The present invention relates to a papermaking screen having at least one single fabric for the paper side and at least one single fabric for the machine side. Each fabric has a set of weft yarns and warp yarns. At least a part of the stacked individual fabrics are connected to each other by binder yarns.
Use is increasingly made today in the papermaking industry of high-performance papermaking machines running at speeds of up to 2000 m/min and with operating widths exceeding 10 m. As a very general rule, the sheet forming unit is configured as a twin-wire former, in many instances as a gap former. In typical machines, the sheet forming process takes place immediately in a relatively short dewatering zone between two papermaking screens. The time for sheet formation is reduced to a few milliseconds because of this short distance and the high output rate. The solid content or dry content of the fiber suspension must be raised from about 1 percent to about 20 percent over this interval. This operation requires the papermaking screens to possess high dewatering capability without leaving marks in the paper and with providing high fiber support.
Another important point is the cross-directional stability of screen tension, which is decisive in determination of the thickness and moisture content profile of the sheet. Very high and precise requirements have been set for this stability in the case of modern machines operating with great sheet widths. Consequently, use is increasingly being made in the sheet forming zone of forming strips mounted on the machine sides of the screens and pressed against them to improve the forming. This use results in rapidly changing deflection of the fabric of the screens in the longitudinal direction.
There are basically two different approaches in the state of the art to solve the problem of meeting these requirements, and in particular to effect binding together of the individual fabrics of the paper side and the machine side. One solution is characterized in that the two individual fabric layers are connected to each other together by a weft or transverse yarn. Another solution provides that the connecting is effected by a longitudinal or warp yarn. However, the known approaches are now unsuitable if it is desired to employ different warp diameters on the machine and paper sides.
If the configuration of the two individual fabrics accordingly is oriented especially toward a fine paper side with small diameters and a coarse machine side with large diameters in order to arrive at high stability values, connecting of the two layers must be effected by a weft, a binding weft in particular. The state of the art offers corresponding proposals for solution of this problem as well.
Hence the possibility exists of interweaving the two individual fabrics by an additional binding or stitching yarn which belongs neither to the binding pattern of the upper fabric (paper side) nor to that of the lower fabric (machine side). Such a solution is disclosed, for example, for the papermaking screen of U.S. Pat. No. 5,238,536, which provides a linen binding and a five-shank binding for the lower fabric. There are also approaches involving additional stitching yarns which simultaneously effect connecting of the two fabric layers and in addition serve as filling threads. Such a solution is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,518,042, for example.
In such disclosed solutions, the additionally used binder yarns alter the inherently homogeneous upper side. In a practical application, this leads to some extent to undesirable marks in the paper. To counter this result, the binder yarns are made to be increasingly thinner, but this has the disadvantage that the service life of the connection of individual fabric layers is correspondingly shortened. In addition, practical application has shown that “looping through” of the binding weft yarns may occur, this resulting in separation of the individual layers and rendering the fabric unusable.
In another disclosed solution, complete upper wefts are replaced by pairs of binding structural yarns. Depending on the type of fabric, the ratio of true upper wefts made by weft or warp yarns to the binding weft pairs varies. For example, PCT publications WO 99/06630 and WO 99/06632 disclose fabrics in which the upper fabric is made as a type of linen binding by combining two binding weft yarns. The lower fabric in turn is in these disclosed solutions in the form of a five-shank binding.
Despite the good interconnection of the two individual fabrics, the disclosed solutions present the essential disadvantage that the upper warp of the paper side is not supported at the points of intersection of the binding wefts. If the course of a “complete” upper weft in these solutions is considered, it is seen that both yarns are positioned at an elevated level as a result of alternate binding of upper weft and upper warp, with the result that both the warp and weft bends are positioned in one plane. As a result of use of the binding pairs, this support is now absent from all intersections and all yarns absorb the main forces along their respective longitudinal axis which at the intersections is oriented in the direction of the interior of the fabric. This disadvantage of absence of support arises especially when upper weft and binding pair are introduced in alternating sequence, so that, for example, a complete upper weft follows a binding pair which is then followed by an upper weft. To produce the preferably disclosed linen binding, the following upper weft must extend above the warp yarn which was previously positioned above the intersection and as a result is additionally pulled into the interior of the fabric. The result is that either every other upper warp yarn is positioned deeper in the fabric or none of the warp yarns may be positioned at the level of the weft yarns. This arrangement leads to uneven progress of the fabric on the paper side, something which may result in undesirable marks in the paper.
