This application represents a National Stage application of PCT/US2016/018250 filed Feb. 17, 2016 and titled “Paperboard Carton”. The entire content of this application is incorporated by reference.
The invention generally pertains to packaging products, particular food products, in cartons and, more specifically, to a paperboard carton made from a single blank and separate side inserts for increased structural integrity.
In connection with shipping various types of products, such as food products, from a manufacturer to a retail establishment, it is known to initially package the products in cartons. Although various materials could be used in making the cartons, the most common material employed is paperboard. In general, the paperboard is provided in the form of a blank which can be conveniently stored in a flat configuration or side seamed configuration but easily erected through a simple folding operation to establish an open-ended carton which can be filled and sealed, typically in an automated process. Multiple cartons are then typically arranged side-by-side in a corrugated box for shipping through designated distribution channels to the retail establishment, such as a grocery store, where the cartons in each shipping box can be unloaded and arranged on a display shelf for sale to consumers.
Known end load cartons of this type are not only lightweight, but the paperboard is advantageously recyclable. However, such paperboard cartons lack significant compression strength, leading to the need for the cartons to be loaded side-by-side in the protective, outer corrugated shipping boxes. If additional strength is needed for shipping purposes, common sense would dictate strengthening a single corrugated box which can hold numerous paperboard cartons rather than incurring the added expense of reinforcing each paperboard carton. With this in mind, certain advancements have been made in the area of corrugated boxes to enable numerous loaded boxes to be stacked on one another, while avoiding crushing of the boxes and stacking forces from being borne by the cartons. For example, enhanced lamination configurations, fluting techniques and material variations represent certain approaches commonly considered in the industry.
Another possibility would be to form the carton from a blank having a higher caliper, thereby increasing the basis weight and strength. With either of these potential design changes, the goal of strengthening a food product carton is certainly achievable. Unfortunately, neither of these scenarios is considered practical, particularly as the added cost of bolstering the strength of the cartons, taking into account the sheer volume of such paperboard cartons used in the food industry alone, would be prohibitive. With this in mind, it would really only be advantageous to package food products directly in paperboard cartons if the cartons themselves could be strengthened, such as to enable vertical stacking of the cartons without damage, without increasing the amount of fiber material employed so as to avoid increasing the fiber material costs. Even further, it would be unprecedented if the paperboard cartons could even be shipped in a stacked configuration without the need for an outer container, such as a corrugated box. Still, in light of the known drawbacks, it would be desirable to provide paperboard cartons which are stronger so as to enhance their ability to be stacked if the same could be economically accomplished.
The invention is directed to forming a paperboard carton from a single, unitary blank in combination with side inserts. The side inserts are formed of at least the same caliper material as the blank while increasing the structural integrity of the carton, such that the carton exhibits a compression strength which enables similarly configured cartons to be directly stacked upon each other for shipping purposes. In other embodiments, the blank differs from the side inserts in construction, particularly with respect to a caliper and/or a fiber orientation, to further enhance the overall structural integrity.
More specifically, a carton constructed in accordance with the invention is formed from a unitary blank made from a paperboard material having a specified caliper or basis weight. The unitary blank is folded to establish a front panel, a rear panel, opposing side panels, a bottom wall and a top wall. To strengthen the carton, at least two side inserts, having a caliper which is equal to or greater than the caliper of the unitary blank, are provided within an interior cavity of the carton and against the opposing side walls. The unitary blank has a predominate fiber orientation which is directionally different from each of the at least two side inserts. With this arrangement, the carton exhibits a compression strength which enables similarly configured ones of the cartons to be directly stacked for shipping purposes.
Additional objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts in the several views.
Detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein. In connection with this description, it should be noted that the use of certain terms, such as inside, outside, front, rear, top, bottom and the like, herein is for reference purposes only in describing exemplary forms of the invention as set forth below and illustrated in the drawings. Therefore, these terms should not be considered limiting as to the overall invention. Instead, it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various and alternative forms. The figures are not necessarily to scale, and some features may be exaggerated or minimized to show details of particular features or components.
In general, described below is the construction of cartons, such as food cartons formed from paperboard, in accordance with the invention. It will be recognized that each embodiment is concerned with establishing a carton from a single, unitary blank in combination with side inserts. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the blank differs from the side inserts in construction, particularly with respect to a caliper and/or a fiber orientation. The overall construction provides added strength to the cartons, enabling similarly configured ones of the cartons to be directly stacked for shipping purposes.
With initial reference to
As perhaps shown best in
In assembling or erecting carton 5 to the condition presented in
At this point it should be recognized that the bottom of carton 5 is sealed by folding flaps 71 and 73 inward along fold lines 77 and 79, folding flap 28 along fold line 31 and then folding flap 38 along fold line 41. Adhesive, such as on flaps 71, 73 and a portion of flap 38 which overlaps with flap 28, is preferably used to seal the bottom of carton 5. After filling internal cavity 130, such as with a liner bag containing food pieces (not shown), the top of carton 5 can be sealed by folding flaps 70 and 72 inward along fold lines 76 and 78, folding flap 37 along fold line 40, and then folding flap 27 along fold line 30. Again, adhesive can be used to secured these portions together, such as providing adhesive on flaps 70 and 72, as well as a long an overlapping portion of one or more of flaps 27 and 37.
In this embodiment shown, front and rear panels 25 and 35 are the largest of the side walls of carton 5 in area, i.e., each panel 25, 35 establishes a face for carton 5 having an associated area which is generally in the order of at least three times the surface area of either of opposing side panels 65 and 66. For the particular type of carton shown, each of the side panels 65, 66 is also greater in area than a bottom wall established essentially by overlapping lower flaps 28 and 38. By way of example, panel 25 can constitute the face of a cereal or other carton and can be provided with suitable indicia reflecting the name, brand and the like of product contained within interior cavity 130 of carton 5 for sale to a consumer, such as edible cereal food products. Like a conventional food carton which is formed by folding a single blank, the top of carton 5 can be selectively closed, after being initially opened, by slipping tab 50 of upper flap 27 in a slot 55 provided in lower flap 37.
As indicated above, it is an object of the invention to increase the structural integrity of carton 5, particularly so that carton 5 is able to withstand significant vertical loading without being crushed or buckling, even enabling multiple cartons 5 to be vertically stacked and have exerted thereon certain vertical loads without deformation, particularly when shipped. Initially, it should be recognized that the vertical load capability of carton 5 is enhanced to a significant degree in accordance with the invention as compared to a conventional carton based on the inclusion of side inserts 19 and 21 which importantly extend into the vertical corners of carton 5. By way of example, below is presented Table 1 with top-to-bottom compression force data of cereal boxes with side inserts constructed in accordance with the invention in relation to a standard 64 cubic inch cereal box made from 16 pt recycled fiber paperboard.
With the above in mind, the multi-piece construction of carton 5 certainly contributes to the goals of the invention. However, in further accordance with the invention, other structural parameters can also be altered to further enhance the objects of the invention. In particular, the basis weight or caliper of the paperboard material of side inserts 19 and 21 can be made greater than the caliper of blank 15. This aspect of the invention can be achieved by reducing the basis weight of blank 15, increasing the basis weight of side inserts 19 and 21, or both. In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the fiber orientation of each of side inserts 19 and 21 is different than blank 15. Most preferably, the paperboard fibers of front panel 25, rear panel 35 and side panels 65 and 66 are arranged to more predominantly run horizontally, while the fibers of side inserts 19 and 21, including each of side walls 87 and 97, as well as elongated legs 88, 89, 98 and 99, mainly run vertically (see Grain Direction or GD indications in
At this point, it should be recognized that it is most important in accordance with the present invention to make the main body of carton 5 from a single blank to which is added side inserts. Although a preferred embodiment is described above, it should be recognized at this point that variations can be employed. For instance,
At this point it should be noted that, in connection with the invention, there is seen to exist particular advantages in employing the invention in connection with cartons having aspect ratios of bottom wall to either small side panel, i.e., side panel 40 or 41, which are less than one. That is, although the strength improvement achieved in accordance with the invention can be considered independent of aspect ratio, cartons or boxes including bottoms having associated areas greater than the relative side panels tend to be stronger and therefore may not benefit as much from the invention, at least as compared to cartons which have a relatively small base in combination with fairly large upstanding walls.
