This disclosure relates generally to classical and quantum computing systems, and more specifically to a parametric amplifier system.
A parametric oscillator is a driven harmonic oscillator in which the oscillations are driven by varying some parameter of the system at some frequency, typically different from the natural frequency of the oscillator. A parametric oscillator can amplify a signal as a parametric amplifier, such as when operated at pump levels below oscillation. A typical parametric amplifier can exhibit much lower noise than an ordinary amplifier based on a gain device like a transistor or vacuum tube based on varying a reactance instead of resistance. An example of a parametric oscillator is a varactor parametric amplifier that operates as a low-noise amplifier in the radio and microwave frequency range. A varactor parametric amplifier can provide non-linear adjustment to the reactance of a given microwave signal via a varactor diode. Applications that require a parametric amplifier can require both high bandwidth and high gain, which can sometimes result in trade-offs in a given parametric amplifier design.
One example includes a parametric amplifier system. The system includes an input/output (I/O) transmission line to propagate a signal tone. The system also includes a non-linearity circuit comprising at least one Josephson junction to provide at least one inductive path of the signal tone in parallel with the at least one Josephson junction. The system further includes an impedance matching network coupled to the I/O transmission line to provide impedance matching of the tone signal between the I/O transmission line and the non-linearity element.
Another example includes a parametric amplifier system. The system includes an I/O transmission line to propagate a signal tone and at least one impedance matching element coupled to the I/O transmission line to provide a frequency pole associated with the signal tone. The system also includes a non-linearity circuit comprising at least one Josephson junction to provide at least one inductive path of the signal tone in parallel with the at least one Josephson junction.
Another example includes a parametric amplifier system. The system includes an I/O transmission line to propagate a signal tone and at least one impedance matching element coupled to the I/O transmission line to provide a frequency pole associated with the signal tone. The system also includes a non-linearity circuit comprising a plurality of RF superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) arranged in alternating orientations in an array between a first terminal of the non-linearity circuit and a second terminal of the non-linearity circuit to provide at least one inductive path of the signal tone.
This disclosure relates generally to classical and quantum computing systems, and more specifically to a parametric amplifier system. The parametric amplifier system can be implemented in any of a variety of classical and quantum computer systems that may require amplification of a signal tone, such as for a state-readout of a qubit. The parametric amplifier system can include an input/output (I/O) transmission line on which a high-frequency signal tone (e.g., having a center frequency of approximately 7.5 GHz) can propagate. As an example, the I/O transmission line can correspond to both an input and output associated with the signal tone, such that the amplified output signal tone can be reflected back to the I/O transmission line and can be separated from the input signal tone at the I/O transmission line (e.g., via a circulator). As a result, the output signal tone can be provided from the I/O transmission line and processed (e.g., via an analog-to-digital converter (ADC)).
The parametric amplifier also includes at least one impedance matching element to provide a respective at least one frequency pole with respect to the signal tone. As an example, each of the impedance matching element(s) can be configured as a resonator coupled to the I/O transmission line, and can each be separated by a reactive circuit element (e.g., a capacitor or an inductor). The parametric amplifier further includes a non-linearity circuit that is configured to provide the amplification of the signal tone. As an example, the non-linearity circuit can include at least one Josephson junction that is arranged in parallel with at least one inductive path of the signal tone. For example, the non-linearity circuit can include a plurality of RF superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) that are arranged in an alternating series arrangement. Each of the RF SQUIDs can include a Josephson junction and a pair of inductors that form an inductive path in parallel with the respective Josephson junction. For example, the arrangement of the RF SQUIDs can include two inductive paths in parallel, such that two series RF SQUID arrangements can be provided in parallel between respective terminals of the non-linearity circuit. As a result, the parametric amplifier can achieve sufficient gain (e.g., at least approximately 20 dB) over a large bandwidth (e.g., at least approximately 1 GHz) with a high saturation power (e.g., approximately −90 dB).
The parametric amplifier system 10 includes an input/output (I/O) transmission line 12 on which a high-frequency signal tone, demonstrated in the example of
As an example, the I/O transmission line 12 can have an impedance Z0 of approximately 50Ω. The parametric amplifier system 10 also includes an impedance matching network 14 that is configured to provide at least one frequency pole with respect to the signal tone SIG. As an example, the impedance matching network 14 can include at least one impedance matching element to provide the respective at least one frequency pole with respect to the signal tone SIG. As an example, each of the impedance matching element(s) can be configured as a resonator coupled to the I/O transmission line 12, and can each be separated by a capacitor. Thus, the impedance matching network 14 can provide impedance matching of the signal tone SIG with respect to amplification of the signal tone SIG, as described in greater detail herein.
The parametric amplifier system 10 further includes a non-linearity circuit 16. The non-linearity circuit 16 is configured to provide parametric amplification of the input signal tone SIGIN to provide the amplified output signal tone SIGOUT. As an example, the non-linearity circuit 16 can include at least one Josephson junction that is arranged in parallel with at least one inductive path of the signal tone SIG. For example, the non-linearity circuit 16 can include a plurality of RF superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) that are arranged in an alternating arrangement along an array. Each of the RF SQUIDs can include a Josephson junction and a pair of inductors that form an inductive path of the signal tone SIG in parallel with the respective Josephson junction. For example, the arrangement of the RF SQUIDs can include two inductive paths in parallel, such that two RF SQUID arrays can be provided in parallel between respective terminals of the non-linearity circuit 16.
Additionally, in the example of
The parametric amplifier system 50 includes an I/O transmission line 52 on which a high-frequency signal tone, demonstrated in the example of
The first impedance matching element 54 includes a capacitor CP1 arranged between a node 60 coupled to the capacitor C12 and the low-voltage rail, demonstrated in the example of
The parametric amplifier system 50 further includes a non-linearity circuit 64 that forms part of the first impedance matching element 54. The non-linearity circuit 64 is configured to provide parametric amplification of the input signal tone SIGIN to provide the amplified output signal tone SIGOUT. In the example of
The non-linearity circuit 100 includes a first terminal 102 and a second terminal 104 that can correspond to the terminals coupled to the node 60 and the low-voltage rail, respectively, in the example of
Each of the RF SQUIDs 108 includes a pair of inductors and a Josephson junction. In each of the two N-sequence arrays of RF SQUIDs 108, the inductors are labeled LX1 and LX2, with X corresponding to the number of the respective RF SQUID 108 along the respective array of the RF SQUIDs 108. Similarly, in each of the two N-sequence arrays of RF SQUIDs 108, the Josephson junctions are labeled JX. As an example, all of the Josephson junctions JX can have an approximately equal critical current IC. In the example of
As an example, with reference to
La(Φdc)=1/ω02C1 Equation 1
Additionally, the choices for C1 and ω0 determine the impedance of the resonator of the first impedance matching element 54, Z1, as follows:
Similarly, the other two poles of the respective impedance matching elements 56 and 58 are formed with the impedances Z2 and Z3 as follows:
The resonators of the impedance matching elements 54, 56, and 58 are coupled via admittance inverters Jij having values that can be calculated from tabulated filter prototypes {gi} as follows:
J12=w/√{square root over (Z1*Z2*g1*g2)} Equation 5
J34=w/√{square root over (Z1*Z2*g1*g2)} Equation 6
Where: Z0=50Ω; and
w is the fractional bandwidth, defined as:
w*|Rsq|/Z1=g1. Equation 7
Where: Rsq=1/Re{Ysq}
As an example, the impedance Z3 of the third impedance matching element 58 can be selected as follows:
Z3=w*Z0/g3*g4 Equation 8
As another example, the impedance Z2 of the second impedance matching element 56 can be selected as follows:
Z2=√{square root over (Z1*Z3)} Equation 9
As another example, the admittance inverters can be arranged as capacitive pi-sections to form the parametric amplifier system 50, such that:
Cij=Jij/ω0 Equation 10
Where:
Cp1=C1−C12 Equation 11
Cp2=C2−C12−C23 Equation 12
Cp3=C3−C23 Equation 13
As a result, the admittance Yext(ω) associated with the non-linear element 64 and 100 looking through the impedance matching network formed by the impedance matching elements 54, 56, and 58 to the exemplary 50Ω impedance Z0 of the I/O transmission line 52 can be evaluated at the center of the frequency band as follows:
Accordingly, the parametric amplifier system 50 can be designed based on Equations 1-14 to provide sufficient impedance matching for the Josephson non-linearity of the non-linearity circuit 64 and 100.