Objects of the present invention are to provide a papermaking screen characterized by high stiffness values, in particular a high degree of cross-directional stability, and affording dewatering output comparable to that of the disclosed solutions and helping prevent formation of marks in the paper.
These objects are basically attained by a papermaking screen where the respective binder yarn extends above warp yarns of the individual fabric at specific points on the paper side, below which at least one weft yarn of this individual fabric extends on the opposite side. Connection of the two fabric layers (paper side and machine side) is in turn effected by binder yarns which are then nevertheless fully integrated into the fabric structure of the paper side and in the process support the binding point by the special type of connection in such a way that the binder yarns remain on one plane with the wefts and the remaining warp yarns. Application of this binding concept results in production of a papermaking screen having a high degree of stiffness, possessing good dewatering properties and uniform structure, on the paper side in particular, so that undesirable marks in the paper are prevented.
As a result of the present invention, the warp yarns are supported from below by the associated weft yarns of the individual fabric of the paper side at points at which the warp yarns are pulled into the interior of the fabric by the binder yarn. The functional separation of upper and binding weft also makes it possible to employ for the upper weft (paper side) a material which supports the cross-directional stability of the fabric, such as a polyester material. Both materials are of the same type in the solutions referred to in the foregoing in use of a binding weft pair and require optimization with respect to connection of the layers, use customarily being made of polyamides. Although only one binder yarn is used in a given plane of the present invention, the number of binding points, and accordingly contact between binding weft and upper and/or lower chains of paper side and machine side, are not reduced in comparison to the disclosed solutions.
In one especially preferred embodiment of the papermaking screen of the present invention, provision is made such that the diameter of the binder yarn corresponds to that of the upper weft, resulting in a high degree of stiffness of binding of the fabric layers.
Other objects, advantages and salient features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, taken in conjunction with the annexed drawings, discloses preferred embodiments of the present invention.
Referring to the drawings which form a part of this disclosure:
The following numeral identifications are employed in all the illustrations:
In
In the other disclosed screen shown in
The papermaking screen of the present invention will now be described below. For the sake of simplicity and greater ease of understanding, the same reference numerals are used for the following illustrations of solutions, as well as for the conventional screens described in the foregoing.
The first exemplary embodiment of a papermaking screen as shown in
Also in
The binding of the present invention, configured as a five-shank binding with respect to a repeat, provides that the weft yarns 6 extend below four warp yarns 5 and above a following warp yarn 5. The respective binding weft yarn 3 rises obliquely from the lower fabric to the upper fabric at the point of this extension above 9. The respective binding weft yarn 3 is essentially of the same diameter as that of the respective weft yarn 2 of the individual fabric on the paper side. In addition, the warp yarns 5 and weft yarns 6 of the lower fabric, that is, on the machine side, are of a diameter larger than that of the associated yarn systems on the upper or paper side of the papermaking screen. With respect to the upper or paper side of the screen, the respective extension above 7 of the respective binder yarn 3 is separated in sequence from a weft yarn 2 by three warp yarns 1 positioned between them. At the point of the center, warp yarn 1 of this group of three the binding weft yarn 3 executes extension below yarn 6, a short distance in advance of the extension above 9, with a warp yarn 5 positioned underneath. As a result of the functional separation of upper weft yarns 2 of the upper fabric and binding weft yarns 3, these two sets of yarns may be formed of different materials. Preferably, the upper weft yarns 2 are formed of a polyester material and the binding weft yarn 3 are formed of a polyamide material, for the purpose of increasing the cross-directional stability of the screen.
The upper weft yarn 4 shown in
The modified embodiment shown in
In the embodiment illustrated in
A high degree of stability is achieved with the papermaking screen solution of the present invention. The screen is characterized by very good dewatering output and its production is cost-effective.
While various embodiments have been chosen to illustrate the invention, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 53 491 | Nov 2002 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP03/11776 | 10/24/2003 | WO | 00 | 4/8/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/046458 | 6/3/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4705601 | Chiu | Nov 1987 | A |
4729412 | Bugge | Mar 1988 | A |
5238536 | Danby | Aug 1993 | A |
5482567 | Barreto | Jan 1996 | A |
5518042 | Wilson | May 1996 | A |
5826627 | Seabrook et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6533901 | Taipale | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6581645 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6810917 | Stone | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6905574 | Festor | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920902 | Majaury et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926043 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6978809 | Quigley | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7007722 | Quigley et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7048829 | Heger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7048830 | Heger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 29 828 | Mar 1994 | DE |
WO 9906630 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9906632 | Feb 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060162804 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |