The present invention claims priority from and incorporates by reference in its entirety U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/129,483, filed on Mar. 6, 2015, titled Particle Feeder.
The present disclosure relates generally to the continuous or nearly continuous transfer of particles from a first area across a pressure differential to a second area having a pressure different than the first area, and is particularly directed to an apparatus and method for sealing between the two areas during the transfer of particles. Specifically disclosed is an apparatus which introduces cryogenic particles received from a source of particles, having a first pressure, into a moving transport fluid, having a second pressure, for ultimate delivery to a workpiece or target as particles entrained in a transport fluid flow which seals between the source of particles and the transport fluid flow.
Carbon dioxide systems, including apparatuses for creating solid carbon dioxide particles, for entraining particles in a transport gas and for directing entrained particles toward objects are well known, as are the various component parts associated therewith, such as nozzles, are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,744,181, 4,843,770, 5,018,667, 5,050,805, 5,071,289, 5,188,151, 5,249,426, 5,288,028, 5,301,509, 5,473,903, 5,520,572, 6,024,304, 6,042,458, 6,346,035, 6,695,679, 6,726,549, 6,739,529, 6,824,450, 7,112,120, 8,187,057 and 8,869,551, all of which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference. Additionally, U.S. Patent Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/487,837 filed May 19, 2011 and U.S. non-Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 13/475,454 filed May 18, 2012 both For Method And Apparatus For Forming Carbon Dioxide Particles, U.S. Patent Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/589,551 filed Jan. 23, 2012, for Method And Apparatus For Sizing Carbon Dioxide Particles, and U.S. Patent Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/592,313 filed Jan. 30, 2012, for Method And Apparatus For Dispensing Carbon Dioxide Particles, 14/062,118 filed Oct. 24, 2013 for Apparatus Including At Least An Impeller Or Diverter And For Dispensing Carbon Dioxide Particles And Method Of Use, all are hereby incorporated in their entirety by reference. Although this patent refers specifically to carbon dioxide in explaining the invention, the invention is not limited to carbon dioxide but rather may be applied to any suitable cryogenic material. Thus, references to carbon dioxide herein are not to be limited to carbon dioxide but are to be read to include any suitable cryogenic material.
Many prior art blasting system include rotating members, such as rotors, with cavities or pockets for transporting particles into the transport gas flow. Seals are used, urged against the rotor surface to maintain the pressure differential, with the goal of minimizing parasitic loses due to the contact while obtaining adequate sealing.
The accompanying drawings illustrate embodiments, and, together with the specification, including the detailed description which follows, serve to explain the principles of the present innovation.
In the following description, like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views. Also, in the following description, it is to be understood that terms such as front, back, inside, outside, and the like are words of convenience and are not to be construed as limiting terms. Terminology used in this patent is not meant to be limiting insofar as devices described herein, or portions thereof, may be attached or utilized in other orientations. Referring in more detail to the drawings, an embodiment constructed according to the teachings of the present invention is described.
It should be appreciated that any patent, publication, or other disclosure material, in whole or in part, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein is incorporated herein only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as explicitly set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein will only be incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material.
Each bearing support 16a, 16b supports a respective bearing 32a, 32b, which may be a sealed bearing. Bearings 32a, 32b locate and rotabably support rotor 18 for rotation. Rotor 18 includes interface 18a for engaging a source of rotational power in a manner as is well known. Thrust bearing plate 34 and retaining plate 36 retain rotor 18 at its other end.
Thrust bearing plate 34 may be made of any suitable material, such as UHMW plastic. Fasteners 38a, 38b, 38c, 38d removably secure thrust bearing plate 34 and retaining plate 36 to bearing support 16a, allowing withdrawal of rotor 18 through bearing 32a.
Upper seal 20 and lower seal 22 may be made of any suitable material such as, by way of example only, an unreinforced, semi-crystalline thermoplastic polyester based on polyethylene terephthalate (PET-P), such as is sold under the trade name Ertalyte®. Upper seal 20 may be supported by bearing supports 16a, 16b via fasteners 38a, 38b, 40a, 40b, in sealing engagement with the upper portion 18b of peripheral surface 18c (see
Referring also to
Straps 54 include respective grooves 54b disposed in lower surface 54a surrounding respective openings 22c through which respective fasteners 52 are disposed. Respective seals 60, illustrated as O-rings which may be made of any suitable material such as Buna-N, are disposed in respective grooves 54b to seal openings 22c against pressure leaking out of inlet side chamber 62 and outlet side chamber 64. Seals 60 may be configured to provide such sealing throughout the entire range of float of lower seal 22. Seal 59 is disposed in groove 58a sealing between lower seal 22 and cavity 58.
Adequate, but not excessive, sealing pressure between rotor 18 and lower seal 22 is necessary to prevent incoming transport fluid from leaking from feeder assembly 10. The prior art described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,112,120 includes lower seal pad 58 which moves vertically within cavity 38 and is urged against rotor 26 as a result of the static pressure of the fluid flow flowing through chambers 74, 78 acting across the entire lower seal pad 58 surface area. At many operating transport fluid pressures, this can result in higher sealing pressure being exerted against rotor 26 by lower seal 58 than is needed for sealing. Such higher than necessary sealing pressure places parasitic drag on rotor 58, requiring more power (e.g., a higher horsepower motor, such as ⅓ horsepower) to rotate rotor 26 to overcome the parasitic drag, and causing faster wear of rotor 26 and lower seal pad 58. At low transport fluid pressures, even though acting on the entire lower seal pad 58 surface area of chambers 74, 78, the sealing pressure may be inadequate. Additionally, the sealing pressure resulting from the discussed prior art configuration may not be timed properly relative to startup of the transport fluid flow to effect sealing, even when the transport fluid operating pressure is high enough to produce adequate sealing pressure.
The present innovation allows achieving adequate sealing pressure over the desired low to high range of transport fluid operating pressure. The previously described float allows lower seal 22 to align properly with rotor 18 at low pressure, avoiding the high pressure of the prior art required to elastically conform lower seal pad 58 to align properly with rotor 26.
Referring to
With the configuration of lower seal/piston assembly 46 limiting the effect of the transport fluid operating pressure on the level of sealing pressure exerted against rotor 18, the desired sealing pressure is achieved and controlled by the movement of lower seal/piston assembly 46 within cavity 58. As seen in
Referring to
In an alternate embodiment, a controlled secondary fluid pressure could be applied to the cavity to supplement the sealing force, such as at start up or when the operating pressure of the transport fluid is low. Of course, such controlled secondary fluid pressure could be used as the primary or sole source of the sealing force against rotor 18, with any appropriate modifications to annular pressure chamber 80. A range of different designs of rotor 18 and/or lower seal/piston assembly 46 could be compensated for by secondary fluid pressure applied through port 90.
It will be appreciated that while pressure chamber 80 is depicted as having an annular shape disposed about central raised portion 82, it may have any suitable shape, size and location. For example, pressure chamber 80 could be centrally disposed surrounded by a raised portion.
Referring to
During start up at a low operating pressure, for example, 40 psig, it is important attain sufficient sealing between lower seal 22 and rotor 18 before there is sufficient fluid flow between lower seal 22 and rotor 18 through gap 56 to prevent achieving adequate steady state sealing between lower seal 22 and rotor 18. The mass of lower seal/piston assembly 46 and the friction between it and cavity walls 58 does not vary at start up: The level of force required to attain sufficient sealing between lower seal 22 and rotor 18 at startup to close gap 56 before fluid flow therethrough becomes great enough to prevent closing gap 56 remains the same, yet the available pressure to act on piston 48 is less due to the low operating pressure.
