Patent Grant
7229640
The present invention relates to a novel formulation containing paroxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, and to its use in the treatment and/or prophylaxis of certain disorders.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,007,196 describes inter alia a compound which is commonly known as paroxetine. This compound is a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI) and is currently marketed world-wide for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of depression.
The current formulation which is the only marketed formulation of paroxetine hydrochloride is a swallow tablet.
It has now been surprisingly found that controlled release and delayed release formulations containing paroxetine give rise to an unexpected reduction in the side effects associated with swallow tablets.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a controlled release or delayed release formulation containing paroxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
A further aspect of the invention provides a controlled release or delayed release formulation containing an SSRI. Examples of SSRIs other than paroxetine include fluoxetine (U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,081), fluvoxamine (U.S. Pat. No. 4,085,225), and sertraline (U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,518).
By controlled release is meant any formulation technique wherein release of the active substance from the dosage from is modified to occur at a slower rater than that from an immediate release product, such as a conventional swallow tablet or capsule.
By delayed release is meant any formulation technique wherein release of the active substance from the dosage form is modified to occur at a later time than that from a conventional immediate release product The subsequent release of active substance from a delayed release formulation may also be controlled as defined above.
Examples of controlled release formulations which are suitable for incorporating paroxetine and other SSRIs are described in:
Sustained Release Medications, Chemical Technology Review No. 177. Ed. J. C. Johnson. Noyes Data Corporation 1980.
Controlled Drug Delivery, Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd Edition. Eds. J. R. Robinson, V. H. L. Lee. Mercel Dekkes Inc. New York 1987.
Examples of delayed release formulations which are suitable for incorporating paroxetine and other SSRIs are described in:
Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16th Edition, Mack Publishing Company 1980, Ed. A. Osol.
Such controlled release formulations are preferably formulated in a manner such that release of active substance such as paroxetine is effected predominantly during the passage through the stomach and the small intestine, and delayed release formulations are preferably formulated such that release of active substance such as paroxetine is avoided in the stomach and is effected predominantly during passage through the small intestine.
Said formulations are preferably formulated such that the release of the active substance is predominantly 1½ to 3 hours post ingestion.
The small intestine is suitably the duodenum, the ileum or the jejunem.
Patients who benefit most from the formulations of the present invention are those who are known to suffer from nausea upon oral administration using swallow tablets.
Preferred formulations are ultimately enteric coated tablets or caplets, wax or polymer coated tablets or caplets or time-release matrices, or combinations thereof.
Particularly preferred formulations are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,102,666.
Thus, a particular aspect of the invention provides a polymeric controlled release composition comprising a reaction complex formed by the interaction of (1) a calcium polycarbophil component which is a water-swellable, but water insoluble, fibrous cross-linked carboxy-functional polymer, said polymer containing (a) a plurality of repeating units of which at least about 80%o contain at least one carboxyl functionality, and (b) about 0.05 to about 1.5% cross-linking agent substantially free from polyalkenyl polyether, said percentages being based upon the weights of unpolymerised repeating unit and cross-linking agent, respectively, with (2) water, in the presence of an active agent selected from the group consisting of SSRIs such as paroxetine. The amount of calcium polycarbophil present is from about 0.1 to about 99% by weight, for example about 10%. The amount of active agent present is from about 0.0001 to about 65% by weight, for example between about 5 and 20%. The amount of water present is from about 5 to about 200% by weight, for example between about 5 and 10%. The interaction is carried out at a pH of between about 3 and about 10, for example about 6 to 7. The calcium polycarbophil is originally present in the form of a calcium salt containing from about 5 to about 25% calcium.
Further particularly preferred formulations are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,422,123.
Thus, a further particular aspect of the invention provides a system for the controlled release of an active substance which is an SSRI such as paroxetine, comprising (a) a deposit-core comprising an effective amount of the active substance and having defined geometric form, and (b) a support-platform applied to said deposit-core, wherein said deposit-core contains at least the active substance, and at least one member selected from the group consisting of (1) a polymeric material which swells on contact with water or aqueous liquids and a gellable polymeric material wherein the ratio of the said swellable polymeric material to said gellable polymeric material is in the range 1:9 to 9:1, and (2) a single polymeric material having both swelling and gelling properties, and wherein the support-platform is an elastic support, applied to said deposit-core so that it partially covers the surface of the deposit-core and follows changes due to hydration of the deposit-core and is slowly soluble and/or slowly gellable in aqueous fluids. The support-platform may comprise polymers such as hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, plasticizers such as a glyceride, binders such as polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydrophilic agents such as lactose and silica, and/or hydrophobic agents such as magnesium stearate and glycerides. The polymer(s) typically make up 30 to 90% by weight of the support-platform, for example about 35 to 40%. Plasticizer may make up at least 2% by weight of the support-platform, for example about 15 to 20%. Binder(s), hydrophilic agent(s) and hydrophobic agent(s) typically total up to about 50% by weight of the support-platform, for example about 40 to 50%.
Paroxetine used in the present invention is suitably in the form of the free base or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Preferably, paroxetine is suitably in the form of the hydrochloride hemihydrate.
Paroxetine hydrochloride hemihydrate may be prepared according to the procedures generally outlined in U.S. Pat. No. 4,721,723.
Paroxetine in the form of a controlled release or delayed release formulation can be used to treat and prevent the following disorders:
Alcoholism
Anxiety
Depression
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Panic Disorder
Chronic Pain
Obesity
Senile Dementia
Migraine
Bulimia
Anorexia
Social Phobia
Pre-Menstrual Syndrome (PMS)
Adolescent Depression
Trichotillomania
Dysthymia
Substance Abuse
These disorders are herein after referred to as “the disorders”.
