The present invention is directed to printing paper, and the method of making this paper.
Hardwood and softwood wood pulp fibers are used in the manufacture of printing paper and newsprint. These fibers are produced in a chemical pulping process, either sulfate or sulfite, or in a mechanical pulping process. Mechanical processes would include thermomechanical and chemithermomechanical. To form the printing paper or newsprint, these hardwood or softwood pulp fibers and wet end chemicals are mixed with water in the headbox of the paper machine to form a suspension of fibers and chemicals. The wet end chemicals may include fillers such as calcium carbonate and clay. The suspension of fibers and chemicals flow from the headbox onto a wire. The water is removed from the fibers and chemicals by both gravity and vacuum to form a wet web of pulp fibers into which the chemicals are incorporated. The chemicals are throughout the sheet. The sheet may be pressed and dried to remove more water.
Starch, optical brightener additives and surface size may be placed on surface of the sheet in a surface sizing step at the size press Some of the materials may enter into the web if the pressure of the nip at the press is great enough.
Thereafter the web of fiber, wet end chemicals and other materials is dried by heat, calendered and rolled into rolls. The resulting product is referred to as an uncoated or lightly coated paper sheet or web.
The uncoated sheet may be coated in another application of one or more coating layers placed on the sheet in an off-line coating operation. The uncoated sheet passes through a coating station and a second drying station. It may pass through a second calendering operation. The resulting product is referred to as a coated paper sheet or web.
Uncoated or coated printing paper has a basis weight of from 16 to 180 pounds per 3300 square feet.
The application of high speed, variable printing is experiencing tremendous growth in the printing industry, displacing conventional offset printing for many applications. A digital printing technology such as web-fed ink jet printing presents new and different challenges for the paper maker as the optimum surface physics and chemistry of paper for these printers are very different than those required for conventional offset inks.
High speed, ink jet printing is exceptionally challenging because it employs aqueous inks and a great deal of water is placed on the paper surface during the printing process. In the process, these water based inks may be applied at high coverage at paper speeds of 500-1,000 ft. per minute. It is difficult to completely dry the paper before the paper leaves the printer. If uncoated paper is used, the water from the ink penetrates the sheet and disrupts the bonding between the paper fibers. This creates a deformation of the paper surface, which results in unacceptable curling, cockling, or puckering of the printed paper.
Standard desk top ink jet printers are increasing in speed and some of the same challenges are found when printing with these printers because of the water placed on the paper and the difficulty of completely drying the paper before it leaves the printer.
Wide printers have similar challenges because of the amount of ink and water placed on the paper.
Because of these factors, special papers are used when the print job requires high levels of ink coverage. These special papers are coated with water-absorbent silica or swellable gel materials such as polyvinyl pyrilodone, or combinations of these materials. Typically, these materials are applied by an off-line coating operation. The price of these materials and the off-line application significantly increases the cost of paper for these applications.
The optical density of the printed image is also of primary concern for many print jobs as high levels of ink are required to provide vivid, robust colors. This is known as high optical density. Uncoated papers are limited in the amount of ink they can tolerate because of their tendency to curl and cockle. Thus more expensive coated papers are generally required when high optical densities are needed.
The inks are anionic. Highly cationic chemicals are usually added to the paper in order to precipitate the ink and cause the ink to be water fast.
Hexasulfonate optical brighteners are used to enhance the brightness of the paper and make it appear better visually. These optical brighteners are also anionic and the highly cationic chemicals will react with the optical brightener also. This reduces the ability of the brightener to brighten the paper.
Many of these papers are preprinted in an offset press before being printed in an ink jet system. An example would be placing a watermark or logo on the paper. These inks are also anionic and a highly cationic chemical reacts with these inks also. This creates a problem in cleanup of the offset presses.
It is desirable to find a material that may be placed on an uncoated paper in a size press operation, that will reduce the cockle in paper so that it may be used in high speed ink jet printing, make the ink water fast so that it does not bleed when sprayed with water, and may allow the paper to be pre-printed in an offset press.
The present invention is directed to an uncoated paper usable with ink having a water content and which has a maximum Cockle Value of 0.25. The Cockle Value is used to determine the amount of cockle or water induced curl in the paper. An embodiment of the invention is an uncoated paper having a paper basis weight of 16 to 180 pounds per 3300 square feet and a maximum Cockle Value of 0.25.
An embodiment of the invention is a paper that has been treated with a at least 50 pounds per ton of paper with a mono alkali metal salt of citric acid, a mono sodium or potassium citrate, that is capable of being added at the size press, blade coater or by a spray before the heated drying section. Another embodiment is a paper that has been treated with at least 75 pounds of the citrate per ton of paper. Another embodiment is a printing paper that has been treated with up to 250 pounds of the citrate per ton of paper. Another embodiment is a paper that has been treated with up to 300 pounds of the citrate per ton of paper.
