Parallelization of Video Decoding on Single-Instruction, Multiple-Data Processors

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20070274398
  • Publication Number
    20070274398
  • Date Filed
    May 23, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Published
    November 29, 2007
    16 years ago
Abstract
A method of parallelizing the prediction of H.264 luma blocks is disclosed. The illustrative embodiment, for example, enables the prediction of H.264 luma blocks to be performed in parallel on a single-instruction, multiple-data processor so that any two—and up to all 16 pixels—can be set simultaneously in different execution units. This is very fast and economical. The invention of formulas for enabling the parallelization of the H.264 luma blocks is noteworthy because of the diversity in the structures of the formulas for predicting the various pixels given by the H.264 standard. For example, the standard specifies fundamentally different formulas for some pixels than for others, which makes their parallelization appear impossible.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts a video frame that comprises an image of a person in the prior art.



FIG. 2 depicts a video frame that is partitioned into a two-dimensional array of 45 by 30 macroblocks.



FIG. 3 depicts a macroblock as it is partitioned into luma blocks and pixels.



FIG. 4 depicts the designation of the pixels in a luma block.



FIG. 5 depicts the designation of the pixels in the luma block with regard to the pixels from which they are derived.



FIG. 6 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction mode.



FIG. 7 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction mode.



FIG. 8 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Diagonal_Down_Right prediction mode.



FIG. 9 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Diagonal_Down_Right prediction mode.



FIG. 10 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Right prediction mode.



FIG. 11 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Right prediction mode.



FIG. 12 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Down prediction mode.



FIG. 13 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Down prediction mode.



FIG. 14 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Left prediction mode.



FIG. 15 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Left prediction mode.



FIG. 16 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Up prediction mode.



FIG. 17 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Up prediction mode.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION


FIG. 6 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction mode, which illustrates that the pixels to be predicted are based on the pixels above them and to the right. Although the parallel lines might appear that the prediction of the pixels is straightforward, there is a substantial difference in the structure of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. In particular, the H.264 standard specifies that:






pred4×4L[3,3]=(p[6,−1]+3*p[7,−1]+2)>>2  (8-51)


and in contrast, the formula for the other 15 pixels is:






pred4×4L[x,y]=(p(x+y,−1]+2*p[x+y+1,−1]+p[x+y+2,−1]+2)>>2  (8-52)



FIG. 7 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction mode.


At task 700, the illustrative embodiment sets all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L in accordance with the 16 formulas shown in FIG. 7. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to do this. The ability to parallelize the H.264 Intra4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction is noteworthy because the formula for predicting pred4×4L[3, 3] has a substantially different structure than the formula for predicting the other 15 pixels. For this reason, the ability to set pred4×4L[3,3] in parallel execution with the other 15 pixels enables the H.264 Intra4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction to be performed far more quickly on a SIMD processor than it had been previously envisioned.


In some alternative embodiments of the present invention (e.g., in single-instruction/single-data processors, single-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, and multiple-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, etc.) any subcombination of the 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L can be set simultaneously.



FIG. 8 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Diagonal_Down_Right prediction mode, which illustrates that the pixels to be predicted are based on the pixels above them and to the left. Although the parallel lines might appear that the prediction of the pixels is straightforward, there is a substantial difference in the structure of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. In particular, the H.264 standard specifies that:






pred4×4L[x,y]=(p[x−y−2,−1]+2*p[x−y−1,−1]+p[x−y,−1]+2)>>2  (8-53)


when x is greater than y, and






pred4×4L[x,y]=(p[−1,y=x−2]+2*p[−1,y−x−1]+p[−1,y−x]+2)>>2  (8-54)


when x is less than y, and






pred4×4L[x,y]=(p[0,−1]+2*p[−1,−1]+p[−1,0]+2)>>2  (8-55)


when x is equal to y.



FIG. 9 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Diagonal_Down_Right prediction mode.


At task 900, the illustrative embodiment sets all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L in accordance with the 16 formulas shown in FIG. 9. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to do this.


The ability to parallelize the H.264 Intra4×4_Diagonal_Down_Right prediction is noteworthy because of the diversity in the structures of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. For this reason, the ability to set, for example, pred4×4L[0,0], pred4×4L[0,1], and pred4×4L[1,0] in parallel execution enables the H.264 Intra4×4_Diagonal_Down_Right prediction to be performed far more quickly on a SIMD processor than it had been previously envisioned.


