being configured as exchangeable jaws, can be interchangeably disposed on a hydraulic and/or electric pressing tool. It is therefore further possible, for example, for pairs of cutting jaws of different dimensions to be used for cutting rods or the like of different materials and/or with different diameters. Using a pressing tool to act upon the cutting jaws allows high cutting forces to be transmitted, which is further enhanced by the lever-like configuration of the cutting jaws. Moreover, the further proposed reduction in the thickness of the jaws in the region of the working portion makes them easy to handle, in particular in confined working areas. It is therefore also possible by means of the proposed pair of cutting jaws to use the pressing tool for cutting rods or the like in areas where access is difficult and space is restricted. For this purpose, the working portion has a thickness that is reduced by at least half in comparison with the driving portion, so furthermore a thickness that corresponds to 0.1 to 0.5, further for example 0.2 or 0.3 to 0.4, of the thickness of the driving portion.
The subject matters of the further claims are explained below with reference to the subject matter of claim 1, but may also be of importance in their independent formulation.
So, in a preferred configuration of the subject matter of the invention it is provided that the working portion has a region of continuously decreasing thickness. Correspondingly, the reduction in thickness is not, or not necessarily, provided abruptly, for example in the manner of steps, but rather such that it decreases continuously, at least over part of the portion. As a result of such a continuous reduction in thickness, a flank at the surface when seen in cross section through the working portion may assume an acute angle of 5 to 45°, further for example an angle of 15° or 30°, in relation to a plane of the driving portion that is parallel to the surface.
In one configuration of the subject matter of the invention, it is provided that a cutting blade is formed on one jaw and a supporting surface running at right angles to the axis of pivoting is formed on the other jaw. Said supporting surface acts like an anvil for the cutting blade of the other jaw, moving toward it or pivoted onto it. The cutting blade of the other jaw is achieved in cross section by a pointed formation of the thickness-reduced portion of the working portion, this further preferably extending from a thickness of the heel of the blade that corresponds substantially to the thickness measured in the same direction of the anvil-like opposing supporting surface.
The region of continuously decreasing thickness of the working portion is chosen such that, associated with the cutting edge, the thickness of the working portion is the same over the length of the jaw. Correspondingly, the projected region of the cutting blade, when viewed in the longitudinal extent of the jaw, is provided with a constant thickness that is reduced in comparison with the driving portion. From the end of the cutting blade closer to the pivot axis, or else at a, spacing from this end, the working portion thickens in a continuously increasing manner up to a thickness dimension that corresponds approximately to the thickness dimension of the driving portion. In a further preferred configuration, the region of the other cutting jaw, lying opposite the cutting edge and serving as an anvil-like supporting surface for the cutting blade, is also provided with a constant thickness over the length in projection of the cutting blade, further preferably with a thickness corresponding to the thickness of the heel of the blade.
In order in particular to dissipate high cutting forces safely, it is provided in a preferred development of the subject matter of the invention that the cutting blade goes over on the pivot axis side into a supporting surface running at right angles to the pivot axis. Here, the cutting edge preferably lies in the plane formed by the neighbouring supporting surface, which supporting surface is additionally formed in a planar manner. This supporting surface adjacent the cutting edge is further preferably formed in the region of continuously increasing thickness of the working portion and, in the abutting or cutting position of the pair of cutting jaws, meets a facing, likewise planar-formed supporting face of the other cutting jaw. These two supporting surfaces, formed on the pivot axis side of the cutting blade and the anvil-like supporting surface, respectively, are preferably of the same configuration in outline, so that full surface contact is obtained in the cutting position. In the case of the cutting jaw opposing the cutting blade, this supporting surface, formed in the region of the continuously reducing thickness, goes over into the anvil-like supporting surface that is opposing the cutting blade and has a constant thickness over the length or the projection of the cutting blade.
In an exemplary configuration of the subject matter of the invention, the cutting blade and the supporting surfaces are formed in a portion of the jaws that is as a whole trapezoidal. This trapezoidal portion is made up of the respective end regions of the working portions that are associated with the cutting blade. So, furthermore, the thickness-reduced regions of the jaws are also formed in this trapezoidal portion.
In an exemplary configuration of the subject matter of the invention, the cutting blade and the supporting surfaces are formed in a portion of the jaws that is as a whole trapezoidal with respect to a projection into a plane of pivoting. This trapezoidal portion is made up of the respective end regions of the working portions that are associated with the cutting blade. So, furthermore, the thickness-reduced regions of the jaws are also formed in this trapezoidal portion.
