This invention relates generally to air conditioning and refrigeration systems and, more particularly, to parallel flow evaporators thereof.
A definition of a so-called parallel flow heat exchanger, sometimes referred to as a flat tube heat exchanger, is widely used in the air conditioning and refrigeration industry now and designates a heat exchanger with a plurality of parallel passages, among which refrigerant is distributed to flow in an orientation generally substantially perpendicular to the refrigerant flow direction in the inlet and outlet manifolds.
Refrigerant maldistribution in refrigerant system evaporators is a well-known phenomenon. It causes significant evaporator and overall system performance degradation over a wide range of operating conditions. Maldistribution of refrigerant may occur due to differences in flow impedances within evaporator channels, non-uniform airflow distribution over external heat transfer surfaces, improper heat exchanger orientation or poor manifold and distribution system design. Maldistribution is particularly pronounced in parallel flow evaporators due to their specific design with respect to refrigerant routing to each evaporator circuit. Attempts to eliminate or reduce the effects of this phenomenon on the performance of parallel flow evaporators have been made with little or no success. The primary reasons for such failures have generally been related to complexity and inefficiency of the proposed technique or prohibitively high cost of the solution.
In recent years, parallel flow heat exchangers, and brazed aluminum heat exchangers in particular, have received much attention and interest, not just in the automotive field but also in the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC&R) industry. The primary reasons for the employment of the parallel flow technology are related to its superior performance, high degree of compactness, good structural rigidity and enhanced resistance to corrosion. Parallel flow heat exchangers are now utilized in both condenser and evaporator applications for multiple products and system designs and configurations. The evaporator applications, although promising greater benefits and rewards, are more challenging and problematic. Refrigerant maldistribution is one of the primary concerns and obstacles for the implementation of this technology in the evaporator applications.
As known, refrigerant maldistribution in parallel flow heat exchangers occurs because of unequal pressure drop inside the channels and in the inlet and outlet manifolds, as well as poor manifold and distribution system design. In the manifolds, the difference in length of refrigerant paths, phase separation and gravity are the primary factors responsible for maldistribution. Inside the heat exchanger channels, variations in the heat transfer rate, airflow distribution, manufacturing tolerances, and gravity are the dominant factors. Furthermore, the recent trend of the heat exchanger performance enhancement promoted miniaturization of its channels (so-called minichannels and microchannels), which in turn negatively impacted refrigerant distribution. Since it is extremely difficult to control all these factors, many of the previous attempts to manage refrigerant distribution, especially in parallel flow evaporators, have failed.
If the two-phase flow enters the inlet manifold at a relatively high velocity, the liquid phase (droplets of liquid) is carried by the momentum of the flow further away from the manifold entrance to the remote portion of the header. Hence, the channels closest to the manifold entrance receive predominantly the vapor phase and the channels remote from the manifold entrance receive mostly the liquid phase. If, on the other hand, the velocity of the two-phase flow entering the manifold is low, there is not enough momentum to carry the liquid phase along the header. As a result, the liquid phase enters the channels closest to the inlet and the vapor phase proceeds to the most remote ones. Also, the liquid and vapor phases in the inlet manifold can be separated by the gravity forces, causing similar maldistribution consequences. In either case, maldistribution phenomenon quickly surfaces and manifests itself in evaporator and overall system performance degradation.
While traditional round tube heat exchangers have a potential to feed each tube or circuit individually, flat tubes have not had such a capability and efforts to improve refrigerant distribution in such heat exchanger have included, for instance, the use of inserts and multiple inlet headers, all of which complicate the design and increase the manufacturing cost. Also, since large diameter headers are replaced with small diameter headers and connectors, operating pressures may be substantially elevated.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, the individual flat heat exchange tubes of an evaporator are interconnected to a refrigerant delivery member by way of connector tubes such that the two phase refrigerant flows first from the refrigerant delivery member into the connector tubes and then into the individual flat heat exchange tubes to thereby obtain improved distribution of refrigerant flow.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention the connector tubes are connected to a common inlet manifold and extend generally orthogonally therefrom.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the connector tubes are cylindrical in shape, and the flat heat exchange tubes are inserted into longitudinal slots formed in the connector tubes to form tee joints.
By yet another aspect of the invention, the connector tubes have orifices at their one end such that the refrigerant entering the connector tube is expanded in the process to thereby improve uniform refrigerant distribution.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, each of the connector tubes is fluidly connected directed to a traditional refrigerant distributor by way of an inlet tube.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, preferred and alternative embodiments are depicted; however, various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring to
Each of the flat heat exchange tubes 13 is fluidly connected to a respective connecting tube as shown at 16, 17, 18 and 19 which are, in turn, fluidly connected to the inlet manifold 12.
In operation, two-phase refrigerant flow enters an inlet port 21 of the inlet manifold 12 and flows toward both ends of the inner manifold 12. It then flows to the individual connector tubes 16, 17, 18 and 19 and then to the respective flat heat exchange tubes 13, after which it passes to the outlet manifold 14 and exits from the outlet port 22.
Such a design configuration allows for sufficiently small diameters of the inlet manifold 12 and connecting tubes 16-19, which are favorable for refrigerant, distribution among the flat heat exchange tubes 13.
As is seen in
As is seen in
As should be understood, the relative sizes of the flat heat exchange tubes 13 and their respective connector tubes 16-19 are such that the diameter of the connector tubes is sufficient to allow for the height of the slot 24 to accommodate the height H of the flat heat exchange tube. Similarly, the length of the connector tube, i.e. the distance between the two ends 28 and 29, should be sufficient to accommodate the width W of the heat exchange tube 13.
Further, it may be beneficial to have flat heat exchange tubes of different sizes. For instance, the height or the width of the flat heat exchange tube may be varied. The corresponding slot dimensions of the respective connectors then need to be adjusted accordingly to accept the flat heat exchange tube of different sizes. As one example, the parallel flow heat exchanger may include sections with flat heat exchange tubes of different width to accommodate substantially different airflow amounts passing over these sections.
Although the outlet header 14 has been shown as being directly connected to the flat tube channels 13, it should be understood that connector tubes similar to the connector tubes 16-19 may be used to interconnect the flat heat exchange tubes 13 to the outlet manifold 14.
The embodiment as described above shows the individual connector tubes 16-19 (which are of the two-end connector type) being aligned in parallel arrangement and extending orthogonally from the inlet manifold 12. It also shows them as being connected such that the flow of refrigerant therein is parallel. It should be understood that, the connector tubes 16-19 may be interconnected in serial flow relationship and may be further connected directly to the inlet port, without the need for an inlet manifold 12. Such an embodiment is shown in
The refrigerant flow then enters the inlet port 34, passes through the connector tube 16, one flat heat exchange tube 13, the elbow 31, the connector tube 17, another flat heat exchange tube 13, the elbow 32, the connector tube 18, the elbow 33 and the connector tube 19. Eventually, the refrigerant flows out of the outlet port 36.
The heat exchanger design in
The heat exchangers described above may operate as condensers and evaporators. Usually, condensers have vapor at the inlet and liquid at the outlet. Due to the difference in densities of liquid and vapor phases, the condensers are typically more efficient if they have more inlets and fewer outlets.
The heat exchangers shown on
Heat exchangers operating as evaporators should have means for distribution of the two-phase refrigerant. Another embodiment which is applicable for evaporators wherein an inlet manifold is not used is that shown in
A variation of the
There are two possible designs. One configuration implies that the manifold 12 operates as a receiver, and the orifices 42 along the manifold 12 operate as expansion devices, providing isenthalpic expansion from a condenser pressure to the evaporator pressure. Another arrangement includes an expansion device attached to the manifold 12. The expansion device provides isenthalpic expansion from the condenser pressure to a pressure which is higher than the evaporator pressure and lower than the condenser pressure. The orifices 42 function as a refrigerant distributor of the two-phase refrigerant providing single, double, or multiple expansions from the pressure downstream of the expansion device to the evaporator pressure.
In addition to the advantages discussed hereinabove, the present design features allow for the use of substantially wider heat exchange tubes, reduced fin density and/or increased fin height, without comprising performance characteristics and cost of the heat exchanger.
It should be understood that the present invention is intended for use with a heat exchanger that can be oriented horizontally, vertically, or inclined. That is, although the flat heat exchange tubes are shown as being horizontally oriented, the present invention would also be useful with vertically oriented and inclined flat heat exchange tubes.
While certain preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed in detail, it is to be understood that various modifications in its structure may be adopted without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US07/12929 | 6/1/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/30/2009 |