This application is the U.S. national phase of international application PCT/F12004/000658 filed 9 Nov. 2004 which designated the U.S. and claims benefit of Fl 20031635, dated 11 Nov. 2003, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to techniques for separating magnetic particles and is directed to a device used in the separation. The invention is applicable to various chemical methods for separating particles from liquid mixtures containing them.
Magnetic particles are employed in various methods as a solid phase on whose surface a reaction is allowed to occur. A particle is typically coated with a substance having a specific reaction with a given second substance. This allows separation of this second substance from a mixture in which it is contained.
The particles usually need to be separated from the reaction mixture after the reaction. This has been conventionally done by removing the reaction medium from the vessel and by leaving the particles in the vessel.
WO 94/18565 discloses a method and a device for separating particles by removing them from a vessel. This is done with the aid of an elongated remover comprising a magnet located within a casing and movable in it in the longitudinal direction. As the remover is introduced into a mixture with the magnet in lower position, the particles adhere to the surface of the remover and can thus be removed from the mixture. By contrast, as the magnet is pulled into upper position, the particles are detached from the surface of the remover. The device may comprise a plurality of removers operating in parallel so as to allow simultaneous treatment of a plurality of samples. WO 96/12958 discloses a similar remover, whose magnet has a length such that only the lower pole of the magnet collects particles. Such separating techniques have also been commercially implemented in the KingFisher® separating devices of Thermo Electron Oy, Finland. These devices comprise a plurality of removers disposed in parallel, with their magnets oriented in the same direction, i.e. with similar poles always oriented in the same direction.
A separating device as defined in claim 1 has now been invented. The other claims define some embodiments of the invention.
In accordance with the invention, the separating device comprises a plurality of substantially aligned magnets in parallel. Some of the magnets are oriented in the opposite direction. This array reduces the effect of the magnets on the separation areas of adjacent magnets.
The greater the number of magnets included in the separating device, the more useful the invention.
The accompanying drawings pertain to the written description of the invention and relate to the detailed description of the invention given below. In the drawings,
The separating device of the invention comprises a plurality of aligned magnets substantially in parallel, a number of which are oriented in the opposite direction, in other words, with the north pole of at least one magnet directed upwardly and the north pole of at least another directed downwardly. Thus, for instance, about half of the magnets may be inversely oriented, especially with every second magnet oriented in the opposite direction. The magnets may particularly be placed in a matrix array comprising a plurality of magnet rows. This allows the magnets to be positioned e.g. with the magnets of an entire row, especially a shorter row in the case of a matrix not shaped as a square, all oriented in the same direction. Developments of various different combinations are also conceivable.
The invention provides the benefit of the magnets interfering less with particle collection from the collecting areas of adjacent magnets. In particular, it reduces particle adhesion to the side walls of the separating vessel. In fact, the inventors have found that, because the fields formed of equally oriented magnets reject each other, the fields of the magnets in the border zone are slightly tilted towards the border areas of the magnet matrix due to the rejecting effect of the magnets in the central area. Inclined magnetic field beams tend to act also on the neighbouring vessel, thus binding part of the particles of the adjacent vessel to the vessel walls. These particles are at risk of not being collected by the magnet specific to this vessel, and there will thus remain uncollected particles in the well. With the magnets positioned in the opposite direction in accordance with the invention, the magnetic fields will be fixed between the magnets. With the magnetic fields locally fixed, the magnets will not generate a far-reaching rejecting effect, and the collection will be locally defined to the vessel located at the magnet.
The invention also provides other, partly quite different advantages. Firstly, the effect of external disturbing factors will decrease. Magnetic materials outside the magnet matrix (tracks, motors, box structures) tend to act on the inclination of the field beams generated by the magnets. The field of magnets oriented in the opposite direction will be fixed between the magnets, resulting in a decrease of such interference. Secondly, a weaker magnetic field will now act outside the separating device. This reduces any interference with other apparatus. This also facilitates protection during transport. Air transportation, for instance, is subject to specific upper limits for the magnetic field generated by the freight. Magnetic fields might also cause interference with for instance therapeutic devices such as pacemakers. Thirdly, magnets will be bent to a lesser extent under the action of attractive forces of the free poles of adjacent magnets with alternating pole directions than they are under the action of repulsive forces of like poles.
Magnets are usually united into one single piece, called a magnet head. The magnet head may be disposed vertically movable in a separating device.
Each magnet head may have a casing in which it is movable. The casings are also usually joined to form one single piece disposed in the device so as to be vertically movable under the magnet head.
The magnets may especially be elongated so as to allow particle collection on the tip of the separator (cf. WO 96/12959). The ratio of the length to the thickness of the magnet may be e.g. at least about 2:1, such as at least 5:1. During particle collection, the upper pole of the magnet is preferably kept above the mixture. However, conventional short magnets are also applicable. The separator tip is preferably pointed and convex (cf. WO 94/18564, WO 94/18565 and WO 96/12959). An agent for reducing surface tension may be dosed into the mixture containing the particles, thus enhancing particle adhesion to the separator (cf. WO 00/42432).
The magnet particles to be separated may be micro particles in particular. The maximum particle size is e.g. 50 μm, such as 10 μm. The minimum size may be e.g. 0.05 μm. The typical particle size is in the range 0.5-10 μm.
Particles are usually coated with a substance having specific reaction with a component in the sample.
Some embodiments of the invention are further disclosed in detail below.
The separating apparatus 1 is used for treating samples in micro filtration plate format comprising 8*12 wells with a 9 mm distribution.
The apparatus has a magnet head 2 comprising 96 elongated permanent magnets 3 (length/thickness about 10:1) with the same distribution as the plate, the upper ends of the permanent magnets being joined by means of a support plate. The magnets are preferably made of a material (e.g. NeFeB) that has high remanence and coercivity. The magnet head is fixed to a lifting device 4, which is movable in the vertical direction. At the same location under the magnet head a casing support 5 is provided, which has a hole at the location of each magnet. The casing support is fixed to a lifting device 6 so as to be movable in the vertical direction. A comb of casings 7 is disposed on the casing support, this comb of casings 7 comprising a plurality of individual casing wells 8 for insertion of each magnet 3 of the magnet head 2. At their lower ends, each of the casing wells 8 has a separating area shaped as a cone with a concave surface, with a sharp lower tip at the centre.
The apparatus comprises a rotating tray 9 with locations for sample plates 10. By rotating the tray 9, the desired plate 10, whose wells have a liquid mixture containing magnetic particles to be separated therefrom, is placed in a treatment position under the magnet head 2. When it is desirable to remove the particles from the liquid mixture in the wells of the sample plate 10, the magnet head 2 is lowered into the comb of casings 7 and these two are inserted together into the wells of the sample plate 10. The particles in the wells of the sample plate 10 now adhere to the separating area of the casing wells 8. After this, the comb of casings 7 and the magnet head 2 are lifted together. When the magnetic particles are to be released, the comb of casings 7 and the magnet head 2 are lowered jointly into the wells of another sample plate 10, and after this the magnet head 2 is lifted first, and then the comb of casings 7. Both in the steps of removing and of releasing the magnetic particles, the comb of casings 7 may perform a number of reciprocating movements (cf. WO 94/18565). In
The magnets 3 of the magnet head 2 are positioned with some of the magnets turned in the opposite direction.
In
In
In
In
The magnets in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20031635 | Nov 2003 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2004/000658 | 11/9/2004 | WO | 00 | 4/10/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/044460 | 5/19/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4966618 | Letemps et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4988618 | Li et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5318914 | Matte et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5458785 | Howe et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5567326 | Ekenberg et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5779907 | Yu | Jul 1998 | A |
6132607 | Chen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6409925 | Gombinsky et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6514415 | Hatch et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6514416 | Harradine et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
20020070173 | Otto et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084225 | Hatch et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 136 126 | Apr 1985 | EP |
2-133438 | May 1990 | JP |
7-25949 | Jan 1995 | JP |
WO 9205443 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9418565 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9612958 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 02066165 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report mailed Jul. 25, 2006 in PCT/FI2004/000658. |
Translation of Corresponding JP Patent Application 2006-538874 Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070221543 A1 | Sep 2007 | US |