For limiting the opening gap in the direction of the pivot axis, an abutment projection is formed on the working portion of one and/or the other jaw. This abutment projection is chosen such that the opening gap is limited in its opening width in the opening direction of the jaws to match the configuration of the cutting jaws or to match the cutting blade or furthermore to match the pressing tool, and consequently the cutting force that can be applied by means of the pressing tool. This counteracts the problem, for example, of using an inappropriately dimensioned pair of cutting jaws on a rod or the like of a diameter that is too large. So, for example, the opening angle is limited to 5 to 30°, so furthermore for example to 10 to 15°, so that furthermore, for example, a maximum opening dimension for receiving a workpiece to be cut is achieved, which maximum opening dimension corresponds approximately to the length of the cutting edge or less. So it is proposed that the jaws can only be opened by such an angle that the greatest clear spacing between the jaws corresponds to the length of the cutting edge.
The cutting blade and/or the supporting face are integrally formed in one piece on the jaw. In a further alternative configuration, it is also possible for both jaws to have cutting edges that meet one another, which in this case further go over on the pivot axis side into a supporting surface running at right angles to the pivot axis.
The invention is explained in more detail below on the basis of the accompanying drawing, which merely illustrates two exemplary embodiments and in which:
Shown and described, in first instance with respect to
The two cutting jaws 3 and 3′ are formed substantially identically to one another with the exception of the direct cutting region, and respectively have bearing eyes 4, 5 with coaxial mounting openings 6.
Each cutting jaw 3 and 3′ is formed in the manner of a lever, with driving portions 7 and working portions 8 extending oppositely from a pivot axis x defined by the mounting opening 6. The mutually facing flanks of the driving portions 7 form curved paths 9.
The bearing eyes 4, 5 of each cutting jaw 3, 3′ have different thicknesses, measured in the axial direction of the mounting opening. The bearing eye 4 is thus provided with a thickness that is approximately three times that of the bearing eye 5.
The clear spacing between the two bearing eyes 4 and 5 corresponds approximately to the thickness dimension of the bearing eye 4 of greater thickness.
In the assembled state, the cutting jaws 3, 3′ are aligned with one another in such a way that the bearing eyes 4, 5 are disposed so as to engage in one another, forming connecting lugs. The bearing eye 4 of greater thickness of the one cutting jaw 3 is accordingly disposed between the two bearing eyes 4, 5 of the other cutting jaw 3′.
The mounting openings 6 of the two cutting jaws 3, 3′ are axially aligned in relation to one another and, in the assembled state, are passed through by a locking bolt 10 of the receiving neck 2.
The receiving neck 2 is configured in the customary way in the form of a fork, with a bolt receiving feature 12 in the form of a through-bore, transverse to the extent of the neck and passing through the fork legs 11. The locking bolt 10 is secured in this bolt receiving feature 12.
Extending between the fork legs 11 are the bearing eyes 4, 5 of the cutting jaws 3, 3′, a sleeve 13 being positioned between the mounting openings 6 and the locking bolt 10.
The curved paths 9 of the driving portions 7 protrude into the region between the fork legs 11 of the receiving neck 2 and are acted upon in the course of the pressing operation, counter to the effect of a spring 14 mounted between the driving portions 7, by rolling bodies 15, which can be displaced, preferably hydraulically, in the direction of the curved paths 9, which has the effect of spreading the driving portions 7 and, as a result this, effecting closing of the cutting mouth 16 formed by the working portions 8 extending in the opposite direction to the driving portions.
In their free end regions, the working portions 8 of the cutting jaws 3 and 31 are reduced in their thickness in comparison with the driving portions 7 and also in comparison with the mounting portions. So, the thickness d′ in the free end region of the working portions 8 corresponds to approximately 0.3 of the original thickness d in the region of the working portions 7 (cf.
As can be further gathered in particular from the representation in
Proceeding from the pivot axis x in the longitudinal extent of the working portions 8, a first part, so furthermore over approximately half the length of the extent of the working portion 8, has a constant thickness d. In the central region, a slight elevation is provided in comparison, to form the bearing eyes, in particular the thinner-walled bearing eyes 5.
The part of the working portions 8 that is away from the pivot axis x is reduced in thickness in comparison, the middle portion that has the original thickness d being adjoined in first instance by a portion 17 with a thickness decreasing continuously in the direction of the free end of the working portions 8. The decreasing thickness takes place uniformly on both sides toward the broad-side faces of the working portions 8, so that the broad-side faces 18 of the region 17 respectively form an acute angle beta of equal magnitude of approximately 15° in relation to a plane aligned parallel to the broad-side face 19 of the driving portions 7.
The region 17 of continuously decreasing thickness extends over approximately half the extent dimension of the entire thickness-reduced working portion 8. The remaining region 20 at the end is positioned such that it is centrally aligned in relation to the driving portion 7 and in relation to the region of the working portion 8 that is not reduced in thickness, and is provided with a constant thickness d′, which results from the continuous reduction in thickness in the region 17.
