Patent Grant
11536028
The present invention relates to sheathing systems and, more particularly, to sheathing systems for roofs and walls utilizing moisture resistant and skid resistant panels.
The roof of a residential or commercial building is typically constructed by attaching several roofing panels to the rafters of an underlying supporting structural frame; the panels are most often placed in a quilt-like pattern with the edge of each panel contacting the edges of adjacent panels so as to form a substantially continuous flat surface atop the structural frame.
However, problems with roofs constructed according to this method may present themselves. In particular, small gaps along the edges of adjoining roofing panels remain after roof assembly. Because the roofing panels are typically installed days or even weeks before shingles are installed, it is important to have a panel system that minimizes leakage resulting from exposure to the elements until such time as the roof is completed. To prevent water from leaking through the gaps between panels, it is commonly known in the industry to put a water resistant barrier layer on top of the roofing panels (e.g., felt paper). Accordingly, there is a need in the art for roofing panels, which can be conveniently fit together and yet are constructed to minimize the gaps or allow the gaps to be sealed between adjacent roofing panels to prevent or minimize the penetration of bulk water through the roof as it travels over the roof's surface. It is desirable for roofing panels to shed precipitation, such as rain and snow, during construction so that the interior remains dry.
While it is important that the barrier layer shed bulk water, it should also allow for the escape of water vapor. If the barrier were to trap water vapor in a roofing panel, the build-up of moisture could lead to rot or mold growth that is undesirable. As mentioned previously, it is known in the art that substantial bulk water-impermeability of installed roofing panels is achieved by adding a layer of impermeable material, such as asphalt-impregnated roofing paper or felt over the external surface of the roof panels. However, while this provides additional protection against bulk water penetration, it has the disadvantage of being difficult and time-consuming to install because the paper or felt must be first unrolled and spread over the roof surface and then secured to those panels. Further, the use of a felt paper overlay often results in a slick or slippery surface, especially when wet. Additionally, when the felt paper is not securely fastened to the roof panels or becomes loose due to wind and other weather conditions or because of poor construction methods, the roof system can become very slippery and leak bulk water. Accordingly, a worker walking atop the felt paper must be careful to avoid slipping or sliding while thereon. To that end, the present invention provides a panel for a roof sheathing system comprising structural panels, a mass-transfer barrier, and seam sealing means that is advantageously bulk water resistant and that exhibits adequate anti skid characteristics.
In addition to roof panel systems, wall panel construction systems of residential or commercial buildings do not typically provide simple, efficient, and safe means of installation. Known wall systems are frequently slick and do not provide adequate traction to securely support a ladder leaning thereon. Further, most often in these systems, an extra step must typically be added to the installation process to prevent liquid moisture and air from passing through the wall. Specifically, constructing a wall with a weather barrier requires not only that panels be attached to framing members, but also a house wrap is unrolled and spread over the walls. The house wrap is attached to the sheathing panels with staples or button cap nails and fenestration openings for windows or doors must be cut out of the wrap and the flaps from these openings folded back and stapled down. The house wrap is often difficult to install because it is typically in nine-ft wide rolls, which can be difficult to maneuver by workers on scaffolding or in windy conditions. Accordingly, there is also need in the art for wall-sheathing panels, which are moisture vapor permeable, skid-resistant and which create a simplified, safe, and time-saving installation process by means of a surface overlay member or coating permanently bonded thereon. To that end, the present invention also provides a panel for a wall sheathing system comprising structural panels, a mass-transfer barrier, and seam sealing means.
Accordingly, another general object of this invention is to provide a wall system that provides a barrier to bulk water, water vapors, air and heat transfer, irritants, insects and mold that can be permeable to moisture movement and is suitable for use behind numerous exterior finishes, such as siding, EIFS, brick, stucco, lap siding, vinyl, and the like.
Furthermore, the wall assembly consists of a simple process. Panels are affixed with a barrier layer and fastened to a building frame in a side-by-side manner, with or without a tongue and groove connection. Next, a sealing means, such as tape, laminate, caulk, foam, spray, putty, mechanical means, or any other suitable sealing mechanism, is used to seal the joints or seams between adjoining panels, thus completing the moisture barrier.
Given the foregoing, there is a continuing need to develop improved panels for roof and wall construction that prevent or minimize the penetration of bulk water, that come pre-equipped with a water permeable barrier layer applied during manufacture, and that have a skid resistant surface.
The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings embodiments which are presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, and that for purposes of illustration, these figures are not necessarily drawn to scale.
All parts, percentages and ratios used herein are expressed by weight unless otherwise specified. All documents cited herein are incorporated by reference.
As used herein, “wood” is intended to mean a cellular structure, having cell walls composed of cellulose and hemicellulose fibers bonded together by lignin polymer. “Wafer board” is intended to mean panels manufactured from reconstituted wood wafers bonded with resins under heat and pressure.
By “wood composite material” it is meant a composite material that comprises wood and one or more other additives, such as adhesives or waxes. Non-limiting examples of wood composite materials include oriented strand board (“OSB”), waferboard, particleboard, chipboard, medium-density fiberboard, plywood, and boards that are a composite of strands and ply veneers. As used herein, “flakes” and “strands” are considered equivalent to one another and are used interchangeably. A non-exclusive description of wood composite materials may be found in the Supplement Volume to the Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, pp. 765-810, 6th edition.
As used herein, “structural panel” is intended to mean a panel product composed primarily of wood which, in its commodity end use, is essentially dependent upon certain mechanical and/or physical properties for successful end use performance such as plywood. A non-exclusive description may be found in the PS-2-92 Voluntary Product Standard.
The following describes preferred embodiments of the present invention which provides panels for a panelized roofing system, attached to the rafters of a timber frame structure to form a roof, and that is suitable for use in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. In addition, an alternate embodiment of the present invention, which provides panels for a panelized wall sheathing system that is suitable for use in the construction of residential and commercial buildings is shown and described.
The panels 20 prepared according to the present invention may be made from a variety of different materials, such as wood or wood composite materials. As shown in
Each of the surface layers 22, 24 of the panel 20 are preferably oriented in parallel with the long dimension of the panel 20, and the oriented strand board core 26 preferably includes a plurality of substantially parallel strands 23 that are oriented perpendicular to the strands of the surface layers 22, 24. The panels 20 of the panelized roof system 10 may be selected from a number of suitable materials that provide adequate protection against the penetration of bulk water. Preferably, the panels of the present invention are comprised of reconstituted lignocellulosic furnish. More preferably, the panels 20 are comprised of structural wood such as OSB or plywood. Types of wood material used to manufacture the panels 20 may be, but are not limited to particle board, medium density fiber board, waferboard or the like.
The presently described panels 20 are preferably of a thickness T in a range from about 0.635 cm (0.25 inches) to about 3.175 cm (1.25 inches). The panels 20 may also comprise a radiant barrier material attached to the lower face of the panel, i.e., the face of the panel facing inwardly, toward the interior of the building. The radiant barrier material preferably includes a reflective surface that reflects infrared radiation that penetrates through the roof back into the atmosphere. The combination of this reflective function, as well as the foil's low emissivity, limits the heat transfer to the attic space formed in the interior of the building in the space under the roof. By limiting the heat transfer, the attic space temperature is reduced, which in turn reduces the cost of cooling the house.
