The invention relates to pressed paperboard containers, such as disposable paper plates and bowls, having increased strength and rigidity, and the processes used to form such containers.
Pressed paperboard containers, including plates, bowls, platters, etc., with any appreciable vertical draw generally have some form of material gathering in the drawn regions, usually depicted as a structure commonly called pleats. The pleats are located around the periphery of a container, in areas in which the vertical drawn portion follows a curved path about the periphery.
During the manufacturing process of forming the container, a process referenced herein as “conversion” of the paperboard blank into a container, the paperboard stock at the outer regions of blank fold to accommodate the excess material gathering at regions where the vertical draw follows such a curved path. As the conversion process continues, mating dies that are used to form the depth or draw of the container move toward each other, and are typically configured as mating dies with little or nominal die clearance between the mating surfaces. In this manner, the mating conversion dies act on each folded segment of paperboard in the outer regions of the container to create formed pleats. As is well known in the art, tightly packed and ironed out pleats, and preferably ones with at least some degree of bonding of pleat layers or integration and re-bonding of the layers of paperboard fibrous material, will provide resistance from separation of the pleat layers when the container is in use.
Thus, one of the ways to improve the appearance and the rigidity of a formed paperboard container it to provide generally inseparable pleats in normal-use conditions, resulting in greater resistance from deformation of the container such as when a load of food items are placed on the container. Further, it is known that poorly formed pleats will result in an unattractive appearance, and regions of delaminated paperboard that act as lines of weakness for possible catastrophic buckling of the paperboard container, sometimes even when the user places a normal load (amount of food) on the container. Thus, prior attempts at increasing plate rigidity have focused on applying increased heat and pressure by the dies to iron out the pleats.
Prior art paperboard plates generally have either randomly-formed pleats, or radially-extending linear pleats that are formed by scoring along a radial line. Such scored pleats are formed in a desired pattern or arrangement by scoring the blank between dies prior to converting the container into its drawn shape. Scoring weakens the material at the points of scoring by damaging the laminar structure of the paperboard, which influences the paper to fold at the scored areas when the paperboard is pressed into a container, such as a plate. Thus, scoring of paperboard prior to converting the plate results in a catastrophic de-lamination of the paperboard in the scored regions, which causes a loss of integrity of the rigid paperboard.
Prior art containers with scored pleats are made with linear pleats formed of linear scores in the blank, and pleats/scores extend radially outward relative the center of the plate. Thus, such pleats common to prior art plates and processes may be described as “linear” along their length, and “radial” as they extend along a radial line across the diameter of the container. Similarly, therefore, such pleats are created by first forming scores in the paperboard blank, wherein such scores are linear along their entire length and extend radially outward along a respective radial line across the diameter of the blank. Such common structure and method of pleated paperboard containers is described in numerous patents, including the following: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,609,140; 4,606,496; 4,721,499; 5,938,112; and, 7,048,176.
Prior art scored pleats are formed in the shape of the linear radial score. If there is no scoring of the blank for pleats, then randomly-formed pleats result as the paperboard blank is converted into a depth by forming dies. Such randomly formed pleats then naturally form in unspecified arrangements around the outer regions of the container. Randomly-formed pleats often have a linear length and reside along a radially extending line of the container. Randomly formed non-scored pleats may also include non-linear portions of the pleats and portions that do not extend along a radial line. As is known in the art, random non-scored pleats are not desirable, as the uncontrolled pleat formation causes inconsistencies and generally inferior pleats.
Non-scored randomly-formed pleats are not desired due to being less attractive in appearance and non-uniformity of pleats along the outer region of the container. The poor formation of such pleats is due in part to the natural occurrence of an uncontrolled amount of paperboard material gathered into a pleat, simply due to a lack of scoring that would to provide weakened paperboard regions to direct and disperse the “gathering” of paperboard. Similarly, the lack of such score arrangement results in the randomly-formed pleats having undesirable variation in the orientation and/or frequency of such pleats.
Although scoring the blanks for pleat formation, and forming such scored pleats in finished paperboard containers is advantageous and desirable for numerous reasons as described above, such pleats may result in a linear path of weakened paperboard susceptible to creasing or folding when the container is in use and is subject to a load or distortion by being carried by the user. For example, when a container, such as a paper plate, is subject to a heavy load of food and is held by a user in a manner that potentially distorts a region of the plate, the pleat may then act as a line of weakness of the rigidity of the paperboard. The result, of course is that the plate folds along the line of weakness of the pleat, which may be even more likely as the hinge-line of the fold reaches a similar radially extending pleat on the other side of the plate.
Further, linear and/or radial-extending pleats are believed to be susceptible to separation of pleat layers when subject to the compressive and tensile stresses in use, such as when food is loaded on a plate. This is believed to be primarily due to the linear and radial path of the pleat, such that separation of the paperboard propagates along a directly linear path of the radial pleat.
As an example of such features and problems in the prior art, a prior art circular paperboard container (1) is shown in
As shown in
A alternative specific geometry of the plate structure is common. For example, prior art container geometry may not include a recess ring 3 around the bottom wall 2, and may have a curved or rounded rim 5, rather than a flat or substantially horizontal portions of the rim 5. Still other paperboard designs are elliptical, obround, or rectangular in shape rather than substantially round. In such non-circular containers, pleats generally form where the container has curvature in the well or drawn region. Thus, much like the linear and radially extending pleats shown in
Also, the method of manufacturing plates after forming a scored blank are well accepted and common. Paperboard containers are formed from a blank cut from paperboard sheet stock. Typically, the score lines are formed as the blank is cut from the sheet. Thus it is known that the containers must be formed by pressure exerted between mating manufacturing (“conversion”) dies, while preferably optimizing the moisture content of the paperboard and subjecting the paperboard to heat and pressure from the dies to facilitate pleat forming. A prior art circular blank 8 is shown in
Other shapes and sizes of blanks are used to create other types of prior art containers, and these prior art blanks may be scored as desired. In sharply curved areas of the blank and smaller round plates or similar containers, where pleats form close to one another, scoring is usually closely spaced. Regardless of the number or arrangement of score lines in such the prior art containers, however, linear radial scores result in radial linear pleats in the container 1. Such pleats are subject to susceptibility to separate along the linear pleat path. Further, the general alignment of opposed straight pleats at opposite edges of the plate is susceptible of forming a crease line across the width of the container, resulting in buckle failure of the structure. Thus, there is a need for an improved paperboard container structure, and method for manufacturing the same, which has increased rigidity and optimized gathering of pleated material.
The present invention is provided to solve the problems discussed above and other problems, and to provide advantages and aspects not provided by prior containers of this type. A full discussion of the features and advantages of the present invention is deferred to the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides a paperboard container including a bottom wall, a sidewall extending upward from the bottom wall, a rim extending outward from the sidewall, and with pleats extending outwardly through at least a portion of the sidewall rim and/or lip. According to one aspect of the invention, a plurality of pleats are non-linear in shape. According to another aspect of the invention, the pleats extend outward non-radially relative a radial line along the diameter of the container.
The present invention also provides a method of manufacturing a paperboard container using a paperboard blank and a set of forming dies. The method includes creating scores around an outer region of the blank, so that at least some of the score lines are non-linear in shape and/or do not extend radially along a radial line through the origin of the radius of curvature of the container. The method further includes the step of pressing the blank between the forming dies to form the paperboard container with pleats along the scores.
The present invention also provides a method of manufacture of paperboard containers such that gathering of material into pleats is optimized at the different areas of the container profile and depth of draw.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following specification taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
To understand the present invention, it will now be described by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
While this invention is susceptible of embodiments in many different forms, there are shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail preferred embodiments of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiments illustrated.
The present invention provides a novel scoring arrangement and a novel pleat arrangement for pressed paperboard containers, as well as a novel method of manufacturing paperboard containers using such score arrangements. The invention is discussed herein primarily relating to use in pressed paperboard plates that have a substantially round outer dimension and a constant outer radius of curvature of the bottom. However, other paperboard container types and shapes can benefit from the present invention, including a bowl, platter, tray or similar paperboard container. Accordingly, the preferred plate designs discussed herein are used by way of example only, and the present invention is not limited to these designs, nor is it limited to relatively shallow paperboard containers such as a plate.
