Patent Application
20220183321
The present disclosure relates generally to the field of animal feeds.
Various products and combinations of products are used in animal feed. Many of them are subject to variations in weather. Current animal feeds have various limitations and disadvantages, and a need exists for further improvement.
World demand for animals and animal products is tremendous and continually growing. The U.S. cattle and dairy industries alone are billion dollar industries. They involve millions of head of cattle that consume billions of dollars of feed annually. Animal feed can come from a variety of sources, but typically involves a significant component that is from crops that are grown specifically for the purpose of serving in animal feed or that is susceptible to drought and may struggle in arid conditions. For example, alfalfa, which is regularly found in cattle feed, struggles during dry and hot seasons. The tremendous demand for cattle feed can strain resources.
Various animal feeds described herein can be based on palm fronds. Palm trees are found throughout the World in arid locations and palm fronds are frequently viewed as a source of waste or trash. Palm fronds are commonly burned or chopped up to be dispersed. However, palm fronds have a variety of nutrients.
Generally, palm fronds have an estimated Total Digestible Nutrient (TDN) content that can be greater than or equal to approximately 40% and/or less than or equal to approximately 60%. For example, palm fronds from Mexican Fan Palms (Washingtonia Robustas) have an estimated TDN content of approximately 51.8% on a dry matter basis. Similarly, Deglet Noor palm fronds can have a TDN content of approximately 52.1% on a dry matter basis. Oil palm fronds have been estimated to have a metabolizable energy (ME) content of approximately 5.65 MJ/kg. Palm fronds harvested during the spring, such as during and between March and May, can have higher energy and TDN contents than they do during other times during the year. Rather than being discarded, such palm fronds can be used in animal feed, helping generate an animal feed that is based on recycled products. Palm-based animal feeds can be used to feed a variety of animals, including horses or ruminants such as cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, or camels.
Because of their toughness, preparing palm fronds into a desired form has presented various difficulties. Various embodiments described herein relate to methods of preparing and processing palm fronds for convenient transport, storage, mixing with additional components, and/or consumption. This can make it much more efficient and easy to generate an animal feed based on palm fronds, rather than discarding them as is frequently done.
Many varieties of palms grow palm fruit, such as dates, which are also very nutritious. Generally, dates can have a TDN content that is greater than or equal to approximately 65% and/or less than or equal to approximately 90%. For example, dates from a Deglet Noor Palm tree can have a TDN content of approximately 87.9% on a dry basis. Dates from Canary Palms can have a TDN content of approximately 86.7% on a dry basis. In various embodiments described herein, dates and palm fronds can be combined in different forms and quantities in order to create a nutritious, effective, and sustainable animal feed from what was previously considered largely waste. Additionally, the main products of this feed can be grown in hot and dry conditions. In fact, these sources can thrive in conditions that might destroy products currently used in cattle feed.
In some embodiments, additional additives can be combined with palm fruit and palm fronds in order to adjust nutritional content. For example, nutritional additives, such as urea, can be included to increase the available levels of nutritional content, such as protein, within the animal feed. In some embodiments, nutritional additives, such as wheat, corn, or other components described herein can be included to increase the available levels of nutritional content, such as protein, within the animal feed. Various ratios of palm fronds, palm fruit, and nutritional additives are described herein.
In some embodiments, feeds with palm fronds, palm fruits, and additives such as urea, wheat, sorghum, milo, and/or other suitable additives including varieties of grains, can serve as an independent animal feed. The various benefits of palm and palm fruit, however, make them desirable for use together or independently in different combinations with different types of animal feeds. Thus, in some embodiments, feeds with palm fronds, palm fruits, and additives such as urea, wheat, and/or other suitable additives, can serve as a base feed to be combined with additional components depending on the desired characteristics of a final feed. In some embodiments, palm fronds themselves can serve as a base feed to be mixed with additional components. In some embodiments, palm fruit and/or seeds can be combined with general base feeds, such as alfalfa, soy, corn, hay, or grass, which can also be mixed with a portion of palm fronds.
According to various embodiments described herein, an animal feed can include a processed palm frond component, a palm fruit component, and a nutritional additive. The palm fruit component and the nutritional additive can have a ratio by weight between 5:1 and 7:1. In some embodiments, the palm fruit can be dates. In some embodiments, the nutritional additive can be urea. In some embodiments, the nutritional additive can be wheat. In some embodiments, palm fruit component and the nutritional additive have a ratio by weight of approximately 6:1. In some embodiments, the processed palm frond component can have a moisture content between 10 and 14%. In some embodiments, the palm frond component, the palm fruit component, and the nutritional additive can have a ratio by weight of approximately 2000 parts palm frond to approximately 25 parts palm fruit to approximately 4 parts nutritional additive.
According to various embodiments described herein, a method of making an animal feed can include collecting palm fronds, shredding, chopping, or grinding the palm fronds, and combining a palm fruit component and a nutritional additive to the palm fronds, wherein the palm fruit component and the nutritional additive have a have a ratio by weight between 5:1 and 7:1. In some embodiments, the palm fruit can be date. In some embodiments the nutritional additive can be urea. In some embodiments, the nutritional additive can be wheat. In some embodiments, collecting palm fronds can include collecting palm fronds with a moisture content between about 10% and about 14%. In some embodiments, making an animal feed can include drying the palm fronds to a moisture content between about 10% and about 14%. In some embodiments, shredding, chopping, or grinding the palm fronds includes shredding the palm fronds. In some embodiments, the palm fronds can be chopped after they are shredded. In some embodiments, the palm fronds can be ground after they are chopped.
According to various embodiments described herein, a method of making an animal feed can include collecting palm fronds and drying the palm fronds in wind rows. The palm fronds can be shredded, chopped, and/or ground when dried to a desired moisture content. The palm fronds can be combined with a palm fruit component, such as dates, to the palm fronds. The dates can be combined, for example, in a ratio of 8 units by volume of palm fronds for every unit by volume of dates. In some embodiments, the dates can be combined in a ratio of 8 pounds of date for every 50 pounds of palm fronds. In some embodiments, the palm frond and date mixture can be chopped and/or ground. This mixture can be fed through a mill to collect mill run, such as wheat or other grain or material. In some embodiments, the resulting mixture can have approximately 30% mill run by weight. In some embodiments it can have more or less. The mixture of palm frond, date, and mill run can then be run through a feed compressing machine, such as a cubing machine or pelletizer.
In some embodiments, the palm fruit component and the nutritional additive can have a ratio by weight of approximately 6:1. In some embodiments, the palm fruit and nutritional additive components can be combined with the palm fronds according to a ratio by weight of approximately 2000 parts palm frond to approximately 25 parts palm fruit to approximately 4 parts nutritional additive.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can include a processed palm frond component, a palm fruit component, and a nutritional additive wherein the animal feed has a nutritional content at one or more of the following levels: approximately 15% crude protein, approximately 3% crude fat, approximately 25% crude fiber, approximately 12% ash, and approximately 0.5% minerals.
In some embodiments, the animal feed can have a nutritional content that includes a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%, a crude fat content that is greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 8%, a crude fiber content that is greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 45%, an ash content that is greater than or equal to approximately 4% and/or less than or equal to approximately 17%, and a mineral content that is greater than or equal to approximately 0.1% and/or less than or equal to approximately 1%.
In some embodiments, the animal feed can have a nutritional content that includes a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 12% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%, a crude fat content that is greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 5%, a crude fiber content that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%, an ash content that is greater than or equal to 8% and/or less than or equal to 12%, and a mineral content that is greater than or equal to 0.3% and/or less than or equal to 0.7%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can include a palm frond component that includes chopped palm fronds having a moisture content between 10% and 25%; a palm fruit component including one or more of dates, palm berries, and palm seeds; and a nutritional additive. In some embodiments, the palm fruit component and the nutritional additive have a ratio by weight between 5:1 and 7:1. In some embodiments, the animal feed has a crude protein content between 5% and 30% and a fiber content between 15% and 45%.
