This invention relates generally to air conditioning and refrigeration systems and, more particularly, to parallel flow evaporators thereof.
A definition of a so-called parallel flow heat exchanger is widely used in the air conditioning and refrigeration industry now and designates a heat exchanger with a plurality of parallel passages, among which refrigerant is distributed and flown in the orientation generally substantially perpendicular to the refrigerant flow direction in the inlet and outlet manifolds. This definition is well adapted within the technical community and will be used throughout the text.
Refrigerant maldistribution in refrigerant system evaporators is a well-known phenomenon. It causes significant evaporator and overall system performance degradation over a wide range of operating conditions. Maldistribution of refrigerant may occur due to differences in flow impedances within evaporator channels, non-uniform airflow distribution over external heat transfer surfaces, improper heat exchanger orientation or poor manifold and distribution system design. Maldistribution is particularly pronounced in parallel flow evaporators due to their specific design with respect to refrigerant routing to each refrigerant circuit. Attempts to eliminate or reduce the effects of this phenomenon on the performance of parallel flow evaporators have been made with little or no success. The primary reasons for such failures have generally been related to complexity and inefficiency of the proposed technique or prohibitively high cost of the solution.
In recent years, parallel flow heat exchangers, and brazed aluminum heat exchangers in particular, have received much attention and interest, not just in the automotive field but also in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC&R) industry. The primary reasons for the employment of the parallel flow technology are related to its superior performance, high degree of compactness and enhanced resistance to corrosion. Parallel flow heat exchangers are now utilized in both condenser and evaporator applications for multiple products and system designs and configurations. The evaporator applications, although promising greater benefits and rewards, are more challenging and problematic. Refrigerant maldistribution is one of the primary concerns and obstacles for the implementation of this technology in the evaporator applications.
As known, refrigerant maldistribution in parallel flow heat exchangers occurs because of unequal pressure drop inside the channels and in the inlet and outlet manifolds, as well as poor manifold and distribution system design. In the manifolds, the difference in length of refrigerant paths, phase separation, gravity and turbulence are the primary factors responsible for maldistribution. Inside the heat exchanger channels, variations in the heat transfer rate, airflow distribution, manufacturing tolerances, and gravity are the dominant factors. Furthermore, the recent trend of the heat exchanger performance enhancement promoted miniaturization of its channels (so-called minichannels and microchannels), which in turn negatively impacted refrigerant distribution. Since it is extremely difficult to control all these factors, many of the previous attempts to manage refrigerant distribution, especially in parallel flow evaporators, have failed.
In the refrigerant systems utilizing parallel flow heat exchangers, the inlet and outlet manifolds or headers (these terms will be used interchangeably throughout the text) usually have a conventional cylindrical shape. When the two-phase flow enters the header, the vapor phase is usually separated from the liquid phase. Since both phases flow independently, refrigerant maldistribution tends to occur.
If the two-phase flow enters the inlet manifold at a relatively high velocity, the liquid phase (droplets of liquid) is carried by the momentum of the flow further away from the manifold entrance to the remote portion of the header. Hence, the channels closest to the manifold entrance receive predominantly the vapor phase and the channels remote from the manifold entrance receive mostly the liquid phase. If, on the other hand, the velocity of the two-phase flow entering the manifold is low, there is not enough momentum to carry the liquid phase along the header. As a result, the liquid phase enters the channels closest to the inlet and the vapor phase proceeds to the most remote ones. Also, the liquid and vapor phases in the inlet manifold can be separated by the gravity forces, causing similar maldistribution consequences. In either case, maldistribution phenomenon quickly surfaces and manifests itself in evaporator and overall system performance degradation.
Moreover, maldistribution phenomenon may cause the two-phase (zero superheat) conditions at the exit of some channels, promoting potential flooding at the compressor suction that may quickly translate into the compressor damage.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, the uneven distribution of refrigerant to the individual channels from the inlet manifold is overcome and compensated by providing non-uniform external heat transfer characteristics associated with the individual channels, such that the detrimental effects of refrigerant maldistribution are counter-balanced, their effect on the heat exchanger performance is minimized and potential flooding conditions at the evaporator exit are avoided.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the external heat transfer surface parameters such as a number, and/or type and/or size of the fins are varied among the individual channels, which will result in a variable heat transfer rate for the individual channels in such a manner as to counter-balance and compensate the refrigerant maldistribution that would otherwise manifest itself in a variety of applications.