In some alternative embodiments of the present invention (e.g., in single-instruction/single-data processors, single-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, and multiple-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, etc.) any subcombination of the 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L can be set simultaneously.



FIG. 10 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Right prediction mode, which illustrates that the pixels to be predicted are based on the pixels above them and to the left. Although the parallel lines might appear that the prediction of the pixels is straightforward, there is a substantial difference in the structure of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. In particular, the H.264 standard specifies that:












pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


x
-

(

y
>>
1

)

-
1

,

-
1


]


+

p


[


x
-

(

y
>>
1

)


,

-
1


]


+
1

)


>>
1














when





2
*
x

-
y



{

0
,
2
,
4
,
6

}


,
and





(

8


-


56

)









pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


x
-

(

y
>>
1

)

-
2

,

-
1


]


+

2
*

p


[


x
-

(

y
>>
1

)

-
1

,

-
1


]



+

p


[


x
-

(

y
>>
1

)


,

-
1


]


+
2

)


>>
2














when





2
*
x

-
y



{

1
,
3
,
5

}


,
and





(

8


-


57

)









pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


-
1

,
0

]


+

2
*

p


[


-
1

,

-
1


]



+

p


[

0
,

-
1


]


+
2

)


>>
2














when





2
*
x

-
y

=

-
1


,
and





(

8


-


58

)









pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


-
1

,

y
-
1


]


+

2
*

p


[


-
1

,

y
-
2


]



+

p


[


-
1

,

y
-
3


]


+
2

)


>>
2













when





2
*
x

-
y




{


-
2

,

-
3


}

.






(

8


-


59

)








FIG. 11 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Right prediction mode.


At task 1100, the illustrative embodiment sets all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L in accordance with the 16 formulas shown in FIG. 11. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to do this.


The ability to parallelize the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Right prediction is noteworthy because of the diversity in the structures of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. For this reason, the ability to set, for example, pred4×4L[0, 0], pred4×4L[0, 1], pred4×4L[0, 2], and pred4×4L[1, 1] in parallel execution enables the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Right prediction to be performed far more quickly on a SIMD processor than it had been previously envisioned.


In some alternative embodiments of the present invention (e.g., in single-instruction/single-data processors, single-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, and multiple-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, etc.) any subcombination of the 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L can be set simultaneously.



FIG. 12 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Down prediction mode, which illustrates that the pixels to be predicted are based on the pixels above them and to the left. Although the parallel lines might appear that the prediction of the pixels is straightforward, there is a substantial difference in the structure of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. In particular, the H.264 standard specifies that:












pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


-
1

,

y
-

(

x
>>
1

)

-
1


]


+

p


[


-
1

,

y
-

(

x
>>
1

)



]


+
1

)


>>
1














when





2
*
y

-
x



{

0
,
2
,
4
,
6

}


,
and





(

8


-


60

)







pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(




p


[


-
1

,

y
-

1


(

x
>>
1

)


-
2


]


+

2
*

p


[


-
1

,

y
-

(

>>
1

)

-
1


]



+

p
[


(


-
1

,

y
-

(

x
>>
1

)



]

+
2

)


>>



2









when





2
*
y

-
x



{

1
,
3
,
5

}



,
and






(

8


-


61

)









pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


-
1

,
0

]


+

2
*

p


[


-
1

,

-
1


]



+

p


[

0
,

-
1


]


+
2

)


>>
2














when





2
*
y

-
x

=

-
1


,
and





(

8


-


62

)









pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


x
-
1

,

-
1


]


+

2
*

p


[


x
-
2

,

-
1


]



+

p


[


x
-
3

,

-
1


]


+
2

)


>>
2













when





2
*
y

-
x




{


-
2

,

-
3


}

.






(

8


-


63

)








FIG. 13 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Down prediction mode.


At task 1300, the illustrative embodiment sets all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L in accordance with the 16 formulas shown in FIG. 13. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to do this.


The ability to parallelize the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Down prediction is noteworthy because of the diversity in the structures of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. For example For this reason, the ability to set, for example, pred4×4L[0, 0], pred4×4L[0, 1], pred4×4L[0, 2], and pred4×4L[1, 1] in parallel execution enables the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Down prediction to be performed far more quickly on a SIMD processor than it had been previously envisioned.


In some alternative embodiments of the present invention (e.g., in single-instruction/single-data processors, single-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, and multiple-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, etc.) any subcombination of the 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L can be set simultaneously.