As can be readily seen, the compression strengths associated with the cereal cartons constructed in accordance with the invention are significantly greater than the compression strength of a conventional cereal carton, even when the basis weight of the side inserts in accordance with the invention is the same as the blank. In fact, as evidenced above when comparing a fabricated, sealed one-piece 16 pt CRB caliper carton to a corresponding carton with 16 pt CRB unglued side inserts made in accordance with the invention, the top to bottom compression strength has been shown to increase by 76%, and the strength actually increased to over 150% (151% based on the above data) when the same side inserts were glued in place. By comparison, to achieve similar top to bottom compression values, it is estimated that a minimum of 5 pt and 10 pt caliper increases, respectively, would be required. Therefore, cartons of the invention can withstand increased vertical loading. Still, compression enhancements can also be achieved with fiber reductions for the blank and, correspondingly, savings in material costs. In either case, the increased compression strength has been amazingly found to avoid the need for additional corrugated shipping boxes. Instead, as represented in
Based on the above, it should be readily apparent that the invention provides for an end load carton with enhanced compression strength even with a reduction in basis weight. Although disclosed with reference to preferred embodiments of the invention, is should be readily apparent that various changes and modifications can be made to the invention without departing from the spirit thereof. For instance, assembly can be achieved utilizing means other than adhesive, such as ultrasonic welding. In addition, the timing of the attachment of the side inserts can be altered. For example, the side inserts could be attached to the blank prior to folding the blank. Furthermore, it should be recognized that different shapes can be employed for the inserts, such as I, T, H or the like shapes. Finally, the cartons can be employed to house various products, including additional food products like noodles. In any case, the invention is only intended to be limited by the scope of the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2016/018250 | 2/17/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/142528 | 8/24/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
269170 | Bragdon | Dec 1882 | A |
380364 | Scales | Apr 1888 | A |
674009 | Lewis | May 1901 | A |
1265273 | Stokes et al. | May 1918 | A |
1512157 | Bliss | Oct 1924 | A |
1514367 | Bliss | Nov 1924 | A |
1895778 | Andrews | Jan 1933 | A |
2149955 | Burns | Mar 1939 | A |
2362862 | Sidebotham | Nov 1944 | A |
2374390 | Snyder | Apr 1945 | A |
2475441 | Abbott | Jul 1949 | A |
2593778 | McGinnis | Apr 1952 | A |
2606709 | Carey et al. | Aug 1952 | A |
2609138 | Weiss | Sep 1952 | A |
2701679 | Goldstein | Feb 1955 | A |
2947414 | Johnson | Aug 1960 | A |
3007622 | George | Nov 1961 | A |
3099379 | Stease | Jul 1963 | A |
3217924 | Chidsey, Jr. | Nov 1965 | A |
3237838 | Elias | Mar 1966 | A |
3291370 | Elias | Dec 1966 | A |
3788538 | Kuenzi | Jan 1974 | A |
3993239 | Exel | Nov 1976 | A |
4040559 | Giebel | Aug 1977 | A |
4211358 | Crane | Jul 1980 | A |
4620479 | Diamond et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4655386 | Billberg | Apr 1987 | A |
4871063 | Kumbier | Oct 1989 | A |
4884739 | Nederveld | Dec 1989 | A |
5201461 | Sykora | Apr 1993 | A |
5316207 | Ross et al. | May 1994 | A |
5333779 | Sykora et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5390847 | Young | Feb 1995 | A |
5419485 | Petriekis et al. | May 1995 | A |
5497939 | Heiskell et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5639015 | Petriekis et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5839650 | Sheffer | Nov 1998 | A |
6050484 | Galomb | Apr 2000 | A |
6062467 | Ours et al. | May 2000 | A |
6138904 | Baird et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6168074 | Petriekis et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186393 | Tsamourgelis | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6712214 | Wintermute et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7070054 | Scrymgeour et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7074171 | Mahlum et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
8196806 | Tao | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8695870 | Etzel et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8763890 | Clark et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8777097 | Jacomelli et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8875983 | Lenhard et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20010048022 | Zoeckler | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20030038169 | Thibault | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20060113364 | Bonner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070152029 | Gardner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20120261463 | Scott | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130020383 | Tautz et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140013716 | Mallard | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2609965 | Jul 1988 | FR |
WO 1994012328 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 2015116049 | Aug 2015 | WO |
WO 2017018988 | Feb 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
The Gold Jellybean, “Repurposed Cereal Boxes for Desk Organization”, Blog Article, retrieved on Apr. 2, 2016 from the internet: <URL:http://thegoldjellybean.com/2012/05/repurposed-creal-boxes-for-deks-organization.html>. |
Urbanik, “Machine Direction Strength Theory of Corrugated Fiberboard”, Journal of Composites Technology & Research, JCTRER, vol. 18, No. 2, Apr. 1996, pp. 80-88. |
Grain Direction, The Paper Mill Store, Oct. 11, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190039778 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |