This invention relates to a filtration system for airborne particles. More particularly, the present invention relates to a no pressure drop filtration apparatus, which eliminates the pressure drop across the filter media while still providing satisfactory filter efficiency.
Particle trajectory in a room environment is controlled dominantly by two forces, airflow, and electromagnetic fields. These two forces are the dominant transport mechanism for particles. Two equations dictate particle behavior. Force equals the change in momentum of the particle (F=ma), due to airflow. The airflow must overcome the charge times the electric field E (F=qE) due to electric forces in the room environment.
Note 1: F is the force, m is the mass, a is acceleration, and E is the electric field. Note 2: “E”, “F”, and “a” are vectors. This means the quantity has both magnitude and a direction. For example, E has both magnitude and direction.
The first equation (F=ma) describes how airflow controls particle trajectory and the second equation (F=qE) describes how the electric field controls particle trajectory.
When a media filter is placed in an airstream it has a pressure drop across it because it is placed perpendicular to the airflow. Air must pass through the media material. Pressure drop is the force required per unit of surface area that a fan must overcome to allow the proper airflow to pass through the filter material. The more efficient the filter, the more dense the material in the filter, and as a result the higher the pressure drop to allow the proper airflow through the filter. As an example, a HEPA filter can have over an inch and a half of static pressure drop across it.
Pressure drop is directly related to higher energy usage. The fan in an HVAC System must work harder to force air through the filter (
Some HVAC fans do not have the capability to operate under high pressure drop conditions. Furthermore, a fan that has the capability to create the acceptable pressure drop across a high efficiency filter must use more energy, in the form of kilowatt hours, and create more noise (unacceptable in certain environments, including hospital care facilities). These are the reasons it has been difficult to incorporate sufficient air purification in some of these HVAC systems. In any air handling system the struggle has always been to incorporate efficient filters and still maintain acceptable air flow rates through these systems. The result has been high energy costs to run the HVAC fan in the air conditioning system to provide the pressure drop needed to maintain acceptable airflow. Another example of a system that cannot withstand any pressure drop through it is the Chilled Beam Induction System, which is described in more detail below.
Therefore, in this disclosure a filtration system was developed with no, or very low, pressure drop across it. This system has acceptable filter efficiency without the associated pressure drop.
Aerosols are composed of either solid or liquid particles, whereas gases are molecules that are neither liquid nor solid and expand indefinitely to fill the surrounding space. Both types of contaminates exist at the micron and sub-micron level. Most dust particles, for example, are between 5-10 microns in size (a micron is approximately 1/25,400th of an inch). Other airborne contaminates can be much smaller. Bacteria and viruses are an example of airborne contaminates. Bacteria commonly range anywhere between 0.3 to 2 microns in size. Viruses can be as small as 0.02 microns in size. The importance of removing these contaminates varies based upon the application. Semiconductor clean rooms and hospital operating rooms are two examples of spaces where the ability to remove contaminates is critical. One factor complicating the removal of contaminates is that particle number density increases with smaller particle size. For example, in the typical cubic foot of outside air there are approximately 1000 10-30 micron sized particles. The same volume of air, however, contains well over one million 0.5 to 1.0 micron particles. Ultimately, over 98% of all airborne particles are less than a micron in size. The prevalence of small particles is problematic from an air quality standpoint because small particles are hard to control and capture. Transport Mechanisms are what causes particles in the air to move from point A to point B. In every building environment there are forces present that determine these transport mechanisms and control particle movement. The major types of forces on particles in a building environment are caused by airflow and/or electromagnetic fields (or forces). When a particle approaches a strong electrostatic field, say a negative 15 kV field, a dipole is formed. Some of the positive charges in the particle will move toward the strong field (front of the particle) and some of the negative charges will move towards the opposite end (rear) of the particle, away from the static field. Once this occurs the particle passes through the electrostatic field. If a second static field, of the same potential is downstream from the first static field the particle propels toward it. Attached to the second static field is a media material, made up of dielectric material (such as fiberglass) the particle propels into the media material and gets trapped. Thus the particle gets filtered, note
Electronic Charging of a Particle −A corona field is an ion field that is created by a very thin wire or a thin metal blade with a serrated edge. If a negative high voltage is applied to the wire or metal edge, electrons are created in the air surrounding the wire or blade. When a particle passes through this created electron field the particle acquires some of the electrons and becomes a negative ion.
