The present invention relates to floors, and more particularly, to hardwood sport floors having a wear layer supported over a base by an intermediate subfloor having enhanced uniformity in performance characteristics.
Wood floors remain popular for athletic and residential applications, for a number of reasons including aesthetics, quality, stability, ease of maintenance, durability, etc. One popular type of wood floor employs parallel rows of tongue and groove floorboards, laid end to end, across the entire floor surface.
Particularly with hardwood sports floors used primarily for athletics, such as basketball, it is desirable to provide some degree of cushioning, or impact absorption, for the upper surface of the floor relative to the base, or underlying surface. This is typically done by supporting the floorboards above the base via pads, and in most cases the floorboards are secured to the top of some intermediate structure, with the pads located below the intermediate structure, supported on the base. The use of pads in this manner creates an open air space, or air break, between the floor and the base, thereby minimizing moisture ontake by the intermediate structure or the floorboards, which are usually made of wood. If the structure does not include some mechanism for attachment to the base, the floor is said to be “free floating” relative to the base.
In some cases it is desirable to secure, or anchor, the floor to the base, primarily for stability and to minimize the potentially adverse effects of floorboard expansion and contraction which may occur as a result of moisture ontake and/or egress as humidity levels change with the seasons. Also, this moisture-caused expansion and contraction of floorboards adversely affects the performance uniformity of the floor. Thus, anchoring the floor helps to assure uniformity in performance. These dual objectives, to resiliently support the floorboards above the base and to anchor the floorboards to the base, are not easy to achieve simultaneously. Because of this situation, there have been a number of developments in the athletic hardwood floor industry.
More specifically, assignee's U.S. Pat. No. 5,388,380, entitled “Anchored/Resilient Sleeper for Hardwood Floor System” (“Niese '380”) and issued in the name of Mike Niese, discloses several anchoring arrangements for anchoring attachment members to a base, with the attachment members supported on pads residing on the base and anchored in a manner which does not precompress the pads. Generally, Niese '380 relates to resiliently anchoring parallel rows of relatively narrow elongated attachment members which are spaced from each other.
Another patent of the present assignee, U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,000, entitled “Anchored/Resilient Hardwood Floor System” and also issued to Mike Niese (“Niese '000”), discloses, among other things, some variations in the subfloor structure which resides between the floorboards and the pads. Niese '000 is expressly incorporated by reference herein, in its entirety. These variations maintain the benefits of anchoring and resiliency in a manner which does not precompress the pads, while also simplifying the way in which these objectives are achieved.
For these types of floors, as perhaps with all floors, there remains a high customer demand for additional improvements, lower costs, shorter installation time, uniformity in performance, all without any reduction in the floor's other attributes. For suppliers and installers, there is a demand for easier handling, and reduced quantity and/or type of materials.
It is an object of the present invention to optimally achieve these customer, supplier, and installer demands, primarily the demands for reduced costs and shorter installation time, for floors that are anchored or free floating relative to a base, or resiliently supported above the base.
It is also an object of the invention to supply a uniformly stable and resilient hardwood floor, with relatively low labor costs, reduced complexity, and fewer different types of installation components.
The present invention achieves the above-stated objects via a subfloor comprising a plurality of sandwich-like panel sections, each panel section having a resilient layer sandwiched between upper and lower rigid layers. The panel sections are preferably prefabricated and shipped to the installation site in ready to install form. To install, the downwardly directed surface of the lower rigid layer is placed directly on the base, or on a moisture barrier covering the base. These panel sections require no shims. Their relatively large surface area and the conformity of the pad (or pads) which occupy the middle of the “sandwich” allow this subfloor of panels to conform to the base, to provide a horizontal support surface despite some unevenness in the base, within reasonable tolerances.
These panels can be used to create a free floating floor, or alternatively an anchored/resilient floor.