The present invention provides a method of treating and/or preventing the disorders by administering an effective and/or a prophylactic amount of a controlled release or delayed release formulation containing paroxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, to a sufferer in need thereof.
The present invention further provides the use of a controlled release or delayed release formulation containing paroxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof in the manufacture of a medicament, for treating and/or preventing the disorders.
The present invention also provides a pharmaceutical composition for use in the treatment and/or prevention of the disorders which comprises a controlled release or delayed release formulation containing paroxetine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
The following examples illustrate the present invention.
The powder blend for each layer was wet granulated in a high shear mixer/granulator and dried in a fluid bed drier. The bilayer tablets were compressed on a Manesty triple layer press.
The core constituents were wet granulated in a high shear mixer/granulator, and dried in a fluid bed drier. The magnesium stearate was then added and the mixture processed in a low shear mixer. The mix was then compressed on a B type rotary tablet press. Coating was carried out using an Accela cota.
The process was as described in Example 8.
The process was as described in Example 8.
The process was as described in Example 9.
GI Tolerance Study
The design of the study is outlined below
The study was conducted to compare the incidence, severity and duration of nausea and vomiting, and diarrhoea (theoretically if the controlled release formulations slow down absorption of paroxetine then, as paroxetine is known to be prokinetic to the GI tract there may be an increased incidence).
Adverse experiences (AE) information was assessed each morning at the time of dosing and again 24 hours following the last dose. Investigators and subjects were given diary cards detailing how to classify severity of AEs in order to standardise as much as possible across all 6 centres.
Of the 485 evaluable subjects, 18 (3.7%) withdrew, 17 because of adverse events. Subjects with nausea/vomiting on the day of withdrawal were more common on (b) than either of (c) and (d).
The incidence of nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea is shown in the table below:
The incidence of nausea was increased for both (b) and placebo compared to the expected rates of approximately 25% and 5% respectively for volunteers at these dosages for 3 days duration. The overall incidence of nausea was less on (c) and (d) than on (b). The severity of nausea was also decreased as shown in the next table.
Severity of diarrhoea is reported in the table below:
In conclusion, there appears to be a trend for (c) to reduce the incidence of nausea and the dropout rate due to adverse events in comparison to (b), but analysis of the results was complicated by a statistically significant treatment-by-centre difference. (d) shows a halving in the dropout rate and a fall in incidence of nausea of 20% (a proportional fall of 33%). In addition there is a reduction in severity of nausea of those individuals who report nausea on (c) and (d). There is an increase in incidence of diarrhoea on both of (c) and (d) in relation to (b), but this is confined to an increase in the number of individuals reporting moderate diarrhoea and there is no increase in those with severe diarrhoea.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9514842 | Jul 1995 | GB | national |
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/391,796, filed Sep. 9, 1999, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/817,911 filed Aug. 26, 1997, now abandoned which is a §371 of PCT/EP96/03252, filed Jul. 19, 1996.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3536809 | Appleweig | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3598123 | Zaffaroni | Aug 1971 | A |
| 3630200 | Higuchi | Dec 1971 | A |
| 3845770 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3916899 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 4007196 | Christensen et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4008719 | Theeuwes et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4085225 | Welle et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4314081 | Molloy et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4444778 | Coughlin | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4536518 | Welch, Jr. et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4615697 | Robinson | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4721723 | Barnes et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4797286 | Thakkar et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4804669 | Lassen | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4839177 | Colombo et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4847092 | Thakkar et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4851228 | Zentner et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4988679 | Chavkin et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4996358 | Handa et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5102666 | Acharya | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5110605 | Acharya | May 1992 | A |
| 5151434 | Irikura et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5271946 | Hettche | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5284662 | Koparkar et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5322697 | Meyer | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5371092 | Johnson | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5422123 | Conte et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5668134 | Limstra et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5686094 | Acharya | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5776969 | James | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5811436 | Leonard et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 6133289 | Ward et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6168805 | Hein et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2 031 393 | Dec 1989 | CA |
| 1 298 479 | Apr 1992 | CA |
| 2 143 070 | Dec 2001 | CA |
| 0 269 303 | Nov 1987 | EP |
| 0 449 562 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0 432 607 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 0 546 593 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0 654 263 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 714 663 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 4 036 237 | Feb 1992 | JP |
| 5 139 964 | Jun 1993 | JP |
| WO 9113612 | Sep 1991 | WO |
| WO 9203124 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| 9209281 | Jun 1992 | WO |
| WO 9213452 | Aug 1992 | WO |
| WO 9219226 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO 9309769 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO 9324154 | Dec 1993 | WO |
| WO 9410990 | May 1994 | WO |
| 9515155 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| WO 9516448 | Jun 1995 | WO |
| WO 9519956 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO 9520964 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO 9530422 | Nov 1995 | WO |
| WO 9602240 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 9614059 | May 1996 | WO |
| WO 9631197 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9633165 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9633166 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 9702037 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 9702239 | Jan 1997 | WO |
| WO 9703966 | Feb 1997 | WO |
| WO 9718798 | May 1997 | WO |
| WO 9726257 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 9743249 | Nov 1997 | WO |
| WO 9843959 | Oct 1998 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20020090394 A1 | Jul 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09391796 | Sep 1999 | US |
| Child | 10024858 | US | |
| Parent | 08817911 | US | |
| Child | 09391796 | US |