The radiant barrier material may simply be a single layer radiant barrier sheet, such as metal foil, such as aluminum foil. Alternatively, the radiant barrier material may be composed of a radiant barrier sheet adhered to a reinforcing backing layer made from a suitable backing material, such as polymeric film, corrugated paper board, fiber board or kraft paper. The backing material makes the foil material easier and more convenient to handle. The multi-layered material may be a laminate in which a backing material is laminated to a radiant barrier sheet.
Methods of manufacturing the radiant barrier material are discussed in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,814, issued Aug. 3, 1993 to Hageman and U.S. Pat. No. 3,041,219, issued Jun. 26, 1962, to Steck et al. Other suitable radiant barrier material is manufactured under the name SUPER R™ by Innovative Insulation, Inc. of Arlington, Tex. These SUPER R™ products have two layers of aluminum foil each of which have an aluminum purity of 99%, and a reinforcing member located inside, between the two layers. The reinforcing member may be a reinforcing scrim or a polymer fabric.
Both the radiant barrier material and the barrier layer can be applied to the panel by spreading a coat of adhesive to the surface of the panel, applying the heat-reflecting material (or the barrier layer) over the adhesive onto the panel and pressing the radiant barrier material (or barrier layer) onto the panel. After the adhesive dries or cures, the panel is ready for use.
Additionally, the radiant barrier may be a coating on either side of the panel 20, which could be used facing into or out from the attic. Additionally, some panels 20 may also provide protection against ultraviolet light per ASTM G53, G154, which does not delaminate, does not reduce slip resistance, and does not promote fading.
Referring now to
These barrier layers 30 may optionally be comprised of a resin-impregnated paper 32 having a paper basis weight of 21.772 kg (48 lbs.) to about 102.058 kg (225 lbs.) per ream or a dry weight of about 78.16 gm/m2 (16 lbs./msf) to about 366.75 gm/m2 (75 lbs./msf), and they preferably substantially cover the outward facing surface 24 of the panels 20. The paper 32 is preferably resin-impregnated with a resin such as, but not limited to a phenol-formaldehyde resin, a modified phenol-formaldehyde resin, or other suitable resin. Preferably, the paper has a resin content of about greater than 0% to about 80% by dry weight, most preferably from a range of about 20% to about 70% by dry weight. The resin-impregnated paper for the panel in the panelized roof or wall sheathing construction system of the present invention also preferably includes a glueline layer 50 in a range from about 9.77 gm/m2 (2 lbs./msf) to about 244.5 gm/m2 (50 lbs./msf), and more preferably of a range from about 9.77 gm/m2 (2 lbs./msf) to about 177.24 gm/m2 (12 lbs./msf). The glueline layer 50 may be formed from a phenol-formaldehyde resin, and isocycanate, or the like.
Further optionally, the barrier layer may comprise an applied coating layer. One such coating is an experimental acrylic emulsion coating from Akzo-Nobel. Another suitable coating is Valspar's Black Board Coating. It is understood that by those skilled in the art that other classes of coatings may serve as an appropriate barrier layer. Coatings may be used with paper overlays to add the desired functions to the panel.
The barrier layer 30 is resistant to bulk water but permeable to water vapor. These panels with barrier layers 30 are optionally characterized by water vapor permeance in a range from about 0.1 U.S. perms to about 1.0 U.S. perms, and have a water vapor transmission rate from about 0.7 to about 7 g/m2/24 hrs (at 73° F.—50% RH via ASTM E96 procedure A), and have a water vapor permeance from about 0.1 to about 12 U.S. perms (at 73° F.—50% RH via ASTM E96 procedure B), and a liquid water transmission rate from about 1 to about 28 (grams/100 in2/24 hrs via Cobb ring), per ASTM D5795. This test method allows the quantification of liquid water that passes through the underlayment to the underlying substrate and can be easily done on specimens where the underlayment cannot be removed for visual inspection.
An embodiment of this invention suggests that a non-skid surface that has a coefficient of friction equal to or better than plywood or oriented strand board when dry and/or wet can be achieved in a primary process that is both quick and relatively inexpensive. Specifically, the water-resistant barrier layers 30 of the present invention advantageously provide a textured surface 35 to the structural panels 20. Specifically, the textured surface 35 is adapted to provide a wet coefficient of friction in a range of from about 0.8 to about 1.1 (English XL Tribometer) and a dry coefficient of friction in a range of from about 0.8 to about 1.1 (English XL Tribometer). Examples of methodology used to measure wet surfaces may be found at pg. 173 in “Pedestrian Slip Resistance; How to Measure It and How to Improve It.” (ISBN 0-9653462-3-4, Second Edition by William English).
Referring now to
The texture preferably has a number of features or elements disposed in a first direction and a number of features or elements disposed in a second direction. For example, a first group of elements may be disposed in a direction across the width of a panel and a second group of elements may be disposed in a direction along the length of a panel. These elements or features disposed in first and second directions may be of similar or may be of different sizes. The elements similarly may be of different or of similar shapes. Non-limiting examples of similarly sized features include a embossed herringbone or a embossed basketweave configuration. A herringbone pattern may be very tightly disposed or may be somewhat “spread-out” in such a manner so that major channels with minor indentations are created.
The embossed textured surface preferably is more preferably comprised of a plurality of major or primary textured features and a plurality of minor or secondary textured features. Preferably, the minor or secondary textured features are at least partially disposed on one or more corresponding major feature. To illustrate, and although the general appearance of the preferred textured surface 35 appears to be a random pattern of raised areas, a closer examination of the preferred textured surface reveals finer detail. Specifically, the preferred textured surface 35 includes a plurality of major channels 33 that are disposed substantially parallel with a pair of opposing edges (preferably the shorter pair of opposing edges) of the panel. Additionally, a plurality of minor indentations 34 are disposed within the major channels 33 and run generally orthogonally to the major channels. It should be appreciated that the exploded magnified view of
Although it is within the scope of the present invention to provide for advantageous slip-resistance by providing any number of major channels, preferably, the density of the major channels is about 5 to about 15 major channels per 2.54 cm (inch) as measured in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the major channels. More preferably, the density of the major channels is about 9 to about 12 major channels per 2.54 cm (inch) as measured in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the major channels. On a typical 1.219 m×2.438 m (4′×8′) sheathing panel, the major channels will preferably run generally across the 1.219 m (four-foot) or short direction. It should be appreciated that it is not necessary nor required that the major channels be exactly parallel and may undulate slightly from side to side in a somewhat serpentine fashion rather than being straight.
Although it is within the scope of the present invention that the minor indentations 34 may vary in length and width, the minor indentations 34 have a preferably elongated shape that measures preferably about 0.0508 cm (0.020 inches) to about 0.254 cm (0.100 inches) in length and about 0.0254 cm (0.010 inches) to about 0.254 cm (0.100 inches) wide. Although it is within the scope of the present invention to provide for advantageous slip-resistance by providing any number of minor indentations, preferably, the density of the minor indentations is about 15 to about 35 of the minor indentations per inch as measured along the direction of the major channels. The long direction of the minor indentations preferably extends generally across the eight-foot (or long) direction of a typical panel.
The textured surface may also, alternatively, be created via a plurality of raised protrusions and grooves. The protrusions may have a height in a range of about 0 mils to about 25 mils, preferably from a range of about 3.0 to about 13.0 mils as measured by profilometry (Mitutoyo SJ201P).
In accordance with the preferred configuration of the textured surface 35, in a typical roof sheathing application using 1.219 m×2.438 m (4′×8′) panels where the 2.438 m (eight-foot) edge of the sheathing panel is parallel to the floor of the home, the major channels 33 will generally be oriented up and down, while the long direction of the minor indentations 34 will generally run across the roof. Preferred depth of the major channels and minor indentations have been found to be in a range of about 5 to about 13 mils as measured by the Mitutoyo Surface Profiler. It should be appreciated that at least some of the major channels and minor indentations may be of a depth greater or deeper than the thickness of the paper (i.e., some of the major channels and minor indentations may be of a depth that would project into the surface of the panel).
The anti-skid surface of the present system advantageously reduces the potential for a ladder leaning thereon to slip. A worker who is applying house wrap or taping house wrap is currently exposed to the risk of his ladder skidding against the slippery surface of house wrap. Current house wrap products create the opportunity for a worker to fall from a ladder that skids against house wrap. The surface of current house wrap products promotes the likelihood of “ladder slip.” Workers have complained that ladders will slide unless they apply a skid resistant product to their ladders
As shown in
The panels 20 of the panelized roof sheathing construction system 10 preferably have a first edge which is parallel with a corresponding second edge of a panel 20 and are preferably linked together via one of a tongue 27 and groove 28 configuration (
Referring now to
Another such example is shown and described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/308,649 entitled “Composite Wood Board having an Alternating Tongue and Groove Arrangement along a Pair of Edges” which is incorporated herein by reference. The length of the first edge of each panel 20 is preferably a multiple of the length of a section, with the multiple being at least two. The length of the tongue 27 in each section measured in the longitudinal direction of an edge is preferably less than or equal to the length of the grooves 28, or the longest groove 28 in each section.
Referring to
Referring to
As a general summary shown in
As a person becomes accustomed to walking on sloped surfaces such as roof systems, a small change in the coefficient of friction can cause someone to easily lose his or her footing. This is illustrated in Table 1, which shows the coefficient of friction of plywood, OSB, those panels with securely fastened roofing felt and OSB and plywood with loose felt paper applied. The significant differences seen in the coefficient of friction of systems between felt paper being securely fastened and loose, is more than enough to cause a slipping hazard. The present system 10 has an advantage over felt paper in that the coefficient of friction does not change since the barrier layer 30 is securely fastened to the panel 20 prior to installation thus virtually eliminating the occurrence of paper coming loose in the field.
It is important that the panels used in roof applications are not slippery in service. It has also been observed that the coefficient of friction can vary among roof sheathing products of similar types from different sources. Further, the coefficient of friction of panels from one manufacturer can change dramatically, such as when the panels get wet from a change in weather conditions or morning dew. Further, the change in coefficient of friction can be inconsistent among manufacturers. This may be the result of process conditions, wood species, and raw materials used to manufacture these products. Sanding does not improve friction for sheathing panels even though it removes a top layer of wood that may be partially degraded by the process conditions, but it does promote adhesion for secondary lamination. Flat laminated products are perceived to be more slippery than textured products, and water on many substrates makes them slippery when wet. An anti-skid coating can be added to improve the coefficient of friction, but these coatings add additional manufacturing steps, equipment, and cost. Indeed, when plywood or OSB panels are overlaid with paper to create a smooth surface, the coefficient of friction drops compared to regular plywood and OSB. Adding texture to the surface of OSB has been suggested as a method of improving friction or skid-resistance of these panels, but testing of OSB sheathing using the English XL Tribometer showed that the coefficient of friction of the smooth and textured sides of OSB were very similar under dry conditions and that the texture could decrease the coefficient of friction in the wet condition, which is shown in Table 2.
Thus, another notable advantage of the present invention is retained skid resistance when wet. When texture is added to the surface of an overlaid wood composite panel of the present invention, the coefficient of friction unexpectedly increased above that of standard plywood and OSB.
An embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in Tables 3 & 4 and Plots 2 & 3, which shows the coefficient of friction of the screen imprinted overlaid panel vs. smooth overlaid panels, oriented strand board with a screen imprint, oriented strand board that has been sanded and plywood in dry and wet conditions. Paper basis weights (per ream) of 31.751 kg (70 lbs.), 44.906 kg (99 lbs.) and 59.874 kg (132 lbs.) were also tested and compared to show that the range of paperweights mentioned in the embodiment of this record of invention will satisfy the coefficient of friction requirements.
From testing conducted using the English XL Tribometer, the coefficient of friction, as can be seen from Table 3, is significantly higher when a screen imprint is embossed on the surface of the panels as compared to the smooth surface of paper-overlaid panels. From Table 4, it can be seen that the coefficient of friction of the overlaid panels with the textured surface does not significantly decrease when wet and is much better than the coefficient of friction of plywood when wet.
As one example of this invention, a roll of Kraft paper of 44.9 kg (99 lb.) basis weight (per ream), saturated to about 28% by weight resin content with a glue line of phenolic glue of about 4.536 kg/304.8 m2 (10-lbs/1000 ft2) applied to one side of the paper was mounted onto a paper feeding apparatus so that the paper could be fed onto the forming line of an oriented strand board.
The paper was then fed onto the forming line belt with the glue line side of the paper facing up away from the belt. To prevent wrinkling or tearing of the paper, the paper roll must be un-wound at a speed that is consistent with the speed of the forming line. To maintain complete coverage of the paper overlay onto the wood composite substrate, the paper is aligned with the forming line belt as it carries the mat toward the press.
Once the paper is fed onto the forming line, a wood mat is formed on top of the paper as it moves toward the press. The wood mat is formed with the first and second layers being the surface layers composed of strands oriented in a direction parallel to the long dimension of the panels and a third core layer composed of strands oriented in a direction perpendicular to the first and second layers.
1Loose felt over OSB substrate.
2Loose felt over plywood substrate.
During this process, flakes can be pushed underneath the paper overlay and can be pressed on to the surface of the panel, giving the panel a low quality look and hindering the performance of the final product. Therefore, air wands are used at the nose of the forming line to remove the excessive flakes between the paper overlay and the forming line belt.
The mat is then cut into a predetermined size for placing into press. The cut mats are then moved over the nose on the forming line (where the flakes are removed from the paper's surface using the air wands) and picked up by a screen embossed transfer mat. If appropriate, in the production of oriented strand board, the screen embossed transfer mat is sprayed with a release agent to keep the flakes from sticking to the press. However, given that there is a Kraft paper overlay between the flakes and the mat, the release agent is not needed. To prevent the wood mat from slipping off the transfer mat during acceleration, water is sprayed on the surface of the transfer mat prior to the transfer mat picking up the wood mat.
The screen embossed transfer mat and wood mat are then placed in a hot press at a temperature preferably greater than 360° F. for a period long enough to cure the binders on the wood flakes.
The transfer mat then moves the pressed master mat out of the press, removing the screen embossed transfer mat from the wood master mat, leaving an embossed pattern on the surface of the paper overlay. The embossed pattern has hills and valleys with a distance between the valleys and hills of preferably about 0.03048 cm ( 1/1000 inch) to about 0.3048 cm ( 10/1000 inch). The pattern is enough to provide needed skid resistance without puncturing the paper overlay, compromising the water-resistant quality of the panel.
Once the master mat is removed from the press, it can be cut into any dimension to meet the needs of the final user and the edges of the panels sealed with an edge seal coating.
It is understood by those skilled in the art that a continuous press could be used to manufacture overlay panels. One obvious change in the method would be that mastermats would be cut to size after leaving the press.
According to an alternate embodiment of the present invention,
Depending on the size of the panels 120 selected, the panels 120 may be installed with a horizontal or vertical orientation. In
As is well known in the field, the panels 120 may be structural, and may comprise a wood composite, such as veneers, strands, wafers, particles, fibers, and binders, or may be made from any building grade material as required for the particular build. The preferred dimensions of the wall panels 120, including the length L, width W, and thickness T of the panel may be designed to fit the particular application. Optionally, a one half inch thick panel T is used, however a 0.635 cm (quarter inch) to 3.175 cm (1.25-inch) thick panel 120 or thicker may be used if heavier construction is desired.
Turning now to
Where the tongue-and-groove configuration is utilized, opposing edges have a groove or tongue compatible with an opposing corresponding edge and the length of the tongue in each section measured in the longitudinal direction of an edge is less than or equal to the longest grooves in each section. However, as shown in
As depicted in
Further optionally, the barrier layer may comprise an applied coating layer. One such coating is an experimental acrylic emulsion coating from Akzo-Nobel. Another suitable coating is Valspar's Black Board Coating. It is understood that by those skilled in the art that other classes of coatings may serve as an appropriate barrier layer. Coatings may be used with paper overlays to add the desired functions to the panel.
An adhesive 136 is used to bond 155 the surface overlay member 130 to the outward facing surface of each of the plurality of panels 120. Optionally, the adhesive 136 is a glueline applied to 154 one side of the barrier layer 130 to facilitate attachment to the panels 120 during manufacture. Preferably, a glueline layer 136 is of a range from about 4.885 gm/m2 (1 lbs./msf) to about 244.5 gm/m2 (50 lbs./msf). More preferably, the glueline layer 136 has of a range from about 34.18 gm/m2 (7 lbs./msf) to about 58.59 gm/m2 (12 lbs./msf), creating a very efficient and durable bond. As mentioned previously, the glueline layer 136 may be composed from the group phenol-formaldehyde resin, hot-melt or PVA resin. Further optionally, the glueline layer may be isocynate-based.
As the plurality of resin-impregnated overlay bonded panels 120 are affixed to a building frame 115 in substantially abutting relationship, joints or seams are formed there between. Referring again to
The permeability of the tape used at the seams can be altered for the climatic zone (cold, mixed or hot/humid) and the building design used. In some climates in building designs, the tape may not need to be permeable since adequate permeability is available through the building envelope. In other climates in building designs, the tape will have to have a high level of permeability such that the moisture escapes from the interior spaces of the wall, and mold, fungus, etc. is not supported by the trapped moisture. Where a vapor barrier is required, the tape used will have a permeance of less than 1.0 US Perm.
In one example, the tape 140 is polyolefin (polyethylene preferred) backing of a thickness of about 2.5 mils. to about 4.0 mils. Adhesive (butyl preferred) layered deposed on said backing is of a thickness of about 8.5 mils. to about 30 mils. Where a permeable barrier is required, the tape has water vapor permeance of greater than 1.0 US perm at 73° F.—50% RH via ASTM E96 procedure B) and possibly, as high as 200 US perms or more.
Whether the tape 140 is impermeable or permeable to water vapor, it must be able to resist liquid water from entering into the building envelope. Since the seam tape will need to seal against the liquid water as traditional house wraps do, it is reasonable to require the tape to meet standards currently employed to measure liquid water penetration through house wraps, as would be readily known by one skilled in the art.
The technologies that are used to make films or fabrics with water vapor permeance greater than 1.0 US Perm are well known. Tapes that have high permeance are often used in medical applications. Permeable tapes are made from a variety of processes and such tapes may be made bonding a pressure sensitive adhesive to a permeable layer. To improve strength, the permeable layer may be bonded to a woven or non-woven backing. Tapes may have in their structure permeable fabrics, coatings, membranes, or combinations thereof.
According to the preferred construction of the invention, the installation method 150 is shown in
The presently described panels may also comprise a radiant barrier material attached to the lower face of the panel, i.e., the face of the panel facing inwardly, toward the interior of the building. The radiant barrier material has a reflective surface that reflects infrared radiation that penetrates through the roof back into the atmosphere. The combination of this reflective function, as well as the foil's low emissivity, limits the heat transfer to the attic space formed in the interior of the building in the space under the roof. By limiting the heat transfer, the attic space temperature is reduced, which in turn reduces the cost of cooling the house.
The radiant barrier material may simply be a single layer radiant barrier sheet, such as metal foil, such as aluminum foil. Alternatively, the radiant barrier material may be composed of a radiant barrier sheet adhered to a reinforcing backing layer made from a suitable backing material, such as polymeric film, corrugated paper board, fiber board or kraft paper. The backing material makes the foil material easier and more convenient to handle. The multi-layered material may be a laminate in which a backing material is laminated to a radiant barrier sheet. Yet further alternatively, the radiant barrier may be a coating.
Both the radiant barrier material and the barrier layer can be applied to the panel by spreading a coat of adhesive to the surface of the panel, applying the heat-reflecting material (or the barrier layer) over the adhesive onto the panel and pressing the radiant barrier material (or barrier layer) onto the panel. After the adhesive dries or cures, the panel is ready for use.
Another embodiment of the panel of the present invention is a panel, useful for roof and wall sheathing, that has improved friction under some common conditions normally found on construction sites. Specifically, the panel of the presently described embodiment was designed to achieve improved skid-resistance. As described previously, when installing a roof, it is very important that the surface of the sheathing panels need to have sufficient skid resistance so that a person exercising reasonable care can work on the angled surfaces of the roof without slippage.
Although preferable for panels to remain dry during installation, on a construction site, the panels can be subject to moisture or wetness or have sawdust or other foreign materials deposited on their surface, which can reduce the coefficient of friction (CoF) and result in undesirable slippage. Sawdust is especially common on panel surfaces as panels often need to be cut to fit the roof properly. Sawdust can be a significant problem as it may cause a reduction in the coefficient of friction of the sheathing panel surfaces. Accordingly, it is desired to remove as much sawdust as possible from the panel surfaces prior to walking thereon. Although construction workers may take some efforts to clean the sawdust off the surface of the panels using a broom, tapping the board while on the edge, or using a leaf blower, these measures often prove to be inadequate. Specifically, these sawdust removal methods do not always completely remove the sawdust from the surface. Accordingly, a panel that restores adequate skid-resistance after removing as much sawdust as possible using any suitable means or method such as those described above is desired.
Improved performance after the removal of sawdust was achieved in either of two ways. The first method of improving performance and retaining adequate friction after the removal of sawdust is to use a saturating resin in the barrier layer which has a slightly higher fraction of volatiles. The percent volatiles can be a relative reflection of the average molecular weight of the saturating resin. Accordingly, a slight change in the percent volatiles can result in a measurable change in the depth of embossing achieved in the final cure. For example, about a 6% increase in volatiles (as measured in the present experimentation from 3.5% to about 3.7% of the total weight of the resin-saturated paper, including the glueline) resulted in improved embossing in that the measured depth of at least some of the embossed features was measured to be deeper. A thorough discussion of the overlay technology, including the measurement of volatiles, is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,203.
The second method of improving the frictional characteristics of the panel after the removal of sawdust was to change the type of wood furnish used to manufacture the paper in the paper overlay. It was discovered that changing the furnish used in the manufacture of the barrier layer from the typically used hardwood species to softwood species improved the retaining of friction after removal of sawdust.
To measure the friction in the presence of sawdust for the present embodiment, the coefficient of friction was measured using the English XL Tribometer. The standard techniques for using this equipment are described in ASTM F1679-04 and “Pedestrian Slip Resistance; How to Measure It and How to Improve It.” (ISBN 0-9653462-3-4, Second Edition by William English). The standard methods were used to compare the various test surfaces and conditions. To test the sheathing panels with sawdust, the amount of sawdust deposited on the surface of a panel near a saw cut was measured. The sawdust deposited on a panel surface was measured by placing sheets of paper on the surface of a panel and making cuts at the edge of the paper using a circular saw with a new blade. The amount of sawdust produced by the saw was under these conditions was 2.5 g/ft2. The sawdust had a size distribution as shown in Table 6 (Runs 1-4: 20 g samples; Run 5: 60 g sample; all 15 min. on vibration screen shaker.) That amount of sawdust was applied to and spread across the test specimen surface evenly as possible, then the CoF was measured using the English XL Tribometer. The sawdust was removed by tilting on its edge and tapping it with a hammer to “knock” the sawdust off and the specimen's CoF in this state was then measured. The wet condition was measured according to the procedure described at pg. 173 in “Pedestrian Slip Resistance; How to Measure It and How to Improve It.” Since CoF can change depending on the surface, water was added in doses of about 1.54 g of water per test strike until the CoF remained constant. The CoF was measured for several configurations of sheathing panels and compared to existing sheathing materials as controls. The data are reported in Table 5.
The overlay panel has a texture on the surface that imparts a satisfactory CoF on the exterior surface of the panel. As described previously in the prior described panel embodiment, the texture results from pressing a screen into the surface of the panel and comprised major channels and minor indentations. The screen pattern is not symmetric, but has large channels that are roughly orthogonal to much smaller channels that are inside the larger channels. Ideally, the larger channels run up and down and the smaller channels run side to side when the panel is installed on a roof. It was found that a small difference in CoF was measured depending on the test direction. The average of four measurements (N, E, S, and W) is reported and the testing shown in the following tables was initiated so that the first measurement was taken with respect to the textured surface. N and S is measured along the direction of the major channels and E and W is measured generally orthogonally with the major channels. It was noted that some very small differences in CoF could be measured depending on the axis (N-S vs. E-W) along which the measurements were taken. It is also expected that the conditions under which the test is conducted will have some affect on the measured CoF. Variations in temperature and humidity may also have an affect on the measured CoF.
The texture preferably has a number of features or elements disposed in a first direction and a number of features or elements disposed in a second direction. These elements or features disposed in first and second directions may be of similar or may be of different sizes. The elements similarly may be of different or of similar shapes. Non-limiting examples of similarly sized features include a embossed herringbone or a embossed basketweave configuration. A herringbone pattern may be very tightly disposed or may be somewhat “spread-out” in such a manner so that major channels with minor indentations are created.
The embossed textured surface preferably is more preferably comprised of a plurality of major or primary textured features and a plurality of minor or secondary textured features. Although the general appearance of the preferred textured surface 35 appears to be a random pattern of raised areas, however, a closer examination of the preferred textured surface reveals finer detail. Specifically, the preferred textured surface 35 includes a plurality of major channels 33 that are disposed substantially parallel with a pair of opposing edges (preferably the shorter pair of opposing edges) of the panel. Additionally, a plurality of minor indentations 34 are disposed within the major channels 33 and run generally orthogonally to the major channels. Although it is within the scope of the present invention to provide for advantageous slip-resistance by providing any number of major channels, preferably, the density of the major channels is about 5 to about 15 major channels per inch as measured in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the major channels. More preferably, the density of the major channels is about 9 to about 12 major channels per inch as measured in a direction perpendicular to the direction of the major channels. On a typical 4′×8′ sheathing panel, the major channels will preferably run generally across the four-foot or short direction. It should be appreciated that it is not necessary nor required that the major channels be exactly parallel and may undulate slightly from side to side in a somewhat serpentine fashion rather than being straight.
Although it is within the scope of the present invention that the minor indentations 34 may vary in length and width, the minor indentations 34 have a preferably elongated shape that measures preferably about 0.0508 cm (0.020 inches) to about 0.254 cm (0.100 inches) in length and about 0.0254 cm (0.010 inches) to about 0.254 cm (0.100 inches) wide. Although it is within the scope of the present invention to provide for advantageous slip-resistance by providing any number of minor indentations, preferably, the density of the minor indentations is about 15 to about 35 of the minor indentations per inch as measured along the direction of the major channels. The long direction of the minor indentations preferably extends generally across the eight-foot (or long) direction of a typical panel.
In accordance with the preferred configuration of the textured surface 35, in a typical roof sheathing application using 1.219 m×2.438 m (4′×8′) panels where the eight-foot edge of the sheathing panel is parallel to the floor of the home, the major channels 33 will generally be oriented up and down, while the long direction of the minor indentations 34 will generally run across the roof. Preferred depth of the major channels and minor indentations have been found to be in a range of about 5 to about 35 mils as measured by the Mitutoyo Surface Profiler. It should be appreciated that at least some of the major channels and minor indentations may be of a depth greater or deeper than the thickness of the paper (i.e. some of the major channels and minor indentations may be of a depth that would project into the surface of the panel).
For preparation of the test panels for the presently described embodiment, the overlay papers were bonded to mats in a primary process either in the lab or on the regular manufacturing line. Then, test specimens were cut from these panels. The conditions used to prepare the test panels in the laboratory were approximately: Press time: 5 minutes; Press temp: 200° C.; panel dimensions: 40.64 cm×40.64 cm×1.27 cm (16″×16″×0.5″) thick; target density: 41.5 pcf; wood species: mixtures of pine; resin loading: face; MDI @ 4%; PPF @ 2% Core; MDI @ 4.5%; and wax loading: 2%.
The measurements in Table 5 were taken under conditions of higher temperature and humidity as compared with earlier described testing conditions.