The narrow-side faces 21 of the working portions 8 in the region of the thickness that is reduced in comparison with the original thickness d, i.e. in the regions 17 and 20, are inclined with respect to a straight line defined by the mutually facing surfaces of the working portions 8 in the cutting mouth 16, crossing the pivot axis x and passing centrally through the receiving neck 2, so furthermore for instance with the inclusion of an angle delta of 30°.
According to the representation in
The two working portions 8 may be formed identically on the cutting mouth side. Shown is an embodiment in which the working portions 8 are differently formed in this respect. So, the working portion 8 of the cutting jaw 3′ forms in the region of the free end, i.e. in the region 20 with a constant reduced thickness d′, an anvil-like supporting surface 23. This planar supporting surface 23 defines a plane which is shown by line 100 in
Opposing this widened supporting surface 24 there is on the further cutting jaw 3 an identically formed supporting surface 25. In a closed position of the cutting mouth 16 (as shown for example in
The region 20 of this cutting jaw 3 is formed toward the opposing cutting jaw 3′ as a cutting blade 26 with a cutting edge 27, which extends in the longitudinal extent of the working portion 8, the cutting edge 27 furthermore running into the surface plane which is shown by line 102 in
According to the representation in
Both the closed position of the cutting mouth and the open position of the cutting mouth are defined by outwardly facing stops 28, which are disposed on the bearing eyes 5 of smaller thickness and as a result of which the pivotability of the mounted cutting jaws 3, 3′ is limited.
The stops 28 move on a circular path about the pivot axis x of the cutting jaws 3, 3′ and interact with an end face 29 of the receiving neck 2.
The stops 28 may also serve as a blocking part 30 for limiting the pivoting of the driving portions 7 with respect to one another, so that the opening of the cutting mouth that is achievable as a, result prevents gripping over a workpiece that does not match the cutting geometry and/or the cutting forces that can be applied to it by means of the pressing tool.
In the exemplary embodiment represented, the opening stop is chosen such that the cutting jaws 3, 3′ can only be opened by such an angle gamma that the greatest clear spacing a between the cutting jaws 3, 3′ corresponds at most to the length b of the cutting edge 27. So, furthermore, chosen in the exemplary embodiment represented is a maximum clear opening dimension a that corresponds approximately to three times the thickness value d′ in the thickness-reduced region 20, or corresponding approximately to the original thickness d in the region of the driving portion 7.
In the closed position of the cutting mouth according to the representations in
The cutting jaws 3, 3′ of this second embodiment are also formed in opposite directions, taken from the respective pivot axes x, at one end as a working portion 8 and at the other end as a driving portion 7, the driving portions 7 having mutually facing curved paths 9.
Like the first embodiment, the working portions 8 are formed such that they taper toward the free end, so, proceeding from a region 17 associated with the connecting lugs 32, first with a continuously reducing thickness and then in an adjoining region 20 with a constant reduced thickness d′. In this region 20 of constant thickness d′, one cutting jaw 3 forms a cutting blade 26 with a cutting edge 27, which interacts with a supporting surface 23 formed on the opposing cutting jaw 3′.
This embodiment may also have means for limiting the opening angle gamma.
All disclosed features are (in themselves) pertinent to the invention. The disclosure content of the associated/accompanying priority documents (copy of the prior application) is also hereby incorporated in full in the disclosure of the application, including for the purpose of incorporating features of these documents in claims of the present application.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2006 009 273 U | Jun 2006 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
119231 | Johnson | Sep 1871 | A |
596066 | Helwig | Dec 1897 | A |
617955 | Clement | Jan 1899 | A |
648224 | Triolo | Apr 1900 | A |
1005268 | Metzger | Oct 1911 | A |
1173527 | Mckenney | Feb 1916 | A |
1351569 | Heil | Aug 1920 | A |
1702801 | Smith | Feb 1929 | A |
1883842 | Womack | Oct 1932 | A |
1987375 | Simonsen et al. | Jan 1935 | A |
2046642 | Lynch | Jul 1936 | A |
2138726 | Cartwright | Nov 1938 | A |
2396619 | Strayer | Mar 1946 | A |
2447988 | Pierson | Aug 1948 | A |
2841924 | Fink | Jul 1958 | A |
2979862 | Tacderan | Apr 1961 | A |
3834215 | Lemley | Sep 1974 | A |
4141141 | ViPond | Feb 1979 | A |
4255857 | Foley | Mar 1981 | A |
4967475 | O'Keeffe et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5359775 | Morikawa et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5438753 | Stepan | Aug 1995 | A |
5926958 | Ramun | Jul 1999 | A |
5937626 | Gorman | Aug 1999 | A |
6244085 | Dummermuth | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6619158 | Bates et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7216523 | Frenken | May 2007 | B2 |
7216575 | Alseth et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7254982 | Frenken | Aug 2007 | B2 |
20030126747 | Kusaba | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20070033812 | Kimura | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080072434 | Clemons et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080072436 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |