The invention relates to the field of pallets. More particularly, the invention relates to plastic pallets.
Large numbers of conventional pallets are known in the industry, most of which are made of wood. These wooden pallets are often particularly inexpensive disposable pallets, but there area also higher quality wooden pallets that are constructed, so as to last through multiple use cycles.
A smaller number of the pallets are made of plastic. Plastic pallets, also known as skids, are preferred particularly in fields where hygiene concerns are high, because the smooth plastic surface does not readily absorb dirt and is particularly easy to clean.
Compared to wooden pallets, plastic pallets slide more easily. This can be problematic when empty plastic pallets are stacked directly one on top of the other. It is known to provide an anti-slip coating or device on plastic pallets, in order to allow such empty pallets to be stacked in a secure manner. The anti-slip effect on a pallet can sometimes be diminished, depending on weather conditions. For example, a layer of frost on a pallet reduces the anti-slip effect.
It is known to provide projecting contours on a pallet, for example, edge strips that project upwards beyond the surface of the pallet deck. In some cases, these strips are placed within the base load area of the pallet deck, and in other cases, are placed outside the base load area, so that the pallet deck maintains a full, standardized pallet load area of, for example, 1200×800 mm, on which the load can be placed. In highly automated environments, such as fulfillment centers and the like, such projecting contours that extend beyond the standardized dimensions of a pallet can create problems with automated materials handling systems.
What is needed, therefore, is a pallet that is stackable with other pallets to form a stack that is stable. What is yet further needed is such a stackable pallet that maintains standardized dimensions.
The invention is a plastic pallet that allows empty pallets according to the invention to be stacked into a stack that has high stability. The invention also allows wooden and plastic pallets to be stacked together. To achieve this, the pallet according to the invention has stacking stops on its pallet deck and voids on its runners that accommodate the stacking stops of another pallet of the same construction. Thus, stacked pallets of the same construction form a positive fit with one another, thereby creating a stable stack.
Some facilities work with both plastic and wooden pallets. For this reason, the pallet according to the invention is constructed to allow a wooden pallet to be reliably stacked on top of the plastic pallet.
The pallet according to the invention is a rectangular pallet, i.e., has two long sides and two short sides. The short sides form the front and rear end faces of the pallet and have the forklift pockets that allow the pallet to be transported by an industrial truck. The bottom of the pallet has three parallel runners or skids that extend the length of the pallet and provide the contact surface of the pallet with the floor. Between the pallet deck and the runners are legs that provide space for the forklift pockets. The pallet deck, i.e., the upper surface of the pallet, has a base load area for receiving a load of goods. Typically, the base load area of the pallet is a standardized dimension and the pallet shown herein is a standard European pallet that has a base load area of 800×1200 mm. It is understood, however, that the present invention is not limited to a pallet having these dimensions.
The pallet according to the invention has runners that differ from the typical runner on a wooden pallet. Wooden runners are rectangular. They are flat boards that have been simply cut to length, i.e., they have square or 90-degree corners. The pallet according to the invention, by contrast, has runners that extend the length of the pallet, but the corner areas of the runners are rounded or have a 45-degree chamfer, in other words, have a contour at the corners that deviates from an exactly rectangular contour, thereby creating an open space in the corner areas. This open space is hereinafter referred to as a void.
Multiple stacking stops are provided on the pallet deck, placed on each of the short sides at locations that are directly above the voids formed at the corners of the runners below the deck. When pallets of the same type are stacked, the stops of a lower pallet are received in the voids on each side of the runner, and this prevents the pallets from shifting in the longitudinal direction, as well as in the lateral direction.
The pallet deck is a substantially rectangular surface, but the corners of the deck are rounded. Thus, the corners of the deck do not provide a surface on which to provide a stop. The three runners with their rounded corners thus provide a total of four voids that are covered by the pallet deck. Thus, up to four stops may be provided near the edges of the short sides of the pallet deck at locations that are aligned with a corresponding void in the runners below the deck—two middle stops, one above a void on each side of the middle runner, and two outer stops, each one above an inner void of the two outer runners. These four stops provide an optimum form fit with a pallet of the same construction stacked above it.
The two outer stops may have a smaller height than the two middle stops. When plastic pallets of the same type are stacked together, the greater height of the two middle stops ensures an optimum form fit and the two outer stops merely serve a supportive role. It is a particular advantage of the pallet according to the invention, however, that a wooden pallet may also be reliably stacked on the pallet. To achieve this, the middle runner of the pallet according to the invention is constructed to be wider than the width of a typical wooden pallet. Because the middle stops are located above the voids on the middle runner, they are spaced wider apart than the wooden pallet runner. Thus, when a wooden pallet is stacked on the pallet according to the invention, the middle stops do not make contact with the runner on the wooden pallet, but rather, those stops project into the spaces between the wooden runners. Instead of resting on all four stops, the wooden pallet rests on the outer stops only.
Depending on the construction of the runners on the pallet according to the invention and/or the wooden pallet, however, it is possible that the wooden pallet rests on all four of the stops. The fact that the two middle stops are greater in height would mean that they act as a tilt axis for the wooden pallet, that is to say, the wooden pallet would be able to tilt to either side of the pallet. In this case, the wooden pallet, due to its inherent elasticity, rests on all four stops and the outer stops prevent the wooden pallet from tilting.
The stops may be constructed as vertically upright buttons or knobs. It is desirable to keep the cross-sectional area of the stops as small as possible, first of all, because they should fit within the voids at the corners of the runner, but also, because these stops are provided within the base load area of the pallet deck and a load of goods that takes up the full base load area may be placed on top of these stops. The cross-sectional area of the stops is kept as small as possible in order to keep the risk of damaging the goods as low as possible. Thus, the dimensions of the stops are such that, even if the stops should make a slight indentation into cardboard packaging, for example, the pressure or deformation exerted on the load of goods is not enough to damage the actual goods.
The stops may have a constant cross-section, i.e., have straight wall in the vertical direction and a flat top. This provides optimum mechanical stability compared to stops that taper sharply towards the upper end. This also reduces the risk that the stops become damaged or deformed, when a load is placed on the stops. Also, the flat top allows a wooden pallet, which has runners without the voids, to be stacked on the pallet, so that the wooden pallet and any additional pallets that are stacked thereon are also resting on the stops.
A suitable height of the stops that extends upward of the pallet deck is between 3 and 10 mm, and preferably between 4 and 6 mm. Initial tests have shown that these dimensions are a good compromise between keeping the stops as flat as possible, yet having sufficient height to create a positive fit with the voids. These dimensions ensure a reliable positive fit, which in turn ensures a secure stack of plastic pallets of the same type, yet are sufficiently low to avoid undesirable damage, both to the stops as well as to the goods placed on the pallet.
An anti-slip coating or material may be applied to some areas of the pallet deck. Anti-slip means are known in the industry, and thus, there is no need to discuss such means in more detail herein. The anti-slip surface increases the stability of the stack with pallets of an identical or a different construction. However, if the anti-slip effect is diminished, due to moisture, ice formation or the like, the stops according to the invention still ensure a stable stack of pallets.
The present invention is described with reference to the accompanying purely schematic drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
The present invention will now be described more fully in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the preferred embodiments of the invention are shown. This invention should not, however, be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, they are provided so that this disclosure will be complete and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art.
In the embodiment shown, four stops 6, constructed as cylindrical knobs, are provided near the edges of the short sides 2 of the pallet deck 4—two middle stops 6 and two outer stops 6. Tests have shown that the most suitable heights for the middle stops are between 5 and 6 mm, and preferably 5.5 mm, and for the outer stops between 3.5 and 4.5 mm, and preferably 4 mm. In this embodiment, the middle stops 6 project 5.5 mm above the surface of the pallet deck 4 and the two outer stops 6 project 4 mm above the pallet deck 4.
Referring now to
In the embodiment shown, the two outer stops 6 allow a wooden pallet to be reliably stacked on the pallet 1. As previously mentioned, the runners on wooden pallets are precisely rectangular, i.e., without voids at the corners. As can be seen in
In another embodiment (not shown), the middle runner 9 may have a width dimension similar to that of the middle runner on the typical wooden pallet. In this case, the wooden pallet rests on all four stops 6. Because the middle stops 6 have a greater height than the outer stops 6, there would be a tendency for the wooden pallet to tile to one side or the other. The outer stops, which are slightly lower in height, prevent the wooden pallet from tilting.
It is understood that the embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present invention. Variations in the construction of the pallet with stacking stops may be contemplated by one skilled in the art without limiting the intended scope of the invention herein disclosed and as defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3648883 | Bridenstine | Mar 1972 | A |
3750596 | Box | Aug 1973 | A |
3750598 | Campbell | Aug 1973 | A |
3926321 | Trebilcock | Dec 1975 | A |
4051787 | Nishitani | Oct 1977 | A |
4397246 | Ishida | Aug 1983 | A |
4580680 | Wind | Apr 1986 | A |
4700959 | Lars | Oct 1987 | A |
5052307 | Morrison | Oct 1991 | A |
5092252 | Gillhart | Mar 1992 | A |
6138582 | Fujii | Oct 2000 | A |
6357366 | Frankenberg | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6386118 | Bendit | May 2002 | B1 |
6807911 | Carson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6874428 | Apps | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7090078 | Gits | Aug 2006 | B2 |
10029819 | Storteboom | Jul 2018 | B2 |
11279516 | Valdés | Mar 2022 | B2 |
20060272556 | Apps | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080210140 | Valentinsson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100218705 | Mani | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120325125 | Apps | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140283713 | Baltz | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150274359 | Linares | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160288951 | Rader | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160368659 | Bastian, II | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3979788 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1652784 | May 2006 | EP |
H08207932 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2008127045 | Jun 2008 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220002026 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP2019/056846 | Mar 2019 | US |
Child | 17471352 | US |