While the present invention has been described with respect to several embodiments, a number of design modifications and additional advantages may become evident to persons having ordinary skill in the art. While the illustrative embodiments have been described in considerable detail, it is not the intention of the applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/105,644 filed Aug. 20, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/639,027 filed Jun. 30, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,072,415 issued Sep. 11, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/196,415 filed Jun. 29, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,702,140 issued Jul. 11, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/927,548 filed Jun. 26, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,010,044 issued Apr. 21, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/326,401 filed Dec. 15, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,474,197 issued Jul. 2, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/987,125 filed Jan. 9, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,112,950 issued Feb. 14, 2012. The '950 patent is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/647,249 filed Dec. 24, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,877,938 issued Feb. 1, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/029,535 filed Jan. 4, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,658,040 issued Feb. 9, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 60/547,029 filed Feb. 23, 2004, and U.S. Patent Application No. 60/547,031 filed Feb. 23, 2004. The '950 patent is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/722,787 filed Mar. 12, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,870,694 issued Jan. 18, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/029,293 filed Jan. 4, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,721,506 issued May 25, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 60/547,029 filed Feb. 23, 2004, and U.S. Patent Application No. 60/547,031 filed Feb. 23, 2004. And the '950 patent is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/701,260 filed Feb. 5, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,866,100 issued Jan. 11, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/029,300 filed Jan. 4, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,677,002 issued Mar. 16, 2010, which claims the priority benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 60/547,029 filed Feb. 23, 2004, and U.S. Patent Application No. 60/547,031 filed Feb. 23, 2004. The disclosures of all of the above priority documents are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1257144 | Stanwood | Feb 1918 | A |
| 1534511 | Frederiksen | Apr 1925 | A |
| 1776254 | Finley | Sep 1930 | A |
| 2044782 | Harshberger | Jun 1936 | A |
| 2144168 | Sherriff | Jan 1939 | A |
| 2226239 | Elmendorf | Dec 1940 | A |
| 2246514 | Harris | Jun 1941 | A |
| 2858236 | Asselin et al. | Oct 1958 | A |
| 3041219 | Steck | Jun 1962 | A |
| 3094447 | Chamberlain | Jun 1963 | A |
| 3111787 | Chamberlain | Nov 1963 | A |
| 3266206 | Cosby et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3284967 | Elliott et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3402520 | Lee et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
| 3411256 | Best | Nov 1968 | A |
| 3448001 | Jarvi et al. | Jun 1969 | A |
| 3468086 | Warner | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3522138 | Lee | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3654044 | Hirota | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3666593 | Lee | May 1972 | A |
| 3851427 | Lacoste, III | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3900102 | Hurst | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3909998 | Simpson et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3934066 | Murch | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3969181 | Seabold | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4021981 | Wagoner | May 1977 | A |
| 4053339 | Story et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4132220 | Thomason | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4160346 | Kaufmann | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4172830 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4194335 | Diamond | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4252767 | Piazza et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4326909 | Slavik | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4404252 | Hetzler et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4405675 | Dessens | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4415324 | Henckel et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4443988 | Coutu, Sr. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4555292 | Thompson | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4564554 | Mikuski | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4581384 | Marion | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4590733 | Schneller et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4601935 | Metcalf | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4646498 | Schneller et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4689275 | Sandman | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4719723 | Van Wagoner | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4775567 | Harkness | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4786547 | St-Michel | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4825616 | Bondoc et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4828635 | Flack et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4852311 | Lee | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4852314 | Moore, Jr. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4888930 | Kelly | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4924644 | Lewis | May 1990 | A |
| 4929303 | Sheth | May 1990 | A |
| 4936071 | Karrfalt | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4937992 | Dawson | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4965119 | Sancaktar | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4974382 | Avellanet | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4992315 | Zickell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4992331 | Decoste | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5011866 | Suh | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5061258 | Martz | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5093185 | Ungar | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5096759 | Simpson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5134831 | Avellanet | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5143768 | Wilderman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5147486 | Hoffman | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5187000 | Chow | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5220760 | Dimakis | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5231814 | Hageman | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5236757 | Probst et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5251416 | White | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5259236 | English | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5270119 | Yanutola | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5317035 | Jacoby et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5335473 | Chase | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5345738 | Dimakis | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5374477 | Lawless et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5384994 | Borba | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5425976 | Clarke et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5497596 | Zatkulak | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5515659 | MacDonald | May 1996 | A |
| 5616419 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5617687 | Bussey et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5646419 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5632095 | Day | May 1997 | A |
| 5647934 | Vaders et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5661937 | Doppler | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5687517 | Wiercinski | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5695870 | Kelch et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5700570 | Fahmy | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5711124 | Stough et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5718786 | Lindquist et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5732520 | Maietta | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735092 | Clayton et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5755067 | Mercurio | May 1998 | A |
| 5759670 | Bussey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766721 | Bussey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5787665 | Carlin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5822940 | Carlin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5837620 | Kajander | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843552 | Karrfalt | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859114 | Davis et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5881521 | Porter et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5891282 | Stough et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5891563 | Letts | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5953883 | Ojala | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5955203 | Briggs et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5989668 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6018918 | Long, Sr. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023906 | Folkersen | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6044604 | Clayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6067770 | Lubker, II et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6115926 | Robell | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120869 | Cotsakis et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6131353 | Egan | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6133168 | Doyle et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6187127 | Bolitsky et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6205729 | Porter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6209283 | Folkersen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6209284 | Porter | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6235365 | Schaughency et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6240704 | Porter | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251495 | Wilson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6253530 | Price | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6269608 | Porter | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6279284 | Moras | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6293069 | Monda et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6303207 | Kajander | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308491 | Porter | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6331339 | Kajander | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6355333 | Waggoner | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6408594 | Porter | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6418683 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6455151 | Sakashita et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6481172 | Porter | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6523324 | Porter | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526676 | Ledergerber | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6536176 | Nordgren et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6564521 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6578331 | Leslie et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6581348 | Hunter | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6584742 | Kligler et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6588172 | Porter | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6599621 | Porter | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6656858 | Cahill | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6675544 | Ou et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6701685 | Rippey | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 66989157 | Porter | Mar 2004 | |
| 6715249 | Rusek et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6737155 | Ou | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6745535 | Nordgren et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6769215 | Carkner | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6772569 | Bennett et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6799403 | Winter | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6800352 | Hejna et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6800361 | Bruce et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6804922 | Egan | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6840372 | Giles et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6854228 | Arseneau et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6868643 | Williams | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6892498 | Roman | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6901712 | Lionel | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6901713 | Axsom | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6925766 | Di Pede | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6926785 | Tanzer et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931809 | Brown et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6988343 | Gleeson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7021018 | Peng | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037864 | Faucher | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7082733 | Nordgren et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7093397 | Nordgren et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7100337 | Nordgren et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7127856 | Hagen et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7148160 | Porter | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7150128 | Schuman et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152383 | Wilkinson, Jr. et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7155868 | Cole | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7159368 | Peng | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7183339 | Shen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7343716 | Nordgren et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7378044 | Hejna et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
| 7487624 | Baba | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7501357 | Carroll et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7550187 | Seth et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7658038 | Mower et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7658040 | Bennett | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7677002 | Bennett | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7721506 | Bennett | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7829197 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7838104 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7838123 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7849659 | Kopshever, Sr. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7866100 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7870694 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7877938 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7895796 | Baldock et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7972981 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7984591 | Cashin et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8112950 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8215083 | Toas et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8222164 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8328968 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8474197 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8590217 | Gleeson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8590267 | Jaffee | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 9010044 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9382713 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9546479 | Bennett et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9689159 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9695588 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9702140 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9895824 | Borowka et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 20010010141 | Folkerson | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021448 | Kajander | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010028943 | Mashiko | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20020194807 | Nelson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020100249 | Peng et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020132547 | Grondin et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136915 | Sano et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020179265 | Snyder | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030022578 | Lubker, II | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030054127 | Heifetz | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030089070 | Wall | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030113534 | Poisson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030126817 | Gleeson | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030129348 | Peng | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030131550 | Cole et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030145551 | Grant | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030163959 | Deming | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199217 | Cashin | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040023585 | Carroll et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040029469 | Anderson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040071927 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040103608 | Lionel | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040109853 | McDaniel | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040123555 | Cole | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137819 | Faucher | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040148889 | Bibee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040180195 | Mauga | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040226247 | Byrd | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040244315 | Rust et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050003180 | Kondos | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050011155 | Ponting et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043423 | Schmidt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055973 | Hagen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076611 | Crawford | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097857 | Mehta et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050098255 | Lembo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050118446 | Faucher | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229504 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229524 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257469 | Bennett et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060019568 | Toas et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060034381 | Ionescu et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053737 | Jaffee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053738 | Jaffee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060053739 | Jaffee | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059852 | Toas et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117457 | Williams et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060117686 | Mankell et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060141191 | Seth | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060201089 | Duncan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207204 | Wasitis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236641 | Nordgren et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070015424 | Toas et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070087640 | Albertone et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125475 | Cecilio et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070178793 | Gerello | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234667 | Lubker et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261340 | Cecilio et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080098667 | Williams | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080145681 | Toas | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282632 | Sleeman | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313991 | Chouinard | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090098357 | Bergtold et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113830 | Clark et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090202852 | Chen | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100028668 | Janda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100095607 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100132294 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100170178 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20110120049 | Leo | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135879 | Bennett et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110197528 | Egan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110247286 | Houle | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110269363 | Cashin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120011792 | Dewildt et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120079785 | Bennett et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20130026172 | Asakawa et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130082414 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130283715 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1181565 | Jan 1985 | CA |
| 1189434 | Jun 1985 | CA |
| 10120810 | Nov 2001 | DE |
| 102008031859 | Jan 2010 | DE |
| 2422898 | Nov 1979 | FR |
| 2583337 | Dec 1986 | FR |
| 2364338 | Apr 2001 | GB |
| 2429219 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 11290771 | Apr 1998 | JP |
| 2001020415 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2002121871 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2003276008 | Sep 2003 | JP |
| 122497 | Apr 2006 | MY |
| 1999029978 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| 02103099 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 02103099 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| 2003091508 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| 2005030860 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| 2006034381 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| 2011101546 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2013026172 | Feb 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Abrams, J. “High-Performance Homes on a Budget,” JLC, Jan. 2011, pp. 1-8. |
| Weinstein, N., “Ply-on-foam walls increase energy efficiency,” Daily Journal of Commerce Oreqon, <website citation>, Mar. 8, 2010, pp. 1-2. |
| Madrigal, E., “Portland's Green Building Rock Star,” Green Landlady, <website citation>. Aug. 6, 2010, pp. 1-4. |
| “What is ZIP System Wall Sheathing?,” Huber Engineered Woods, Technical Tip, Oct. 2010, DD. 1. |