The combination of stability and resiliency in a panel-type structure enhances the overall uniformity of the floor, whether anchored or not. That is, the panel sections have a high degree of uniformity in point elasticity, area defection, and a good degree of dampening, or deflection attenuation, without dead spots. Moreover, the panel sections are relatively easy to arrange in a desired fashion over a base. Also, the panel sections can easily be anchored in a manner which does not precompress the resilient layer. This can be achieved by providing access openings in the upper rigid layer and in the pad layer, to enable the lower rigid layer to be directly accessed for anchoring to the base.
The resilient layer may be one continuous panel-type pad, or it may include a plurality of smaller pads. The upper and lower rigid layers preferably comprise plywood, but other suitable rigid materials may also be used.
A plurality of these subfloor panel sections are placed end to end in parallel rows, preferably spanning the width of the floor. Then the sections are anchored to the base by driving anchors through the lower rigid layers of the sections. With this structure, the anchors do not precompress the resilient layer at all, because the anchors do not span a vertical distance in which the resilient layer resides. Preferably, at the anchor points there is direct access to the top surface of the lower rigid layer, such as via an access opening formed in the resilient layer and the upper rigid layer. Preferably, anchoring occurs along the perimeter of the sections, so that each anchor provides anchored securement of at least two adjacently located panel sections.
If desired, a top subfloor layer of rigid panels may be placed on the sections, oriented at a 45°, angle so as to lap the joints of the subfloor panel sections. With this arrangement, the wear layer (preferably floorboards) are secured to this top subfloor. If a top subfloor layer is used in this manner, it may be relatively low thickness, such as ⅜ inch. Similarly, with this structure the rigid upper layer of the panel sections may be of the same reduced thickness, i.e. ⅜ inches. If desired, to further assure defection attenuation, one or more surfaces of the upper or lower rigid layers of the panel sections, or one or both of the top and bottom surfaces of the top subfloor, may be kerfed.
Also, it may be desired to use a multiple pieces to form the rigid upper layer of the panel sections, with one piece forming the rigid lower layer. This large lower layer simplifies installation. At the same time, the breaks between the upper layer pieces help to enhance deflection attenuation.
The wear layer may comprise maple or other hardwood strips, as well as nonstructural wear surfaces. Due to the unique strength, resiliency and other desirable characteristics of the subfloor panel sections, relatively thin (e.g., about 0.5 inch) maple strips may be used for the wear surface. Comparatively, most conventional systems require hardwood strips having a thickness of 0.75 inch or more.
Again, with these panel type subfloor sections, the invention achieves a high tensile strength through the interaction of the respective layers. The panel sections provide superior dampening, easier installation, no precompression of the pads, and consistent acoustics throughout the entire surface area of the floor, thereby enhancing player performance. Also, the use of preformed panel sections, shipped from the factory, reduces the installation costs and the potential for installer error. Moreover, the variability of the dimensions of the prefabricated subfloor panel sections enables relatively convenient transport and storage.
This invention uses readily available and relatively low cost materials. For instance, the rigid layers of the subfloor sections may be formed from plywood, or any other suitably strong material of relatively uniform thickness. Compared to other floors, the floor of this invention achieves superiority in the degree of uniformity in stability and resiliency, but with readily available materials, lower cost, and simplified installation.
The general concepts of this inventive floor are also adaptable to various other permutations. For instance, the dimensions of the subfloor panel sections may vary depending on the particular application. For instance, while exemplary dimensions are shown in the drawings (e.g., measuring width-wise about a foot and a half to four feet in width), other panel section dimensions could actually include a relatively narrow width, but generally a width greater than about three inches. Such relatively narrow subfloor sections could be laid end to end in parallel rows, and spaced apart relative to one another. For instance, such elongated sleeper-type sections could be spaced about 8 to 16 inches apart.
These and other features of the invention will be more readily understood in view of the following detailed description and the drawings.
To install the floor 10 of this invention, a suitable number of subfloor panel sections and floorboards are shipped to the installation site, along with suitable fasteners if the floor is to be anchored. As shown in
In
In a preferred embodiment, the lower rigid layers 12a are of uniform length and width. Nonetheless, the invention also contemplates the use of a relative large single piece to form the lower rigid layer 12a, with multiple pieces used to form the upper rigid layer 12c.
If the panel-type subfloor is to be anchored to the base 14, during fabrication the panel sections 12 are provided with perimeter access openings 16 to facilitate anchoring. As shown in
If desired, a top subfloor layer 24 may be arranged on the subfloor panel sections, as shown in
With this structure, on-site installation is facilitated, because each of the subfloor panel sections 112 has an overall dimension of 4 feet wide by 8 feet long and the installable dimensions of the panel sections 112 are dictated by the dimensions of the lower rigid layer 112a. Thus, the number of panels 112 that need to be arranged on the base 14 is reduced to a number which is as low as reasonably possible. Yet, because of the multple pieces of the upper layer 112c, and the discontinuities residing therebetween, this structure provides an added degree of vibration dampening within the surface area of floor 110 occupied by each such panel section 112. This helps the floor 100 to attenuate area deflection upon impact, and it also reduces noise levels.
Compared to prior floors, the installation of the present floor 10, 110 is relatively simple and can be done at low cost. Due to the sandwich structure of the intermedately located subfloor panel sections 12, 112, this invention achieves an anchored floor 10, 110 with no precompression of the resilient layer 12b, 112b, and with very few different types of components. Even compared to other free floating hardwood floors, or other anchored floors that may have little or no resilience, the present invention presents a number of advantages to the end user, namely a uniformly stable and resilient hardwood floor 10, 110 with substantially lower installation, handling, and material costs.
While this application describes one presently preferred embodiment of this invention, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the invention is susceptible of a number of structural variations from the particular details shown and described. For instance, not all of the above layers may be used in certain embodiments that are consistent with the invention. More particularly, one system may not have one of the upper or lower subfloor panels. Therefore, it is to be understood that the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details of the embodiment shown and described. The embodiment shown and described is not meant to limit in any way or to restrict the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/694,282, filed on Jun. 27, 2005, which application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1787067 | Eisler | Dec 1930 | A |
1929871 | Jones | Oct 1933 | A |
2035902 | Macleod | Mar 1936 | A |
4567100 | Pickett et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4577448 | Howorth | Mar 1986 | A |
4578910 | Germeroth et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4697294 | Schafer | Oct 1987 | A |
4824498 | Goodwin et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831806 | Niese et al. | May 1989 | A |
4860516 | Koller et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4890434 | Niese | Jan 1990 | A |
4922670 | Naka et al. | May 1990 | A |
4930280 | Abendroth | Jun 1990 | A |
4995210 | Niese et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
5183438 | Blom | Feb 1993 | A |
5388380 | Niese | Feb 1995 | A |
5411352 | Eren | May 1995 | A |
5412917 | Shelton | May 1995 | A |
5428935 | Mitchell | Jul 1995 | A |
5433052 | Niese | Jul 1995 | A |
5566930 | Niese | Oct 1996 | A |
5609000 | Niese | Mar 1997 | A |
5653099 | MacKenzie | Aug 1997 | A |
5667444 | Caballero | Sep 1997 | A |
5778621 | Randjelovic | Jul 1998 | A |
5906082 | Counihan | May 1999 | A |
5935675 | Hayden et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6055785 | Counihan | May 2000 | A |
6073409 | Chambers | Jun 2000 | A |
6115981 | Counihan | Sep 2000 | A |
6122873 | Randjelovic | Sep 2000 | A |
6158185 | Counihan | Dec 2000 | A |
6164031 | Counihan | Dec 2000 | A |
6199328 | McGrath et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
RE37615 | Niese | Apr 2002 | E |
6363675 | Shelton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367217 | Niese et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6637169 | Niese et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6688065 | Chambers | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6883287 | Niese et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7096632 | Pacione | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7121052 | Niese et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7383663 | Pacione | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20020124515 | Pacione | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050257474 | Randjelovic | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070022711 | Paradis et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080172968 | Pacione | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070039269 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60694282 | Jun 2005 | US |