The present disclosure relates to the field of door security systems and more specifically to a mechanism operable with the existing panic device to release the dogging mechanism without the use of an external key or similar external device.
Door exit devices, also referred to as panic exits or fire exits, are typically operated from the inside of an outward swinging door and are designed to provide building occupants fast and easy egress in an emergency. A door exit device generally comprises a manually actuated latch release mechanism releasing a door latch responsive to a relatively minimal force applied in the direction of egress travel through the doorway. The manually actuated release mechanism includes a readily accessible push pad or crossbar rail extending at least halfway across the width of the door.
With safety of building occupants as its primary function, a door exit device must always release the door latch, allowing exit without special access authorization or significant door operation knowledge. Any minimally sufficient horizontal push force applied to the outer vertical surface of a push pad type exit device retracts the latch bolt and releases the door to be opened. Several exit device designs have been designed and utilized including rim type, vertical rod, and mortise lock type devices. Examples of such devices are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,466,643, to Godec at al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,016,927 to Toledo; U.S. Pat. No. 5,184,852 to O'Brien; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,927,765 to Austin et al.
Many of these panic devices have a dogging function which allows the panic device to be intentionally placed into an unlocked and unsecure position. This is achieved by means of a cylinder or hex key latching of the panic device when in the depressed push pad state. One example of such a device is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,968,070 to Choi. Currently the functionality will only allow the panic device hardware to be locked/unlocked by means of this hex key or cylinder key.
There is a need for an apparatus that will allow the locking of the panic device hardware in a quick manner without the need of a hex key or cylinder key. One benefit of this added functionality is that any individual can lock the panic device door without the need for a hex key or cylinder key. This feature would provide an added security to the door if a need arises requiring the immediate securing of the door. Currently only building owners with the hex key or cylinder key can lock the panic device door if the panic device is in the dogged down (always unlocked) position.
There remains a need for an exit device apparatus, system and method that efficiently and quickly releases the dogging function of the panic device. The present invention addresses such a need and other needs not addressed by the prior art.
A door exit device, security, and method are provided for releasing the dogging function of the panic device in a quick and efficient manner without the need of a key of other mechanical device. The quick panic release device provides securing of a door into the locked position with a depressing of the end cap button. This depressing of the button actuates and releases the dogging function thereby placing the door in a secure locked mode relative to the exterior side of the device. Exiting the door from within is still allowed as normally intended by depressing of the panic device bar. The panic device will remain in the locked position and access back in through the door will only be granted by those in possession of a key to the rim cylinder lock.
The above as well as additional objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed written description.
The features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The present invention is described in a preferred embodiment in the following description with reference to the figures. While this invention is described in terms of the best mode for achieving this invention's objectives, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variations may be accomplished in view of these teachings without deviating from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Furthermore, each panic device manufacturer has variations of the latch mechanism by which the dogging function is achieved. This invention is intended to apply to the desired means of releasing the dogging function and will require the connection to this latch to be adapted so as to provide this quick panic release without compromising the existing function of the device.
As shown in
The quick latch release functionality is achieved by the replacement of the existing end cap (not shown) of the panic device with a new end cap 50 that has a built-in button 52. An internal connecting rod 54 protrudes from the back side of the end cap 50 through a hole 51 (
In one aspect of the present device, the existing panic dogging latch plate would be replaced with new latch plate 20 that provides a point of connection that facilitates the release of the dogging function of the panic bar, as described in more detail below. The pushing of the end cap button 52 will only release the dogging function that keeps the panic bar in the always unlocked position (FIGS. 1,3), thereby locking the panic door to the outside of the room. The panic bar operation will continue to function as normal operation, whereby depressing the panic bar will open the door from the inside of the room. Reactivation of the dogging function will only be achieved by use of the existing locking mechanism 18 by way of a]hex key or cylinder key, thereby only allowing authorized individuals to unlock or “dog down” the panic device. This is critical in not allowing the door to be left unlocked by unauthorized persons.
As is known, panic bar devices can be of various lengths which are determined by the size of the door and various manufacturers. These panic devices are field cut by the installer during the initial installation as per door size and site condition. To accommodate the variations in lengths, the connecting rod from the push button 52 to the latch plate needs to be adjustable. This can be achieved by the connecting rod 54 that fits inside tube 64 in a manner that allows several inches of total connection length adjustment. The set collar 66 with lock screw can secure this rod and tube at the appropriate length to facilitate the desired activation of the release of the dogging latch mechanism. Typical door sizes vary between 32 in. and 42 in., so the adjustment between the tube 64 and shaft 54 is preferably in the range of 8-16 inches.
The modified dogging latch 20 has a connection lever 70 that projects upward from the latch plate 20, as shown in
This proposed invention will only require the replacement of two components of an existing panic bar device, namely the end cap of the housing 12 and the latching plate, and the installation of the quick panic release assembly. An existing panic device can be modified with the quick panic release assembly in a matter of minutes, whereby minimal labor costs are involved in the retrofitting of an existing panic device that has a dogging function.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a utility filing from and claims priority to Provisional Application No. 61/458,634, filed on Nov. 29, 2010, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2049144 | Wahlberg | Jul 1936 | A |
2719744 | Schlage | Oct 1955 | A |
2724609 | Donnelly | Nov 1955 | A |
2945372 | Reed | Jul 1960 | A |
3530695 | Balducci | Sep 1970 | A |
3563585 | Welch | Feb 1971 | A |
3614145 | Zawadzki | Oct 1971 | A |
4083590 | Folger | Apr 1978 | A |
4167280 | Godec et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4968070 | Choi | Nov 1990 | A |
5016927 | Toledo | May 1991 | A |
5074602 | Hwang | Dec 1991 | A |
5490696 | Hutson | Feb 1996 | A |
6623050 | Peng | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6820905 | Haeck et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7832777 | Banks et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8070192 | Tien | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010005996 | Haeck et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20060255596 | Yong | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080295416 | Kintz | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20110192201 | Lin | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120261928 | Dye et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140109479 | Morstatt et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120133156 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61458634 | Nov 2010 | US |