If a “V” shaped grid is placed in the path of the particle, and has the same voltage applied to it as the corona grid the particle will be repelled by it (like charges repel each other). If a positive set of grids are placed to the side of the first set of grids, as shown in
It is therefore an object of this invention to create a filtration system that eliminates, or greatly reduces, the pressure drop across the filter media.
It is another object of this invention to create a filtration system wherein electromagnetic fields are the dominate transport mechanism.
Still another object of this invention is to use electromagnetic fields to control particle trajectories.
Still another objective is to control small particles by forming dipoles and projecting them into a media without agglomerating these particles.
Still another objective is to use only electromagnetic fields to control particles and not airflow.
It is therefore one of the objectives of this invention to provide a Particle Guide Collector System (PGCS) wherein a series of metal grids were either thin serrated edges or thin wires are utilized to create negative ions out of entering ambient particles, and then to allow these particles to be guided by metal grids appropriately charged to make electromagnetic fields the dominate transport mechanism thus creating a PGCS.
These and other objectives are carried out using a complex grid system and a static field of −15 kV and +15 kV are utilized. When particles pass through the corona field, set up by the serrated edged thin blades, the particles take on a negative charge. The “V” shaped grids are also −15 kV, as can be seen. However, they are not a set of thin serrated blades or thin wires. They do not create a corona field. They are a wire mesh grid system that sets up a plane of charge. They are placed in the path of the negative ions to deflect them towards the sidewalls of the system. A set of positively charged grids (made the same way as the negative charged grid, are placed on a dielectric filter material that is positioned on the sidewalls of the NPDFS and in parallel to the airflow thus creating no pressure drop across the airflow stream. The field in the positive grid attracts the deflected ions toward the filter media (it has the opposite charge of +15 kV applied to it). The dielectric media filter pad is placed behind each of the two +15 kV grids shown in
Another iteration of the NPDFS is a series of two grid systems with a static field of −15 kV each. When particles pass through the first static field, set up by a grid (not a corona blade or wire), the particles became dipolar (with the positive end of the particle in front and the negative end in the back of the particle). The second grid is placed close enough to the first grid for the dipolar particle to propel toward it. However, the grid is placed outside the airstream (
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the more pertinent and important features of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood so that the present contribution to the art can be more fully appreciated. Additional features of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the invention, reference should be had to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
a) is a diagram of a chilled beam.
b) is a diagram of an output grill showing supply and return.
a-b) are an iteration of the PGCS.
Similar reference characters refer to similar parts throughout the several views of the drawings.
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus that uses a corona discharge grid and a series of electrostatic grids to create a no pressure drop filtration system. The various components of the present invention, and the manner in which they interrelate, are described in greater detail hereinafter.
In the preferred system is depicted in
In the preferred embodiment, the corona discharge apparatus 22 creates an electron field along a serrated edge 32 by way of a power source (note
The operation of the corona discharge apparatus 22 and each of the grids (24, 26) are described in greater detail hereinafter in conjunction with
The negative and positive charged (24, 26) grids are next described in conjunction with
Although the present invention is not limited to any particular voltage, up to 100 kV is acceptable for the corona discharge apparatus 22 and the negative and positive grids (24, 26). The only limitation is the amount of ozone acceptable created by the corona discharge apparatus and current arcing is unacceptable.
There are other embodiments of the present invention. For example, a positive corona discharge apparatus 22 can be employed. The second and third grids (24, 26) need only use opposite fields (grid set 24 will be positive and grid set 26 would be negative).
The steps associated with the present method are detailed below. First, the corona discharge grid conditions ambient particles by giving them a negative charge. Second, these charged particles then delivered to subsequent grids. Third, one set of grids repels the particles and another set attracts the particles. It is understood, that the second set of grids are placed on a dielectric media material that acts as the collection filter. The first set of grids are shaped in a “V” and have a negative charge applied to them. This negative charge plane repels the negatively charged particles toward a second set of grids. The second set of grids are positively charged. The second set of grids are placed on a dielectric media material that takes on the same charge as the grid. The positive grid attracts the negatively charged particles and they are propelled into the dielectric media material, thus filtering the particles.
Another preferred iteration can be used in a Chilled Beam System. A Chilled Beam does not have the capability to operate if a media filter is employed because of the pressure drop conditions created. If any pressure loss is experienced in a Chilled Beam the system is compromised. This is the reason no Chilled Beam System has incorporated air purification. The system of the present invention creates a no pressure drop collector system.
To summarize, a Chilled Beam takes primary air from a dedicated outside air unit (Air Handling System) and distributes the air through a bank of specially designed nozzles. It then discharges the air at a high velocity into a mixing chamber inside the Chilled Beam (
A PGCS is placed in the return section of the Chilled Beam (
The PGCS works as follows: Without the collector system turned on and only a simple collector pad were placed in the chilled beam, particles entrained in the air that make it back to the chilled beam would follow the path as described in
When the PGCS is incorporated, particles are driven (guided) to the collector by the strong electric field differences in the PGCS. The collector pad is condition to “grab” particles that are guided to it and keep them from leaving by strong ionic bonding that takes place in the collector pad due to the fields employed (
Although this invention has been described in its preferred form with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred form has been made only by way of example and that numerous changes in the details of construction and the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Now that the invention has been described,
This application claims priority to Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/383,118 filed on Sep. 15, 2010 and entitled “No (Very Low) Pressure Drop Filtration System (NPDFS).” The contents of this application are fully incorporated herein for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1357466 | Moller | Nov 1920 | A |
2906369 | Lagarias | Sep 1959 | A |
3984215 | Zucker | Oct 1976 | A |
3985524 | Masuda | Oct 1976 | A |
4056372 | Hayashi | Nov 1977 | A |
4094653 | Masuda | Jun 1978 | A |
4170447 | Goldstein et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4209306 | Feldman et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4265641 | Natarajan | May 1981 | A |
4357150 | Masuda et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4496375 | Le Vantine | Jan 1985 | A |
4690694 | Alig et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4734105 | Eliasson et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4781736 | Cheney et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4822381 | Mosley et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4979364 | Fleck | Dec 1990 | A |
5061296 | Sengpiel et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5199257 | Colletta et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5255178 | Liberati | Oct 1993 | A |
5282891 | Durham | Feb 1994 | A |
5401299 | Kroeger et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403383 | Jaisinghani | Apr 1995 | A |
5542964 | Kroeger et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547493 | Krigmont | Aug 1996 | A |
5547496 | Hara | Aug 1996 | A |
5549735 | Coppom | Aug 1996 | A |
5593476 | Coppom | Jan 1997 | A |
5645627 | Lifshutz et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647890 | Yamamoto | Jul 1997 | A |
5695549 | Feldman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707422 | Jacobsson et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707428 | Feldman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711788 | Kim et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5733360 | Feldman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5787704 | Cravero | Aug 1998 | A |
6004376 | Frank | Dec 1999 | A |
6162285 | Fong et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6245132 | Feldman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245299 | Shiloh et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251171 | Marra et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6375714 | Rump et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6491743 | Joannou et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6611440 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6635106 | Katou et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6713026 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6773489 | Dunn | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6790259 | Rittri et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6872238 | Truce | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6878192 | Pasic | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6989049 | Belson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7156898 | Jaisinghani | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7160363 | Kulmala et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7175695 | Hess | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7261765 | Katayama | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7404847 | Hess | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7513933 | Coppom et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7803213 | Hess | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20010025570 | Fukushima | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20040159232 | Mohamed | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060150816 | Jaisinghani | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070022876 | Hess | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070137479 | Hess | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080295693 | Hess | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0646416 | Apr 1995 | EP |
S5233173 | Mar 1977 | JP |
S5245781 | Apr 1977 | JP |
H07246347 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H11156237 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2001334172 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003103196 | Apr 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120085234 A1 | Apr 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61383118 | Sep 2010 | US |