In some embodiments, a method of making an animal feed from palm fronds can include collecting palm fronds, placing the palm fronds in rows, allowing the palm fronds to dry to a moisture content of between 10% and 25%, chopping the palm fronds, grinding the palm fronds, and combining a palm fruit component and a nutritional additive to the palm fronds. In some embodiments, the ratio of palm fronds to palm fruit can be between approximately 70:1 and approximately 90:1. In some embodiments, the combined palm fronds, palm fruit, and nutritional additive can be cubed.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can include a processed palm frond component, a palm fruit component, and a nutritional additive, wherein the nutritional additive is between 20 and 40 percent of a total weight of the animal feed. In some embodiments, the palm fruit can be date. In some embodiments, the nutritional additive can be wheat. In some embodiments, the processed palm frond components can have a moisture content between 10% and 14%. In some embodiments, the feed can be cube and/or pellet shaped. In some embodiments, the nutritional additive can be mill run from a mill. In some embodiments, the mill run comprises wheat.
In some embodiments, a method of cleaning a mill with an animal feed can include providing a base feed comprising a palm frond component and a fruit component, passing the base feed through an inlet to a mill that contains mill run different from the base feed, and collecting a mixture of the base feed and mill run from an outlet to the mill. In some embodiments, the mixture can include at least about 5 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, the mixture can include at least 20 percent or about 20 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, the mixture can include between 20 percent (or about 20 percent) and 40 percent (or about 40 percent) mill run by weight. In some embodiments, the ratio of the palm frond component to the fruit component in the base feed is about 8 to 1 by volume. In some embodiments, the ratio is about 8 to 10 by weight. In some embodiments, the mill run can include wheat. In some embodiments, the fruit component can be palm fruit, such as dates. In some embodiments, the mixture of the base feed and mill run can be fed through a feed compressing machine. In some embodiments, the feed compressing machine can be a cubing machine or a pelletizer.
Animal feed formed with a base of palm fronds and combined with palm fruit, such as dates, is a sustainable and affordable feed product that can be developed in hot climates. Palm fronds with a desired moisture content are shredded, chopped and/or ground, and mixed with palm fruit. Additives such as urea can increase the nutritional content. Feeds with palm fronds, palm fruit, and/or additives can serve as a base feed for other components. Palm fronds can also serve as a base feed for other components. Animal feeds with a variety of bases can have palm fruit added. Animal feeds with a variety of bases, including palm fronds, can include a variety of other components added.
Processed palm fronds and palm fruit, such as dates, can be combined according to a variety of different ratios. For example, in some embodiments palm fronds and palm fruit can be combined according to a ratio by weight of approximately 80 pounds of processed palm fronds for each pound of palm fruit. In some embodiments, the ratio by weight of processed palm fronds to palm fruit can be greater than or equal to approximately 70 and/or less than or equal to approximately 90. In some embodiments, smaller ratios may be desired. For example, in some embodiments palm fronds and palm fruit can be combined according to a ratio by weight of approximately 8 pounds of processed palms fronds for each pound of palm fruit. In some embodiments, the ratio can be approximately 5 to 1, or even lower, such as approximately 2.5 to 1, 1 to 1, or less than 1 to 1. In some embodiments, palm fronds and palm fruit can be combined according to a ratio by weight of approximately 8 pounds of processed palm fronds for each 10 pounds of palm fruit. In some embodiments, this ratio can be approximately 5 pounds of processed palm fronds for each 10 pounds of palm fruit. In some embodiments, the ratio can be approximately 1 pound of processed palm fronds for each 10 pounds of palm fruit.
In some embodiments, larger ratios may be desired. For example, in some embodiments palm fronds and palm fruit can be combined according to a ratio by weight of approximately 10 pounds of processed palms fronds for each pound of palm fruit. In some embodiments, the ratio can be approximately 12 to 1. In some embodiments, the ratio can be approximately 15 to 1, 20 to 1, or even larger, such as approximately 25 to 1 or greater in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, these ratios can be by volume instead of by weight. For example, a ratio by volume of 8 to 1 would indicate that a mixture of processed palm fronds and palm fruit was formed by mixing 8 scoops of processed palm fronds with 1 scoop of palm fruit. Preferably, in embodiments where processing machines are used, such as described further below, the ratio is such that the mixture is not too sticky to gum up or block the processing machine. In other embodiments, stickiness of the mixture is desirable and advantageous to produce a desired feed consistency and composition.