FIG. 14 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Left prediction mode, which illustrates that the pixels to be predicted are based on the pixels above them and to the right. Although the parallel lines might appear that the prediction of the pixels is straightforward, there is a substantial difference in the structure of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. In particular, the H.264 standard specifies that:












pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


x
+

(

y
>>
1

)


,

-
1


]


+

p


[


x
+

(

y
>>
1

)

+
1

,

-
1


]


+
1

)


>>
1













when





y



{

0
,
2

}


,
and





(

8


-


64

)







pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(



p


[


x
+

(

y
>>
1

)


,

-
1


]


+

2
*

p


[


x
+

(

y
>>
1

)

+
1

,

-
1


]



+

p
[


(


x
+

(

y
>>
1

)

+
2

,

-
1


]

+
2

)


>>


2









when





y




{

1
,
3

}

.








(

8


-


65

)








FIG. 15 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Left prediction mode.


At task 1500, the illustrative embodiment sets all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L in accordance with the 16 formulas shown in FIG. 15. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to do this. The ability to parallelize the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Left prediction is noteworthy because of the diversity in the structures of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. For this reason, the ability to set, for example, pred4×4L[0, 0] and pred4×4L[0, 1] in parallel execution enables the H.264 Intra4×4_Vertical_Left prediction to be performed far more quickly on a SIMD processor than it had been previously envisioned.


In some alternative embodiments of the present invention (e.g., in single-instruction/single-data processors, single-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, and multiple-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, etc.) any subcombination of the 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L can be set simultaneously.



FIG. 16 depicts a graphical illustration of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Up prediction mode, which illustrates that the pixels to be predicted are based on the pixels below them and to the left. Although the parallel lines might appear that the prediction of the pixels is straightforward, there is a substantial difference in the structure of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. In particular, the H.264 standard specifies that:












pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


-
1

,

y
+

(

x
>>
1

)



]


+

p


[


-
1

,

y
+

(

x
>>
1

)

+
1


]


+
1

)


>>
1














when





x

+

2
*
y




{

0
,
2
,
4

}


,
and





(

8


-


66

)







pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(




p


[


-
1

,

y
+

(

x
>>
1

)



]


+

2
*

p


[


-
1

,

y
+

(

x
>>
1

)

+
1


]



+

p
[


-
1

,

y
+

[


(

x
>>
1

)

+
2

]

+
2


)


>>



2









when





x

+

2
*
y




{

1
,
3

}



,
and






(

8


-


67

)









pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(


p


[


-
1

,
2

]


+

3
*

p


[


-
1

,
3

]



+
2

)


>>
2














when





x

+

2
*
y




{
5
}


,
and





(

8


-


68

)







pred





4
×
4


L


[

x
,
y

]



=

(




p


[


-
1

,
3

]











when





x

+

2
*





{

6
,
7
,
8
,
9

}

.







(

8


-


69

)








FIG. 17 depicts a flowchart of the salient operations associated with the parallelization of the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Up prediction mode.


At task 1700, the illustrative embodiment sets all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L in accordance with the 16 formulas shown in FIG. 17. In accordance with the illustrative embodiment, all 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor. It will be clear to those skilled in the art, after reading this specification, how to do this. The ability to parallelize the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Up prediction is noteworthy because of the diversity in the structures of the formulas for predicting the various pixels. For this reason, the ability to set, for example, pred4×4L[0, 0], pred4×4L[1,0], pred4×4L[1, 2], and pred4×4L[3, 3] in parallel execution enables the H.264 Intra4×4_Horizontal_Up prediction to be performed far more quickly on a SIMD processor than it had been previously envisioned.


In some alternative embodiments of the present invention (e.g., in single-instruction/single-data processors, single-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, and multiple-instruction/multiple-data processors having fewer than 16 execution units, etc.) any subcombination of the 16 pixels of the array pred4×4L can be set simultaneously.


It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative of the present invention and that many variations of the above-described embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention. It is therefore intended that such variations be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Diagonal_Down_Left prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[3, 2] using the formula (sample p[5,−1]+sample p[7,−1]+2* (sample p[6,−1])+2)>>2; andsetting pred4×4L[3, 3] using the formula (sample p[6,−1]+sample p[7,−1]+2* (sample p[7,−1])+2)>>2.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[3,2] and pred4×4L[3,3] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[3,2] and pred4×4L[3,3] are set simultaneously and in parallel in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor.
  • 4. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Diagonal_Down_Right prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0,0] using the formula (sample p[−1,0]+2*sample p[−1,−1]+sample p[0,−1]+2)>>2;setting pred4×4L[0,1] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+2*sample p[0,−1]+sample p[1,−1]+2)>>2.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[1,0] using the formula (sample p[−1,1]+2*sample p[−1,0]+sample p[−1,−1]+2)>>2.
  • 6. The method of claim 4 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[0,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 7. The method of claim 4 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[0,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 8. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Vertical_Right prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+1*sample p[0,−1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[0, 1] using the formula (sample p[0,−1]+1*sample p[1,−1]+1)>>1.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 2] using the formula (sample p[1,−1]+1*sample p[2,−1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 1] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+2*sample p[0,−1]+sample p[1,−1]+2)>>2.
  • 10. The method of claim 8 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[0,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 11. The method of claim 8 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[0,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 12. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Vertical_Right prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+1*sample p[0,−1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 1] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+2*sample p[0,−1]+sample p[1,−1]+2)>>2.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 1] using the formula (sample p[0,−1]+1*sample p[1,−1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[0, 2] using the formula (sample p[1,−1]+1*sample p[2,−1]+1)>>1.
  • 14. The method of claim 12 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 15. The method of claim 12 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 16. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Horizontal_Down prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+1*sample p[−1,0]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,0]+1*sample p[−1,1]+1)>>1.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[1, 1] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+2*sample p[−1,0]+sample p[−1,1]+2)>>2; andsetting pred4×4L[2, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,1]+1*sample p[−1,2]+1)>>1.
  • 18. The method of claim 16 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,0] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 19. The method of claim 16 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,0] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 20. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Horizontal_Down prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+1*sample p[−1,0]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 1] using the formula (sample p[−1,−1]+2*sample p[−1,0]+sample p[−1,1]+2)>>2.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[1, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,0]+1*sample p[−1,1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[2, 0] using the formula (sample p[−1,1]+1*sample p[−1,2]+1)>>1.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 24. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Vertical_Left prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] equal to (sample p[0,−1]+1*sample p[1,−1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[0, 1] equal to (sample p[1,−1]+1*sample p[2,−1]+1)>>1.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[1, 0] equal to (sample p[0,−1]+2*sample p[1,−1]+1*sample p[2,−1]+2)>>2; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 1] equal to (sample p[1,−1]+2*sample p[2,−1]+1*sample p[3,−1]+2)>>2.
  • 26. The method of claim 24 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[0,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 27. The method of claim 24 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[0,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 28. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Vertical_Left prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] equal to (sample p[0,−1]+1*sample p[1,−1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 1] equal to (sample p[1,−1]+2*sample p[2,−1]+1*sample p[3,−1]+2)>>2.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 further comprising: setting pred4×4L[1, 0] equal to (sample p[0,−1]+2*sample p[1,−1]+1*sample p[2,−1]+2)>>2; andsetting pred4×4L[0, 1] equal to (sample p[1,−1]+1*sample p[2,−1]+1)>>1.
  • 30. The method of claim 28 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 31. The method of claim 28 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,1] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 32. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Horizontal_Up prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] equal to (sample p[−1,0]+1*sample p[−1,1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 0] equal to (sample p[−1,1]+1*sample p[−1,2]+1)>>1.
  • 33. The method of claim 32 further comprising setting pred4×4L[1, 2] equal to (sample p[−1,2]+1*sample p[−1,3]+1)>>1.
  • 34. The method of claim 32 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,0] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 35. The method of claim 32 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,0] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.
  • 36. A method of parallelizing the Intra—4×4 Horizontal_Up prediction of a 4×4 luma block, pred4×4L[ ], said method comprising: setting pred4×4L[0, 0] equal to (sample p[−1,0]+1*sample p[−1,1]+1)>>1; andsetting pred4×4L[1, 2] equal to (sample p[−1,2]+1*sample p[−1,3]+1)>>1.
  • 37. The method of claim 36 further comprising setting pred4×4L[1, 0] equal to (sample p[−1,1]+1*sample p[−1,2]+1)>>1.
  • 38. The method of claim 36 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,2] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at the same time.
  • 39. The method of claim 36 wherein said pixels pred4×4L[0,0], and pred4×4L[1,2] are set in different execution units in a single-instruction, multiple-data processor at different times.