This invention relates generally to air conditioning and refrigeration systems and, more particularly, to parallel flow evaporators thereof.
A definition of a so-called parallel flow heat exchanger is widely used in the air conditioning and refrigeration industry now and designates a heat exchanger with a plurality of parallel passages, among which refrigerant is distributed and flown in an orientation generally substantially perpendicular to the refrigerant flow direction in the inlet and outlet manifolds. This definition is well adopted within the technical community and will be used throughout the specification.
Refrigerant maldistribution in refrigerant system evaporators is a well-known phenomenon. It causes significant evaporator and overall system performance degradation over a wide range of operating conditions. Maldistribution of refrigerant may occur due to differences in flow impedances within evaporator channels, non-uniform airflow distribution over external heat transfer surfaces, improper heat exchanger orientation or poor manifold and distribution system design. Maldistribution is particularly pronounced in parallel flow evaporators due to their specific design with respect to refrigerant routing to each refrigerant circuit. Attempts to eliminate or reduce the effects of this phenomenon on the performance of parallel flow evaporators have been made with little or no success. The primary reasons for such failures have generally been related to complexity and inefficiency of the proposed technique or prohibitively high cost of the solution.
In recent years, parallel flow heat exchangers, and brazed aluminum heat exchangers in particular, have received much attention and interest, not just in the automotive field but also in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC&R) industry. The primary reasons for the employment of the parallel flow technology are related to its superior performance, high degree of compactness and enhanced resistance to corrosion. Parallel flow heat exchangers are now utilized in both condenser and evaporator applications for multiple products and system designs and configurations. The evaporator applications, although promising greater benefits and rewards, are more challenging and problematic. Refrigerant maldistribution is one of the primary concerns and obstacles for the implementation of this technology in the evaporator applications.
As known, refrigerant maldistribution in parallel flow heat exchangers occurs because of unequal pressure drop inside the channels and in the inlet and outlet manifolds, as well as poor manifold and distribution system design. In the manifolds, the difference in length of refrigerant paths, phase separation, gravity and turbulence are the primary factors responsible for maldistribution. Inside the heat exchanger channels, variations in the heat transfer rate, airflow distribution, manufacturing tolerances, and gravity are the dominant factors. Furthermore, the recent trend of the heat exchanger performance enhancement promoted miniaturization of its channels (so-called minichannels and microchannels), which in turn negatively impacted refrigerant distribution. Since it is extremely difficult to control all these factors, many of the previous attempts to manage refrigerant distribution, especially in parallel flow evaporators, have failed.
In the refrigerant systems utilizing parallel flow heat exchangers, the inlet and outlet manifolds or headers (these terms will be used interchangeably throughout the text) usually have a conventional cylindrical shape. When the two-phase flow enters the header, the vapor phase is usually separated from the liquid phase. Since both phases flow independently, refrigerant maldistribution tends to occur.
If the two-phase flow enters the inlet manifold at a relatively high velocity, the liquid phase (droplets of liquid) is carried by the momentum of the flow further away from the manifold entrance to the remote portion of the header. Hence, the channels closest to the manifold entrance receive predominantly the vapor phase and the channels remote from the manifold entrance receive mostly the liquid phase. If, on the other hand, the velocity of the two-phase flow entering the manifold is low, there is not enough momentum to carry the liquid phase along the header. As a result, the liquid phase enters the channels closest to the inlet and the vapor phase proceeds to the most remote ones. Also, the liquid and vapor phases in the inlet manifold can be separated by the gravity forces, causing similar maldistribution consequences. In either case, maldistribution phenomenon quickly surfaces and manifests itself in evaporator and overall system performance degradation.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a structure is provided in association with the inlet manifold so as to create a swirling motion of the two-phase refrigerant flow in the evaporator inlet manifold to thereby obtain and uniformly distribute a homogenous two-phase mixture, that consist of liquid and vapor phases, among the parallel channels. At high velocities, the droplets of liquid are driven to the periphery of the manifold by the centrifugal force and some of them pass through the channels closest to the manifold entrance. In the case of low refrigerant velocities, the swirling motion creates the momentum that will carry some of the liquid droplets to the remote channels in the manifold. Additionally, mixing of the refrigerant vapor and liquid phases further promotes homogeneous flow conditions. In each case non-uniform refrigerant distribution is avoided.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the swirling motion is brought about by a spirally wound insert extending longitudinally within the inlet header and having a plurality of perforations for conducting the refrigerant flow into the internal cavity of the inlet header and then to the individual channels adjacent thereto.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the inlet manifold itself is formed in a spirally wound coil that extends along the entrance to the individual channels and is fluidly interconnected thereto by its individual elements.
By yet another aspect of the invention, a spirally formed, short insert is provided at the entrance to the inlet header and the refrigerant flow passing around the spiral insert prior to entering the inlet header.
By still another aspect of the invention, a spiral insert is placed within the inlet manifold preferably in a coaxial relationship therewith such that the outer surface of the spiral insert causes a desirable swirling of the refrigerant flow within the inlet manifold such that uniform distribution of refrigerant is provided to the individual channels.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, preferred and alternate embodiments are depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring now to
In operation, two-phase refrigerant flows into the inlet opening 14 and into the internal cavity 16 of the inlet header 11. From the internal cavity 16, the refrigerant, typically in the form of a mixture of liquid and vapor, enters the channels openings 17 to pass through the channels 13 to the internal cavity 18 of the outlet header 12. From there, the refrigerant, which is now usually in the form of a vapor, passes out the outlet opening 19 and then to the compressor (not shown).
As discussed hereinabove, it is desirable that the two-phase refrigerant passing from the inlet header 11 to the individual channels 13 do so in a uniform manner (or in other words, with equal vapor quality) such that the full heat exchange benefit of the individual channels can be obtained and flooding conditions are not created and observed at the compressor suction (this may damage the compressor). However, because of various phenomena as discussed hereinabove, a non-uniform flow of refrigerant to the individual channels 13 (so-called maldistribution) occurs. In order to address this problem, the applicants have introduced design features that will create a swirling motion of the two-phase refrigerant flow in the inlet manifold 11 to thereby bring about a more uniform flow to the channels 13. Also, the increased velocity typically associated with the swirling motion will further promote the mixing process of the liquid and vapor phases.
In the
The inlet opening 14 is fluidly connected by a tube 23 to one end of the insert 21 so as to cause the refrigerant to pass into the insert 21. A plurality of openings 24 in each of the coil elements 22 provides for fluid communication of the refrigerant from the internal portion of the insert 21 to the internal cavity 16 of the inlet manifold 11. The refrigerant exiting the openings 24 thus will have a swirling motion at increased velocity imparted thereto prior to entering the internal cavity 16, thus providing the mixing effect as it moves to the individual channels 13 in a uniform fashion. Additionally, relatively small openings 24 provide uniform dispersement of both phases (liquid and vapor) of refrigerant along the cavity 16 of the manifold 11. It should be noted that the openings 24 may have various shapes and be of different sizes, preferably with the diminishing sizes as the refrigerant flows from the inlet 14 of the manifold 11 to the remote end of the spirally formed insert 21. Furthermore, a spirally formed insert 21 may itself have enhancement elements to further promote mixing process. For instance, the insert 21 can be manufactured from a twisted tube, have surface indentations, etc.
In
In the
The
In the
Fluidly connected to the inlet header 26, is the plurality of parallel channels 13 for receiving the refrigerant flow from the inlet header 26. Because of the swirling motion imparted to the flow of refrigerant within the inlet header 26, the refrigerant flowing to the individual microchannels 13 is uniformly distributed so as to obtain maximum efficiency from the heat exchanger. It should be noted that the inlet header 26 may be of a progressively diminishing size to reflect a reduction in the refrigerant mass flow rate toward a remote end of the inlet header 26. Once again, the inlet header 26 may have enhancement elements, such as surface indentations or internal fins, to further promote the mixing process.
Referring now to
Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in
A variation of this design is shown in
In each of the embodiments of the present invention as shown in
It is well understood to a person ordinarily skilled in the art that any of the embodiments can be combined in a singled design if desired. Also, the teachings of the invention can benefit any heat exchanger orientation and configuration.
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred and alternate embodiments as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2097602 | Rohlin | Nov 1937 | A |
3976128 | Patel et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4261177 | Sterlini | Apr 1981 | A |
4277953 | Kramer | Jul 1981 | A |
4309987 | Higgins, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4382468 | Hastwell | May 1983 | A |
4524823 | Hummel et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4593539 | Humpolik et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
5103559 | Hoffmuller | Apr 1992 | A |
5343620 | Velluet | Sep 1994 | A |
5523607 | Zambrano | Jun 1996 | A |
5651268 | Aikawa et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5704221 | Lego | Jan 1998 | A |
5743111 | Sasaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5765393 | Shlak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5806586 | Osthues et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5881456 | Bergins et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5901785 | Chiba et al. | May 1999 | A |
5931220 | Ueda et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941303 | Gowan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6053243 | Kato et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6179051 | Ayub | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6286590 | Park | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6394176 | Marsais | May 2002 | B1 |
6430945 | Haussmann | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6470703 | Wada et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6484797 | Saito et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6688137 | Gupte | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6688138 | DiFlora | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6729386 | Sather | May 2004 | B1 |
6796374 | Rong | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814136 | Yi et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6988539 | Kato et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7021371 | Saito et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7143605 | Rohrer et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
20020174978 | Beddome et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030010483 | Ikezaki et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030116310 | Wittmann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2250336 | Jun 1992 | GB |
04295599 | Oct 1992 | JP |
6159983 | Jun 1994 | JP |
2001304775 | Oct 2001 | JP |
WO-9414021 | Jun 1994 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060102331 A1 | May 2006 | US |