As an example, the amplitude of the pump current IPUMP can be selected to provide a desired pump amplitude Φac, and thus gain of the parametric amplifier system 50, based on the admittance Ysq of the non-linearity circuit 100. As an example, flux-pumped non-linearity can be provided as follows:
Ysq(ωs)=1/jωsLa+1/jωs(Lb+Lc) Equation 15
Where: ωs is the frequency of the signal tone SIG;
Where: L′T(Φac) is the flux derivative of the inductance evaluated at the operating point of the parametric amplifier system 50;
Where: Φ0 is a flux quantum, and δ0(Φdc) can be expressed as:
Therefore, based on Equations 15-21, in combination with Equation 14, an amplitude of the pump current IPUMP can be selected to provide a pump amplitude Φac for which the expression:
Rsq=1/Re{Ysq(ω0)} Equation 22
can satisfy the constraint of Equation 7 at the center of the operation frequency band.
As a result of the arrangement of the non-linearity circuit 64 and 100 in combination with the impedance matching network formed by the impedance matching elements 54, 56, and 58, the parametric amplifier system 50 can provide parametric amplification of the signal tone SIG at high gain, higher saturation power (e.g., relative to typical Josephson parametric amplifiers), and over a large bandwidth. As an example, the admittance at an idler frequency Yext(ωp−ωs) for a given signal frequency ωs can be evaluated to calculate the admittance of the pumped non-linearity Ysq(ωs). Therefore, the impedance of the parametric amplifier system 50, as seen from the exemplary 50Ω impedance Z0 of the I/O transmission line 52 to an overall impedance of the parametric amplifier system 50, Zamp(ωs), and the signal power gain can be calculated as follows:
Accordingly, the parametric amplifier system 50 can be implemented with the impedance matching network of the impedance matching elements 54, 56, and 58 and the non-linearity circuit 100 to achieve broadband performance and to achieve higher gain and bandwidth, with minimum ripple, relative to typical Josephson junction parametric amplifiers. Additionally, the RF SQUID arrays of the non-linearity element 100 can be implemented to achieve high saturation powers relative to typical Josephson junction parametric amplifier systems.
What have been described above are examples of the disclosure. It is, of course, not possible to describe every conceivable combination of components or method for purposes of describing the disclosure, but one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that many further combinations and permutations of the disclosure are possible. Accordingly, the disclosure is intended to embrace all such alterations, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of this application, including the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3341380 | Mcts | Sep 1967 | A |
4117354 | Geewala | Sep 1978 | A |
4132956 | Russer | Jan 1979 | A |
4149097 | Faris | Apr 1979 | A |
4274015 | Faris | Jun 1981 | A |
4360898 | Faris | Nov 1982 | A |
4916335 | Goto | Apr 1990 | A |
5051627 | Schneier | Sep 1991 | A |
5099152 | Suzuki | Mar 1992 | A |
5309038 | Harada | May 1994 | A |
5942950 | Merenda | Aug 1999 | A |
6188236 | Wikborg | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6486756 | Tarutani | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6507234 | Johnson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6518786 | Herr | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6549059 | Johnson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6617643 | Goodwin-Johansson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6724216 | Suzuki | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6750794 | Durand | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6865639 | Herr | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6897468 | Blais | May 2005 | B2 |
6960780 | Blais | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6960929 | Bedard | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7129870 | Hirano | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7498832 | Baumgardner | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7613765 | Hilton | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7714605 | Baumgardner | May 2010 | B2 |
7724020 | Herr | May 2010 | B2 |
7772871 | Herr | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772872 | Lewis | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7782077 | Herr | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7977964 | Herr | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8022722 | Pesetski | Sep 2011 | B1 |
8111083 | Pesetski | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8508280 | Naaman | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8654578 | Lewis et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8975912 | Chow | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9000621 | Ichikawa | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9208861 | Herr | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9281057 | Herr | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9735776 | Abdo | Aug 2017 | B1 |
10122352 | Miller | Nov 2018 | B1 |
20020063643 | Smith | May 2002 | A1 |
20020190381 | Herr | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030011398 | Herr | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016069 | Furuta | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039138 | Herr | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040440 | Wire | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030115401 | Herr | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030183935 | Herr | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030207766 | Esteve | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040120444 | Herr | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040201099 | Herr | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201400 | Herr | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050001209 | Hilton | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023518 | Herr | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050098773 | Vion | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110106 | Goto | May 2005 | A1 |
20050224784 | Amin | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231196 | Tarutani | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060091490 | Chen | May 2006 | A1 |
20070052441 | Taguchi | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20090082209 | Bunyk | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084991 | Ichimura | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090153180 | Herr | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090289638 | Farinelli | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090322374 | Przybysz | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20110175062 | Farinelli | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120094838 | Bunyk | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130015885 | Naaman | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043945 | McDermott | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20150092465 | Herr | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150254571 | Miller et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20170141769 | Miller et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180076777 | Hofheinz | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0467104 | Jan 1992 | EP |
3217336 | Sep 2017 | EP |
3378162 | Sep 2018 | EP |
S6192036 | May 1986 | JP |
2001345488 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2004080129 | Mar 2004 | JP |
199808307 | Feb 1998 | WO |
2003090162 | Oct 2003 | WO |
2005093649 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2008050864 | May 2008 | WO |
2009157532 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010028183 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2016127021 | Aug 2016 | WO |