Referring to
Inlet passageway 194 utilizes the relationship of total pressure as the sum of dynamic pressure and static pressure, to provide desired pressure within annular pressure chamber 180. Referring to
The orientation, including the angle, and size of inlet passageway 194 are selected relative to the transport fluid's total pressure at inlet passageway 194, with the levels of static pressure and dynamic pressure at inlet passageway 194 resulting at least in part from passageway alignment angle α. Angle α and size of inlet passageway 194 are selected such that a sufficient amount of dynamic pressure is available at startup in the secondary flow through inlet passageway 194 into annular pressure chamber 180 to provide the desired sealing in a sufficiently quick response time by pressurizing annular pressure chamber 180. Outlet passageway 196 and annular pressure chamber 180 are sized such that the resulting force exerted on piston 148 at the lowest of the operating pressure range produces adequate sealing pressure between lower seal 122 and rotor 118. Inlet passageway 194, annular pressure chamber 180 and outlet passageway 196 are also configured to provide a sufficiently quick response time of force sufficient for lower seal 122 to seal against rotor 118 quickly enough to prevent transport fluid flow between lower seal 122 and rotor 118 at gap 156 during start up from preventing achieving adequate steady state sealing between lower seal 122 and rotor 118 at the steady state low operating pressure. The effective flow area experienced by the secondary flow increases as the secondary flow travels from inlet passageway 194 into annual pressure chamber 180. The resulting drop in velocity of the secondary flow reduces the dynamic pressure producing a correlating increase in static pressure. The surface area of piston 148 which forms a boundary of annular pressure chamber 180 is sized to provide the desired response time and steady state sealing force produced by the static pressure in annular pressure chamber 180 acting thereon. The secondary flow path for the secondary flow, which in the embodiment depicted comprises inlet passageway 194, annular pressure chamber 180 and outlet passageway 196, may be of any suitable configuration and structure. For example, annular pressure chamber 180 may have any shape and volume which functions to produce the desired sealing and timing of effecting the seal between rotor 118 and seal 122. Inlet passageway 194 may be configured to be in fluid communication with the transport fluid upstream of inlet 166, such as for example being configured as a tap or port formed in communication with an upstream transport fluid passageway disposed at an orientation sufficient to provide a sufficient level of total pressure in the secondary flow sufficient to achieve the desired functionality of sealing and timing of sealing. Outlet passageway 196 functions to provide suitable and desired reduction in velocity of the secondary flow within annular pressure chamber 180 to decrease dynamic pressure so as to adequately increase static pressure by presenting a desired resistance to the secondary flow at outlet passageway 196. An alternative embodiment of outlet passageway 196 comprises a flow control valve which may be operated in any suitable manner (such as manually or controlled electronically) to produce the desired static pressure within annual pressure chamber 180. The amount of restriction provided by such a flow control valve may, for example, be varied in dependence on the transport fluid operating pressure. The size of the surface area of piston 148 on which the static pressure within annular pressure chamber 180 amount is based at least in part on the static pressure within annular pressure chamber 180. As is clear from the illustrations, in the embodiment depicted, the size of centrally disposed raised portion 182 is complementary to the size of the surface area of piston 148 on which the static pressure within annular pressure chamber 180.
During steady state operation, there is continuous secondary flow through inlet passageway 194, annular pressure chamber 180 and outlet passageway 196, which may be sized to reduce the possibility of foreign object buildup or contamination of the path of the secondary flow. For example, water or secondary contaminant particles such as sand or dirt which enter through inlet passageway 194 would be carried by the secondary flow through chamber 180 and out outlet passageway 196 without blockage.