| “Allowable Shear Capacity for ZIP System Wall Panels,” Huber Engineered Woods, Technical Tip, Oct. 2011, DD. 1. |
| “Spray Foam Insulation with ZIP System Sheathing,” Huber Engineered Woods, Technical Tip, Nov. 2010, pp. 1. |
| “ICC-ES Evaluation Report—ESR-3373,” ICC-Evaluation Service, Jun. 1, 2012, DD. 1-3. |
| “ACFOAM Nail Base,” Atlas Roofing Corporation, Product Data Sheet, May 21, 2009, DD. 1-2. |
| “Water Resistive Barrier System,” Atlas Roofing Corporation, Installation Guide, Nov. 3, 2009, pp. 1-2. |
| “Insulating Sheathing Installation Guide,” Atlas Roofing Corporation, Installation Guide, Aug. 12, 2010, pp. 1-8. |
| “Sheathing Products,” Atlas Roofing Corporation, Product Brochure, Aug. 12, 2010, pp. 1-8. |
| “Atlas Insulating Sheathing,” Atlas Roofing Corporation, Product Data Sheet, Aug. 12, 2010, pp. 1-2. |
| “APA Panel Handbook Grade Glossary”, 1997, pp. 1-32. |
| “Construction and Industrial Plywood Voluntary Product Standard PSI-95”, Mar. 1996, pp. 1-49. |
| “Joint Claim Construction Chart”, Jan. 21, 2020, pp. 1-26. |
| “English Translation of JP 2001020415”, Feb. 14, 2020, pp. 1-8. |
| “Wayback Machine Internet Archive for Grace”, Jan. 3, 2020, pp. 1. |
| “US Copyright Catalogue Entry for the APA Handbook”, Feb. 5, 2020, pp. 1. |
| “Merriam-Webster Definition of “polymer””, Feb. 12, 2020, pp. 1-9. |
| “Patent Owner Response in IPR2019-00919”, Jan. 16, 2020, pp. 1-77. |
| “Moisture Control for Buildings,” 2002 (“Lstiburek”). |
| LP Test Report T011035, Feb. 2020. |
| LP Test Report—Hybrid PBO TH, Feb. 2020. |
| LP Test Report—Hybrid PBO SB TH, Feb. 2020. |
| LP Test Report—Portland Hybrid TK, Feb. 2020. |
| LP Test Report—Portland PBO TH, Feb. 2020. |
| LP Test Report—70lb PBO, Feb. 2020. |
| LP Test Report—Portland Hybrid NB, Feb. 2020. |
| Huber Engineered Woods, PerformMAX™ 500 Product Sheet (Huber Reference HUB 208), first sale date Sep. 21, 2000. |
| Huber Engineered Woods tri-fold pamphlets with product overview including PerformMAX™ (Huber Reference HUB 22), first sale date Sep. 21, 2000. |
| CoFair Products, Inc., Tite-Seal™ Self-Adhesive Waterproof Flashing Flyer, Jan. 4, 2005. |
| Arnold et al., Installing Housewrap, When properly detailed, high-tech wrappings can reduce the flow of air into outside walls while allowing moisture to escape, Fine Homebuilding, Feb./Mar. 1997, No. 107, pp. 44-47. |
| Energy Source Builder, Wall Sheathing Seam Tape, Oikos, Energy Source Builder #39, Jun. 1995, Iris Communications, Inc. |
| TiteSeal®,Roof Deck Seam Tape, http://www.cofair.com/sheathingtape.aspx, Cofair Products Inc. Feb. 1, 2011. 1 page. |
| Information Disclosure Statement, filed by Georgia-Pacific on Apr. 13, 2015 under U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,580, 14 pages. |
| United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Complaint regarding Huber Engineered Woods LLC vs. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-399. Filed Jun. 17, 2016. 87 Pages. |
| United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Declaration of S. Benjamin Pleune in Support of Defendant Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Transfer. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00399-FDW. Filed Aug. 1, 2016. 4 Pages. |
| United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. Defendant Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC's Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff Huber Engineered Woods LLC's Complaint. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00399-FDW. Filed Aug. 1, 2016. 19 Pages. |
| Answer and Counterclaim Exhibit 1. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00399-FDW. U.S. Pat. No. 9,382,713. Filed Aug. 1, 2016. 29 Pages. |
| United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. First Amended Complaint regarding Huber Engineered Woods LLC vs. Georgia-Pacific Wood Products LLC. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00399-FDW. Filed Aug. 16, 2016. 22 Pages. |
| Yoong Hau Chun, Market Potential of Oriented Strand Board (OSB) & Laminated OSB (Lami-OSB) in Asia Pacific (Thesis), Universiti Putra Malaysia, May 2001, 56 pages. |
| Georgia-Pacific, GP Camo Panel Featuring Mossy Oak, 2010, 2 pages. |
| Ludlow Coated Products, Thermo-Ply Sheathing Technical Specifications Sheet, Available at least as early as Jan. 4, 2015, 2 pages. |
| Department of Housing and Urban Development. Thermo-Ply Stormbrace Laminated Kraft Paperboard, Nov. 21, 2005, 6 pages. |
| Building 46.1, High performance walls (IDEAS Challenge), Copyright Crailer Communications, Feb./Mar. 1996. |
| Dryvit Systems, Inc., DS224, Infinity® System: A Patented Pressure-Equalized Rainscreen Exterior Insulation and Finish System That Incorporates Continuous Insulation and an Air/Water-Resistive Barrier,1997. |
| Dryvit Systems, Inc., DS224, The Infinity® Wall System: The pressure equalized rainscreen engineered to prevent water infiltration, 1997. |
| Boston Globe; Matt Carroll; “Luxury by Design, Quality by Chance: Wall Sheathing Creates Headaches for Builder, Homeowners”; May 1, 2001. |
| OHCD-PHDC-RDA Constructions Specifications; Thermal and Moisture Protection; May 2001. |
| ICC Evaluation Service; ICC-ES Legacy Report ER-1439; Jul. 2001. |
| Clemson University; Holding on to Your Roof; Nov. 2001. |
| Sea Grant North Carolina; Coastwatch; Ann Green; “Hurricane Resistance: Retrofitting, Storm Shutters Increase Safety”; Early Summer 2002. |
| APA; HDO/MDO Plywood Product Guide; 2002. |
| ICC Evaluation Service, Inc.; Acceptance Criteria for Foam Plastic Sheathing Panels Used as Weather-Resistive Barriers; Feb. 2003. |
| Modern Materials; Deniz Carroll; “The Expanding Role of EPS in Construction”; Nov. 2003. |
| ICC Public Hearing; Code Change Proposals, RB251-RB270; Sep. 2006. |
| Building Science Press; Building Science Digest 105; Joseph Lstiburek; “Understanding Drainage Planes”; Oct. 24, 2006. |
| RoyOMartin; Exterior Sheathing; Dec. 15, 2010. |
| OHCD/PHDC/RDA Small Building Specifications; May 2011. |
| LSU College of Agriculture; Hazard Resistant: Wind-resistant Roofs and Attachments; Jul. 26, 2011. |
| APA; HDO/MDO Plywood Product Guide; 2011. |
| LSU College of Agriculture; Teaching Center Roof No. 2; Feb. 29, 2012. |
| ICC Evaluation Service; ICC-ES Evaluation Report ER-3063; Aug. 2013. |
| Energy Vanguard Blog; Allison Bailes; “6 Materials that Drain the Rain on the Plane and Keep a House Dry”; Jan. 27, 2014. |
| Thermo-ply Structural Sheathing; Product Brochure from website, http ://oxengineeredproducts.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/TPly-Product-InfoWeb-10_29_14.pdf. |
| RoyOMartin; Eclipse Reflective Housewrap Product Information and Installation Manual 01; Mar. 2015. |
| RoyOMartin; Eclipse Reflective Housewrap; Webpage, https://products.royomartin .com/eclipse; Before Apr. 2015. |
| RoyOMartin; FSC-Certified Products; Webpage, https://products.royomartin.com/products/fscr-certified-products; Before Apr. 2015. |
| Sto Technical Report 01-07.3—StoGuard: Testing for International Building Code Compliance and Comparison to Sheet Water-Resistive Barrier Products; Before Apr. 2015. |
| Energy-Efficient Building—The Best of Fine Homebuilding, pp. 110-121, 1999, Taunton Press, Inc., Newtown, Connecticut. |
| Encyclopedia Britannica—Polyolefin, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 4 pgs. |
| ASHRAE Journal—Moisture Control For Buildings, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 7 pgs. |
| TECO—OSB Design and Application Guide, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 35 pgs. |
| Wall Sheathing Seam Tape, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 2 pgs. |
| Installing Housewrap, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 6pgs. |
| Performance of Southern OSB Overlaid with Resin-impregenated Paper, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 8 pgs. |
| Merriam-Webster—Definition of Lignocellulose, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 7 pgs. |
| ASTM—Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 8 pgs. |
| “AdvanTech Flooring Installation Instructions”, Huber Engineered Woods, 2013, 4 pages. |
| “ICC ES Legacy Report ER-5866”, ICC Evaluation Service, Inc., Jan. 1, 2004, 3 pages. |
| “OSB Structural Sheathing”, Huber Engineered Woods, published at least by Aug. 26, 2019, 2 pages. |
| “Wall Sheathing Seam Tape”, http://oikos.com/esb/39/P B_Tape.html, Energy Source Builder #39, Iris Communications, Inc,, Obtained Feb. 1, 2011, 2 pages. |
| “Wall Sheathing Seam Tape”, https://web.archive.org/web/19980421012000/http://oikos.com/esb/39/P_B_Tape.html, Iris Communications, Inc., Obtained Jan. 3, 2020, Energy Source Builder #39, 1 page. |
| “ZIP System R-6 Sheathing—Installation Manual”, Huber Engineered Woods, HUB 3004, Dec. 12, 2011, 8 pages. |
| “ZIP System R-3 Sheathing—Installation Manual”, Huber Engineered Woods, HUB 3003, Installation Manual, Dec. 12, 2011, 9 pages. |
| “ZIP System R Sheathing Insulated Wall Panel”, Huber Engineered Woods, HUB 3011, 2011, 2 pages. |
| “ZIP System Sheathing Load-Span Tables”, Huber Engineered Woods, Technical Tip, published at least by Aug. 26, 2019, 5 pages. |
| “ZIP System Sheathing and Covering Applications Technical Bulletin,” Huber Engineered Woods, Technical Bulletin, published at least by Aug. 26, 2019, 1 page. |
| “Sheathing Products Comparison Chart,” Atlas Roofing Corporation, published at least by Aug. 26, 2019, 1 page. |
| LP Test Report—2001 Table, 1 page. |
| Laks Declaration, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 32 pgs. |
| Prosecution History, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 139 pgs. |
| APA Handbook, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 133 pgs. |
| ASTM D5795-00, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 3 pgs. |
| D01-1093, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 10 pgs. |
| Building in Alaska, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 6 pgs. |
| Dupont Tyvek Tape, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 2 pgs. |
| Edward Allen—Fundamentals of Building Construction Materials and Methods, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 9 pgs. |
| LP SmartSide, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 4 pgs. |
| ICBO—ES Report, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 7 pgs. |
| SmartSide—Application Instructions, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 8 pgs. |
| Sto Guard Press Release Archive 2001, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 1 pg. |
| Sto Guard Press Release Archive 2003, published at least by Apr. 3, 2019, 2 pgs. |
| Claim-Construction Opinion and Order for Case 1:19-cv-00342-LPS, Aug. 31, 2020, pp. 1-27. |
| Final Decision for IPR2019-00919 U.S. Pat. No. 9,546,479, dated Oct. 5, 2020, pp. 1-36. |
| English translation of Abstract of Malaysian Patent No. MY122497A; titled “Board and Method for its Production”; filed 1998; inventors Rahim Bin Sudin, Mohd Nor Mohd Dr Yusoff, and S Ganesan; applicant Malaysian Inst of Lami Osb Technologies Milot. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190376287 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60547029 | Feb 2004 | US | |
| 60547031 | Feb 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16105644 | Aug 2018 | US |
| Child | 16551214 | US | |
| Parent | 15639027 | Jun 2017 | US |
| Child | 16105644 | US | |
| Parent | 15196415 | Jun 2016 | US |
| Child | 15639027 | US | |
| Parent | 13927548 | Jun 2013 | US |
| Child | 15196415 | US | |
| Parent | 12987125 | Jan 2009 | US |
| Child | 13927548 | US | |
| Parent | 12647249 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Child | 12987125 | US | |
| Parent | 11029535 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Child | 12647249 | US | |
| Parent | 12722787 | Mar 2010 | US |
| Child | 12987125 | US | |
| Parent | 11029293 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Child | 12722787 | US | |
| Parent | 12701260 | Feb 2010 | US |
| Child | 12987125 | US | |
| Parent | 11029300 | Jan 2005 | US |
| Child | 12701260 | US |