It has been found that a mono alkali metal salt of citric acid such as mono sodium or potassium citrate has enough cationicity to react with the ink jet inks to cause them to be water fast. The mono alkali metal salt of citric acid also causes the paper to have a Cockle Value of 0.25 or less. The mono alkali metal salt of citric acid does not have enough cationicity to react with an optical brightener, including hexasulfonate optical brighters, or to react with offset printing inks. It provides a paper that is water fast,that has a reduced cockle and can be preprinted in an offset press.
In another embodiment of the invention the paper also contains a binder such as starch, ethylated starch, latex, polyvinyl alcohol, styrene acrylic acid or an ester in addition to the mono alkali metal salt of citric acid and the low viscosity of the additive can be maintained.
In another embodiment of the invention the paper also contains a florescent whitening agent, an optical brightener or a hexasulfonated optical brightener in addition to the mono alkali metal salt of citric acid.
One embodiment of the present invention is directed to an uncoated or lightly coated paper having a mono alkali metal salt of citric acid and which may be used for printing on ink jet printers and which has a maximum Cockle Value of 0.25 after such printing. Another embodiment is directed to an uncoated or lightly coated printing paper having a mono alkali metal salt of citric acid and which is water fast.
It has been found that a mono alkali metal salt of citric acid such as mono sodium or potassium citrate has enough cationicity to react with the ink jet inks to cause them to be water fast. The mono alkali metal salt of citric acid also causes the paper to have a Cockle Value of 0.25 or less. The mono alkali metal salt of citric acid does not have enough cationicity to react with an optical brightener, including hexasulfonate optical brighters, or to react with offset printing inks. It provides a paper that is water fast, that has a reduced cockle and can be preprinted in an offset
In another embodiment of the invention the paper also contains a binder such as starch, ethylated starch, latex, polyvinyl alcohol, styrene acrylic acid or an ester in addition to the mono alkali metal salt of citric acid and the low viscosity of the additive can be maintained.
In another embodiment of the invention the paper also contains a florescent whitening agent, an optical brightener or a hexasulfonated optical brightener in addition to the mono alkali metal salt of citric acid.
A quantitative test has been developed to determine the curl and cockle of paper. It replaces the subjective test of viewing the paper to determine whether there was curl and cockle and the amount of curl and cockle. This prior subjective test also determined whether a sheet of paper had sufficient treatment. The quantitative test is the second side cockle test method.
The second side cockle test method is used to evaluate the amount of cockle that an inkjet print, at an ink application level of 5.9 grams/square meter, produces in the unprinted or second side of a paper printed with a block print. The present test used a Scitex Test Cockle Form Print. The unprinted side of the inkjet print is illuminated using low angle (15°) lighting. A digital image is made of the cockled area on the unprinted side associated with a 3.5 by 3.5 inch half-tone printed square on the printed side of the sample. The image is then evaluated to determine the amount of second side cockle.
The apparatus used for the second side cockle test method is shown in to
The samples of paper to be tested are printed on one side with a Scitex Test Cockle Form using an inkjet printer and inkjet ink. In the following tests a Hewlett Packard ink jet printer HP560C was used. The ink used was Scitex Ink 2002 and the ink application level was 5.9 g/square meter. The ink should be a water based ink. The paper was handled carefully so as not to crease or wrinkle the paper because creases or wrinkles would be analyzed as cockle.
The settings of the camera 12 were adjusted to a pixel resolution of 100 microns/pixel and an f-stop of F8. The camera control was on Fixed and the image centering was at 127. The Dedolight light 14 was adjusted for uniform low angle lighting. All lighting was from the Delolight light 14. Other room lights were turned off.
The paper sample 18 was placed on the surface 16 of the test stand 10 with the unprinted side of the paper turned to the camera and facing up. The 3.5 by 3.5 inch cockle area was centered in the camera field of view with the light aimed at the center of the cockle area. The camera's exposure was adjusted until the average image pixel value was 127. The image was collected and saved to a disk.
This process was repeated for each sample.
The images were analyzed using the Mathworks, Inc. Matlab® computer software. Version 6, release 13 was used. The image is read into the program and smoothed with a 5×5 median filter to remove high frequency noise. The mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated for each row and column. The larger of the maximum row coefficient of variability and maximum column coefficient of variability is taken as the sample Cockle Value. The program is evaluating the differences between the light and dark areas of the image and determining the variability.
Cockle Value means the cockle value determined by this test.
An embodiment is an uncoated paper that has been treated with a hexasulfonated optical brightener and at least 50 pounds per ton of paper with a mono alkali metal salt of citric acid, a mono sodium or mono potassium citrate. The maximum Cockle Value of the treated printing paper is 0.25. A ton is defined here as 2000 pounds. The salt of citric acid would be applied in a solution at a concentration of 20-50% of the total weight of the solution at room temperature or at temperatures of 50° C. or less.
In another embodiment of the invention at least 75 pounds of citrate per ton of paper is used. In another embodiment of the invention as much as 300 pounds of citrate per ton of paper may be used. In another embodiment as much as 250 pounds of citrate per ton of paper may be used.