The foregoing description of an embodiment of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Obvious modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best illustrate the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to best utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Although only a limited number of embodiments is explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its scope to the details of construction and arrangement of components set forth in the preceding description or illustrated in the drawings. The innovation is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also specific terminology was used for the sake of clarity. It is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents which operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose. It is intended that the scope of the invention be defined by the claims submitted herewith.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1875677 | Thaler | Sep 1932 | A |
3151784 | Tailor | Oct 1964 | A |
3161442 | Reed | Dec 1964 | A |
3516714 | Brown | Jun 1970 | A |
3522972 | Kemp | Aug 1970 | A |
3610476 | Starrett | Oct 1971 | A |
3612307 | Vogt | Oct 1971 | A |
3625487 | Spragg | Dec 1971 | A |
3770179 | McHugh | Nov 1973 | A |
3806199 | Aonuma | Apr 1974 | A |
3955486 | Strommer | May 1976 | A |
4015754 | Leurs | Apr 1977 | A |
4154486 | Nishikawa | May 1979 | A |
4376600 | Egli | Mar 1983 | A |
4486126 | Hellerman | Dec 1984 | A |
4536121 | Stewart | Aug 1985 | A |
4613281 | Lubieniecki | Sep 1986 | A |
4617064 | Moore | Oct 1986 | A |
4744181 | Moore | May 1988 | A |
4843770 | Crane | Jul 1989 | A |
4947592 | Lloyd | Aug 1990 | A |
5018667 | Lloyd | May 1991 | A |
5050805 | Lloyd | Sep 1991 | A |
5071289 | Spivak | Dec 1991 | A |
5076501 | Tschumi | Dec 1991 | A |
5109635 | Inzerillo | May 1992 | A |
5109636 | Lloyd | May 1992 | A |
5188151 | Young | Feb 1993 | A |
5249426 | Spivak | Oct 1993 | A |
5265983 | Wennerstrom | Nov 1993 | A |
5288028 | Spivak | Feb 1994 | A |
5301509 | Lloyd | Apr 1994 | A |
5341966 | Blankmeiser | Aug 1994 | A |
5392964 | Stapp | Feb 1995 | A |
5405062 | Torchard | Apr 1995 | A |
5473903 | Lloyd | Dec 1995 | A |
5480268 | Smoot | Jan 1996 | A |
5520572 | Opel | May 1996 | A |
5538365 | Seim, II | Jul 1996 | A |
5615830 | Matsunaga | Apr 1997 | A |
5620116 | Kluger | Apr 1997 | A |
5645379 | Stoner | Jul 1997 | A |
5678971 | Hiorth | Oct 1997 | A |
5984150 | Scott | Nov 1999 | A |
6010041 | Lonardi | Jan 2000 | A |
6024304 | Sawada | Feb 2000 | A |
6042458 | Lehnig | Mar 2000 | A |
6346035 | Anderson | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6524172 | Rivir et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6695679 | Anderson | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695685 | Stratford et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6726549 | Rivir | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6739529 | Linger | May 2004 | B2 |
6824450 | Opel | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7094004 | Dunlop | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112120 | Rivir | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7125204 | Wysong | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7303362 | Dunlop | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7882992 | Faber | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7950984 | Rivir et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8187057 | Broecker | May 2012 | B2 |
8215643 | Cohen-Zada | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8277288 | Spivak et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8353644 | Dunlop | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8869551 | Young | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9095956 | Broecker et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9487360 | Gaudfrin | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9592586 | Lehnig et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9700989 | Cooper | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9895788 | Kubi{hacek over (s)} | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9931639 | Lehnig | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10315862 | Mallaley et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
20030199232 | Rivir | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20070128988 | Rivir | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090093196 | Dressman | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100021247 | Aldred | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20120291479 | Moore | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130164152 | Kjonigsen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140110510 | Rivir | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150166350 | Fritz et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150375365 | Lehnig et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160010671 | Shellef | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160146352 | Juchymenko | May 2016 | A1 |
20160257506 | Mallaley et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170036869 | Baier | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170106500 | Mallaley et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2801303 | Aug 2006 | CN |
201055857 | May 2008 | CN |
S53-131297 | Oct 1978 | JP |
H04-500931 | Feb 1992 | JP |
2005-523168 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2002119454 | Feb 2004 | RU |
200635710 | Oct 2006 | TW |
201300216 | Jan 2013 | TW |
WO 2002060647 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 11, 2016 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/021189. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Sep. 12, 2017 for International Application No. PCT/US2016/021189. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/487,837, filed May 19, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/589,551, filed Jan. 23, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/592,313, filed Jan. 30, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/129,483, filed Mar. 6, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190291975 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62129483 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15062842 | Mar 2016 | US |
Child | 16436097 | US |