The present invention is directed to cryogenic liquefied gas expanders configured within one or more containment vessels with parallel flow through the expanders, where cryogenic fluid enters through a common inlet and is split between a first expander and a second expander, while expanded cryogenic fluid is generated by both expanders and exits through a common outlet. Parallel flow between the liquefied gas expanders is further facilitated by a rotary control valve positioned either between the vessels or within a vessel and between the two liquefied gas expanders.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Cryogenic liquids are liquefied gases that are maintained in their liquid state at very low temperatures, typically below −150° C. or −238° F. Different cryogens become liquids under different conditions of temperature and pressure. Industrial facilities that produce, store, transport and utilize such gases make use of a variety of valves, pumps and expanders to move, control and process the liquids and gases. For example, Joule-Thomson (J-T) expansion valves are frequently used to reduce pressure within a system carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG). While J-T valves are important, they have limited value in comparison to certain types of liquefied gas expanders, which are able to reduce pressure while also reducing the enthalpy of the natural gas and generating work. For example, turbine expanders are able to reduce pressure and create rotational momentum that generates shaft torque (which reduces enthalpy). The shaft torque is then used by a generator to produce electrical power.
Hence, turbine expanders are frequently used to expand liquefied gas from a high pressure to a low pressure, while capturing energy generated by the expansion. In this manner, single-phase LNG expanders are used to enhance the performance of LNG liquefaction plants. Two-phase LNG expanders are further used to reduce liquefaction costs and increase production, which has the positive benefit of extending the lifetime of depleting gas fields by generating more usable liquid from the field.
When liquefied gas expanders are used in new plants, the new plant will require less power generation and smaller gas compressors, gas expanders and heat exchangers. When used in new or existing plants with pre-existing power generators, gas compressors, gas expanders and heat exchangers, the addition of liquefied gas expanders will increase LNG production. The value and importance of cryogenic liquefied gas expanders, and their various applications is disclosed in the presentation entitled “Comprehensive Applications for LNG Expanders,” Joel V. Madison, Sixth World LNG Summit, Nov. 30, 2005, Rome, Italy, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. International Publication Number WO/2007/148122 further discloses an LNG plant and the various manners in which expanders can be used therein, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
The publication and corresponding presentation entitled “Transient Characteristics of Two-Phase LNG Expanders,” Finley et al., American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AlChE) Spring National Meeting 2007, 7th Topical Conference on Natural Gas Utilization, Apr. 22-26, 2007, Houston, Tex., which are incorporated in their entirety herein by reference, provide an explanation of how different types of liquefied gas expanders are used in LNG production. In particular, this publication and presentation discuss how the loss of power in one expander and certain transient characteristics and no-load conditions of expanders can be addressed through the use of a single-phase expander in series with a two-phase expander within a single vessel. United States Publication Number 2008/0122226, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference, also discloses the use of multiple expanders within a single vessel, but the expanders are used for distinctly different purposes and are neither in series nor in parallel.
The application of a single two-phase LNG expander in parallel with multiple Joule-Thomson (J-T) expansion valves within an overall LNG plant design is disclosed in the publication entitled “Two-Phase LNG Expanders,” Kociemba et al., Gas Processors Association-GTL and LNG in Europe, Feb. 24-25, 2005, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, which is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference. The application demonstrated in this publication, however, is more reflective of the standard practice of placing a J-T valve in parallel with an expander to take the place of the expander should there be a need to shut the expander down temporarily.
When considering the modification of existing (in particular) LNG plant installations, the cost, size and construction impact of any modification, such as adding an expander, are major factors. Furthermore, while the addition of expanders may make it possible to increase flow capacity, increased flow capacity has historically required the size of the expanders to be increased and therefore the size of the vessels holding the expanders, as well as the passages and the diameter of the generators to be increased. In order to increase the diameter of current generators, the generator would have to be four pole, versus current two pole generators, which would significantly increase the size of the generators, while decreasing their efficiency, and significantly complicating the hydraulic component design, thereby further increasing costs.
The present invention is directed to cryogenic liquefied gas expanders, and more particularly to two liquefied gas expanders (herein referred to as “expanders”) operating in parallel within one or more containment vessels with parallel flow through the expanders. As noted above, it is known to use single-phase or two-phase expanders (both a type of liquefied gas expander), by themselves or within a single vessel, to enhance the performance of cryogenic plants and facilities. Expanders are also used in series and in parallel, where the physical arrangement is in parallel (meaning the expanders are physically located next to one another) and the flow through the expanders is in parallel. While the use of multiple expanders has its benefits, additional or different benefits are possible if expanders are used in parallel in a more compact physical arrangement, such as within a single vessel or in a serial physical arrangement, with parallel flow between the expanders. In particular, a serial arrangement, parallel flow design allows for a higher flow capacity without increasing the size of the expanders, the size of the vessel(s), the size of the passages, or the diameter of the generators, thereby eliminating the need for a larger four pole generator. A serial arrangement, parallel flow design also reduces the cost of the expanders (overall), reduces space requirements and reduces disruption of the LNG plant for installation and maintenance.
In addition, the parallel flow design of the present invention increases operational flexibility. With two expanders operating in parallel within one or more vessels, and through utilization of the rotary control valve discussed below, the range of flow and head that the expanders can operate in is much larger than is possible with a single expander or multiple expanders, running in series or otherwise. For example, in a single or multi-expander design, to turn down flow by some percentage, the operating capacity of the expander(s) must be turned down by a corresponding percentage. Running such expanders at less than 100% or near full capacity, however, compromises the efficiency of the expanders and turning them down by as much as 50% renders the expander(s) inoperable. With the parallel flow design of the present invention, a fifty percent turndown is possible by simply not running one of the expanders and other percentage variations are possible through use of the control valves to selectively restrict flow through the expanders, as further described below.
As partially noted above, the serial arrangement, parallel flow design of the present invention is also much more compact than prior art designs with similar capacity. This is because the common inlet (for unexpanded cryogenic fluid) and outlet (for expanded cryogenic fluid) of the two expanders, as further illustrated below, reduces the amount of piping that is required and allows two expanders to operate within the space of approximately one expander. Since size, construction impact, and cost are all major factors in expander integration, this new design provides an attractive alternative to prior art designs that can be easily installed in both existing and new liquefaction plants. The novel rotary control valve of the present invention further enhances the compactness and operational flexibility of the design by eliminating the need for external control valves, as further explained below.
The plate or disk of the divider 22 would create the passageways 17 and 19 and could be bolted between the two chambers 13 and 15, or welded, or both bolted and welded, so as to form a seal between the two chambers 13 and 15. Technically, the two chambers 13 and 15 could be separate vessels that are joined together by the divider 22 to form a single vessel, so references to a single vessel, herein, are understood to include two vessels operating as a single vessel, and references to chambers are understood to include separate vessels joined together to effectively form a single vessel. The plate or disk between the chambers or vessels would be formed of stainless steel or some other similarly suitable material. The divider 22 and passageways 17 and 19 could be structured in such a way as to look very much like the plate 44 and accompanying passages of the rotary valve illustrated in
To regulate the parallel flow between the two expanders 12 and 14, external, independently operated valves 16 and 18 are utilized. When both valves 16 and 18 are open, fluid flows through expanders 12 and 14 along the illustrated paths. When valve 16 is open, but valve 18 is closed, fluid only flows through expander 12. When valve 16 is closed and valve 18 is open, fluid only flows through expander 14. The combination of valves and expander allows the careful control of the expanders 12 and 14 within the vessel 10. Further flexibility is possible by partially opening/closing the valves 16 and 18 to control the flow through each expander. This aspect of the present invention makes it possible to control the flow through both variable speed and fixed speed expanders, without having to adjust the speed at which the expanders operate (something which, of course, was not possible with a fixed speed expander).
Although
Further while the present invention is illustrated in the Figures of the drawing as a single vessel, multiple vessel configurations are possible as well. In such instances, one expander would be located within a first vessel and a second expander would be located within a second vessel, with passageways formed between the two vessels so that expanded fluid created by the first expander is routed to the second vessel and around the outside of the second expander and unexpanded fluid in the first vessel is routed to the second expander in the second vessel. To route the fluid appropriately between the two vessels, pipes could be utilized to route the unexpanded fluid and the expanded fluid as necessary, a plate or disk as described above could be positioned between the two vessels, or a rotary valve of the type described below could be positioned between the two vessels. The key is that all of the unexpanded fluid enters through the same vessel inlet with some of the unexpanded fluid in the first vessel being routed to the second vessel at the same time that expanded fluid from the first vessel is routed to the second vessel and out through a common vessel outlet, so that fluid flow between the two vessels is in parallel, regardless of the physical arrangement between the vessels or expanders. This enables vessels to be positioned in a serial arrangement while operating in parallel, versus being positioned in parallel and operating in parallel, which requires significantly more space and is not practical in many installations.
One drawback to the embodiment illustrated in
Accordingly,
As noted above, in place of seals 32 between the valve 30 and the two chambers 34 and 36 (seals can pose issues at cryogenic temperatures anyway), it may be desirable to use the valve 30 as a form of divider and seal itself, especially since chamber 36 will be at a lower pressure than chamber 34. Making a portion of the plate 44 (discussed below with respect to
Returning to the embodiment illustrated in
The rotary control valve 30 is further illustrated in
The operation of the rotary valve 30 is further illustrated with reference now to
The interaction between the expanders 12 and 14 and the rotary control valve 30 within the vessel 10 is further illustrated in
While the present invention has been illustrated and described in terms of a preferred embodiment and several alternatives herein in association with the various drawing figures, it should not be limited to just the particular description contained in this specification. For example, the present invention could use a different type of gated valve positioned between the two chambers of the vessel 10. Many other alternative or equivalent components and steps could be used to practice and be within the scope of the present invention.
This is a utility patent application, taking priority from provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/011,914, filed Jan. 21, 2008, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61/011914 | Jan 2008 | US |