This invention relates in general to a battery cover, and deals more particularly with a battery cover having parallel ribs formed on the underside thereof, thus providing greater structural rigidity and integrity.
Over the past 25 years, containers for lead-acid batteries have come to be made chiefly of polypropylene. As a structural material, polypropylene exhibits the desired chemical resistance and strength over the temperature ranges in which motive-power and automotive batteries normally operate. Moreover, the use of polypropylene material is economically viable in the large-scale production of battery containers.
The covers utilized with polypropylene battery containers are typically attached to the body of the battery jar via hot-plate welding operation or the like. Prior to the use of polypropylene, hard rubber was utilized for lead-acid battery containers, and their covers were attached and sealed with asphalt. Asphalt seals, however, were not as strong or as durable as welded polypropylene seals.
Despite these drawbacks, one benefit of containers and covers made from hard rubber is that they exhibit a higher stiffness modulus than does polypropylene. Covers are preferably stiff in the area surrounding the filling hole, as it is undesirable for this area to become depressed by forces exerted during the filling process. Any such depression in this area may promote the collection of acid, water and contaminates which may get inside the battery and thus lead to possible catastrophic failure of the battery as a whole.
It is also desirable that the peripheral area surrounding the filling hole remains substantially flat so that a gasket disposed between the filling hole and a filler cap will seal well.
Given the desire in the art for stiff battery covers, stiffening in the area surrounding the filling hole has been previously addressed by several differing techniques. One technique involves providing a cylindrical skirt 10 that depends from the periphery of the filling hole, together with radially extending gussets 12 between the skirt and the underside of the top of the cover, as shown in
Another known technique involves simply making the battery cover thicker. Although marginally effective, such a technique increases material use and hence directly affects cost. Moreover, thicker battery covers would also indirectly affect the cost of each cover as a result of the longer cooling times inherently required during/after the molding process.
With the forgoing problems and concerns in mind, it is the general object of the present invention to provide a battery cover which overcomes the above-described drawbacks while providing greater structural rigidity and integrity.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a battery cover.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a battery cover that provides greater structural rigidity and integrity.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a battery cover that provides greater structural rigidity and integrity without substantially increasing molding time and cost.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a battery cover having parallel ribs formed on the underside thereof, thus providing greater structural rigidity and integrity.
According, therefore, to one embodiment of the present invention, a battery cover includes a planar section and an aperture formed through the planar section. A rib extends outwardly from the planar section and is substantially tangential to the aperture.
These and other objectives of the present invention, and their preferred embodiments, shall become clear by consideration of the specification, claims and drawings taken as a whole.
Returning to
It is therefore an important aspect of the present invention that the ribs 24 in conjunction with the cylindrical skirt 26 provide a cover 20 that is stronger and stiffer than known battery covers which utilize known radially extending gussets (best seen in
As shown in
As shown in
It will be readily appreciated that the present invention therefore increases strength and stiffness while also reducing material cost, and molding and cooling time.
Further increases in both strength and stiffness can also be accommodated without making the ribs 26 extend deeper into the battery cell by alternatively providing a raised area 32 across the area of the filling hole 22, as shown in
As will be appreciated by a review of the drawing figures, the ribs 24 are preferably aligned so as to be substantially orthogonal to the elongated edges of the cover 20. That is, in the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the ribs 24 are oriented to be substantially orthogonal to the two, longest opposing edges of the cover 20, for maximum effect.
While the invention has been described with reference to the preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various obvious changes may be made, and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof, without departing from the essential scope of the present invention. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but that the invention includes all equivalent embodiments.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/527,400 filed on Dec. 5, 2003, entitled “PARALLEL RIB BATTERY COVER,” herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60527400 | Dec 2003 | US |