By yet another aspect of the invention, the airflow rate over the individual channels is selectively made variable such that the variable heat transfer rate is once again obtained to offset the refrigerant maldistribution that would otherwise occur in many applications.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, preferred and alternate embodiments are depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring now to
In operation, two-phase refrigerant flows into the inlet opening 14 and into the internal cavity 16 of the inlet header 11. From the internal cavity 16, the refrigerant, in the form of a liquid, a vapor or a mixture of liquid and vapor (the most typical scenario) enters the tube openings 17 to pass through the channels 13 to the internal cavity 18 of the outlet header 12. From there, the refrigerant, which is now usually in the form of a vapor, passes out the outlet opening 19 and then to the compressor (not shown). Externally to the channels 13, air is circulated uniformly over the channels 13 and associated fins 15 by an air-moving device, such as fan 20, so that heat transfer interaction occurs between the air flowing outside the channels and refrigerant in the channels.
Since, for a particular application, the various factors that cause the maldistribution of refrigerant to the channels are generally known at the design stage, the inventors have found it feasible to introduce the design features that will counter-balance them in order to eliminate the detrimental effects on the evaporator and overall system performance as well as potential compressor flooding and damage. For instance, for a particular application it is generally known whether the refrigerant flows into the inlet manifold at a high or low velocity and how the maldistribution phenomenon is affected by the velocity values. Although, for illustrative purposes only, the present invention will be described with respect to this particular parameter, a person of ordinarily skill in the art will recognize how to apply the teachings of this invention to other system characteristics.
In
Just oppositely, as shown in
In addressing the abovedescribed phenomenon, which exists within the internal confines of the inlet manifold 11 and channels 13, the inventors have found it feasible to modify the design features of the extended external surfaces of the channels 13 in order to counter-balance the non-uniform conditions within the channels 13. This can be accomplished in a number of ways, some of which will be described in detail hereinafter.
Since the pressure drop through all of the parallel paths in the evaporator is substantially equal, the channels flowing predominantly liquid refrigerant (which is at substantially higher density than vapor) receive higher refrigerant flow than the channels flowing vapor refrigerant (assuming equal external heat transfer rate for all the channels) and, as a result of such flow unbalance, performance degradation and possibly flooding conditions occur in the channels, reducing overall system performance and raising reliability concerns for the components such as a compressor.
One approach to solving the maldistribution problem is that of providing a higher external heat transfer rate (reducing external thermal resistance) by incorporating a higher density of fins, more efficient fin type (e.g. louvered fin) or altering other fin characteristics, such as fin material or height (this will reduce the distance between the channels 13 accordingly) for the channels having the higher refrigerant flow. The precautions have to be made to make sure that airflow over these channels is not appreciably altered, that may diminish the desired effect. That is, in the high velocity refrigerant flow example of
Similarly, in the example wherein the refrigerant flow velocity in the inlet manifold 11 is low, as shown in
In operation, for those channels having a higher density of fins, the heat transfer capability will be enhanced over those having the lower density of fins, such that the refrigerant in those channels evaporates at a higher rate generating more low-density vapor, and the superheat conditions at the channel exit are assured. Consequently, the pressure drop through the channels increases, redirecting the imbalance of the refrigerant flow to the other channels and reducing maldistribution.
As it was mentioned above, rather than varying the density of the fins across the plurality of channels, the same effect can be achieved by incorporating an enhanced (e.g. louvered) fins, changing the size of the fins, altering fin thickness or providing material differences, in order to selectively vary the heat transfer rate across the channels. Also, internal elements augmenting the heat transfer rate can be applied in a similar manner to achieve similar results. Once again, these design alterations shouldn't change airflow distribution across the channels, which may diminish the desired outcome.
Another approach to varying the heat transfer rate across the channels is to vary the flow of air over the respective channels such that those channels having the higher refrigerant flow (i.e. those having more liquid droplets and less vapor) have more air flowing over their outer surfaces than those channels having the lower refrigerant flow (i.e. those having more vapor and less liquid droplets).
An air-moving device, such as a fan, provides airflow over the external evaporator surfaces to transfer heat from air to refrigerant. Generally, an effort is made to assure that the airflow is uniform over the cross-section area of the heat exchanger. Unfortunately, for some evaporator section constructions, it becomes a difficult task. As a result, different heat transfer rates for different channels result in the same maldistribution phenomenon and flooded conditions as the ones associated with the inlet manifold and discussed above. One embodiment of this invention proposes to utilize a naturally non-uniform airflow or by simple means alter airflow to be non-uniform, in order to counter-balance the maldistribution phenomenon associated with the inlet manifold.
In
In a similar manner, the
In
Furthermore, it should be noted that both vertical and horizontal channel orientations will benefit from the teaching of the present invention, although higher benefits will be obtained for the latter configuration. Also, although the teachings of this invention are particularly advantageous for the evaporator applications, refrigerant system condensers may benefit from them as well.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred and alternate embodiments as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1524520 | Junkers | Jan 1925 | A |
3073575 | Schulenberg | Jan 1963 | A |
3739841 | Small et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3877517 | Pasternak | Apr 1975 | A |
4300481 | Fisk | Nov 1981 | A |
6286588 | Uehara | Sep 2001 | B1 |
20050098307 | Goto | May 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060102329 A1 | May 2006 | US |