Parallel contact circuit breaker

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6420948
  • Patent Number
    6,420,948
  • Date Filed
    Monday, April 23, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 16, 2002
    21 years ago
Abstract
A parallel pole magnetohydraulic circuit breaker (10), having a single trip element (271) and a pair of trip mechanisms (101, 102), achieving an increased current carrying capacity with reduced nuisance trips. The tip mechanisms (101, 102) are contained within separate housings (14, 16), with electrical connections (30, 40) and multipole trip mechanism (101, 102) communicating through apertures in the common wall (14′). Preferably, the armature (260) of the trip element (271) acts on a single trip mechanism (101, 102), which multiplies the available force to trigger a trip of the other tip mechanism.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to the field of circuit breakers, and more particularly to multipole circuit breakers in which contact sets are paralleled in order to increase breaker capacity rating.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the field of electrical circuit breakers, it is well known to tie the mechanisms of a plurality of electrical poles, or independent circuit paths, together. In this case, it is often desired to provide a single control lever and a trip mechanism which operates the electrical contacts in synchrony. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,565,828; 5,557,082, 4,492,941, and 4,347,488, expressly incorporated herein by reference.




A single pole circuit breaker is a device that serves to interrupt electrical current flow in an electrical circuit path, upon the occurrence of an overcurrent in the circuit path. On the other hand, a multipole circuit breaker is a device which includes two or more interconnected, single pole circuit breakers which serve to substantially simultaneously interrupt current flow in two or more circuit paths upon the occurrence of an overcurrent in any one circuit path.




In a multipole circuit breaker, typically the poles switch independent phases of AC current. Thus, two-pole and three-pole breakers are well known. In these systems, each pole is provided with a current sensing element to generate a trip signal, so that an overload on any phase circuit is independently sensed. In the event that an overload occurs, all of the phase circuits are tripped simultaneously. A manual control lever is provided which operates the phase circuits synchronously as well.




Conventional multipole circuit breaker arrangements thus include a trip lever mechanism associated with each pole of the multipole circuit breaker. Each trip lever includes a portion for joining it to adjacent trip levers. If any pole is tripped open by an overcurrent, the breaker mechanism of that pole causes the trip lever to pivot about its mounting axis. The pivotal motion of one lever causes all the interconnected trip levers to similarly pivot. Each lever may include an arm for striking the armature or toggle mechanism of its respective pole, and causing each pole to be tripped open.




In order to increase the capacity of a circuit breaker system, it has been proposed to parallel a set of contacts, each of which might be insufficient alone to handle the composite load. Thus, by paralleling two single pole circuit breaker elements, a higher capacity circuit breaker may be achieved. However, the art teaches that, preferably, a single contact set is provided having a larger surface area and greater contact force in order to handle a larger load. These larger load-handling capacity devices are typically dimensionally larger than lower load carrying designs. This is because, in part, many elements within a circuit breaker scale in size in relation with current carrying capacity, including the lugs, trip elements, trip mechanism, contacts and breaker arm.




In designing a trip element or system, the type of load must be considered. There are two main classes of trip elements; thermal magnetic and magnetohydraulic. These differ in a number of characteristics, and typically have different application in the art.




However, where such contact parallelization is employed, the contact ratings of the breaker should be derated from the sum of current carrying capacity of each of the contact sets. This is because a contact set having a lower impedance than others will “hog” the current, and may thus see a significantly greater proportion of the total current than 50%, resulting in overheating, and possible failure. Therefore, the art typically teaches that a pair of paralleled contact sets are derated, by for example about 25%, to ensure that each component will operate within its safe design parameters. Further, the contact resistance of a switch may change significantly with each closure of the switch. In parallel contact systems, it is known to employ both unitary thermal magnetic and multiple parallel-operating trip elements in multipole breakers. Thus, it is possible to design a circuit breaker with a specially designed trip element that controls an entire breaker system, or to parallel two entire breaker circuits of a multipole arrangement. In the later case, in order to equalize the current as much as possible between the circuits, a current equalization bar has been proposed. However, this does not compensate for unequal contact resistance, and nuisance tripping of the circuit breaker results when the unequal division of the current has caused enough current to pass through one of the current sensing devices to cause it to trip its associated mechanism.




Attempts have been made in thermal-type breakers to parallel the sets of contacts of a multipole breaker to achieve increased maximum current rating. In one case, exemplified by model QO12150 from Square-D Corp., a unitary thermal magnetic trip element was employed as a trip element for a set of two parallel contact sets, with a connecting member to trip both contact sets at the same time. In this case, the trip dynamics were defined by the thermal-magnetic trip element, and careful calibration of the thermal element was required. This design provided both contact sets within a common housing. Thus, while the internal parts were common with non-multipole arrangements, the housing itself was a special multipole breaker housing. The parallel breaker is housed in a shell that differs from single pole housings, with the parallel poles in a common space.




One typical known system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,492,941, expressly incorporated herein by reference, provides electromagnetic sensing devices that are electrically connected at one of their ends to the load terminals. The load terminals are electrically connected in parallel with each other. A plurality of electromagnetic sensing devices are electrically connected at their other ends to each other and are electrically connected to all of the movable contacts which are themselves all electrically connected together. The stationary contacts are connected to line terminals that are also electrically connected in parallel with each other. Thus, the electromagnetic sensing devices are connected in parallel at both of their ends and the contact sets are also connected in parallel at both of their electrical ends, while the electromagnetic sensing devices, on the one hand, and the contact sets, on the other hand, are also in series with each other, thus seeking to equally divide the current among all of the electromagnetic sensing devices, even though the current may not be equally divided among all of the relatively movable contacts, because of varying contact resistances.




Another attempt to increase current carrying capability by paralleling contact sets using magnetohydraulic trip elements employed two parallel trip elements, each set for a desired derated value corresponding to half of the total desired current carrying capacity. For example, two 100 Amp breakers were paralleled (using a standard multipole trip bar) to yield a 150 Amp rated breaker, with 175% trip (about 250 Amps) rating, meeting UL 1077. The parallel set of breakers employed two side-by-side single breaker housings, with slight modifications, and thus did not require new tooling for housings and contact elements.




In this later case, it is difficult to comply with UL 489, which requires that the breaker trip at 135% maximum of rated capacity and 200% of rated capacity within 2 minutes, and that the breaker be capable of handling the specified loads without damage. For example, if the maximum expected deviation in contact resistance of the contact sets (which changes each time the contact is closed) could cause a current splitting ratio of 60%/40%, then in order to ensure reliable trip at 135% of total rated capacity, each trip element must be designed to trip at about 120% of rated capacity, which would lead to unreliability and nuisance trips because of insufficient margin.




Notwithstanding the foregoing attempts, it has heretofore been considered difficult to employ magnetohydraulic circuit breakers in parallel contact multipole breakers with relatively low overcurrent thresholds, such as that imposed by UL 489, especially for use in load environments with high peak to average load ratios, because the maximum expected currents would result in nuisance trips.




A main advantage of parallel contact circuit breakers is that these may employ many parts in common with lower current carrying single pole devices. It is thus often economically desirable to increase the current carrying capacity of circuit breakers by modifying as little as possible, existing circuit breakers. Toward this end, it has been proposed that the amount of current carrying capacity may be almost doubled by placing two single pole circuit breakers side-by-side (or almost tripled by using three side-by-side) and connecting the line terminals together and likewise connecting the load terminals together.




Commercial circuit breaker manufacturers generally manufacture a complete product line composed of a number of breaker sizes, each one covering a different (although sometimes overlapping) operating current range. Each breaker size typically has required its own component and case sizes. In general, each component and case size combination is useful in circuits having only a single current rating range. The need to have a different set of component and case sizes for each current rating has added to the overall cost of breakers of this general type.




As discussed above, there are two common types of trip elements for circuit breakers. A first type, called a thermal magnetic breaker, provides a thermal portion having a bimetallic element that responds to a heat generated by a current, as well as a solenoid to detect magnetic field due to current flow. Typically, the thermal element is designed to trigger a trip response at a maximum of 135% average of rated capacity, and the magnetic element responds quickly (within milliseconds) at 200% of rated capacity. The thermal portion of the breaker controls average current carrying capability, by means of thermal inertia, while the magnetic element controls dynamic response. This design seeks to provide adequate sensitivity while limiting nuisance trips. However, such thermal magnetic designs typically require calibration of the thermal trip mechanism for precision, and tuning of dynamic response is difficult. Further, the thermal element incurs a wattage loss. The operation of the thermal element is also sensitive to ambient temperature, since the heating of the bimetallic element by the current flow is relative to the ambient temperature. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,943,316, 3,943,472, 3,943,473, 3,944,953, 3,946,346, 4,612,430, 4,618,751, 5,223,681, and 5,444,424.




A second type of trip element is called a magnetohydrodynamic or magnetohydraulic breaker. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,062,052 and 5,343,178. In this element, the current passes through a solenoid coil wound around a plastic bobbin, acting on static pole piece and a movable armature. Within the solenoid coil is a moveable magnetically permeable core, which is held away from the pole piece in a damping fluid, e.g., a viscous oil, by a spring. As a static current through the coil increases, the core is drawn toward the pole piece through the viscous fluid, resulting in a nonlinear increase in force on the armature, which lies beyond the pole piece, as the moveable core nears contact with the pole piece. Thus, as the moveable core is pulled toward the pole piece, the magnetic force on the armature suddenly increases and the armature rapidly moves. In this case, it is primarily the spring constant of the spring which controls the precision of the trip element, and thus a final calibration is often unnecessary given the ease of obtaining precision springs. In the event of a dynamic current surge, the core is damped by the fluid, and thus does not rapidly move toward the pole piece, resulting in a dynamic overload capability, determined by the viscosity of the damping fluid, and thus avoiding nuisance trips. The armature is typically counterbalanced and may be intentionally provided with an inertial mass to provide further resistance to nuisance trips.




Nuisance tripping is a problem in applications where current surges are part of the normal operation of a load, such as during motor start-up or the like. For example, starting up of motors, particularly single phase, AC induction types, may result in high current surges. Motor starting in-rush pulses are usually less than six times the steady state motor current and may typically last about one second, but may be 10 or more times the steady state current. In the later case, a breaker may revert to an instantaneous trip characteristic, because the magnetic flux acting on the armature is high enough to trip the breaker without any movement of the delay tube core or heating of the thermal element, depending on the design. One way to address this problem is by increasing the distance between the coil and armature.




A second type of short duration, high current surge, commonly referred to as a pulse, is encountered in circuits containing transformers, capacitors, and tungsten lamp loads. These surges may exceed the steady state current by ten to thirty times, and usually last for between two to eight milliseconds. Surges of this type will cause nuisance tripping in conventional delay tube type electromagnetic circuit breakers. This problem may be addressed by increasing the inertia of the trip element or by other means. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,117,285, 3,959,755, 3,517,357, and 3,497,838, expressly incorporated herein by reference.




SUMMARY AND OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION




The applicants have found that a single magnetohydraulic trip element can advantageously be used to provide desired trip dynamics in a circuit breaker by passing all current from a set of parallel contact sets through a unitary trip element, and providing a multipole trip arm triggered by the unitary trip element which trips the parallel contact sets simultaneously.




The preferred design employs parallel circuit breaker poles each having a trip mechanism, switch contacts and a housing, which share most components in common with a single pole circuit breaker in the same “family”, thus reducing required number of inventoried parts and engineering costs. The trip element of the preferred design, however, differs from single pole designs, being configured for the desired ratings and dynamic response, and portions of the housing between adjacent poles are modified for common access to electrical terminals to bridge the load and to provide a standard type multipole trip bar. The magnetohydraulic trip element, which is preferably a 150 Amp element with desired dynamic trip characteristics, sits asymmetrically in one of the pole housings within a standard frame, in the normal trip element position, and actuating a standard armature.




The external lugs of each poles are made electrically parallel by placing a conductive bar therebetween. This also serves the visual function of alerting the installer as to the electrical function of the breaker, which is similar to a multipole breaker that is not paralleled. Internally, one set of lugs are connected together with conductive straps to one end of the magnetic coil. The other end of the magnetic coil is connected with conductive straps to each of the contact arms. In order to provide physical access for these connections, a portion of each of the common walls of the breaker pole housings are machined to form an aperture or portal therebetween.




The modifications to the standard single pole housing are minimized; other than the portal in the common wall between the poles, the only other modifications are, for example, an arcuate slot for a common trip mechanism, and an arcuate slot for an internal linkage of the manual switch handles. In the preferred embodiment, however, the handles are linked externally by a crossbar, which fits between the handles and causes them to move in unison. In this way, the standard mountings for the handle, pivot axis of the moveable contact bar, stationary contact, and arc chute and slot motor are unaffected. Further, the safety factors of the design remain relatively intact.




A preferred design provides two parallel switch poles with a design rating of 100 Amps each, in a housing 2.5 inches long, 0.75 inches wide, and 2 inches deep, with electrical contact bolts on 2 inch centers. The resulting parallel multipole design with a rating of 150 Amps therefore fits within a form factor of 2.5 by 1.5 by 2 inches, a substantial improvement over prior 150 Amp rating circuit breakers.




It should be seen that the form factor may be varied according to the present invention, for example other standard size circuit breakers which may be formed as multipole parallel contact breakers are, for example, 2 inches long, by 0.75 inches wide, by 1.75 inches deep (e.g., 50 Amp rating) and 7.25 inches long by 1.5 inches wide by 3 inches deep (e.g., 250 Amp rating).




The present invention may incorporate other known circuit breaker features, such as a mid-trip stop for the manual control lever or other trip indicators, and indeed may be formed into a traditional multipole design with parallel sets of contacts for each of multiple switch poles.




It is also seen that, while the preferred embodiments employ housing parts which are common in essential design with single pole designs, that this is not a limitation on the operability of the inventive design.




It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a magnetohydrodynamic circuit breaker which has a low average overcurrent trip capability with good nuisance trip immunity.




It is also an object of the present invention to provide a circuit breaker having a high current rating and a small form factor.




It is a further object of the invention to provide a circuit breaker having a set of parallel contacts, driven by a trip mechanism, wherein all of the contact sets are tripped by a common magnetohydrodynamic trip element.




These and other objects will be apparent from an understanding of the preferred embodiments.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




These and further objects and advantages of the invention will be more apparent upon reference to the following specification, claims and appended drawings wherein:





FIG. 1

is a side view of a single pole breaker mechanism having a housing half removed;





FIGS. 2A and 2B

are detail views of a known breaker toggle mechanism;





FIG. 3A

is an exploded view of a parallel pole master/slave circuit breaker of a slightly different base design than FIG.


1


.

FIG. 3B

shows a cutaway view of a delay tube shown in

FIG. 3A

;





FIGS. 4A and 4B

shown, respectively, an exploded view of a housing structure, and a side view of an inner case half, for the master/slave circuit breaker according to FIG.


3


A.





FIG. 4C

shows a partial assembly drawing of exploded view


4


A, with a gap between the master housing and slave housing, revealing the electrical and mechanical connections between interconnecting the respective housings.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The preferred embodiments will no be described by way of example, in which like reference numerals indicate like elements.




EXAMPLE




Components of a conventional type single pole circuit breaker are depicted in

FIGS. 1

,


2


A and


2


B. See, U.S. Pat. No. 5,293,016, expressly incorporated herein by reference. As shown, the single pole circuit breaker 10 includes an electrically insulating casing


20


which houses, among other things, stationary mounted terminals


30


and


40


. In use, these terminals are electrically connected to the ends of the electrical circuit that is to be protected against overcurrents.




As its major internal components, a circuit breaker includes a fixed electrical contact, a movable electrical contact, an electrical arc chute, a slot motor, and an operating mechanism. The arc chute is used to divide a single electrical arc formed between separating electrical contacts upon a fault condition into a series of electrical arcs, increasing the total arc voltage and resulting in a limiting of the magnitude of the fault current. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,199, expressly incorporated herein by reference. The slot motor, consisting either of a series of generally U-shaped steel laminations encased in electrical insulation or of a generally U-shaped, electrically insulated, solid steel bar, is disposed about the contacts to concentrate the magnetic field generated upon a high level short circuit or fault current condition, thereby greatly increasing the magnetic repulsion forces between the separating electrical contacts to rapidly accelerate separation, which results in a relatively high arc resistance to limit the magnitude of the fault current. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 3,815,059, incorporated herein by reference.




The trip mechanism includes a contact bar, carrying a movable contact of the circuit breaker, which is spring loaded by a multi-coil torsion spring to provide a force repelling the fixed contact. In the closed position, a hinged linkage between the manual control toggle is held in an extended position and provides a force significantly greater than the countering spring force, to apply a contact pressure between the moveable contact and the fixed contact. The hinged linkage includes a trigger element which, when displaced against a small spring and frictional force, causes the hinged linkage to rapidly collapse, allowing the torsion spring to open the contacts by quickly displacing the moveable contact away from the fixed contact. The trigger element is linked to the trip element.




As is known, the casing


20


also houses a stationary electrical contact


50


mounted on the terminal


40


and an electrical contact


60


mounted on a contact bar


70


. Significantly, the contact bar


70


is pivotally connected via a pivot pin


80


to a stationary mounted frame


100


. A helical spring


85


, which encircles the pivot pin


80


, pivotally biases the contact bar


70


toward the frame


100


in the counterclockwise direction per

FIG. 1. A

contact bar stop pin


90


or contact bar stop mounted on the contact bar


70


(or optionally other stop, such as a surface which contacts the frame), limits the pivotal motion of the contact bar


70


relative to the frame


100


in the non-contacting position (contact bar


70


rotated about pin


80


in the counterclockwise direction to separate contacts


50


and


60


, not shown in FIG.


1


). By virtue of the pivotal motion of the contact bar


70


, the contact


60


is readily moved into and out of electrical contact with the stationary contact


50


. In the contacting position (shown in FIG.


1


), the stationary contact


50


limits the motion of the contact


60


, thus limiting the angular rotation of the contact bar


70


about pin


80


. The pivot pin


80


sits in a conforming aperture in the frame, while a slot


81


is provided in the contact bar


70


to allow a small amount of vertical displacement. Thus, in the contacting position, the contact bar


70


may be displaced vertically by the pressure of the toggle linkage composed of cam link


190


and link housing


200


in the aligned relative orientation (shown in FIG.


1


), against a force exerted by the helical spring


85


.




An electrical coil


110


, which encircles a magnetic core


120


topped by a pole piece


130


, is positioned adjacent the frame


100


. An extension


140


of the coil material, typically a solid copper wire, or an electrical braid, serves to electrically connect the terminal


30


to one end of the coil


110


. An electrical braid


150


connects the opposite end of the coil


110


to the contact bar


70


. Thus, when the contact bar


70


is pivoted in the clockwise direction (as viewed in FIG.


1


), against the biasing force exerted by the spring


85


, to bring the contact


60


into electrical contact with the contact


50


, a continuous electrical path extends between the terminals


30


and


40


.




Magnetic core


120


includes a delay tube. By way of example only, the coil and delay tube assembly may be of the type shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,062,052, expressly incorporated herein by reference.




Magnetic core


120


has at an upper position thereof, a pole piece


130


. Adjacent pole piece


130


is an armature


260


pivotally mounted on a pin


261


secured to frame


100


. Armature


260


is rotatably biased in a clockwise direction (relative to

FIG. 3

) by a spring (not shown), and comprises an arm


265


and a counterweight


266


. Counterweight


266


comprises an enlarged extension of armature


260


, and may include a slot


267


for receiving a pin of an inertia wheel rotatably mounted on frame


100


, not shown. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,497,838, 3,959,755, 4,062,052, and 4,117,285, expressly incorporated herein by reference.




The delay tube of the magnetic core


120


is a typical design, which is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,062,052, expressly incorporated herein by reference. In this design, an outer tube


122


of the magnetic core


120


is supported in the frame


100


by a bobbin


121


, about which the coil


110


is wound. The outer tube is a drawn single piece shell, sealed at its open end by the pole piece


130


. The interior of the delay tube is conventionally filled with a viscous fluid


123


such as oil. Typically, the viscosity of the oil is selected to provide a desired damping within a standard delay tube design, although mechanical modifications, most notably with respect to the clearance around a magnetic delay core


124


(not shown in

FIG. 1

) or slug in the outer tube


122


, will also influence the damping or delay of the system. The construction materials of the magnetic delay core or slug and pole piece


130


may also alter the force induced by the coil


110


. The delay core or slug is biased away from the pole piece


130


by a helical spring


125


provided within the outer shell


122


. For example, the delay core has an enlarged lower end and a reduced diameter upper end around which a portion of spring passes and defining an annular shoulder against which the lower end of spring bears. In conventional circuit breaker delay tubes, the distance from the bottom of the core to the plane containing the bottom of the coil


110


, is customarily chosen to be about one-third of the overall interior distance of the delay tube, namely from the bottom of the core to the underside of the pole piece


130


. Customarily, the coil


110


surrounds the upper two-thirds of the delay tube outer shell


122


. This conventional construction optimizes the delay function of the tube while, at the same time, maintaining the overall length of the tube within reasonable bounds.