In some embodiments, nutritional additives can be added to the mixture to modify the desired nutritional content. For example, in some embodiments, urea can be combined with palm fronds and dates. This can increase the available protein content. Finding the correct mixture can help maximize the protein content. If too much urea is added, it may actually diminish the total protein content of the mixture. In some embodiments, a preferred ratio by weight of dates to urea within a palm frond base can be 6:1. In some embodiments the ratio by weight of dates to urea within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 5:1 and/or less than or equal to approximately 7:1. In some embodiments, the ratio by weight of dates to urea within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 11:2 and/or less than or equal to approximately 13:2. In some embodiments, the identified ratios of dates to urea can be by volume instead of weight.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can include approximately 98.6% palm frond by weight, approximately 1.2% date by weight, and approximately 0.2% urea by weight. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to urea of 2000 to 25 to 4. The ratios of different components can vary according to different embodiments. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to urea of 2000 to 24 to 4. In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of palm frond to the combined weight of dates and urea can be between 65:1 and 75:1.
In some embodiments, other additives can be added to a mixture of palm fronds and palm fruit or to a mixture of palm fronds, palm fruit, and urea in order to modify the desired nutritional content. These additives can include, but are not limited to, almond shells, walnut husks, peanut shells, pits, and/or other rough, edible products; cotton seed, corn, wheat, brewer's grain, distiller's grain, potato, lettuce, tomato, peaches, apples, strawberries, soy, turnips, and/or fruit rind or peel, etc.; and/or beet pulp, sugar beets, sugar cane, citrus fruits, oranges, grapefruit, lemons, grapes, and/or raisins, etc.
For example, in some embodiments, wheat can be combined with palm fronds and dates or other fruit or sugar components. This can increase the protein content. Wheat can be in the form of mill run in some embodiments. In some embodiments, a preferred ratio by weight of wheat to dates within a palm frond base can be 3:1. In some embodiments the ratio by weight of wheat to dates within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 1:1 and/or less than or equal to approximately 5:1. In some embodiments the ratio by weight of wheat to dates within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 2:1 and/or less than or equal to approximately 4:1. In some embodiments the ratio by weight of wheat to dates within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 5:1 or less than or equal to approximately 1:1. In some embodiments the ratio by weight of wheat to dates within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 10:1. In some embodiments the ratio by weight of wheat to dates within a palm frond base can be greater than or equal to approximately 15:1. In some embodiments, the identified ratios of wheat to dates can be by volume instead of weight. In other embodiments, suitable mixtures can be achieved using another fruit and/or vegetable component and/or another protein component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can include approximately 60% palm frond by weight, approximately 10% date or other fruit or sugar component by weight, and approximately 30% wheat or other grain component by weight. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 6 to 1 to 3. The ratios of different components can vary according to different embodiments. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 5 to 1 to 4. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 7 to 1 to 2. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 8 to 1 to 4. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 8 to 1 to 5. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 8 to 1 to 3. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 20 to 1 to 9. In some embodiments, the proportion of date can be greater, and an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat such as 0.75 to 1 to 0.75.
In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of palm frond to the combined weight of dates and wheat can be between 1:1 and 2:1. In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of palm frond to the combined weight of dates and wheat can be greater than 2:1. In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of palm frond to the combined weight of dates and wheat can be less than 1:1. In other embodiments, suitable mixtures can be achieved using other fruit and/or vegetable components and/or other protein components.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can include lower proportions of a palm frond component. For example, in some embodiments an animal feed can include approximately 33% palm frond by weight, approximately 33% date or other fruit or sugar component by weight, and approximately 33% wheat or other grain component by weight. Thus, in some embodiments an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 1 to 1 to 1. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 0.8 to 1 to 0.8. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 0.1 to 1 to 0.5. In some embodiments, an animal feed can include weight-based ratios of palm frond to date to wheat of 2.5 to 1 to 1.
In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of the combined weight of dates and wheat to the weight of palm frond can be between approximately 1:1 and approximately 15:1. In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of the combined weight of dates and wheat to palm frond can be between approximately 1:1 and approximately 10:1. In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of the combined weight of dates and wheat to palm frond can be between approximately 1:1 and approximately 5:1. In some embodiments, the weight-based ratio of the combined weight of dates and wheat to palm frond can be between approximately 1:1 and approximately 3:1.
Dates and/or other palm fruit can be added to the palm fronds according to a variety of methods. In some embodiments, the dates can be diced, chopped, or crumbled and mixed in as such. In some embodiments the dates can be chopped into fine crystals, having a consistency roughly equivalent to sugar. In some embodiments, the dates can be liquefied and poured or sprayed onto the palm fronds. In some embodiments, a liquid, such as water, can be added to the dates to make them easier to pour, spray, and/or mix with the palm fronds. In some embodiments additional additives, such as the urea and/or wheat, can be mixed with the dates before being mixed with the palm fronds. In some embodiments, additional additives can be added to the palm fronds before or after the dates. In some embodiments, date (or other additive) and palm frond can be chopped and/or ground after the dates (or other additive) and palm fronds have been mixed together.
The mixtures described herein can produce a product that rivals or surpasses the nutritional content of current feeds. For example, in some embodiments a mixture can have a TDN content of approximately 55%. It can have an a crude protein content of approximately 15%, a crude fat content of approximately 2.7%, a crude fiber content of approximately 25%, and an ash content of approximately 12%. In some embodiments, additional minerals can be included, either through the urea or other additive, and the final result can have approximately 0.5% of minerals.
In some embodiments a mixture can have varying levels of a crude protein content. For example, in some embodiments a mixture can have a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%. In some embodiments, a mixture can have a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 8% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%. In some embodiments, a mixture can have a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 12% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%. In some embodiments, a desired protein content can depend on the type of animal expected to eat the feed. For example, in some embodiments feed prepared for dairy cattle can have a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 10% and/or less than or equal to approximately 20%. In some embodiments, feed prepared for beef cattle can have a crude protein content that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%.
Other nutritional content of mixtures described herein can similarly vary. For example, in some embodiments a mixture can have a TDN that is greater than or equal to approximately 45% and/or less than or equal to approximately 65%. In some embodiments a mixture can have a TDN that is greater than or equal to approximately 50% and/or less than or equal to approximately 60%.
In some embodiments a mixture can have a crude fat content that can be greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 8%. In some embodiments a mixture can have a crude fat content that can be greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 5%.
Similarly, in some embodiments a mixture can have a fiber content that can be greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 45%. In some embodiments, a mixture can have a fiber content that can be greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%.
The ash content in some embodiments can be greater than or equal to 4% and/or less than or equal to 17%. In some embodiments, the ash content can be greater than or equal to approximately 8% and/or less than or equal to approximately 12%. In some embodiments laws may limit the ash content that can be in the feed, and the ash content can be capped at a legal limit, for example at 12%. The amount of minerals and/or additives can in some embodiments be greater than or equal to approximately 0.2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 1%.
The use of any type of palm frond is contemplated. For example, Washington Robustas (Mexican Fan Palms), Washingtonia filiferas (California Fan Palms), Phoenix canariensis (Canary Island Date Palms), Phoenix dactylifera (Date Palms), or any other date or oil palm can be used. Similarly, any type of date can be used. In some embodiments, other fruits or materials besides dates can be used. For example, palm seeds or other types of palm fruit, such as oil palm berries, can be used instead of or in addition to dates. These alternative fruit or fruit mixtures can be combined with palm fronds and/or other additives such as urea and/or wheat according to the various ratios described herein.
Palm fronds can be tough, and general processing used for other types of feed bases, such as alfalfa, to prepare for use in feeds may be insufficient or too expensive for palm fronds. For example, placing raw palm fronds into a tub grinder may not produce palm fronds that are sufficiently chopped to be used in feeds. Additionally, raw palm fronds are generally too wet to be thrown directly into a tub grinder or other grinding or chopping machine. A variety of processes can be used to put the palm fronds into a form suitable for feed before combining them with dates or other products.
