The present invention relates generally to paper collection devices and, more specifically, to a paper collection system and device for accumulating and securing waste paper, such as for subsequent shredding and/or recycling, wherein a cabinet-style housing with a self-locking door is adapted with a paper guard to prevent unauthorized “reach-in” access to sensitive papers, wherein the swing away door mount of the paper guard and uniquely supported collection bag hangers facilitate easy access to collection bag contents, and wherein the collection bag hangers provide secure positioning for weighty materials within the housing.
Environmental consciousness has increased over time, with improved public education regarding limitations in natural resources, and with increased visibly of the potential and actual impact of unchecked global pollution. Such awareness has led to vast recycling efforts, especially for glass, certain plastics, and for paper. Many communities have embraced individual consumer recycling programs, thereby attempting to limit the amount of waste deposited in ever-growing landfills while also enabling the reclaiming of some items, thereby conserving resources, for example, saving trees by recycling paper. Other communities have turned to massive incinerators in order to reduce vast waste piles, formerly held to decompose on land. Either option, recycling or incinerating, is a viable alternative, but each typically requires at least some sorting of waste by consumers. As a result, trash sorting receptacles have been described, in order to facilitate the collection and disposal process, wherein, for example, paper is collected separately from other recyclable and non-recyclable refuse.
In addition to pollution and conservation, another recently widespread concern related to trash, and particularly to discarded papers, is that of identity theft. Such crimes often occur following the unauthorized examination of paper garbage bearing personal data and information. As a result, large percentages of homes are now equipped with personal shredders, wherein private papers are mutilated prior to placement into recycling or other garbage bins.
Certain businesses and operations, however, have long undertaken to maintain the privacy of information reflected on discarded papers. In particular, attorneys and physicians, both charged with maintaining confidentiality, must be particularly vigilant. Governmental and military facilities, too, must undertake special precautions to ensure the continued security of classified materials. In order to assist these professionals, and others, with the routine disposal of potentially large volumes of sensitive papers, professional shredding services have been designed, wherein sensitive papers are collected on-site, and removed by bonded service providers for shredding, recycling and/or incinerating. Such services allow quick disposal, even of important papers, by placement into a dedicated waste receptacle, whereby the need for the depositor to spend the time necessary to run the materials through an office shredder is eliminated. This convenience ensures and encourages proper disposal of confidential papers, irrespective of volume.
However, security of the discarded papers within such a collection container can be a relevant concern. As such, locks have been designed; however, in view of the present invention, each is disadvantageous. That is, keyed locks are routinely utilized, wherein only authorized individuals possess the ability to open the lock, such as during collection of the bulk paper materials. Unfortunately, in order for the collection bin to be re-secured following access, such locks must be proactively re-engaged. Thus, if an individual should be interrupted during the process, or should otherwise forget, a traditional paper collection cabinet would remain unlocked, and thus unprotected.
Moreover, whether locked or unlocked, the possibility of unauthorized “reach-in” access may remain. Some presently available collection receptacles incorporate a cross bar to prevent an individual from being able to reach therein. However, because such bars are fixed within the cabinet in a position intended to block access to the waste receptacle therein, they disadvantageously continue to inhibit free access to the receptacle during the emptying process.
Further, with respect to the collection bag, the weight thereof from the collected paper can cause failure of the bag mounts, wherein repeated bag transfer, with potential pulling by the authorized collector, can result in weakening or bending of a traditional hook or hanging rod, or can result in a disadvantageous expansion of its mounting aperture.
Therefore, it is readily apparent that there is a need for a shredding/recycling paper collection system and device, wherein a self-locking door safely protects contents while facilitating authorized access, wherein a door-mounted paper guard prevent unauthorized access to collected papers, without inhibiting access for emptying, and wherein a unique bag mounting system soundly supports the collection bag, yet facilitates safe and easy access to and replacement thereof, thus preventing the above-discussed disadvantages.
Briefly described, in the preferred embodiment, the present invention overcomes the above-mentioned disadvantages and meets the recognized need for such a device by providing a paper collection system and device for receiving and securing waste papers for subsequent shredding, recycling, or the like, wherein a cabinet-style housing with a self-locking door is adapted with a paper guard member to prevent unauthorized reach-in access, without inhibiting authorized access to collection bag contents, and wherein uniquely supported collection bag hangers also facilitate easy access to collection bag contents, while also providing secure positioning for weighty materials within the housing.
According to its major aspects and broadly stated, the present invention is a generally rectangular cabinet with a flexible collection vessel removably positioned therein, wherein the collection vessel is held in position via a system of reinforced support components, wherein access to the cabinet is continuously and automatically limited via a self-locking closure mechanism and a door-mounted structural access guard.
More specifically, the present invention is a paper collection system and device, wherein a generally rectangular cabinet includes a hinged front access panel with a self-locking mechanism to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive paper documents prior to destruction of same. The self-locking mechanism necessitates use of a key, or other type of controlled access mechanism, in order to open the cabinet door. Subsequently, however, the lock remains in a ready state after opening. That is, reengagement of the lock via the key is unnecessary to secure the cabinet, because closure of the door automatically reactivates the lock, consistently preventing reopening of the cabinet in the absence of the key.
The cabinet door also includes a deposit way, in the form of a generally rectangular-shaped opening proximate the upper edge of the door, through which documents and other papers are deposited for collection. A document, or paper guard for inhibiting reach-in access into the collection compartment is provided on the interior surface of the cabinet door, just below the deposit way, wherein the surface of the document guard is angled down and out, extending partially over a removable paper collection vessel.
The collection vessel is a reusable bag, generally defining an elongated parallelepiped shape in order to adaptively fit and fill the cabinet. The bag includes hanger ports, opposingly positioned in pairs, proximate the upper edge of the bag, and handles extending from the base in order to facilitate removal from the cabinet when full.
Preferably, the interior sidewalls of the cabinet are adapted to support the bag via the hanger ports, wherein specialized support hooks are mounted inside the cabinet walls. The hooks are operatively designed to effectively support the heavy weight of a collection bag full of discarded paper, wherein placement of the hook mount is positioned to enable the transfer of a portion of the force from the weight of the bag away from the hook to the cabinet itself, transferring the force generated by the momentum of the weight toward the cabinet wall, thereby avoiding undesirable bending or failure of the hook. Via a fulcrum-like action, the downward gravitational pull of the bag contents coincidentally serves to further insert the hook mount into the cabinet wall, unlike previously described mounts. Another support mechanism is alternately envisioned, wherein the reusable collection bag is adapted with male bracket members and is slidably hung thereby via rails or troughs mounted or otherwise defined within the cabinet interior.
The base corners of the exterior cabinet are fitted with a cover that provides protection from damage, and that functions as a floor glide to ease in repositioning of the device. Further, each side of the cabinet is equipped with a handle to further facilitate ease of cabinet movement. Where the handle is formed as an aperture through the cabinet, a shield is provided therewith in order to ensure security of the cabinet contents against unauthorized reach-in access.
Therefore, a feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to facilitate and encourage the collection of waste paper, for shredding, recycling, or other disposal.
Another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to direct paper feed.
Another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to prevent unauthorized reach-in access via a protective document guard, yet to also facilitate authorized access to collection bag contents by mounting the guard in a swing-away manner to enable entirely unimpeded retrieval of the collection bag.
Yet another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to provide secure positioning for weighty materials within a protected housing.
Still another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to maintain the privacy of information reflected on discarded papers.
Still yet another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to ensure and encourage proper disposal of confidential papers, essentially irrespective of volume.
Still another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to self-lock, thereby safely protecting contents while facilitating authorized access.
Yet still another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to inhibit unauthorized reach-in access, thereby safely protecting contents while facilitating authorized access.
Yet still another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to continuously and automatically limit access to contents.
Even still another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to prevent damage to exposed corners by effectively shielding same.
Yet further still another feature and advantage of the present invention is the ability of such a system and device to enhance ease of movement by incorporating handles for enabling grasping of the cabinet, and by incorporating floor glides for enabling slidable movement of the cabinet.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more apparent to one skilled in the art from the following description and claims when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
The present invention will be better understood by reading the Detailed Description of the Preferred and Alternate Embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawing figures, in which like reference numerals denote similar structure and refer to like elements throughout, and in which:
In describing the preferred and alternate embodiments of the present invention, as illustrated in the figures and/or described herein, specific terminology is employed for the sake of clarity. The invention, however, is not intended to be limited to the specific terminology so selected, and it is to be understood that each specific element includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish similar functions.
Referring now to
Preferably, cabinet-style housing 20 is generally rectangular, with hinged front access panel 32, preferably self-locking door 30, wherein preferred self-locking mechanism 34 prevents unauthorized access to sensitive paper documents prior to destruction of same. Front access panel 32 is preferably hingedly secured via piano hinges 48, wherein the preferred hinges 48 inhibit unauthorized removal of front access panel 32 from cabinet-style housing 20. One skilled in the art could employ other suitable hinges, however, piano hinges 48 are preferred.
Referring now to
Although spring bolt rim lock 36 is preferred, other types of self-locking mechanisms 34 could be utilized in order to accomplish the desired feature of consistently preventing reopening of the cabinet in the absence of the key by eliminate the need for proactive locking following authorized access. Further, although keyhole 38 is preferred for controlling access via a key, other types of access controls could be utilized, such as a mechanical and/or electronic keypad or remote. Further, cabinet 30 could also and/or alternately include an alarm mechanism to indicate a reminder signal to an authorized user that hinged panel 30 remains unsecured. In such case, hinged panel 30 could be adapted to require proactive locking following authorized access thereto.
Cabinet housing 20 is preferably adapted with plurality of corner guards 25, whereby protection from inadvertent damage to cabinet corners is provided, and whereby slidable movement of cabinet housing 20 across a surface is facilitated. In the preferred embodiment, each corner guard 25 is a molded synthetic member that is dimensioned to essentially surround each base corner of cabinet housing 20. Of course, any suitable material or shape could be utilized for corner guards 26, wherein the preferred functionality may be supported, including protective qualities as well as slidable qualities. Further, it is preferred that each corner guard 25 is fastened to cabinet housing 20 with a threaded fastener, or the like; however, it should be recognized that adhesive attachment and/or even integral formation with the exterior surface of the cabinet could also be a possibility.
Handles 27, representatively depicted in
Preferably, door 30 includes deposit way 40, preferably generally rectangular-shaped opening 41 proximate upper edge 42 of door 30, preferably defined with generally rounded interior corners 44 through which documents and other papers are safely deposited for collection. Preferably, document guard 50 is provided proximate deposit way 40 for facilitating proper directional feeding of papers into collection bag 100, wherein document guard 50 is preferably affixed on interior surface 46 of cabinet door 30, just below deposit way 40.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Similarly, yet alternately, plurality of collection bag hangers 70 could be configured as depicted in
Also alternately, plurality of collection bag hangers 70 could be configured as depicted in
Referring now to
In the preferred configuration, receiving ports 84 are defined in sidewalls 22a and 22b of cabinet housing 20 in an angular fashion, wherein rear receiving ports 85a are defined closer to top edge 41 of cabinet housing 20 than front receiving ports 85b, thereby defining an angle therebetween that is opposing to the preferred downward angle defined by document guard 50. Secure mounting of plurality of collection bag hangers 70 within front and rear receiving ports 85b and 85a, respectively, thus enables collection bag 100 to be presented toward deposit way 40 for ease of filling. While such configuration and the benefits attendant thereto are recognized, it is recognized that collection bag 100 could be hung in an essentially level formation, or even opposingly angled, although collection of papers could be effected thereby.
In an alternate embodiment, paper collection system and device 10 could comprise an alternately configured collection bag support system, wherein generally horizontally-positioned support rails could be mounted along inner sidewalls 22a and 22b of cabinet housing 20, or troughs or elongated wells could be defined within inner sidewalls 22a and 22b to slidably retain and support the collection bag therein. For such an embodiment, the collection bag, proximate reinforced upper edge 106, could be adapted with a pair of opposingly positioned bracket-like members, with a male-type configuration, wherein the male bracket members could be sewn, glued, or otherwise supportively held by the collection bag in a manner capable of bearing the weight of a full load of discarded paper. The male bracket members could define an extending, sturdy arm member positioned essentially parallel with the upper edge of the collection bag, wherein the arm member could defines an “L” or “T” shaped cross-section, and each support rail or trough within the cabinet housing could define a female well with a compatible cross-section in order to enable slidable reception of the bag brackets and support thereof.
In another alternate embodiment, paper guard 50 could be formed with a plastic top section, and could be secured via plastic support brackets. Further, paper guard 50 could be formed with a plastic top, and could be secured with metal support brackets. Alternately, paper guard 50 could be formed with a plastic top, and wood support brackets or wedges could be utilized to secure paper guard 50 to front access panel 32.
In another alternate embodiment, paper guard 50 could be formed with a metal top section, and could be secured via plastic support brackets. Further, paper guard 50 could be formed with a metal top, and could be secured with metal support brackets Alternately, paper guard 50 could be formed with a metal top, and wood support brackets or wedges could be utilized to secure paper guard 50 to front access panel 32.
In yet another alternate embodiment, paper guard 50 could be formed with a wood top section, and could be secured via plastic support brackets. Further, paper guard 50 could be formed with a wood top, and could be secured with metal support brackets. Alternately, paper guard 50 could be formed with a wood top, and wood support brackets or wedges could be utilized to secure paper guard 50 to front access panel 32.
In still another alternate embodiment, paper collection system and device 10 could be constructed and utilized without document guard 50.
In another alternate embodiment, cabinet-style housing 20 could be alternately shaped, such as, for exemplary purposes only, cylindrical or trapezoidal, as could collection bag 100, and document guard 50 could be suitably arced.
In another alternate embodiment, hinged access to cabinet-style housing 20 could be provided via a sidewall or rearwall, in lieu of front access panel 32.
In still another alternate embodiment, hinged access to cabinet-style housing 20 could be provided via a lid, in lieu of, or in addition to, front access panel 32.
In another alternate embodiment, deposit way 40 could be adapted with an electronic feeding mechanism, with a mechanical roll-feed mechanism, or with a protective flap or hinged coverplate.
In yet another alternate embodiment, deposit way 40 could be defined in a sidewall, rearwall, or lid of cabinet-style housing 20, wherein if deposit way 40 is defined in the lid, document guard 50 could be formed in a manner to extend across a larger area, in order to block unauthorized reach-in access from above, yet to enable receipt of papers and/or documents into collection bag 100. Alternately, also, document guard 50 could be fastened to the lid.
In still another alternate embodiment, document guard 50 could be essentially flat, or rectangularly shaped, wherein an angular mounting could impart the angular upper surface for facilitating movement of papers, while still preventing unauthorized reach-in access.
In use, cabinet housing 20 is preferably assembled via cam-locks, with self-locking, hinged front access panel 30 in an open position. Collection bag 100 is preferably hung, via plurality of hanger ports 102, onto plurality of collection bag hangers 70 therewithin. Access panel 30 is closed, preferably automatically locking, and paper is received into collection bag 100 within secure cabinet housing 20. A key is preferably utilized to unlock and open door 30 of cabinet housing 20, wherein document guard 50 swings away from its position proximate collection bag 100, whereupon collection bag 100 is removed and the collected paper transported for shredding, incineration, recycling, or other desirable process. Once emptied, collection bag 100 is returned to cabinet housing 20 and door 30 is closed, automatically repositioning document guard 50 and reactivating the locking mechanism and securing the contents until the next collection.
Having thus described exemplary embodiments of the present invention, it should be noted by those skilled in the art that the within disclosures are exemplary only, and that various other alternatives, adaptations, and modifications may be made within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments illustrated herein, but is limited only by the following claims.
The present U.S. non-provisional patent application is a Continuation-In-Part of, and claims priority to Patent Cooperation Treaty application, serial no. PCT/US2006/043193, filed on Nov. 7, 2006, entitled “Paper Collection System and Device,” which claims the benefit of a U.S. Provisional application entitled “Paper Collection System and Device,” filed Nov. 7, 2005, having assigned Ser. No. 60/734,328, wherein the present application claims all priority and benefit to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
378955 | Dubey | Mar 1888 | A |
1451343 | Panagopolous | Apr 1923 | A |
2531444 | Lane | Nov 1950 | A |
3204866 | Brighton et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3314632 | Freuler | Apr 1967 | A |
3793756 | Kay et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3802620 | Ferrara | Apr 1974 | A |
3866824 | Lewis | Feb 1975 | A |
3934894 | Hoeffken et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3935994 | Darvishian | Feb 1976 | A |
3995924 | Jones | Dec 1976 | A |
4084495 | Paul | Apr 1978 | A |
4124136 | Bjelland et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4363438 | Connor | Dec 1982 | A |
4404775 | Demartini | Sep 1983 | A |
4523641 | Manderscheid | Jun 1985 | A |
4756445 | Agee, Sr. | Jul 1988 | A |
4775069 | Stonier | Oct 1988 | A |
4801042 | Hamada et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4832290 | Baglio | May 1989 | A |
4834260 | Auten | May 1989 | A |
4856953 | Lin | Aug 1989 | A |
4873811 | Izumitani et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4921196 | Rudko | May 1990 | A |
4941589 | Chen | Jul 1990 | A |
5004195 | McIntyre | Apr 1991 | A |
5105968 | Fiterman et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5108000 | Stoll et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
D327793 | McGrory | Jul 1992 | S |
5137212 | Fiterman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5176315 | Homel | Jan 1993 | A |
5193710 | Podd, Sr. et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201575 | Stolzel | Apr 1993 | A |
5222621 | Matias | Jun 1993 | A |
5226734 | Scott et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5238356 | Salli | Aug 1993 | A |
5261553 | Mueller et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5375781 | Schwelling | Dec 1994 | A |
5421476 | Matias | Jun 1995 | A |
5435484 | Carlson | Jul 1995 | A |
5487485 | Yang et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5494161 | Herbst | Feb 1996 | A |
5540351 | Luescher | Jul 1996 | A |
5542563 | Matias | Aug 1996 | A |
5560507 | Arpin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5560508 | Hsu | Oct 1996 | A |
5626254 | Podd et al. | May 1997 | A |
5632400 | Podd, Sr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5657896 | Matias | Aug 1997 | A |
5758819 | Sniegocki | Jun 1998 | A |
5765613 | Schrager | Jun 1998 | A |
5775649 | O'Leary | Jul 1998 | A |
5803300 | DeMars | Sep 1998 | A |
5842570 | Turnbull | Dec 1998 | A |
5884556 | Klepacki et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5938646 | Carter | Aug 1999 | A |
5944295 | McSherry | Aug 1999 | A |
6131866 | Kesinger | Oct 2000 | A |
6202884 | Verkerke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6241115 | Delmerico et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250488 | Narahara et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6488241 | Kyte et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6533137 | Gervais | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6540096 | Bazany et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6579009 | Schinasi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6625823 | Abbott | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637609 | Stevens | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6728996 | Roscow | May 2004 | B2 |
6837391 | Mino | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7318548 | Felice et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7624915 | Dembowiak et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20030047561 | Neto | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030197009 | Mino | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040035864 | Mino | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040217237 | McAllister | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050005511 | Sacks | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090079306 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60734328 | Nov 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/US2006/043193 | Nov 2006 | US |
Child | 12116306 | US |