When a prolonged overcurrent passes through coil


110


, delay core moves upwardly in the outer shell


122


, with motion damped by the viscous oil, to compress spring until the upper end of delay core engages pole piece


130


, causing an increased magnetic flux in the gap between the pole piece


130


and armature


260


, so that the armature


260


is attracted to the pole piece


130


and rotates about its pivot


261


to engage the sear striker bar


240


to result in collapse of the toggle mechanism, separating the electrical contacts and opening the circuit in response to the overcurrent, as will become apparent below.




The circuit breaker


10


also includes a handle


160


, which is pivotally connected to the frame


100


via a pin


170


. Handle


160


includes a pair of ears


162


with apertures for receiving a pin


180


, which connects handle


160


to a cam link


190


. In addition, a toggle mechanism is provided, which connects the handle


160


to the contact bar


70


. The handle


160


is provided with a helical spring


161


, which applies a counterclockwise force on the handle


160


about pin


170


with respect to frame


100


. A significant feature of the cam link


190


, shown in expanded view in

FIG. 2B

, is the presence of a step, formed by the intersection of non-parallel surfaces


194


and


198


, in the outer profile of the cam link


190


. Cam link


190


is pivotally connected by a rivet or pin


210


to a housing link


200


.




With further reference to

FIGS. 2A and 2B

, the toggle mechanism of the circuit breaker


10


also includes a link housing


200


, which is further connected a projecting arm


205


. The link housing is pivotally connected to the cam link


190


by a pin or rivet


210


and pivotally connected to the contact bar


70


by a rivet


220


.




The toggle mechanism further includes a sear assembly, including a sear pin


230


which extends through an aperture in the link housing


200


generally corresponding to a location of an outer edge


195


of the cam link


190


. This sear pin


230


includes a circularly curved surface


232


(see

FIG. 2B

) which is intersected by a substantially planar surface


233


. The sear assembly also includes a leg


235


(see FIG.


2


A), connected to the sear pin


230


, and a sear striker bar


240


, which is connected to the leg


235


and projects into the plane of the paper, as viewed in

FIG. 2A. A

helical spring


250


, which encircles the sear pin


230


, pivotally biases the leg


235


of the sear assembly clockwise, into contact with the leg


205


of the link housing


200


, and biasing the planar surface


233


of the sear pin


230


into substantial contact with the bottom surface


198


of the step in the cam link


190


. A force exerted against the sear striker bar


240


is transmitted to the leg


235


, and acts as a torque on the sear pin


230


to angularly displace the substantially planar surface


233


of the sear pin


230


from coplanarity the surface


198


of the cam link


190


, thus raising the leading edge


234


of the substantially planar surface


233


of the sear pin


230


above the top edge of the surface


194


. This rotation results in elimination of a holding force for the contact bar


70


in the contacting position, generated by the helical spring


85


acting on the contact arm


70


, through the rivet


220


and link housing


200


and sear pin


230


leading edge


234


, against the surface


194


of the cam link


190


, acting on the pin


180


, ears


162


of handle


160


, held in place by pin


170


with respect to the casing


20


and frame


100


.




The initial clockwise rotation of the cam link


190


is limited by a hook


199


in the outer profile of the cam link


190


, at a distance from the step, which partially encircles, and is capable of frictionally engaging, the sear pin


230


. In addition, the distance from the step to the hook


199


is slightly larger than the cross-sectional dimension, e.g., the diameter, of the sear pin


230


. This dimensional difference determines the amount of clockwise rotation the cam link


190


undergoes before this rotation is stopped by frictional engagement between the hook


199


and the sear pin


230


.




As a consequence, the sear pin


230


engages the step in the cam link


190


, i.e., a portion of the surface


194


of the cam link


190


overlaps and contacts a leading portion of the curved surface


232


of the sear pin


230


. Thus, it is by virtue of this engagement that the toggle mechanism is locked and thus capable of opposing and counteracting the pivotal biasing force exerted by the spring


85


on the contact bar


70


, thereby maintaining the electrical connection between the contacts


50


and


60


.




By manually pivoting the handle


160


in the counterclockwise direction (as viewed in FIG.


1


), the toggle mechanism, while remaining locked, is translated and rotated out of alignment with the pivotal biasing force exerted by the spring


85


on the contact bar


70


. This biasing force then pivots the contact bar


70


in the counterclockwise direction, toward the frame


100


, resulting in the electrical connection between the contacts


50


and


60


being broken, thus assuming a noncontacting position. When in the full counterclockwise position, the handle


160


applies a slight tension or no force on the cam link


190


, resulting in a full extension of the cam link


190


with respect to the link housing


200


. In this position, the leading edge of the surface


232


of the sear pin


230


engages the surface


194


, and thus the toggle mechanism is in its locked position. Therefore, manually pivoting the handle


160


from the left to right, i.e., in the clockwise direction, then serves to reverse the process to close the contacts


50


,


60


, since a force against the action of spring


85


is transmitted by clockwise rotation of the handle to the contact bar


70


.




As shown in

FIG. 1

, the armature


260


, pivotally connected to the frame


100


, includes a leg


265


which is positioned adjacent the sear striker bar


240


. In the event of an overcurrent in the circuit to be protected, this overcurrent will necessarily also flow through the coil


110


, producing a magnetic force which induces the armature


260


to pivot toward the pole piece


130


. As a consequence, the armature leg


265


will strike the sear striker bar


240


, pivoting the sear pin


230


out of engagement with the step (intersection of surfaces


194


,


198


) in the cam link


190


, thereby allowing the force of spring


85


to collapse the toggle mechanism. In the absence of the opposing force exerted by the toggle mechanism, the biasing force exerted by the spring


85


on the contact bar


70


will pivot the contact bar


70


in the counterclockwise direction, toward the frame


100


, resulting in the electrical connection between the contacts


50


and


60


being broken.




As a safety precaution, the operating mechanism is configured to retain a manually engageable operating handle


160


in its ON or an intermediate, tripped position, if the electrical contacts


50


,


60


are welded together. Thus, the handle


160


will not assume the OFF position if the contacts are held together. In addition, if the manually engageable operating handle


160


is physically restricted or obstructed in its ON position, the operating mechanism is configured to enable the electrical contacts


50


,


60


to separate upon a trip, e.g., due to an overload condition or upon a short circuit or fault current condition. See, U.S. Pat. No. 4,528,531, expressly incorporated herein by reference.




Two or more single pole circuit breakers


10


are readily interconnected to form a multipole circuit breaker. In this configuration, each such single pole circuit breaker


10


further includes, as depicted in

FIG. 1

, a trip lever


270


(shown in dotted line) which is pivotally connected to the frame


100


by pin


261


, which also is the pin about which the armature


260


pivots. The trip lever


270


is generally U-shaped and includes arms


280


(shown in

FIG. 1

) and


290


(not shown in

FIG. 1

) which at least partially enfold the frame


100


. A helical spring


330


, positioned between the frame


100


and the arm


280


and encircling the pin


162


, pivotally biases the trip lever toward the frame


100


. A projection


300


of the trip lever


270


, which, as viewed in

FIG. 1

, projects out of the plane of the paper, is intended for insertion into a corresponding aperture


301


in the trip lever of an adjacent single pole circuit breaker. Thus, any pivotal motion imparted to the trip lever


270


, in opposition to the biasing force exerted by the spring


330


, is transmitted to the adjacent trip lever, and vice versa. The projection


300


and aperture of a trip lever of an adjacent breaker, are preferably tapered, to ensure a secure fit therebetween. When the toggle link collapses, a protrusion


291


(not shown in

FIG. 1

) from the contact bar


70


displaces a cam surface


292


of the arm


290


, thus rotating the trip lever about pin


261


, and displacing the projection


300


. The projection


300


thus moves in an arc about the pin


261


, and thus an arcuate slot is provided in a housing half of housing


20


to transmit forces through the projection


300


. A portion of arm


280


acts directly on the sear striker bar


240


, to trip the associated toggle mechanism of an adjacent switch pole. A protrusion from the frame, for example a stop, limits the motion of arm


290


of the trip lever


270


, in response to a bias spring about the pivot axis. Thus, Since the trip lever


270


is not operated directly by the armature


260


, the trip dynamics of the circuit breaker are unaffected. The drag on the trip mechanism from the trip lever


270


is insignificant.




Side


280


has a cam surface


285


, having a bend of about 45 degrees, which engages the sear striker bar


240


at about the position of the bend. Side


290


has a bend


293


, forming cam surface


292


, which is perpendicular with the portion of the side


290


. Protrusion


291


extends from the side of the moveable contact bar


70


, which contacts the surface


292


midway through the travel of the contact bar


70


. When the contact bar


70


is displaced, the protrusion


291


pushes against the surface


292


, causing a rotation about the pin


261


, causing the surface


285


of side


280


to displace the sear striker bar


240


. It is clear that in operation, rotation of trip lever


270


about pin


261


will result in tripping of the toggle mechanism, and tripping of the toggle mechanism will result in rotation of the trip lever about the pin


261


. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,557,082, 5,214,402, 5,162,765, 5,117,208, 5,066,935, and 4,912,441, and also U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,492,941, 4,437,488, 4,276,526, and 3,786,380, expressly incorporated herein by reference.




In addition to the above-described “master” pole, adjacent thereto is provided a “slave” pole. This “slave” pole is identical to the “master” pole with the exception that it lacks the coil


110


, magnetic core


120


, pole piece


130


, and armature


260


. The projection


300


passes through aligned arcuate slots in the respective case walls between the adjacent “master” and “slave” switch pole housings


20


. The trip lever


271


in the “slave” pole, like the trip lever


270


of the “master” pole, receives a torque with respect to its frame from the tapered projection


300


, extending laterally from the “master” pole housing


20


into the “slave” pole housing


20


, into a tapered recess of the trip lever


271


of the “slave” pole. As the trip lever


271


in the “slave” pole rotates, it applies a force to the “slave” pole sear striker bar


240


, which in turn rotates the “slave” pole sear pin


230


about its axis, resulting in collapse of the “slave” pole toggle mechanism


102


. Thus, when the “master” mechanism


101


trips or is manually switched OFF, the “slave” mechanism


102


trips slightly thereafter. A dual ended rod


302


connects the handle


160


of the master and slave circuit breakers so that they move in unison.




As shown in

FIG. 3

, an electrical braided wire


141


serves to connect the terminal


30


in the “master” pole and an electrical braid


142


serves to electrically connect the terminal


31


in the “slave” pole to one end of the coil


110


. Electrical braids


150


,


152


connect the opposite end of the coil


110


to the contact bars


70


,


71


of the “master” and “slave” poles, respectively. Electrical braid


151


passes through a rectangular portal formed in both adjacent case halves. The end of the coil


110


extends through the portal, so that electrical braid


142


does not have to pass through the portal, and indeed, to facilitate connection, the braid


141


may partially or completely pass through the portal to join the end of coil


110


. Conductive plates


43


,


42


are provided for bridging the lug connections


30


,


31


and


40


,


41


, respectively, to ensure low impedance between the “master” and “slave” mechanisms.




To extinguish arcing caused by opening of the contacts


50


and


60


, a stacked array of metal plates


73


(shown in

FIG. 3

) are supported within and by the two half cases


14


and


16


of the circuit breaker housing


20


around the moveable contact arm


70


.




Each housing casing half


14


,


16


includes the following features: An upper boss (half) for the toggle handle


21


; a lower access port


22


; a set of four rivet holes for assembly


23


; a pair of half-recesses for a mounting nut


24


; a first pivot recess for the handle pin


25


; a second pivot recess for the contact arm pin


26


; a pair of half-recesses for electrical contact lugs


27


; a set of indentations for supporting the arc chute members


28


; and a number of side port halves


29


. In addition, each respective inner case half


16


,


14


′ of the “master” and “slave” housing, respectively, has a number of apertures. First, a generally rectangular portal


31


is provided for paralleling the electrical connections from the pair of lug contacts


30


,


31


and the movable contact bars


70


,


71


. Second, an arcuate aperture


32


is provided for the projection


300


of the trip lever


270


. Optionally, an arcuate slot


33


is provided for an internal pin connecting the manual operation handles, causing them to operate synchronously. A cover


34


is provided to close each of the lower access ports. Each of the “master” and “slave” housings


20


are about 2.5 inches long, 0.75 inches wide, and 2 inches deep, with electrical contact bolts on 2 inch centers, each being individually rated at about 100 Amps. The resulting parallel multipole design with a rating of 150 Amps therefore fits within a form factor of 2.5 by 1.5 by 2 inches,




The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are, therefore, intended to be embraced therein. The term “comprising”, as used herein, shall be interpreted as including, but not limited to inclusion of other elements not inconsistent with the structures and/or functions of the other elements recited.



Claims
  • 1. A circuit breaker, comprising:(a) a common magnetohydrodynamic load sensor; and (b) at least two sets of interruptable electrical contacts, each having an associated trip mechanism and a rated load capacity, wherein said magnetohydrodynamic load sensor responds to a sensed load by tripping at least one set of interruptable electrical contacts, and is adapted to sense a load exceeding said rated capacity of a single set of interruptable electrical contacts and within a composite load capacity of said at least two sets of interruptable electrical contacts in parallel.
  • 2. The circuit breaker according to claim 1 wherein said magnetohydrodynamic load sensor comprises an inductive coil having first and second ends, said inductive coil surrounding a magnetically permeable core, said magnetically permeable core being displaceable against a spring force in response to a current flowing through said inductive coil, a movement of said magnetically permeable core being damped by a viscous fluid, and an armature, disposed proximate to an end of said inductive coil such that a current in said inductive coil induces a magnetic field which acts to attract said armature, wherein the magnetohydrodynamic load sensor trips said trip mechanism of a set of interruptable electrical contacts when a sufficient magnetic force is generated to displace said armature.
  • 3. The circuit breaker according to claim 1 wherein each set of interruptable electrical contacts comprises a fixed contact and a displaceable contact disposed on a spring loaded pivoting contact arm, and wherein said trip mechanism comprises a collapsible toggle link mechanism.
  • 4. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein each of said sets of interruptable electrical contacts is connected on one side to said common magnetohydrodynamic load sensor and splitting an electrical current passing therethrough.
  • 5. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein each of the sets of interruptable electrical contacts is electrically parallel.
  • 6. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein said common magnetohydrodynamic load sensor trips a first set of interruptable electrical contacts, and a trip of said first set of interruptable electrical contacts trips a second set of interruptable electrical contacts.
  • 7. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein said circuit breaker has a rated load capacity of about 150 Amps.
  • 8. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein said circuit breaker has a rated load capacity of about 150 Amps, comprising two sets of interruptable electrical contacts, each having a rated load capacity of about 100 Amps, said circuit breaker fitting in a housing about 2.5 inches long, 1.5 inches wide, and 2 inches deep.
  • 9. The circuit breaker according to claim 1, wherein respective sets of interruptable electrical contacts are disposed in separate respective stacked housing compartments, each having at least one inner wall, each respective inner wall having at least one aperture formed therein.
  • 10. The circuit breaker according to claim 9, wherein said trip mechanism of a first set of interruptable electrical contacts is interconnected with a trip mechanism of a second set of interruptable electrical contacts through said aperture.
  • 11. The circuit breaker according to claim 10, wherein a sensing of an overload condition by said magnetohydrodynamic load sensor initiates a trip of a first set of interruptable electrical contacts through its associated trip mechanism, and said associated trip mechanism of said first set of interruptable electrical contacts initiates a trip of a second set of interruptable electrical contacts through its associated trip mechanism, to provide simultaneous tripping of said first and second sets of interruptable electrical contacts.
  • 12. A circuit breaker, comprising:(a) a master breaker, having within a first sub-housing a common magnetohydrodynamic load sensor having a trip load and a first set of interruptable electrical contacts, having a first trip mechanism and a first rated load capacity, wherein said trip load exceeds said first load capacity; and (b) a slave breaker, having within a second sub-housing a second set of interruptable electrical contacts, having a second trip mechanism and a second rated load capacity, wherein said magnetohydrodynamic load sensor responds to a load exceeding said trip load by tripping said first trip mechanism; a trip of said first set of interruptable electrical contacts results in a tripping of said second set of interruptable electrical contacts; and a composite load capacity of said first set of interruptable electrical contacts and said second set of interruptable electrical contacts exceeds said trip load.
  • 13. The circuit breaker according to claim 12, wherein an aperture is formed in adjacent walls of said first and second sub-housings to provide a mechanical signal from said first sub-housing to said second sub-housing indicating that said load exceeds said trip load.
  • 14. A method for providing a high load capacity circuit breaker having a desired load capacity, comprising the steps of:(a) providing a magnetodynamic load sensor at the desired load capacity; (b) providing at least two set of electrical switch elements, each having a load capacity insufficient to meet the desired load capacity, but which in parallel meet the desired load capacity; (c) wiring the sets of electrical switch elements in parallel; (d) when the load exceeds the desired load capacity, causing an interrupter of the first of the electrical switch elements to trip and thereby to cease conducting; and (e) sensing a trip of the first of the electrical switch elements to cause an interrupter of a second of the electrical switch elements to trip and thereby to cease conducting, to thereby block current to the load.
  • 15. The method according to claim 14, wherein each set of electrical switch elements is provided in a separate sub-housing, and wherein the magnetodynamic load sensor is situated primarily in a single one of said sub-housings.
  • 16. The method according to claim 14, wherein each set of electrical switch elements comprises a fixed contact and a displaceable contact disposed on a spring loaded pivoting contact arm, and wherein the interrupter comprises a collapsible toggle link mechanism.
  • 17. The method according to claim 14, wherein the magnetodynamic load sensor comprises an inductive coil having first and second ends, the inductive coil surrounding a magnetically permeable core, the magnetically permeable core being displaceable against a spring force in response to a current flowing through the inductive coil, a movement of the magnetically permeable core being damped by a viscous fluid, and an armature, disposed proximate to an end of the inductive coil such that a current in the inductive coil induces a magnetic field which acts to attract the armature, wherein the magnetodynamic load sensor trips the interrupter of a set of electrical switch elements when a sufficient magnetic force is generated to displace the armature.
Parent Case Info

The present application is a 371 of PCT/US99/24468, filed Oct. 20, 1999, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/176,169, filed Oct. 21, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,034,586, issued Mar. 7, 2000.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US99/24468 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO00/24012 4/27/2000 WO A
US Referenced Citations (37)
Number Name Date Kind
3497838 Merriken et al. Feb 1970 A
3517357 Bakes Jun 1970 A
3786380 Harper Jan 1974 A
3815059 Spoelman Jun 1974 A
3943316 Oster Mar 1976 A
3943472 Oster et al. Mar 1976 A
3943473 Khalid Mar 1976 A
3944953 Oster Mar 1976 A
3946346 Oster et al. Mar 1976 A
3959755 Harper et al. May 1976 A
4062052 Harper et al. Dec 1977 A
4085393 Grenier Apr 1978 A
4117285 Harper Sep 1978 A
4276526 Ciarcia et al. Jun 1981 A
4347488 Mune et al. Aug 1982 A
4427959 Chuzawa Jan 1984 A
4437488 Taggart et al. Mar 1984 A
4492941 Nagel Jan 1985 A
4528531 Flick et al. Jul 1985 A
4612430 Sloan et al. Sep 1986 A
4618751 Wehr et al. Oct 1986 A
4912441 Runyan et al. Mar 1990 A
5053736 Fasano Oct 1991 A
5066935 Harper Nov 1991 A
5117208 Nar May 1992 A
5162765 DiVincenzo et al. Nov 1992 A
5214402 DiVincenzo et al. May 1993 A
5223681 Buehler et al. Jun 1993 A
5231365 Kato Jul 1993 A
5293016 Nar Mar 1994 A
5343178 Bagalini Aug 1994 A
5444424 Wong et al. Aug 1995 A
5463199 Divincenzo et al. Oct 1995 A
5557082 Leet et al. Sep 1996 A
5565828 Flohr Oct 1996 A
5874877 Kawashima et al. Feb 1999 A
6034586 Runyan et al. Mar 2000 A
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/176169 Oct 1998 US
Child 09/830173 US