Preferably, the fronds are allowed to dry until they have a moisture content greater than or equal to approximately 10% and/or less than or equal to approximately 14% In some embodiments, a moisture content greater than or equal to approximately 10% and/or less than or equal to approximately 20% can be used. In some embodiments, a moisture content greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15% can be used. In some embodiments, a moisture content greater than or equal to approximately 10% and/or less than or equal to approximately 25% can be used. In some embodiments the moisture content can exceed 25%.
Once the palm fronds have reached a desired moisture content they can be processed according to a variety of methods. In some embodiments, a shredder can be pulled over the rows to shred the palm fronds. Additionally or alternatively, the palm fronds can be fed through a shredder. As an example, a shredder sold under the brand name Balzer can be used to shred the palm fronds. Once the palm fronds have been shredded, a chopper can be used to chop the palm fronds into finer pieces. As an example, a chopper sold under the brand name Forest Harvester can be used. The chopper can also be used to harvest the dried palm fronds from the ground, passing them into a container as they are chopped. One embodiment of this method of processing palm fronds is illustrated in
The processed palm fronds can form a base product that can be combined according to the various mixtures described above, forming an animal feed. In some embodiments, various mixtures, such as mixtures described herein, can be formed within a grinder. Thus, for example, in some embodiments palm fruit and/or other additives can be added with the palm fronds into the grinder.
Once a desired formulation has been achieved, the products can be prepared for use according to a variety of manners. In some embodiments, the feed can be left loose as initially mixed. In some embodiments, the feed can be baled or formed into cubes or other shapes. In some embodiments, baling or forming feed into cubes or other shapes can be done after feed has been chopped, shredded, and/or ground. One advantage of mixing dates into the palm fronds is that the dates can help provide a binding function, making it easier to form the feed into cubes or any desired shape. It is understood that “cube” is a broad term and is used in its ordinary sense in this application, including, for example, to refer broadly to a compressed feed mixture. References to a cubed shape can refer to a generally square or rectangular shape or to having a generally square or rectangular shaped cross section, but other shapes and cross sections are possible and contemplated, such as, for example, pellets and/or generally cylindrical shapes and/or shapes with a circular or rounded cross section. Cubed feed may have one or more sides or dimensions that are longer than one or more of the other sides or dimensions. In some embodiments, different cubes within a batch of cubed feed may have different dimensions from other cubes within the batch. Additionally, the cubes do not necessarily have defined shapes, sides, edges or corners.
In some embodiments cubes or other forms of compressed feed can be formed with a feed compressing machine, such as a cubing machine or a pelletizer. In some embodiments, the machine can include a grinder that can mix and/or grind the components. In such embodiments, the grinder of the feed compressing machine can be used in addition to or instead of a grinder during the process described with respect to
In some embodiments, a mixture can be passed through a filter, such as a screen or strainer, after it goes through a grinder, whether a first grinder and/or a grinder associated with a feed compressing machine. This can help remove large pieces and hard pieces that might not grind up, such as pits of dates. In some embodiments, a mixture can pass through multiple filters. For example, a grinder may include a filter, and it may be desirable to pass the ground material through a second filter before it goes into the grinder or after it comes out of the grinder.
Cubing the feed can present a variety of advantages. For example, cubed feed can be generally easier and more efficient to ship and/or store. As a further example, because cubes can be compressed when formed, they can have a greater density than loose feed allowing for more feed by mass to fit within the same volume. In some embodiments, cubes can be shipped and/or stored in large containers, such as sacks, boxes, or other containers. In some embodiments, containers can be sized to hold 1000 lbs of cubed feed. In some embodiments they can hold more or less. In some embodiments, cubes can be stored and/or shipped loosely.
Cubing the feed can also extend the shelf life of the feed. For example, in some embodiments loose feed might be good for about a year. Cubed feed can be good for significantly longer. In some embodiments, packaging loose feed or cubed feed can also extend the shelf life of the feed.
In some embodiments, a base feed can be passed through a mill to collect scrap material left in the mill that can be added to the feed. For example, in some embodiments a base feed including a mixture of palm fronds and palm fruit, such as dates, can be fed through a mill that had previously been used to process or transport a first, different feed product. The scraps of the first feed product that remain within the mill (referred to as the “mill run”) can be picked up by the base feed and mixed in with it as an additive. For example, a palm frond and palm fruit mixture can be passed through a mill that had previously had wheat or other grains pass through, such as sorghum, milo, corn, etc. The mill run can act as an additive to the palm frond and palm fruit mixture and can add a protein component to the mixture. In some embodiments, this can provide a desired nutritional content for the resulting feed and can also serve to clean the mill run from the various components of the mill, such as tanks, flues, and/or chutes. This can help minimize and/or eliminate cleaning costs that would otherwise be incurred. In some embodiments, the addition of a palm fruit to a base feed passed through the mill can help collect mill run by helping the base feed to adhere to the mill run. Additionally, as the base feed passes through the mill, the mill can help adequately mix the mill run with the base feed.
In some embodiments, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, a base feed can include any of the feeds described herein, such as various mixtures of processed palm fronds and palm fruit. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have at least 5 percent or about 5 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have at least 10 percent or about 10 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have at least 20 percent or about 20 percent mill run by weight.
In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have between about 20 and about 40 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have between about 10 and about 30 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have between about 25 and about 35 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have between about 5 and about 20 percent mill run by weight. In some embodiments, a base feed passed through a mill to collect mill run can have greater than 40 percent mill run by weight, such as between approximately 40 percent and approximately 50 percent mill run by weight.
In some embodiments various components or mixtures of components described herein can be combined with other types of feed sources to adjust desired nutritional contents of the feeds. For example, the processed palm fronds can be used as a base to which a variety of additives can be added for use in animal feed. These additives suitable for use in animal feed can include, for example, dog food, chicken livers, or other sources of protein or other nutrients. Additives can also include plant based products such as citrus products, sugar beet pulp, wheat, brewer's grain, almond husks, peanut shells, grass clipping, fruit rinds and peels, potatoes, or general vegetable scraps. Additives can also include molasses, tortilla scraps, dough and bread products, or any other processed product with nutritional value. These additives can be added to a palm frond base in any desired combination or quantity.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the proportions used for an animal feed can depend on the type of animal that is expected to eat it. Although various embodiments described below provide examples specific to dairy and beef cows, it is understood that the various ratios described can be used in feed for a variety of animals, including horses or ruminants such as cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, or camels. Additionally, the various ratios described are understood to in some embodiments describe ratios of pre-mixed volumes and in other embodiments describe ratios by weight. In some embodiments, an animal feed for a dairy cow can have a palm frond component that is greater than or equal to approximately 50% and/or less than or equal to approximately 90%. The feed can have a roughening component that is greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 10%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 10% and/or less than or equal to approximately 20%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a dairy cow can have a palm frond component that is greater than or equal to approximately 60% and/or less than or equal to approximately 80%. The feed can have a roughening component that is greater than or equal to approximately 3% and/or less than or equal to approximately 7%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 13% and/or less than or equal to approximately 17%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 8% and/or less than or equal to approximately 12%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a dairy cow can have a palm frond component that is approximately 70%. The feed can have a roughening component that is 5%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is approximately 15%. The feed can have a sugar component that is approximately 10%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a beef cow can have a palm frond component that is greater than or equal to approximately 40% and/or less than or equal to approximately 60%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 35%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 35%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a beef cow can have a palm frond component that is greater than or equal to approximately 45% and/or less than or equal to approximately 55%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a beef cow can have a palm frond component that is approximately 50%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is approximately 25%. The feed can have a sugar component that is approximately 25%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a dairy cow can have a palm frond/fruit base that is greater than or equal to approximately 70% and/or less than or equal to approximately 90%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a dairy cow can have a palm frond/fruit base that is greater than or equal to approximately 75% and/or less than or equal to approximately 85%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 7% and/or less than or equal to approximately 13%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 7% and/or less than or equal to approximately 13%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a dairy cow can have a palm frond/fruit base that approximately 80%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is approximately 10%. The feed can have a sugar component that is approximately 10%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a beef cow can have a palm frond/fruit base that is greater than or equal to approximately 40% and/or less than or equal to approximately 70%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 40%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 15%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a beef cow can have a palm frond/fruit base that is greater than or equal to approximately 45% and/or less than or equal to approximately 60%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 25% and/or less than or equal to approximately 35%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 7% and/or less than or equal to approximately 13%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed for a beef cow can have a palm frond/fruit base that approximately 50%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is approximately 30%. The feed can have a sugar component that is approximately 10%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, palm fruit and/or seeds can be added to different types of feed or feed bases, including, for example, alfalfa, soy, corn, wheat, hay, grass, and other silage. Palm fruit combined according to any of the ratios described herein, or in other suitable ratios, with a nutritional additive, such as urea and/or wheat, can also be added to other types of feeds or components of feeds, such as, for example, alfalfa, soy, corn, hay, grass, and other silage. Because of the particular nutritional qualities of palm fruit, in some embodiments palm fruit can serve as both a vegetable/fruit component and a sugar component as part of the various ratios discussed above. For example, a palm fruit contains a high energy content and can be substituted for corn, for example, in some feed applications. Additionally, some palm fruits, such as dates, include pits, which can provide a roughening component in some embodiments.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component including one or more types of base feeds, such as palm frond, alfalfa, soy, corn, wheat, hay, grass, and/or other silage components, forming the base feed component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 60% and/or less than or equal to approximately 80%. The feed can have a roughening component that is greater than or equal to approximately 3% and/or less than or equal to approximately 7%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 13% and/or less than or equal to approximately 17%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 8% and/or less than or equal to approximately 12%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is approximately 70%. The feed can have a roughening component that is 5%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is approximately 15%. The feed can have a sugar component that is approximately 10%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 40% and/or less than or equal to approximately 60%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 35%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 35%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 45% and/or less than or equal to approximately 55%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%. The feed can have a sugar component that is greater than or equal to approximately 20% and/or less than or equal to approximately 30%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is approximately 50%. The feed can have a vegetable/fruit component that is approximately 25%. The feed can have a sugar component that is approximately 25%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 50% and/or less than or equal to approximately 90%. The feed can have a roughening component that is greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 10%. The feed can have a palm fruit component, such as dates, that is greater than or equal to approximately 2% and/or less than or equal to approximately 50%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 60% and/or less than or equal to approximately 80%. The feed can have a roughening component that is greater than or equal to approximately 3% and/or less than or equal to approximately 7%. The feed can have a palm fruit component, such as dates, that is greater than or equal to approximately 5% and/or less than or equal to approximately 40%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is approximately 70%. The feed can have a roughening component that is 5%. The feed can have a palm fruit component, such as dates, that is 25%.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 40% and/or less than or equal to approximately 60%. The feed can have a palm fruit component, such as dates, that is greater than or equal to approximately 10% and/or less than or equal to approximately 45%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is greater than or equal to approximately 45% and/or less than or equal to approximately 55%. The feed can have a palm fruit component, such as dates, that is greater than or equal to approximately 15% and/or less than or equal to approximately 35%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
In some embodiments, an animal feed can have a base feed component that is approximately 50%. The feed can have a palm fruit component, such as dates, that is approximately 30%. In some embodiments, the feed can also have varying amounts of a roughening component.
The terms “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” as used herein represent an amount close to the stated amount that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately”, “about”, and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than 10% of, within less than 5% of, within less than 1% of, within less than 0.1% of, and within less than 0.01% of the stated amount.
Although this invention has been disclosed in the context of certain preferred embodiments and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. In addition, while a number of variations of the invention have been shown and described in detail, other modifications, which are within the scope of this invention, will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art based upon this disclosure. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims that follow.
Similarly, this method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim require more features than are expressly recited in that claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following the Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/769,058, filed Aug. 19, 2015, which is a U.S. National Phase Application of PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/017207, filed Feb. 19, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/794,686, filed Mar. 11, 2013; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/775,435, filed Mar. 8, 2013; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/767,165, filed Feb. 20, 2013, the entire contents of all of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61775435 | Mar 2013 | US | |
| 61767165 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14769058 | Aug 2015 | US |
| Child | 17384580 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13794686 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 14769058 | US |