2017087070 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Berggren et al. “Analytical approximations to the dynamics of an array of coupled DC SQUIDs”, The European Physical Journal B, 2014 (Year: 2014). |
Beltran, “Development of a Josephson Parametric Amplifier for the Preparation and Detection of Non-classical States of Microwave Fields”, University of Colorado, 2010. (Year: 2010). |
Marino, M.D., “RFiof: An RF Approach to I/O-pin and Memory Controller Scalability for Off-chip Memories”, May 2013 (Year: 2013). |
Bems et al., “Coherent Quasiclassical Dynamics of a Persistent Current Qubit”, Physical Review Letters APS USA, vol. 97, No. 15, pp. 150502, Oct. 13, 2006. |
Garanin et al., Effects of nonlinear sweep in the Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg effect, Physical Review B, vol. 66, No. 17, pp. 174438-1-174438-11, Nov. 1, 2002. |
Koch, et al.: “A NRZ—Output Amplifier for RSFQ Circuits”, IEEE Transaction on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 3549-3552, Jun. 1999. |
Wulf et al., Dressed States of Josephson Phase Qubit Coupled to an LC Circuit, IEEE Transaction on Applied Superconductivity IEEE USA, vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 356-859, Jun. 2, 2005. |
Schuenemann C. et al. “Interleaved Josephson junction tree decoder,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, International Business Machines Corp. (Thorwood), US, vol. 18, No. 12, Apr. 30, 1976, pp. 4168, line 1-p. 4170, line 29; figures I, II. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2018/051076 dated Jan. 2, 2019. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2018/0042466 dated Dec. 12, 2018. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2008/050864 dated Sep. 6, 2008. |
Internation Search Report & Written Opinion corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2008/072017 dated Feb. 23, 2009. |
Gopalakrishnan, R. et al.: “Novel Very High IE Structures Based on the Directed BBHE Mechanism for Ultralow-Power Flash Memories”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 26, No. 3, Mar. 2005. |
Choi, W. Y. et al.: “80nm Self-Aligned Complementary I-MOS Using Double Sidewall Spacer and Elevated Drain Structure and Its Applicability to Amplifiers with High Linearity”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 8, No. 5, dated 2004. |
Choi, W. Y. et al.: “Novel Tunneling Devices with Multi-Functionality”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 16, No. 1B, dated 2007; pp. 2622-2625. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2009/045167, dated Feb. 5, 2010. |
Semenov, et. al, “SFQ Control Circuits for Josephson Junction Qubits”, IEEE Trans. On Applied Superconductivity, vol. 13, No. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 960-965. |
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 2882109 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
Polonsky, et. al., “Transmission of Single-Flux-Quantum Pulses along Superconducting Microstrip Lines,” IEEE Trans. On Applied Superconductivity, vol. 3, No. 1, Mar. 1993, pp. 2598-2600. |
Ohki et. al., “Low-Jc Rapid Single Flux Quantum (RSFQ) Qubit Control Circuit”, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 17, No. 2, Jun. 2007. |
Allman, et al: “rt-SQUID-Mediated Coherent Tunable Coupling Between a Superconducting Phase Qubit and a Lumped-Element Resonator” ; Physical Review Letters, 201O The American Physical Society, PRL 104, week ending Apr. 30, 2010, pp. 177004-1 thru 177004-4. |
Johnson, et al.: “A Scalable Control System for a Superconducting Adiabatic Quantum Optimization Processor” ; arXiv:0907.3757v2 fquant-phl Mar. 24, 2010, pp. 1-14. |
Saira, et al.: “Entanglement genesis by anciila-based parity measurement in 20 circuit QED” Physical review letters 1 i 2.7 ( 201 4): 070502. |
Galiautdinov, et al.: “Resonator-zero-qubit architecture for superconducting qubits” Physical Review A 85.4 (201 2): 042321, Department of Electrical Engineering and Physics, University of California. pp. 1-11. |
Bourassa, et al.: “ Ultra.strong coupling regime of cavity QED with phase-biased flux qubits” Physical Review A 80.3 (2009): 032109. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2015/052666 dated Jan. 3, 2016. |
RSFQubit , RSFQ Control of Josephson Junctions Qubits, D7: Report on the Evaluation of the RSFQ Circuitry for Qubit Control, Sep. 1, 2005, pp. 1-16. |
Herr, et al: “Ultra-Low-Power Superconductor Logic”, Journal of Applied Physics, American Institute of Physics, US, vol. 109, No. 10, May 17, 2011, pp. 103903-103903, XP012146891, ISSN: 0021-8979, 001: 10.1063/1.3585849, p. 2, left-hand column, paragraph 4-right-hand column, paragraph 1; Fig. 1. |
Gui-Long, et al., “A Simple Scheme to Generate X-type Four-charge Entangled States in Circuit QED”, Chinese Physics B, Chinese Physics B, Bristol GB, vol. 21, No. 4, Apr. 5, 2012 (Apr. 5, 2012), pp. 44209/1-5. XP020221550, ISSN: 1674-1056, DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/41044209. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2016/053412, dated Dec. 21, 2016. |
International Search Report corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2013/054161, dated Feb. 25, 2014. |
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 2973060, dated Dec. 18, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/030036 dated Jul. 19, 2019. |
Canadian Office Action corresponding to Canadian Patent Application No. 3003272 dated Feb. 12, 2019. |
Korean Office Action corresponding to Korean Application No. 10-2018-7013489 dated Mar. 28, 2019. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190131944 A1 | May 2019 | US |