The citrate is applied at the size press or the blade coater. It may be applied using a puddle, gate roll or metered size press, or a knife or blade coater. In one embodiment the citrate may be applied in a solution containing at least 20% by weight of material. In another embodiment the citrate may be applied in a solution containing 20 to 50% by weight of the material.
60 gm./m2 unsized paper was used as the base paper for the sheets in this example.
The percentages in this example are weight percentages.
A control sample of paper was coated in a laboratory size press with ethylated starch at 12% concentration. Both side of the paper were coated to a coat weight of 40 pounds of starch per ton of paper per side. This is typical of most uncoated paper grades (Formula I).
Each of the sheets were then dried and conditioned at 50% R.H.
Two commercial paper products A and B, printed with a HP 560 printer using Scitex high speed ink jet ink were digitally recorded with a SONY Mavica digital camera, under low angle light.
A sample of paper was treated in a lab size press with a solution containing a concentration a 25% of the monosodium salt of citric acid (monosodium citrate), heated to 50 degrees C. Both side of the paper were coated to a coat weight of 37.5 pounds of material per ton of paper per side (Formula II).
The sheets were then dried and conditioned at 50% R.H.
One set of the sheets was printed using an HP 560 printer and Scitex High Speed ink jet ink. The image was a 3″×3″ square, printed at 60% density, using Corel Draw, Version 10.
The printed sheets were then placed in a darkroom, face down and viewed under a LANDSCO triple-bulb, low angle light. The degree of curl and cockle were then visually estimated. The sheets were judged against the starch control. The results are shown in Table 1. 100% is the base case for a starch control.
The sheets were also tested for water fastness via submersion in water for 60 seconds and the ink dye was completely immobilized by the salt. The results are also shown in Table 1.
Water fast means the ability of ink to remain intact when exposed to water or moisture. Water fast inks do not bleed. Water based inks must be treated to be water fast. The inks are anionic. It has been found that the mono alkali metal salt of citric acid has enough cationicity to react with the anionic ink and make it water fast. It does not, however, have enough cationicity to react with offset printing inks.
Water fastness is typically obtained with a nitrogen-containing organic compound of a cationic nature and functions by precipitating the dye in the ink, rendering it immobile, when exposed to moisture after printing. Unfortunately, these types of materials are incompatible with anionic fluorescent whitening agents, optical brighteners, or hexasulfonated optical brighteners which are typically applied at the size press to brighten paper. As such, these types of additives reduce the overall paper brightness, often times to levels below customer acceptance. Again, the mono alkali metal salts of citric acid, such as sodium and potassium citrate, do not have enough cationicity to react with the optical brighteners, the flourescent whitening agents or the hexasulfonated optical brighteners.
The pH of the mono alkali metal salts of citric acid is acid enough to react with the ink jet inks but not acid enough to react with the optical brighteners or the offset printing inks.
Monosodium citrate maintains the brightness of the paper with fluorescent whitening agents, optical brighteners or hexasulfonated optical brighteners while providing water fastness and a low degree of curl and cockle.
Water based inks, those found in ink jet printing, are anionic. Water based inks will bleed when placed in water. The inks must be fixed by precipitating the dye in the ink. This is usually done with highly cationic fixatives. The mono alkali metal salt of citric acid is acid enough to react with the ink jet inks but not acid enough to react with the optical brighteners or offset printing inks.
Samples were also evaluated using the second side cockle test method.
The percentage shown are weight percentages.
60 gm./m2 unsized paper was used as the base paper for the sheets in this example.
The Formula 1 control samples were also used as the control samples.
A second sample of paper was treated in a lab size press with a solution containing a concentration a 25% of the monosodium salt of citric acid, heated to 50 degrees C. This percentage is a weight percentage. Both side of the paper were coated to a net coat weight of 37.5 pounds of material per ton of paper per side. The amount of citrate was 37.5 pounds per ton of paper per side.
Two commercial papers were added to the study.
The samples were evaluated both visually and using the second side cockle test method. The image evaluation test correlated well with the visual observation. The results are given in Table 2.
It was determined that paper sheets having Cockle values of 0.25 or less were acceptable.
Additional size press chemicals or materials are placed on the wet paper web at the size press 32. The size press may be a horizontal type with the rolls horizontally aligned, a vertical type with the rolls vertically aligned. The materials may be placed on the web from the rolls or from a puddle between the rolls. The web may, in some instances, be coated with material by the spraying apparatus 34. The materials described in the various embodiments in the present application would also be applied at the size press 32 or the spraying apparatus 34.
The paper web then passes through a drying section 36. The drying is usually done by steam heated drier cans through which the paper web is threaded. The paper is then calendered by calender rolls 38 and rolled into paper rolls at the winder 40. The resulting product is known as uncoated paper.
This is the product of the present invention. Additional expensive off-machine coatings would not be required to provide a paper that has a maximum Cockle Value of 0.25.
Those skilled in the art will note that various changes may be made in the embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/743,846 and 10/744,856, both filed Dec. 22, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10743846 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11538219 | Oct 2006 | US |
Parent | 10744856 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11538219 | Oct 2006 | US |