A paperboard container 10 incorporating the preferred embodiment of present invention is shown in
The container shown in
As shown in
The pleats 30 of the present invention significantly differ from the pleats 7 of prior art containers 1. The pleats 30 of the container shown in
A blank 36 used in forming the plate 10 of
The present invention is useful for providing a paperboard container with increased rigidity, which is an exhibited advantage when in use. Paper board containers are often used for food preparation, food packing, and food service. For example, paper plates formed into a drawn shape for food service. In use, containers such as paper plates are subject to the force of gravity of food placed on the plate. Typical normal-use load of food differ by the size (diameter) of the plate, and usually vary between a few ounces for small plates to eleven ounces for larger plates. A typical paper plate may be loaded with more than 11 ounces of food items by a user; and then held by one hand as it is carried by the user. The gravity force of the normal use load of material on the plate causes stress on areas of the plate, exhibited as resulting stresses that potentially deform the paperboard. When a load is applied on a plate that is typical of normal use of the plate, it is advantageous for the plate to remain rigid, with minimal deflection and for it to not buckle across the plate width. The rigidity or stiffness of a paper plate is the result of numerous factors, including geometry of the plate, thickness of the paper stock, and inseparability of the pleats. The present invention provides plate rigidity increase by a structure that results in greater resistance to pleat separation, and a non-radial structural component in the outer area 32.
Certain tests have been devised in the industry to assess the rigidity of a paperboard containers, with particular focus on rigidity of paper plates. One such test is the Single Serving Institute test (SSI test). The SSI test measures the force (by grams of weight) required to deflect on side of the plate (at the rim portion that is opposite the area of the user's thumb on top of the rim) to a measure of ½ inch (i.e., grams per 0.5 inch deflection).
Another measure of plate rigidity may be observed by applying a force on the plate rim and determining whether the plate buckles, or steadily increasing deflection to observe the amount needed to buckle the plate. Bucking usually involved forming of a crease in the bottom wall and opposed portions of the sidewall, and separation of some pleats. Such buckling of the plate is a different measure of rigidity than SSI testing in that it is a measure f structural rigidity as resistance to catastrophic failure of the plate, such as if the plate folds back on itself when in use and the food on the plate will shift upon or fall from the plate bottom.
Another indication of rigidity is the perceived plate stiffness by a user when handling the plate. A user that is handling a plate may flex the plate to some degree to distort the plate from its flat state. A user may also assess rigidity of the plate by lightly bending the plate in each direction, downward as potentially loaded with food, or upwardly in a folding action.
Practice of the present invention provides enhanced rigidity or stiffness to such paperboard containers. This is achieved by at least three principle structural mechanisms: enhanced resistance from pleat separation; enhancing stiffness in the outer region of the plate with an arrangement of rigid pleat structures; and, enhancing resistance from buckling along a lineal path through the outer region of the plate.
For suitable rigidity of a container, such as a paperboard plate, resistance of pleat separation (resistance from separation of the folded paperboard layers) is preferred. Because the linear score lines 9 of prior art plates result in pleats 7 that are generally aligned at opposite sides of the plate, such an arrangement of pleats gives rise to possible buckling of the plate across a hinge-line of the aligned pleat. The “non-radial” and/or non-linear pleats 30 of this invention offer advantages in rigidity and strength as compared to prior art linear, radial pleats 7, which are more susceptible to pleat separation and propagation. Pleat separation, or pleat failure, occurs primarily due to tensile and/or compressive stresses acting on the paperboard of the pleat, as well as shear stresses. When subject to the tensile and compressive stresses, prior art linear, radially-extending pleats are susceptible to separation of the pleat paperboard layers. In contrast, non-linear and/or non-radial pleats of the present invention are more resistant to separation and failure, partly because the stresses on the paperboard are exhibited directly normal against only a small portion of the pleat. Thus, the tensile and compressive stress components tending to cause pleat separation are lower in non-linear and/or non-radial pleats than typical pleat arrangements. Further, because of such unique arrangement, non-linear pleats are more resistant to propagation of pleat separations caused by shear stresses.
Another structural feature of the invention is a pleat arrangement that utilizes the enhanced stiffness of a pleat, relative adjacent paperboard, to provide a stiffening component on the outer regions of the container. Non-linear and/or non-radial pleats of this invention provide circumferentially-spaced directional component that common linear, radial pleats 7 do not possess. Pleats formed according to the invention exhibit this benefit because, in use, a portion of a bending force in the rim 18 or lip 20 of the plate 10 acts transversely to the pleat 24, bending across the double or triple paperboard thickness of the pleat, rather than acting directly on the pleat to separate the pleat. This aspect further enhances rigidity of the paperboard container. Also, this aspect of the invention provides a container 10 that feels rigid to a user when flexing the plate 10 or twisting the plate 10 from its planar state. The present invention also provides a method of forming paperboard containers, such as paper plates or the like, having increased strength and rigidity as compared to prior art containers. Generally, the method includes forming paperboard containers 10 having non-linear and/or non-radial pleats 24 around the periphery of the container. Preferably, paperboard for plate manufacture is moistened to a level in the range of about 6% to 10%, as is typical in the industry. The paperboard may be treated with a liquid-resistant coating to prevent penetration of liquids from food sitting on the plate 10, which is also a typical feature.
The paperboard stock is formed into blanks of a shape and size appropriate for the desired finished container. An arrangement of score lines 34 are formed into the blank 36 with an arrangement of scoring knives (not shown), arranged to create scores 34 in the specific desired shape (the path of the length of the score) and configuration. Scoring of the paperboard provides the benefit of directing the orientation of the pleat such that the material folds with one crease on the upper (coated consumer) side of the container, and essentially two creases are formed with the bulk of the pleat residing on the opposite (uncoated backside) of the container. The scores 34 are formed by pressing the paperboard between the two dies (not shown), whereby a protruding score knife acts against the upper side of the paperboard, which is pressed into a cavity of the mating die located on the opposite side (underside) of the blank 36. In this manner, the scoring operation, causes de-lamination along the length of the score, such as is commonly practiced with prior art linear, radially-aligned scores 7 (
In the first embodiment shown in the Figures, the container 10 of
By way of an example, a preferred embodiment of the present invention (plates shown in
While the preferred embodiment described in theses tests have curved non-linear and non-radial pleats 30 formed from scores 34 with the configuration shown in
Alternative embodiments of the invention are shown in
Further, similar to the embodiment shown in
In
Each alternate embodiment, shown in the Figures, utilize score/pleat arrangements which may be varied in angular displacement from the container axis A-A and blank axis B-B, while still enjoying the benefits of the invention. Such pleat arrangements (and score arrangements) may also be altered with regard to the curvature of curved segments, such as to increase the radius of curvature of the pleat relative to what is shown in the Figures Further, the number of scores 34 may vary based upon the amount of paperboard gathering necessary to form the depth D of the container 10, while still keeping with the method and article of the invention.
One potential reason for altering the score geometry, as shown in the Figures, is to adjust the score in accordance with differences in geometry of the formed paperboard container. For example, when using the plate geometry shown in
In addition to adding rigidity and strength to the finished container (as a plate or bowl), the non-linear and/or non-radial pleats 30, and associated with non-linear and/or non-radial scores 34, may also enhance the decorative appearance of the plate. Because pleat shapes have traditionally been radial and linear, the use of non-radial and non-linear pleats gives designers freedom to create a variety of unique and distinctive designs. Also, variation of the pleat geometry and frequency provides proper paperboard gathering in non-round container designs.
Another example of such possible use of non-linear and/or non-radial scores and pleats is the manufacture of paperboard trays, such as a generally-rectangular tray shape or some other such drawn shape that has rounded regions and/or rounded corners. Similar to the plates shown herein, pleats 30 of such drawn rounded regions may be arranged in a pattern whereby at least an extent of the pleat 30 is non-radial relative a radial axis 28 of the rounded region. Stated another way, a container 10 with a curvilinear path of the bottom wall 12, and thus a curvilinear path of the sidewall 16, will require pleats 30 in that area of the sidewall 16 and/or rim 18, depending upon the radius of curvature of the curvilinear path. Thus, such pleats should have at least an extent of length that does not reside on a radial line passing from the origin 48 of the radius and transecting the curved region. Similarly, such an alternative container, such as a tray, may include a plurality of pleats 30 in the rounded region of the eventual container have a non-linear configuration.
While the specific embodiments have been illustrated and described, numerous modifications come to mind without significantly departing from the spirit of the invention, and the scope of protection is only limited by the scope of the accompanying Claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/758,953, filed Jan. 13, 2006, which is expressly incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60758953 | Jan 2006 | US |